/jp/ - Otaku Culture

>>6185271 sankakucomplex
never /jp/ related

Do you have it from a different web site?

All of the /jp/ attention whore traps have been drafted by the military or NTR'd into depression

>>6185271
Welcome to /jp/, I see you're new here.

>www.sankakucomplex.com

It's like you don't even want any civil replies.

Not OP, but I've been wondering the reason for the Sankaku hate. Can someone explain it?

>>6185318
>>6185303

>>6185318
They discuss /jp/ related things but they aren't /jp/.

>>6185318
The website's user base is worse than /b/ and the admin is a prick

>>6185318
Apart from general idiocy of the site in question, few months of daily spamlinking quite a while ago. Anonymous never forgets, Anonymous never forgives... or something like that.

They also nick all their ``content'' off 2ch, futaba and 4chan.

Still waiting for Eien 2 to be translated...

>>6185336
Not only that but their articles are flat out some of the worst I've ever seen.

Every single article uses weasle words, false quotes, and a lot of the time flat out lies. They'll quote a source and say exactly opposite of what the source says, if they think it'll fit their userbase better.

It is an awful website.

not to forget retarded tabloid style posting like kotaku and both sites just rip off their info from other sites

I see.

>>6185318

Fucking retarded users and stories that are so pumped up with shit they're close to bursting.... not that the place isn't already covered with shit.

Artefag can go toss himself into a wood chipper.

>>6185345
sounds like /jp/ to me

Which site would you suggest to link for sharing this story?

http://www.amazon.co.jp/gp/product/4862529119
So any other fellow traps wanna buy this book??

>>6185381
I would suggest not to.

Or if you really want to
>>>/fa/

>>6185376
At the very least /jp/ has nothing to do with yellow journalism

sage
reported

http://tinyurl.com/trapbook oh hey found the book on rakuten if any other gaijin are interested! Dunno if they ship international though, most do as long as you know atleast enough Japanese to tell them the order is alright.
Tinyurl'd for long link

Kill yourself.

I don't care about whatever else is on that site, i jut want the manga translated ;_;

>>6185295
Chisame is not an attention whore or a whore of any description.

He is a pure and wonderful creature.

So they've just reposted Onnanoko ni Naritai? I thought half of /jp/ and every so-called "trap" on /jp/ already downloaded that? Fucking shitkaku.

Mai waifu...

>sankakuhate

Do people here really think that fucking 4chan is superior to any other site on the internet?

>>6185640
Yes.

Proof by example: sankakucomplex

>>6185640
No one likes a shitty blog that just takes their "news" and articles from 2ch.

>>6185640
Just look at the level of the comments at Sankaku. If /jp/ doesn't look any better to you, i suggest you to GTFO immediately.

>>6185640
herd u like mudkips nigger lulz
u mad

>>6185650

Of course /jp/ is better.... Just for shits I tried trolling idiots like Artefact a year or so ago with inflammatory posts filled with actual facts and evidence supporting my point that he's a fucking clueless faggot... Somehow I ended up being the bad guy despite being right. Talking to their userbase is just as bad as talking to a bunch of evangelical dimwits about Evolution.
After a while, my factual yet rage inducing posts simply didn't show up anymore, so I gave up on trying to piss people off with the truth. It's not worth it.

>>6185747
lulz you told em xD

>>6185755

>lulz
>xD

You really know how to piss people off. Congrats.

>>6185768
shut up idiot

>>6185773

Suddenly, Sankakucomplex Quality!

Know what's funny. /g/ had a Sankaku thread and they actually discussed the subject matter instead of bitching that it's Sankaku. /jp/ is obviously full of butthurt.

>>6185794

No, /g/ is just fucking clueless.

>>6185798
Nah, they obviously care more about what is being discussed, as opposed to where. Then again, they hate tomshardware.

>>6185798
clueless of...?

Sankaku Complex isn't that bad if you don't think of it as anything close to "news". It's more entertainment, really.

>>6185794
Who cares about /g/?

Is it possible to trap just to attract straight guys? It's because I like men, but not homosexuals.

>>6185879
If you look enough like a cute girl, speaking as an otherwise straight man, I'd consider it. So yes, I guess that is possible.

>>6185295
I believe you might be referring to me.

>>6185856

If I had to pick something... I'd say technology, ironically enough. All they do is talk about PC shit and it's fucking boring. If I want to talk about other consumer level technology, I'm better off going to the AV science forum or something.

>>6185869
Scatological jokes are entertainment, too.

Doesn't make them any less, you know, shitty.

>>6185895
>If you look enough like a cute girl
That's gonna be a bit hard... But I'm very nice and I can wear cute clothes, though!

>>6185912
/jp/ is in no position to bitch about quality. It offers none of its own.

>>6185954

Quality perversion?

>>6185922
Well, okay. Will you look like a cute girl if you're wearing a skirt and maybe a wig and after three or four drinks?

www.shitkakucomplex.com

>>6185979
Maybe. Once when I was 9, at school, somebody asked me if I was a boy or a girl.

