/jp/ - Otaku Culture

>>42192470
Previous general >>42055010

>>42192494
You know I forgot to put that in my tired state. Thank you.

to answer this anon>>42140555
yes that is me.

>>42192535
>Thanks
You're thanking me for mocking you by comparing you to the dozens of idols and Hololive generals that plague this board? Should I have been less subtle with my bait, retard-kun?

>>42192554
I enjoy your work.

>>42192562
>Thanks
why did you type this out instead of highlighting it then clicking to reply? I know you did that because you added an s at the end.

>>42192563
I'm glad you enjoy it

>>42192562
Calm down and take it easy.

>>42193136
I like this one. Did you make it this red on purpose?

Guys, you need to help me. This image has no PNG info on it. How in the world do I make an AI image like this? What model? What prompts?!

I made this cute Meiling so I could drink tea with her!

Who is this semen demon?

>>42192554
>>42192667
Prompts? Model?

>>42198937
not sharing fuck off

>>42198937
this is not me>>42200269
I am getting the model uploaded onto mega right now

>>42198937
here's the model I used:
https://mega.nz/file/qclFUbSJ#k18VS6UljXSYkVI8z9RwfItPr8VED9C1MOzuf-NnxRI

the pics with meta data:
https://files.catbox.moe/lb3fut.png
https://files.catbox.moe/hwsbc1.png

>>42192562
>Should I have been less subtle with my bait, retard-kun?
Maybe you should lower your expectations when trying to make fun of low caliber people.

sage

>>42199285
Looks like shit.

>>42202502
meanie

>>42202604
Are your tear ducts also in the middle of your eyes?

>>42203509
>Masterpiece? Best quality? Best work? With all these supposed advances in AI you'd think that it could at least give anon what he asked for.
DOHOHOHOHOHO

>>42198255
That's not AI...

Experimenting with multiple subjects. The model is a custom one trained off anythingv3 that can do Merry and Renko.
Workflow:
>generate image with 2 girls
>inpaint half of image with 100% denoising scale, with the prompt only describing 1 girl
>inpaint other half with other girl
>img2img with low denoising scale to clean up

>>42205461
It's Mion Sonozaki from Higurashi and it was most likely made using NovelAI

>>42208670
>The model is a custom one trained off anythingv3 that can do Merry and Renko.
What's it called?

Ah, the fated thread returns at long last, thanks /ai/nons
Prompt: masterpiece, best_quality, 1girl, blue_hair, breasts, green_eyes, hairband, klan_klein, large_breasts, long_hair, school_uniform, serafuku, pointy_ears, science_fiction, solo, standing, smile, looking_at_viewer, slim, fit, maclone, giantess, purple_hair, very_long_hair, inside, detailed, realistic, sketch, traditional_media, watercolor_(medium)

Lain's heading out, she doesn't want to be a computer-obsessed neet anymore

Also, this attempt at showing Lain silhouetted against the sky at night didn't really come out the way I expected, but it looked cool so I'll keep it anyway

>>42209482
>If he wanted a thread, why didn't he just make it himself?
>Make it himself? He was waiting for a bot to make it for him.
DOHOHOHO

>>42209705
>>42209850
where is her signature tail?

>>42211345
In the same place as anon’s creative ability.

>>42192470
I missed this general so much, happy to see you anons again.

>>42192667
>>42192554
cutest

>>42204319
I don't think those keywords actually do anything at least with the model I'm using (anythingv3). I've completely dropped those sorts of keywords from my prompts.
I think they may even do more harm than good, as it's just noise diluting rest of your prompt. Same thing with excessive negative prompts.
Keep it simple, stupid.

>>42211009
Man /jp/ is comfy when even the shitposts are high quality

Some real cool but low-quallity pics I got while tuning this prompt at low resolutions, couldn't get as cool scenery/composition again

Adorable

I want to hug her so bad

>>42212410
Sex
>>42211789
Sex
>>42212456
Also sex

>>42212652
No. Bring her inside first, give her a comfy drink and let her warm up. Make her comfy.

>>42212652
No. Bring her inside first, give her a hot drink and let her warm up. Make her comfy.

