[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/jp/ - Otaku Culture


View post   

File: 242 KB, 525x700, fc891340357fd4fad8935eab90e83bab.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4527016 No.4527016 [Reply] [Original]

/jp/, what would you call a girl who finds the thought of a physical relationship to be undesirable, and satisfies her baser urges with a vibrator?

>> No.4527019

Slut.

>> No.4527029

I don't call them.

Gihihihihi

>> No.4527033

>/jp/, what would you call a girl
>slut

Here, I helped.

>> No.4527032

I don't know, good question. Not asexual, because that would imply no urges at all.
Probably 'damaged goods'.

>> No.4527030

A slut, right?

>> No.4527038

1. Bitches
2. Whores

If neither one fits the situation, simply apply both.

>> No.4527043

Me, I, My, or Myself, depending on tense I was using it in and where if my statement was possessive.

>> No.4527047

A prude.

>> No.4527050

/jp/, what would you call a boy who finds the thought of a real physical relationship to be undesirable, and satisfies his baser urges with fictional characters?

>> No.4527053

OP, you are wasting the vagina god gave you.

>> No.4527065

>>4527050
A male with a brain.

>> No.4527068

/jp/, what would you call a boy who finds the thought of a real physical rape to be undesirable, and satisfies his baser urges with a carrot?

>> No.4527070

>>4527043

Please clarify. What do you find most unappealing about a relationship?

>> No.4527075

I would call her Shaniqua

>> No.4527077

>>4527050
Deluding himself.

>> No.4527084

>>4527075
0
But all of the negroid races are bereft of morals and will gladly prostitute themselves for trinkets.

>> No.4527086

>>4527068
DELICIOUS TARP

>> No.4527094

Pygmalion.

>> No.4527099

>/jp/, what would you call a girl who finds the thought of a physical relationship to be undesirable, and satisfies her baser urges with a vibrator?
If she sucks at communicating with people, she might just be my type of gal.
We'll both awkwardly stare at each other for hours and then go home and masturbate.

>> No.4527098

>>4527094
Oh lol

>> No.4527101

>>4527094
Pygmalion is a whore who loves men. I should say loves to USE men. God, I hate that bitch.

>> No.4527108
File: 29 KB, 420x378, funny-dog.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4527108

>>4527094
>pygmalion
>physical relationship to be undesirable

>> No.4527115

>>4527101

>Pygmalion is a whore who loves men. I should say loves to USE men. God, I hate that bitch.

So tsundere

>> No.4527118

>>4527094
I hear she fucks on the first date.

>> No.4527125

>>4527099
sounds like my idea of a fun night
better than sitting at my computer staring at my cat while fapping

>> No.4527134

>>4527118
She's probably quite slutty, but most girls who post on /jp/ would be.

>> No.4527144

>>4527118
she is pretty bad at it though

>> No.4527149

>>4527118

You'd fuck in the first 60 seconds if given the option, what of it?

>> No.4527161

>>4527149
You'd think so.

>> No.4527156

>>4527149
Not if the girl was ugly or fat.

>> No.4527180

>>4527149
I realize I can't speak for everyone here when I say this, but I think I'd rather have a meaningful relationship than "wham, bam, thank you, ma'am".

>> No.4527207

>>4527180
what is this "meaningful relationship"?
either you can get along and have some laughs, or you cant

>> No.4527214

I'd only do it with the girl I love though

>> No.4527224

>>4527207
Christians and Jews think relationships should have "meaning", just like they think life has meaning.

They're going to be so desillusioned when they die.

>> No.4527994
File: 45 KB, 389x257, satori-yes.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4527994

>>4527224

Better to live a life with the illusion of meaning than living an empty, pragmatic life.


>>4527207

You've just never experienced it before, that's all, and you're allowing your narrow perception of life and love to remove all emotional content from your existence. A "meaningful relationship" is one where the partners absolutely trust one another and will go out of their way to please their significant other. You can't get that with casual relationships, ones where there's only "getting along with laughs." People in these relationships understand each other perfectly and completely and can finish each others' sentences.

Unfortunately, only a small percentage of the population can experience a "meaningful relationship." The rest will live their simple, materialistic lives and label the wonderful thing called "true love" as a fairy tale.

I feel bad for you, son(s).

>> No.4528028

>>4527994
Thank you for bumping this.

>> No.4528101

>what is a rape victim
can I take profiling women through hair styles for 300

>> No.4528124

>>4527224
Theoretically, if an afterlife doesn't exist, they will not be disillusioned at all, as they will simply cease to exist. They will not be able to achieve a state of disillusionment.

So, you're wrong, even if they are wrong, too.

How does it feel to be wrong, Mr. Wrong?

>> No.4528145

Tsundere

>>
Name
E-mail
Subject
Comment
Action