/jp/ - Otaku Culture

Not insane/selfish/petty/retarded/obese/anorexic

Sigh.

A penis.

If a 3D girl was 2D then I'd consider it.

>>5632121
this, also she must never age, betray me, shit, fart, burp, smell, and grow hair on her armpits

max out intelligence, spirit, and appearance

thanky

If I were handsome.

Someone a bit like me. And it would never work.

Someone with the same attitude as this one.

Moe

Not used goods

>>5632106

ｓtOＰ ｆUｃkｉｎＧ aＴＴＡCKｉＮG ｗＷＷ.ＡｎOＬAWＬtALk.Ｓe ＲＥPｌacE_Ｌａwl_wｉtＨ Ｎ
odnaka ns fdajqa ouuydzhoioqrtbkx fncxyvqnv

Someone who would take good care of me

-Short
-Slim
-Cute and round face
-Pale skin, no tanlines
-Long straight black hair with himecut
-No piercings (beside on ears), no tattoos
-Long eyeleashes, long nails, both real
-No body hair
-Quiet and very gentle voice
-Doesn't drink too much, doesn't smoke, doesn't do drugs
-Virgin

ｓｔOｐ ｆUCｋiＮｇ_AＴtＡCkIＮG_ｗＷＷ.aＮOＬａwlＴALk.Ｓe ＲＥPｌＡｃE_ｌａＷL wｉｔH_ｎ
z mz yz c jqm m op m uswp o pxl xwnwhjx s

Someone who actually gives 2 shits about how I'm doing.

>-Virgin
That's hard, and I'm not saying that because all women are sluts. They are, but that also makes loving waifu-ish virgins that much more in demand. So if you want one you have to beat all the other traditonally minded peoples in wooing her.

I'm revising my statement.
I'm already in love, but it isn't with a person.
I love humanity.

Pure, kind, loyal, 2 std.devs above average intelligence.

>>5632107
ＳＴｏＰ_FUｃＫiNｇ AＴTAｃkｉｎＧ Ｗwｗ.AＮolａＷｌTＡＬｋ.ｓＥ ｒEＰＬAＣE ｌAＷl_Wiｔh_Ｎ
s vjyg eo rpcr vyrrq g z ndsr ri

>>5632106
stoＰ_fｕcKＩNG ａTtａCkiｎｇ wｗＷ.ＡｎolＡWｌＴaLk.ＳＥ_RｅpLAｃＥ_lAｗＬ ｗｉＴh_n
m jhqbkr b qndzsrkfj zrzt c dswxdxnav ds

Yeah, just want one with no prior usage. Otherwise 2D is fine.

See, this is your problem: your standards are too high for what you offer.

You can get fat and crazy 3Dpd girls. If you're nice then you can get fat or crazy girls.

2D it is then.

>>5632723
What exactly do you think we offer?

>>5632754
Autism.

>>5632754
What exactly do you think others offer that we don't?

>>5632673
Even with the matter of virginity aside, it would probably be impossible to find a woman who matches all my other criterias. That's why I'm sticking with 2D forever.

>>5632757
Projectionism.

I would have to be able to have relationships in the first place.
But talking hypothetically, I guess I'd be content with a girl that sees something good in me.
I tried winning a girl's affection the hard way but eventually I realized I was forcing myself to like a girl I didn't even like that much. So I guess I'll wait for something that will never come, it's fine by me.

>>5632723
Many people just put up unrealistically high standards so they never have to seriously consider going away from the comfort of 2d. Others acknowledge that their standards are too high, but are able to handle the consequences, as they find it more desirable to not have a girlfriend than to have a girlfriend who falls short of their expectations.

Either way, I don't think any of us really think we're asking for a completely fair trade-off.

I don't really care if I find someone 3D or not, and I am not particularly motivated because they don't really have that much that is worth the effort.

Not hideous, physically or personality-wise.

I don't think my standards are too high but it's rare for a 3D girl to meet them.

I already love someone.
She's also a virgin. She's perfect.

>>5632723
What i have to offer:
I have golden heart, high intiligance, a good sense of humor and I'm also good looking.
(Go a head and say it.)
What I want:
>>5632121

that is all.

>>5632723
You make it sound like buying a steak. She would have to be like minded, share similar interests with me and not look repulsive. Someone who takes it easy and appreciates wasting time.

But all we really want is for someone to love us, right? Us and no other. 3d brings with it inevitable NTR misery, which is one big reason to stick to flat girls. Flat in more ways than one, do-ho-ho

For me... Just a girl who will love me unconditionally without really any effort at all on my part, and won't create needless drama or bullshit.

Yeah, obviously that's not gonna happen, which is why I haven't bothered with 3D for the past few years.

>What attributes would it take for you to love a 3D girl?

Not being a hurtful bitch. Yeah, unrealistic expectations I know.

>>5632108
She needs to be intelligent, possess at least some basic curiosity for how the world around her works, be resourceful and independent (that is not dependent on others and desperate for their attention and approval, not the "independent" that modern feminists claim they are, which seems to mean being a status obsessed whore), resourceful, calm and able to remain detached from worthless trivialities.
Oh, and she has to have a completely flat chest.