>>42211789
>How could he think the highest quality post in the thread is a shitpost?
>I wouldn't worry about his judgment, he's clearly blind.
>How could you possible know that he's blind?
>Because you would have to be blind to think the image he posted was presentable.
DOHOHOHO

>>42212776
>>42212810
...
<3

>>42212973
https://files.catbox.moe/te92ji.png

https://files.catbox.moe/35rr4v.png

https://files.catbox.moe/4c0m2l.png

https://files.catbox.moe/oufpxz.png

https://files.catbox.moe/wiamgx.png

>>42214157
Anon leave something for the imagination ...

>>42211009
I have no-one to blame but me lol, I never feel like doing anything in that strange time of stupor between Christmas and New Year's
>>42211345
Let's all love Lain, let's all wish she had an easier hairstyle to diffuse (ironic, given that she can finally be with us through this timeline's Wired)
Prompt:masterpiece, best_quality, iwakura_lain, 1girl, bangs, asymmetric_bangs, short_hair_with_long_locks, x_hair_ornament, collared_shirt, jacket, looking_at_viewer, red_background, red_sky, red_theme, shirt, short_hair, simple_background, solo, upper_body, white_shirt detailed, realistic, 1990s_(artstyle), traditional_media
360*640, CFG 12, 20 iterations on Euler A

>>42212776
>>42212456
>>42212410
All very wholesome, anon, nice work
>>42211873
Your 'low-quality' pics are still pretty good. What prompts did you use for the backgrounds, if you don't mind me asking?

i turned the steps down to minimum to see what would happen
i regret

>>42225458
Gotta love some surreal horror

>>42225816

what even is this fashion

>>42224359
>What prompts did you use for the backgrounds, if you don't mind me asking?
That's the thing, I didn't ask for anything. The only relevant keywords I used were "full body", "snow", and what's become my favorite keyword, "scan". That's literally all, and it gave me these beautiful compositions.
What makes them low-quality though is the characters always look bit off and poorly made. Too obvious it's AI.

KANON DUENDE

>>42227588
Why are the eyes so unique compared to this >>42214157 or this >>42223658 then? (Anything v 3.0 btw)
>>42228359
What do the anons on the WTC thread think about this?

>put "multiple characters" in the negative prompts
>get more multiple characters than ever before
bruh

why is this ai so fucking horny

>>42217629
>>42214157
>>42223658
What dataset are you niggas using?

>>42230153
Das what I'm finna find out too, my nigga. Shiieeett, dog. Dis nigga over here >>42217629
would be dope if he posted his prompts but last thread he didn't and I'm certain he won't do it this thread either. Shhiieett

I made this last year

>>42230258
>Finally, an AI generated image that isn't half bad.
>You're right, it's all bad.

>>42230325
DOHOHOHO

>>42230258
Is that paid NAI or local installation?

>>42230258
Is this one of those "vtubers" I've heard so much about?

>>42230344
local, stable diffusion webui
>>42230347
Yes. Gawr Gura

>>42230347
>he doesn't know about le e/b/in catshark
ngmi

>>42230353
Gross why do you make stuff like that dude? This guy >>42230325 is correct fr fr no cap

>>42230382
because someone shared gura model and it was the first one I've seen

>>42229412
>>42229896
What do the anons on the /07/th Expansion Thread feel about this?

>>42230347
>I've actually really gotten into watching vtubers lately.
>Really? Why?
>Because nothing else quite gives me the motivation to end my mortal suffering.
DOHOHOHO

>>42228600
>>42230430
>Why does he keep asking about the people in the 07th expansion thread?
>It could be dangerous if we don't keep an eye on them.
>Dangerous? How?
>Because after sotsu ended they were all put on permanent suicide watch.
DOHOHOHO

>>42230525
>Because after sotsu ended they were all put on permanent suicide watch
jokes on you, we were on suicide watch way before that

90% of the stuff I generated can't be posted here because it's NSFW

>>42230170
Okay FINE >:T

(scan:1.1), (high contrast:0.9),
1girl, (sketch), (clannad:0.925),
(Toyosatomimi no Miko:1.2), [earmuffs], medium_hair, detailed eyes, (orange eyes:1.05),
(medium breasts:1.0), (white bra:1.0), [cleavage],
(log cabin:1.025), indoors, bed, white bathrobe, (winter:0.925)

Negative prompt:
(cel shading:1.4), (monochrome:0.9), (pale_color:1.4),
long_hair, 2girls,
lowres, text, signature, low quality, jpg, blurry

Steps: 27, Sampler: Euler, CFG scale: 16, Seed: 4170791037, Size: 768x1024, Model hash: 38c1ebe3, Clip skip: 2


>>42228600
Clannad.

