/jp/ - Otaku Culture

http://vocaroo.com/?media=v7LpQlnC0gZwFluOP

What the fuck? Hey let us make these people look at CP and see if they get hard! Fuck,anyone can control getting hard.

>>5902294
I love you 07

This is so /jp/ related.

No, wait, it isn't.

What the fuck is this shit?
They're showing pedophiles CP in order to prove if they're a pedophile? Isn't that entrapment?

Also, not /jp/ related.

>>5902320
How come they're allowed to use CP at all?

>sex offenders as young as 13
>13
So you can't get a hardon if you're 13 and see a 10 year old spreading her cunt?

At that age anything can give you a fucking hardon. Sure, mark the 13 year old as a pedophile because he fapped to the image of a girl in his age range. He should be fapping to his teacher instead, right?

Under the program, sex offenders as young as 13 were required to look at images of nude and semi-nude children and listen to audio descriptions of forced sex while their physical responses were measured.


Derp. Sounds scientific.

>Adult prisoners have referred to it as a "peter-meter."

I lol'd

But seriously, that is a fucked up, stupid test.

That test is fraught with problems. How the hell was that test even developed? Was it developed, or did some random crackhead just wing it and call it a valid test? I would love to see what they would consider a negative control for that test.

>>5902338

That's such bullshit. Anyone who can remember being 13 knows that a boy that age is going to be aroused by damn near anything sexual. Who hasn't been sitting in class only to have a random hard-on just pop up?

>>5902330

This. Isn't the justification for CP being illegal "it hurts the children in the picture"? Regardless of what method it's for. If they claim it's alright for themselves to have CP for these tests, then it's alright by them to bring in loli and have the offenders have sex with them for a test.

They're doing it wrong.
In other places it's just risky images like swimsuits or panty shots.Not that it's a valid source but it was on a documentary I watched.

>Commonwealth country hates lolicons
BREAKING NEWS

I'm aroused by imagining or seeing children of the same age engaging in sexual act.

youth prisons in canada sound pretty hot.

So these anti-pedophiles are using child pornography to check the erections of 13-year-olds?

Yeaaaaaah...

They're playing audio tracks along with it? They do realize that even if you're not into CP, the audio track alone can give you a boner? Some adult women do sound like little girls when they (exaggeratedly) moan.

Let's not even get started on premature ejaculators. I feel sorry for those poor people who can't control their boner, but aren't even pedophiles. The kind of people that get hard from a breeze flowing under their shorts.

Speaking of which, isn't it like REALLY common for kids just entering puberty to suffer from premature ejaculation? They're doing this test on them?

Haha. Fuck them.

Why is this in /jp/ though?

Humanity is doing its best to throw off all the progress of the past 200 years. We've gone back to the equivalent of medieval superstition and witch hunts.

..what about people who ruin the test results by thinking of something arousing no matter what they're shown?

>Under the program, sex offenders as young as 13 were required to look at images of nude and semi-nude children and listen to audio descriptions of forced sex while their physical responses were measured.
>look at CP + listen to rape
>not be a pedo

"Hey little boy. Don't worry, we're just ganna do some tests to make sure you're sexually healthy. Just sit back and relax while she show a few images and play some sounds for you, okay sweetie? Hehe, how's that? You like her cute little 9 year old vagina? Wouldn't you just wanna stick the tip of your penis into that just to test the tightness? Ohh, and then she turns away as you put it in and tells you to be gentle. You have a hard time putting it in, but after rubbing your tip on her cute little clit, she manages to get wet enough for you to slide right in; but as soon as you reach her hymen, she tenses up and you feel her muscles clamp down on your penis in an attempt to stop i- OH, LOOK MARTHA~ HE'S ERECT. Isn't that cute? How bit is it? Hurry, measure it Martha. Aren't you a dirty little boy? Ehehe~"

>>5902442

>'That's the primary consideration, the results and the benefits from those results. Do they outweigh the intrusiveness? Quite obviously, because it was continued, the answer in the past has been Yes.'

Wait, what? The answer is yes because the answer in the past has been yes?

It's like i'm really in the middle ages!

>>5902499

Moreover, they imply that there is any weighing going on at all. If they don't care about the intrusiveness then does that mean they "weighed them up" and decided it was worth it? Does a murderer weight up the sanctity of life and the hundred bucks he's going to get by frisking the corpse and decide reasonably that the 100 bucks is better?

>>5902499
It doesn't say anywhere that the answer is still yes, just that the consensus was that the answer was "yes" in the past.

Lol BC. They also apparently have this test in the US for adults. Well fuck.

I wonder how many real pedophiles work for the institution responsible for those tests. They probably even brag about it when around other pedophiles.

>>5902515
Ah, yes, I misread that.