[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/jp/ - Otaku Culture


View post   

File: 107 KB, 566x800, wa.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5772021 No.5772021 [Reply] [Original]

>> No.5772028
File: 197 KB, 957x1504, 1279440017826.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5772028

>> No.5772041

>>5772021
she's watching you fapping.

>> No.5772118

stupid grinning. stupid staring.

>> No.5772133 [SPOILER] 
File: 783 KB, 700x1050, 10852037.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5772133

>> No.5772134

>>5772021
Is this an actual manga, or just a picture?

>> No.5772136

>>5772133
I thought flowers liked rain.

>> No.5772142

>>5772134
It's going to be a manga this comicket.

>> No.5772146

>>5772134
It's a combination of a manga and series of images

http://danbooru.donmai.us/pool/show/1545

>> No.5772151

>>5772133
Looking at the flower or her naked self?

>> No.5772152

>>5772142
>>5772146
Delights! Here's hoping it's not a "Socks book"

>>5772133
This, would be so much better with just the left side. The anatomy on the right is a bit too undesirable.

>> No.5772157

>>5772133
Not that I'm really complaining but whats up with the random porn to the right?

>> No.5772166

>>5772157
The right artist made a template and some other artist filled it in with a nice comic. I forgot to crop it.

>> No.5772170

>>5772152
from me, she looks perfectly fine. are you saying that the shadow censoring her vagina's bad anatomy?
>>5772157
man. learn the difference between nude and porn.

>> No.5772171

>>5772157
>porn to the right?
You call that porn?

>> No.5772179

>>5772170
Pinched waist, no vag, and ZUN-tier feet. The rest is pretty OK, but still unnecessary.

>> No.5772186 [SPOILER] 
File: 1.88 MB, 2000x2000, yukari 2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5772186

>>5772179
>Pinched waist
nah. that's still good compared to this.

>> No.5772196

>>5772170
>man. learn the difference between nude and porn.
I could not care less about your vexation on the difference, or LACK thereof. I will never refer to it as "nude yuka" either.

>> No.5772204

>>5772186
Cool, another anatomy flaw I can throw into the "don't give a shit" pile.

>> No.5772211

>>5772186
Probably. Although I have to say, I do like the fact she's partly clothed. It makes it even more alluring.

>> No.5772236

>>5772196
Nudity != Pornography.

>> No.5772241

>>5772236
If it'll get me in trouble at work, it's porn.

>> No.5772253

>>5772241
If it gets you in trouble at work, it's not safe for work. But we don't block children from art museums because of nudity, therefore it isn't porn.

>> No.5772255 [SPOILER] 
File: 570 KB, 1000x765, yukari 12561.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5772255

>>5772204
>>5772211
have some more!
>>5772241
but the definition of porn's something that shows sex. nude is like nothing compared to it.

>> No.5772263

>>5772253
My kids sure as fuck aren't going near an art museum.

>> No.5772271
File: 412 KB, 1280x1024, nice photoshop.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5772271

>>5772263
>My kids

>> No.5772272

>>5772263
That's your choice as a parent, and nothing else.

>> No.5772275

>>5772271

He could adopt, faggot.

I plan on adopting a daughter in the future and teaching her my ways.

>> No.5772278

>>5772275
I hope you'll be over your anger issues by then.

>> No.5772280

>>5772275
Isn't it really hard to adopt as a single parent? They don't just let anyone take a kid as far as I know.

>> No.5772282

>>5772255
"Mmmm..." is all I can say to that.

>> No.5772281

>>5772275
yea true.
make sure you wont teach her something wierd.

>> No.5772296

>But we don't block children from art museums because of nudity
To be fair, only two-thirds of all art involves naked women. At the same time, two-thirds of all art involves flowers or fruits.

>> No.5772311

>>5772296
At the same time, there's still nude art, and it isn't lumped into "pornography" for that reason.

A slightly more thought-provoking example: If nudity == porn, bathing your child makes you a pedophile.

>> No.5772315

I think the main thing you're all forgetting is that no one fucking calls it "lol nude touhous," "YUKARI_NUDE.JPG"... It's on the internet, it's porn. It's a simple and easy way to refer to nudity and above. But if you want to get technical, the Yukari in that picture is drawn presenting herself in a suggestive manner while being nude. I'm pretty sure that's enough to pass as pornography. What a neckbeard discussion...

>> No.5772317

>>5772311
No, but taking pictures of you bathing your child is.

>> No.5772330

>>>5772315
>Yukari
Sorry. Yuka, not Yukari.

>> No.5772367 [SPOILER] 
File: 305 KB, 800x800, extacy.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5772367

>>5772315
>>5772330
Oh well. Not all nudity is porn and not all porn is nudity. But generalizing is a lot simpler.

>>
Name
E-mail
Subject
Comment
Action