>>42230153
Plain ol AnythingV3

>>42238309
Post them via links to catbox

>>42238833
oh code tags don't work on this board...

>>42238833
Huh, the prompt was way simpler, I expected a billion tags and custom model or something. Still thanks for finally sharing it.

>>42239428
That's because I intentionally try to make them as simple as possible. I make sure every tag I use is actually effective and recognized by the AI.
Then I can mix a relatively few keywords I know the effects of with specific weights and get something really unique looking out of a model known for generic output.
Those insanely long prompts some people use are complete garbage, 95% of it doesn't do anything except add noise and dilute the actually effective tags.

Try to actually study what the AI thinks of any specific keyword. I especially think anons are also sleeping on the power of negative prompts, there's some really interesting things you can do with them. For example "clannad" is very effective at controlling the slant of eyes. Positive is obvious but negative makes them slant inward, useful for some characters. Then of course the negative "cell shading" I found last thread is far more effective at adding detailed shading than directly asking for it with "highly detailed" or such. Negative "monochrome" and "pale_color" are way more effective and have less side-effects than positive "colorful" and "vibrant". Etc.

sucks to be genning a character no one cares about and that there's so little art of that the AI doesn't know who the fuck they are and needs a dozen tags worth of description to have a chance at getting right

>>42230525
I ask him multiple times because:

1) He avoids my questions on purpose

and

2) Nobody like him on the /07/th Expansion Thread. Even the Rikafag is less obnoxious

>>42239883
>Nobody like him on the /07/th Expansion Thread
i've literally been called the least obnoxious characterfag in the thread multiple times, schizo.

does running a git pull give you the latest SD or do I have to download it again

>>42238309
>Don't worry about it, I'm prepared to be disappointed at work just as much as I am at home.
DOHOHOHO

>>42239781
>Do you agree that lowering the number of prompts can create a better image?
>I do, in fact I've long since figured out the optimal number of prompts: Zero.
DOHOHOHO

>>42240019
>Being the least obnoxious charcterfag doesn't really sound like an honoured position...
>Of course it is, it's just like you having the most advanced dementia in the whole retirement village.
DOHOHOHO

>>42229412
Who are you quoting?

>>42243367
myself

Dammit, I was so excited for this, until I found out my machine memory's too low for this kind of thing..

>>42245957
you can try the cloud versions. colab is free for a while and paperspace's pro tier is pretty cheap.

>>42245957
Upgrade to more memory then or you can use a paid version

this thing is just an infinite bad fashion generator. that leg...................

>>42245957
>Dammit, I was so excited for this, until I found out my machine memory's too low for this kind of thing
So you could spend $4000 on a new GPU with enough VRAM or just pay 20 bux for a NAI membership and use their god tier GPU farms to generate your anime pornos? mmmmm wat do wat do.....

It's fun to try different things and see what happens. Sometime you're trying to make a character and it doesn't quite gives the result you were expecting but it can still surpise you with something beatiful.

Kagerou trying to scare you but it's not working since she's so cute!
https://files.catbox.moe/f8va3y.png
https://files.catbox.moe/b01ha1.png
https://files.catbox.moe/kbhs6x.png <- it made a little Kagerock in the bottom left corner!

Wakasagihime swimming gracefully in the lake
https://files.catbox.moe/bt75mu.png

Reimu looking down on you but that gives you a little peek at her pantsu~
https://files.catbox.moe/zke18g.png

Nue, it's not easy to make the wings look right...
https://files.catbox.moe/eds20p.png
https://files.catbox.moe/2elo59.png

Komachi, didn't manage to get the outfit look right but it's still quite nice i think.
https://files.catbox.moe/8h2zzm.png
https://files.catbox.moe/28lx4w.png
https://files.catbox.moe/oktvyj.png

Akyuu, but it's actually more like two random girls wearing a kimono.
https://files.catbox.moe/2popza.png
https://files.catbox.moe/aw8jnz.png

A date with Sekibanki!
https://files.catbox.moe/587btx.png
https://files.catbox.moe/ddu07z.png

Everything made with Anything V3. I'm still wondering if I should put some on Pixiv, but I'd feel a little guilty since those require so little effort to make... and at the same time I downloaded a lot of AI art from there, and keeping beatiful pictures locked away on my computer, regardless of how they were made, seems like a waste.

