[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/jp/ - Otaku Culture


View post   

File: 195 KB, 800x1260, 1282487956500.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6009394 No.6009394 [Reply] [Original]

To /jp/ QUALITY CONTROL poster. Why do you find every thread to be a quality thread??? I mean I've only been on /jp/ for a month or so and even I agree that some of the threads you say are good "quality" are actually distasteful. Just recently you said that a "is sanae a slut" thread was a quality thread. I'd have to disagree as I find that completely stupid. Why are your standards for what is a good thread so low?? are you trolling??? please tell me if you are.

>> No.6009400

QUALITY THREAD

>> No.6009404

>are you trolling??? please tell me if you are.

are you, OP?

>> No.6009406

Hey QC do you post by any other trips? Is your trip shared or do you literally spend all day and night posting? Thanks in advance.

>> No.6009405

QUALIFIED THREAD

>> No.6009411

So many question marks. The sure sign of an unbalanced mind.

>> No.6009416

>>6009405
Qualified to begin autism treatment?

>> No.6009423

>>6009394

Hi Cirno. If I give you a popsicle, will you suck my dick?

>> No.6009437

Quality control poster posted in my thread today. I'm so happy.

>> No.6009449
File: 313 KB, 800x800, quality thread1.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6009449

>> No.6009456
File: 5 KB, 212x123, 1282670646367.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6009456

because, every thread in jp is made of QUALITY and AWESOME

>> No.6009471

>>6009394
He's being either serious or sarcastic. Problem is telling which one at the time.

>> No.6009478

>>6009456
Shouldn't that be in three-four time signature

>> No.6009500

>>6009423
Offer sugar to Fidel Castro. You will get the sme response.

>> No.6009507

>are you trolling???

Reported

>> No.6009523

QUALITY THREAD

>> No.6009532

OP here... so wtf exactly is the story behind quality control then... sry been here only a month or so...

>> No.6009535

seeing as QC has not posted in this thread... i guess he approves of this!!! epic won op

>> No.6009537

>>6009532
Don't think. Feel.

>> No.6009538

>>6009532
A quality thread is one that was not made by you, or other bad posters.

>> No.6009551

>>6009394
Stop it! If you dont like him, ignore him. He will get tired of it one day.

>> No.6009569

>>6009532
I pity you for being so clearly mentally deficient and your parents for having to raise you and watch you.

>> No.6009583

>>6009532
The story is that he is homosexual. Yes, that's right, he likes men sticking their big fat cocks up his ass. He's only just come to terms with it, so that's why he's acting so extravagantly right now. It'll pass once he settles down with a nice husband and adopts a child.

>> No.6009596

ATTENTION:
HIGH LEVELS OF AUTISM DETECTED COMING FROM OPENING POSTER
PLEASE LEAVE THREAD IF YOU DON'T WANT TO CATCH AUTISM
OVER

>> No.6009605

REFINED THREAD

>> No.6009630

QUALITY is an old meme and is usually used to refer to badly drawn frames in anime.

>> No.6009692

Ok, I hate to do this but let's go. (again)

>When you post in a thread you are meaning the thread is good?
No, it's exactly the opposite.

I hope this help to clear some shit up, especially after this afternoon when someone was upset.

>What is a QUALITY thread?
A QUALITY thread is a bad thread that is still somehow related to the board, thus it can't be reported just for being stupid, so I add a bit of sarcasm as part of a joke. For example: "Sanae is a filthy slut xD!" thread.

That means "QUALITY" threads are not reported by me at least, like I said I just add some sarcasm because it's shitty.

>Are you trolling?
I'm certainly not. I'm not trying to piss the OP off or anything, when I mean that thread is bad is because I really think it's bad. It's just something to make the OP at least think about his thread for a bit.

>What is your standard to trace the line between QUALITY and not QUALITY?
I'm not very picky, in fact I ignore many shitty threads. I try my best to not let my personal taste get in the way, It doesn't matter if the thread is offending my favorite character or not, if it's shitty it will get a response from me.

>Is your tripcode shared?
No it's not.

cont.

>> No.6009698

>I can only see the same kind of post every time with your trip, with some few exceptions, are you autistic?
I post as anonymous and only use the tripcode for the purpose of QUALITY threads.

>Hey! That thread is fucking unrelated and you ignored it!
That's because that thread was probably reported and hidden by me, it's not even QUALITY, it's just right to be reported. You should do the same, actually. If said thread does not contain a QUALITY THREAD post it can be 3 things: The thread is good, The thread is bad and was considered fit to be reported by me or I'm not browsing /jp/ at the time (I'm not a machine after all)

>What about threads that start bad but become good after?
My posts are always directed MAINLY at the OP post. (that doesn't mean it's not valid for the whole thread as well) Sometimes when people are posting good stuff in a thread that started shitty I don't even post on it. Posts that appear after mine were not read by me. I also usually hide the thread after posting QUALITY THREAD on it.