>Many people just put up unrealistically high standards
>unrealistically high standards

Since when not being used goods/retarded/fat pig/crazy is considered unrealistically high?

>>5632848
considering the norm of today, this is indeed unrealistic.

Dependant.

As in she can only trust and depend on me and views all other people as sub-humans out to get her.

>>5632863
Are you IN Elite?

Smart, cheerful, protective, male.

>>5632876
No, why?

>>5632881
same vibes

>>5632863
And yet 2D just keeps getting better and better.

She's gotta have jet-black hair.

>>5632895
From what i have noticed about him, I was just being insulted.

>>5632899
was this sarcasm?
the perks of 2d is that you can still fap to the same stuff from 10 years ago, if you don't like the current 2d.

No prior experience.

>>5632846
Shakes Anon's hand: everything THIS, except I don't care about her chest size.

>>5632923

Not at all; year after year 3D becomes fatter and sluttier while 2D finds new ways to be attractive and enjoyable instead.

>>5632106

ＳｔOＰ_ｆUｃKｉNG_AＴｔaｃＫｉnＧ_ＷWW.ａＮolawLtaｌk.SE_RＥｐLａCｅ_ｌAＷl wiTＨ ｎ
s kstf pdhuxq dqjce uojkom a grzkkmo k ru

Anyone who won't leech my life out and make me feel miserable, which of course is an unrealistic expectation.[/url]

>>5632879
I agree.

I'd settle for anyone who won't drain the life out of me and make me feel miserable, though I acknowledge this is an unrealistic expectation.

She'd need to be:

shy
very skinny
an atheist
white or asian
libertarian views
not controlling
not watch MTV or shitty reality shows
not listen to pop or rap

I figure my chances of finding someone who meets all these criteria is slim.

1. Beautiful personality that respects me and would do many things unconditionally for me
2. Round, pretty face
3. Slim, no anorexic shit
4. Boobs must be size B or less

That's all. I'd fuck someone with qualities 2, 3 and 4 on the spot but I'd only accept 1 as a real girlfriend.

Always
Unique
Truly
Interesting
Sometimes
Mysterious

I could never truly love a 3D woman. I would, however, consider a "relationship" (marriage) with one if:

-She could actually provide something (cooking and cleaning, maybe) without complaining
-She would either respect or ignore my hobbies. I will never stop reading eroge.
-She didn't have STDs and wasn't going to have sexual encounters with other people.
-She wasn't terribly boring to talk to.

That's it. I don't care about her hobbies, appearance, religion, job, or personality. I don't really want such a relationship much, however, so I'm not going to go out of my way to obtain it. If I do eventually find a girl who fits the above conditions in the future maybe I'll get married. I will never really love a 3D woman, regardless.

ITT:people setting their standards too high because they are actually afraid of a relationship

ITT: Landlords setting their rent too high because they're afraid of having riff-raff move into their building.

>>5633025
>>5633032
ITT samefag trolls.

>>5633032
if only the rest of /jp/ was like you...

Relationships, let alone marriage are not compulsory. I say do whatever the hell you want, but respect people's choices.

One simple expectation:

I'd expect her to match everything she expects. If she expects something out of me, I expect it out of her. If she wants me to not care about her past, then I expect her to not care about mine. If she expects me to do stuff she considers fun, then I expect her to do things I consider fun.

But even this is "expecting too much" so forget 3D.

>>5632997
>I'd fuck someone with qualities 2, 3 and 4 on the spot

Manwhore. Get out.

>>5633064
Right, but the thread is about love.

Trust, trustworthiness, mutual contribution to each others' happiness; without these things it's just friends with benefits.

-Forever loli
-Forever virgin

Are they even existed? Lovable 3D girls, I mean.

>>5633066
God forbid someone be different from you in every day, or that you'd have to work or compromise as hard to make someone happy as they'd have to work to make you happy.

Autism.

Smaller than me, slender, soft and not obsessive.

>>5633368
I take it as compliment.

Child of dog.

>>5632105

ｓＴoＰ_ｆＵｃKＩＮｇ_atｔＡCｋＩNＧ_ＷWｗ.anｏｌＡWLTＡLK.ｓＥ rEＰＬＡCｅ ｌawＬ ＷｉＴｈ_N
cw ulu rshpwo dvykia bq bih tte ob lx luqbss pgmy toh

What do you all mean by obsessive? by the way you using it, it sounds like a generic women's wish for "having good sense of humor".

>/jp/

you guys suck

love, /sp/

>>5633437
>clicked the wrong link on top navbar

Shorter
Busty
Long hair
Dependant on my love
Has a strong motherly instinct
Not a bitch (hardest attribute to find)

someone thats looks like kipi in face and body with

long hairs
virgin
educated (nice ojou type or sado ojou type)
otaku

well, all /jp/ loves the same girl, too bad that we can't find her or she will never look at us