>>42246917
Make a Pixiv for them and make money off requests anon. Report back and tell us how it goes.

>>42246703
I keep telling people that you can honestly manage reasonably well even on older 4GB cards if you configure for lowvram and are (reasonably) patient. All of mine are done on a pretty cheap (sub $400) machine, and while not as sophisticated or high-resolution as other anons, it is nice to have full control over the process.
Anyways, the start of a new year means, for me, a time to review old favourites. It's Haruhiposting time

Enjoying experimenting with the ink/watercolour/realistic hybrid style but it's hard to get the balance (consistently) right

>>42246917
isnt there a AI booru already, just post it there

>>42247313
Why not both? Pixiv allows AI-generated art.

How do I learnto do this?

>>42247412
Follow the quick-start guide anon-chan
https://rentry.org/nai-speedrun
Advanced features - https://github.com/AUTOMATIC1111/stable-diffusion-webui/wiki/Features

It can't do words that good

>>42247447
But how do I so it good?

>>42247472
Literally just practice and play around until you have what you want. Other anons in this thread (and the larger if more schizophrenic thread on /g/) have good tips but there is no 'silver bullet' so to speak. One of my favourite lazy time-savers is to search for images off danbooru, stick 'em in the image to image tab, then hit 'interrogate deepbooru' and let the AI come up with (its approximation of) the terms used to build the image. Combined with a few generic 'good' prompts (masterpiece, best quality, realistic, detailed, sketch) you can get a good image quite quickly, which you can then play around with.
Apart from that though it is really just a combination of being as descriptive as possible and plain old trial and error desu.

abstract kanon

>>42247611
Kanon isn't even in the picture

>>42246917
>keeping beatiful pictures locked away on my computer, regardless of how they were made, seems like a waste.
Pull your head out of your ass, all your stuff is super generic.
It's twats with delusions of grandeur like you that made pixiv such a useless website.

Time for best girl Nagato
>>42248399
Well, nta, but I'd like to see you do better

>>42248399
His stuff is beautiful and you're being petty for thinking otherwise. If a human made that you'd think the same, yet you do an aboutface when you find out it's made by a robot. There is such obvious hypocrisy among the anti-AI people.

>>42246703
Anon, any GPU with 8GB VRAM is enough for high-res stable diffusion. 12GB and more is for future-proofing, though it can also give you more throughput as you can run more images in parallel.

>>42245957
Even a GPU with just 4GB VRAM is able to do stable diffusion at lower resolutions. I had an RX480 4GB, though SD impressed me so much I went out and bought an RTX3060.

If you're buying a GPU, stick to RTX cards, they're so much faster than GTX or AMD ones.
But especially the RTX3060 is a very appealing card. It has that unusual 12GB VRAM in a midrange package, giving it the best price/vram/perf ratio. I've seen it here as low as 250€ used. Makes way more sense than some stupid you-will-own-nothing subscription service.

>>42248686
>Anon, any GPU with 8GB VRAM is enough for high-res stable diffusion
Lies

>>42248498
Pull your head out of your ass. AI created a new standard of low effort crap, which our friend exemplifies perfectly. He’s done nothing to be proud of, yet thinks he deserves to be fawned over.
>There is such obvious hypocrisy among the anti-AI people.
I’m pretty sure the only reason you piped up was because you perceived an attack against a member of your tribal in group, but that isn’t the case. I hate people that use AI as a vessel for praise and money not the AI itself.

>>42248762
You can do 1024x1024 with 8GB, right?

>>42248796
It's a tool, qualitatively no different from computer-aided design in the late-80s-90s and photoshop in the 2000s. It's what you get out of it that's important. I care about the end result, not 'how much effort' goes into it. The whole point of any technology is to perform work (expend energy over time) more efficiently; that is, to do the same work for less energy.
If you want to keep on drawing with pen and paper, go right ahead (I still do and so does much of my family), but don't expect praise from me for slogging along on foot when others have joined the highway.

Also, sidebar, the AIchitects have decided to give Yuki thicc thighs out of thighhighs, and I'm all for it.