If you want to make a real trap happy, call her a girl and ignore her penis for the most part. Treat her like a lady. Most traps are, unfortunately, not emotionally like men -so you have to go through the hoops required for women, usually. But they will be more understanding.

During sex, always use a condom(she can't get pregnant but you can get an infection from anal) and treat her like a girl still. I know that most traps like approaches from behind; grabbing from behind, pinned to a wall, doggy style, ect. and that most like it fairly rough, though that is a thing of experience.

I'm a trap in Second Life. I'd love to be one in First Life but I don't have the body for it. Also hikki

Was the anal masturbation book ever translated?

>>6186027

>Second Life

>>6186034
there's no better outlet for my trap feelings. I go shopping with fellow traps, go to the beach, parties, get hit on.... ;_;

>>6185999
You know too much, Anon.

>>6186041

Second Life, though? Really?

>>6185954
I know it's a hard concept to comprehend, but /jp/ is not a single entity. Everyone here posts on behalf of himself and himself only.

Some people, indeed, can't offer anything and resort to posting links to shitty articles. Some people want those people out of here. It's a never-ending struggle.

>>6185999
So no reacharounds, then?

>>6186055
You know, I was like that at first too. In fact I made my first character with the intent of trolling people. Then I realized furries aren't EVERYWHERE like you would think, and there's so much /d/ content it might as well be a /d/ MMO. Granted there's a lot of shit, but you can find some gems here and there

>>6186075

>and there's so much /d/ content it might as well be a /d/ MMO.

Jesus Christ How Horrifying.jpg

>>6186046
Like it's any secret that there are transexuals on 4chan.

>>6186068
Usually. Some are weird. Most of the time, the cock doesn't even work anyway, so you really don't have to worry. Just rub and squeeze thighs and stomach and butt. Some do have well-developed breasts from HRT, so keep those in mind too.

>>6186136
Even without hormones, go for the nipples. I personally like mine rubbed and pinched just a little bit.

>>6186133
Yeah a lot of places are really....out there.

after being reading 'it's my own invention' in subahibi, this is a bit disgusting.
Still wondering what was the author smoking.

>>6186136
>Most of the time, the cock doesn't even work anyway

Wait. You're talking about pre-op transsexuals. I'm not sure they really count as traps, strictly speaking. I guess I'm not really particular, though.

>>6186162

Then why visit that 3D carnival of horrors?

>>6186164

trap =/= ladyboy tranny

>/jp/

>>6186174
Because there's lots of tamer places (if you can consider a trap getting anally violated by tentacles "tame" anyway)

>>6186181

You have funny ideas about good taste.

>>6186178

/thread

>>6186176
>Ladyboy
Thailand is so offensive.New half sounds WAY better

>>6186164
For once, I have to say that "real" traps would be rarer than pre-ops, by your definition...

Still, I imagine most like being treated like girls anyway.

>>6186183
Good taste? This is the internet dear boy!

>>6186191
I don't mind treating a cute trap as a girl if he doesn't mind getting a reacharound. We can pretend he's a futa if he's so inclined.

Hell, it doesn't even matter. Good traps are extremely rare anyway, I guess.

>>6186211

Yes, this is the internet, and good taste is what divides us civilized folk from the furry hordes, and the /b/tards, and the stormfronters, and....well, you've received my point..

>>6186181
You have my attention please tell me more.

>>6186221
There's not much more to say, really. SL has every fetish you can think of. The problem is finding a community that isn't full of dumb fucks and objects that let you act out those fetishes in a good way (as in, dicks that don't clip through the tummy of your partner). It's not for everybody though

>>6186226

>It's not for everybody though

Such as people who have a scrap of sense left in their bodies.

>>6186229
So what made you hate SL so much?

>>6186235

/v/

>>6186241
d-did they rape you?

>>6186244

No, but they went on a big safari through SL and revealed horrors of a most unspeakable nature

>>6186226
and the learning curve is as steep as a wall

>>6186253
Of course it's going to look bad if they only show off bad things. Also: /v/? Really?

>>6186041
Let's play second life together, anon-chan~

>>6186262
Post your name I might IM you.

>>6186259

From the way they portrayed it, 90% of SL is bad.

Also, it's not like /v/ isn't right sometimes. Call of Duty does suck presently, Halo really is for drunken fratboys, Madden is for niggers, etc...none of these things have been proven to be untrue.

>>6186266
>From the way they portrayed it, 90% of SL is bad.

Right, from the way they portrayed it. I don't know why you would trust the opinions of a bunch of 6th graders so much but whatever

>>6185295
>drafted by the military
Wait, what?

Less talk of SL, more talk of cute crossdressers.

>>6186278
MMO's tend to be bad in general.

>>6186273
I haven't set up the game yet, send me an email with some other contact data and ill contact you in about a half-hour?
b38207@lhsdv.com

>>6186278

I notice you skirted around the part of my post highlighting the times /v/ gets shit right.

From the looks of things, they've got Second Life spot-on. You're not doing a great job of convincing me otherwise if you consider tentacle rape to be a normal and healthy part of SL.

>>6186294
sorry I didn't go into the merits of the opinion that "madden is for niggers". I'll be sure to have a 10 page report written up on it tomorrow