>Hey QC do you post by any other trips?
I don't use any other tripcode except this one, my original tripcode was "/jp/ Quality Control!oZ70Zbj6Rg" But it was 'cracked' and was used by someone else 2 times or so during a month after that so I thought it was okay, but then someone started to use it for 7 threads. Even being actually threads I would post I prefer to remain as the only guy posting that. We don't need 2 White Ren. Some times I may use a subtle reference while posting as anon for the sake of being recognized (yes, it's one of the times I'm feeling troubled that people might actually think I'm just trollan for the lulz)

cont.

>> No.6009700

>Why do you think you are fit for judging threads? Your first tripcode was first seen in May this year! Lurk more newfag!
/jp/ Quality Thread appeared for the first time in 05/19/10 but I migrated to /jp/ 1 month after the board creation and left /a/ and other boards forever, always remaining as anonymous because I don't feel the need of sticking to a tripcode for everypost. The thought of using a tripcode to post a single line for specific threads as a sarcastic joke this year. So I kind of understand how things work around here, please don't think I'm just some retard trying to troll people. And please reconsider your "old = good" theory, it's not always correct.

>So you think you are special or something?! >:(
Of course not. If you dislike my posts please filter me, there is nothing I hate more than thread complaining about quality control, if you can't ignore a single post in a thread you should use the filter and everyone will be happier, like I said: It's sort of a joke, if you can't take it easy just use the filter.

>And what do YOU do to improve the board quality?
I sometimes draw for the OC thread and the (few) threads I make are usually serious discussion about something.

>No fun allowed!
That's not true, but there is a border between funny thread and shirnemaiden thread. I myself make joke threads, however the are not like "Eye'm the strongest!!"

I hope this will help the clear some things out, especially after this afternoon when someone got upset.

>> No.6009713

QC is more wordy than he appears at first glance.

>> No.6009722
File: 158 KB, 600x600, thumb.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6009722

>>6009692
>>6009698
>>6009700

>> No.6009723

>>6009692
>>6009698
>>6009700
Dude, seriously, you are on par with crunchyroll forum users. The fact that you're actually putting effort into this is sickening, to say the least. Stop it. Not for anyone else, but for yourself. It's not worth it.

>> No.6009740

>>6009692
>>6009698
>>6009700

I've never seen QC say so much before.

>> No.6009752

>>6009722
you're not cool I hope you know, no matter what.

>> No.6009753

Basically, it's called opinions OP.
Don't be offended if some retard doesn't like your posts/threads.
Deal with it.

>> No.6009755

>>6009700

>I sometimes draw for the OC thread

OC thread is one of the worst threads on /jp/. It should be filtered on sight, but you don't consider it QUALITY? I guess you're just an attention whore.

>> No.6009756

Something special happened here today.

>> No.6009759

>>6009753
Why does someone have to be a retard to not like threads/posts?

>> No.6009767

>>6009759
Because you think that just because you dislike something, it means that it's bad. It's shortsighted at best.

>> No.6009764

>>6009755
>OC thread is one of the worst threads on /jp/
First, explain your reasoning behind this, then say what you consider to be the best threads on /jp/.

>> No.6009770

>>6009759
I never said that, nor did I imply anything along those lines.

>> No.6009773

>>6009764
Not him, but the OC thread has been shit ever since "meido" worshipping started and the fuck actively started to moderate the content of the threads and deleting things he doesn't like.

>> No.6009776

>>6009755
It doesn't matter if you like or not, it's one of the few threads that are actually productive on this board. I'll take that you just don't like them or is trolling. Anyways people should ignore what they dislike instead of complaining. (I'm not saying you are just whining by the way)

>> No.6009785

>>6009776
You know what also has productive OC threads? Gaiaonline.com

>> No.6009790

>>6009770
>Don't be offended if some retard doesn't like your posts/threads.
It certainly sounds like you did.

>>6009767
That's how the world works. Something being bad is never, ever a fact.

>> No.6009795

>>6009764
Some of /jp/'s worst posters participate in the OC threads. They created the jpproject shit, they have deviantart accounts, they act like Gaiafags, I'm pretty sure most of them are bunbunmaru users, and worst of all mugen posts in those threads.

> then say what you consider to be the best threads on /jp/.

The ones that don't involve attention whoring.

>> No.6009806

>/jp/ Quality Thread appeared for the first time in 05/19/10 but I migrated to /jp/ 1 month after the board creation

Sure you did.

>> No.6009808

>>6009795
Oh, you're one of those people.
Nevermind.

>> No.6009818

I think you guys are generalizing too much on OC threads. Of course there is disgusting crap like you mentioned above, but there are still good things such as the random request people make.

"I would like someone to draw this <request>, please" Then someone do it. People overdo the meido and other stuff? Yes, certainly. But you can't say it's a bad thread, in my opinion at least. Most of our threads are pretty horrible along with spam threads.

>> No.6009833

>>6009808
No rebuttal huh? Predictable.

>> No.6009846

>>6009833
Likewise.
You elitists are impossible to reason with. I think you're wrong on a lot of the points made in your posts, but that's impossible, because you're always right and everyone else is always wrong, unless they agree with you.

>> No.6009854

>>6009846
He's not wrong on anything, you should get the fuck back to Gaia.

>>
Name
E-mail
Subject
Comment
Action