>>42248796
It's not about praise, it's about the end-result: a beautiful piece of art made in a small amount of time. People like that, and people appreciate people who make it, regardless what tools they used. Sure, it's generic. That can change. AI is always improving. The fact that you're so fixated on the idea of pride tells me all I need to know about your view on AI art. Here you are, having a meltdown because people are making money off AI. Cry about it.

Friendly reminder that drawing artists and Disney are on the same side here. Their ultimate goal is to lobotomize AI art and/or make it unavailable and illegal. Whenever you see an anti-AI art advocate remember that their ultimate goal is to stifle creativity in favor of large corporations like Disney. This anon >>42248796 is most likely a shill for Disney, using the same baseless and overused arguments like "it's low effort" and "generic" to justify destroying one of the greatest creations that has come out of 2022. Do NOT trust them.

>>42248873
>It's a tool
Yes, one that was used ineffectually in this situation.
>I care about the end result
Me too, that’s why I have a problem with someone talking up their own mediocre work instead of just letting it talk for itself.
>>42248875
>Sure, it's generic. That can change. AI is always improving.
It’s anon’s fault his pictures are generic not the AI’s
>The fact that you're so fixated on the idea of pride tells me all I need to know about your view on AI art.
It should tell you all you need to know about my view on the one dickhead I did criticise.
>Here you are, having a meltdown because people are making money off AI. Cry about it.
Is this the generic bait you use on /g/?

Sorry for ruining your thread op, I didn’t know how specific I had to be in order to not trigger the insane tribalists.

>>42249012
>"mediocre"
I say again, I'd like to see you do better.
If you can convince me or other anons that the requisite standard of work in your head renders >>42246917's or anyone else's work 'mediochre' by posting something better of your own then I might even be persuaded to believe you.
Otherwise, it's your own time you're wasting here, and for what? You say yourself we're a cult (and maybe we are), but then you should know better than to talk us out of it. What do you seriously expect will happen?

As I said it is a fun tool to use, trying various things to see what it can do.

In a way it's not that much different from browsing a booru, you type a bunch of tags and look at the matching results. You're not the author of any of those pictures, and some will look a lot better than others, but in the end you might decide to download a bunch of them or even post some in a thread if you particularly like them. They don't have to be the best ones, just the ones that catched your eyes. You don't want to take credit for drawing nor finding those pictures, but maybe someone will be happy to see them as well, just like you did.

People often enjoy sharing things they found when they appeal to them, even if they're not the creator of said things. I enjoy seeing and saving the pictures made by other people, from Pixiv, this thread, and other places, regardless of how they were made. Some look incredible, some look generic, but they all have something special and unique making them worth looking at.

Boorus are also filled with tons of human-made generic or even badly drawn artworks, and those can be appreciated just as much as the others. Sometimes even the most plain, basic, unfinished drawing can resonate with you, make you feel a certain way, and you don't even know why. It's still art, after all.

>>42249321
>I might even be persuaded to believe you
The only person I want to convince of anything is this guy >>42246917 to stop fellating his own posts.
And I didn’t call anything a cult, I called a couple of tribalists what they are. Stop trying to use everybody else as a cudgel in an insane argument against some villain that only exists in your mind.

>>42247500
so how do me good?

>>42248399
>>42248498
I actually agree with >>42248399
This AI stuff doesn't really have any value, unless you get an absolutely flawless output, which is damn rare (thus has value).
Anyone can just make the same shit as us. This is all very disposable. Unless your prompt is particularly clever and you don't share it.
>He’s done nothing to be proud of,
It's even funnier when you realize he is just using the prompts I shared. The little bit of style it has isn't even his.
Exactly the reason why I was so averse to sharing my prompts.

>>42248973
I'm not a drawfag, but I really wish AI art wasn't a thing. It devalues all art.
To me even a simple cute sketch by a real artist has immerse value. I'm jealous even, how they can with so few pen strokes create something so adorable.
Now everyone, including myself, can write "sketch" into a box and produce the same thing. I hate it, I really do.

Yet here I am, abusing it anyway, even buying new GPUs for it. But not because it can produce beautiful art, but because it can produce this kind of adorable softcore porn ad infinitum.
AI art fucking sucks except for coom.

>>42249665
Well there's really nothing secret about those prompts they're all over the Internet now. You can go to an AI booru and find countless prompts for making styles similar to pretty much everything in this thread.

how do you reconcile it?

speaking of, ive geown familiar with ai art, how do learn to make my own chatbot?

>>42249613
Step 1: Enter prompts and other parameters in webUI

Step 2: Click generate

Step 3: ???

Step 4: Profit!

>>42249834
You know, I went and looked, and I quite disagree.
First, I couldn't find anyone prompting with the same methods as me. Any image that even a bit stood out has a horrible ugly 200+ word prompt full of generic words than don't actually do anything except add noise. Whatever style they got seemed to be more to do with their sampling method, model or other settings.
Second, I couldn't find anything similar to my style. But that's not really here or there, these AIs can produce so many different styles that it's very easy to do something slightly unique. And we both dismiss it because we know it's AI art.

>>42249834
>You can go to an AI booru and find countless prompts for making styles similar to pretty much everything in this thread.
how?

>>42250451
Rikafag I love you please make more of these cuties

>>42250451
rikafag please share your secrets i can't make anything good

>>42250531
Have a special pc, engraved with your favorite character

asking for prompts is like asking for the psd file
i wouldn't share even if one offered to pay

>>42251003
I agree, I don’t like it when people try to scab off the work I put in.

>>42251084
>work

trained my own uiharu model , both with dreambooth and a custom hypernetwork , im happy with everything about it exepect the hands

>>42251258

>>42251263

>>42251266

>>42251270

>>42251276

>>42251279

>>42251283

>>42251290

>>42251292

>>42251295

>>42249012
>Sorry for ruining your thread op, I didn’t know how specific I had to be in order to not trigger the insane tribalists.
It was doomed from the start. Did anybody seriously think that this thread would survive without hostility from either side? Especially how the last thread ended and anons specifically warned against the dangers of creating a new one? You have actual anons like >>42248973 blinded into thinking their side can do no wrong and everyone else on the opposite side is some nefarious strawman entity.

>>42251298

>>42251305

>>42251307

>>42251313

>>42251317

>>42251321

>>42251224
;D

>>42251634
Cute feet

how do you fix hands?

>>42251263
>>42251266
>>42251270
>>42251266
>>42251270
>>42251276
>>42251279
>>42251279
>>42251283
>>42251290
>>42251292
>>42251295
>>42251298
>>42251305
>>42251313
>>42251313
>>42251317
>>42251321
>>42251326
Can you do lewd stuff?

>>42256187
>>>/h/7084550
>>>/h/7084551
>>>/h/7084551
>>>/h/7084552
>>>/h/7084555
>>>/h/7084557
>>>/h/7084558
>>>/h/7084560

Thoughts on vae's?

>>42248796
>I hate people that use AI as a vessel for praise and money not the AI itself.
Well too bad anon because that's reality and you just have to deal with it.

So is the 07th threads just going to remain /jp/s ai thread ?

>>42258735
Those threads are literal schizophrenic garbage and everyone already immigrated to /a/ like they should (Sotsu is canon Higurashi now). I hope the cancerous posters stay there instead of here.

>>42251258
>trained my own uiharu model , both with dreambooth and a custom hypernetwork
How? Tutorial where?

>>42259294
Anon the guide for everything is in the OP please read the arricles for it before asking

>>42248399
>Pull your head out of your ass, all your stuff is super generic.
>It's twats with delusions of grandeur like you that made pixiv such a useless website.
The reality is that AI is not going anywhere, in fact it's just starting and advancing at GIGANTIC pace. The pandora's box been opened, the rubicon is crossed and the Japs of pixiv are favoriting AI generating images more than hand drawn images.

Ive been using Euler A this whole time are all these new samplers better?

>>42251304
Drawing artists are making Disney characters in AI programs and then imploring Disney to file a lawsuit against AI. Why? Because their goal is to have AI art regulated or made illegal so they can prosper. This is not okay, anon. Don't be an imbecile.

ITT: people arguing about how the AI should be used instead of actually using it to post cute girls. Nobody's gonna wait for you and your petty rules, just accept the fact that anyone can produce whatever they feel like by feeding common words to an algorithm

>>42260120
I'm trying convince them anon but they're too stubborn

>>42259891
try DPM++ 2M Karras

kanon torso...............

>>42259542
Cagalli salutes you, comr/ai/de anon

>>42259294
is my uiharu good?

>>42260818
I mean, I don't know the character, but she does look attractive, detailed, and fairly self-consistent. So for a model you trained yourself, I'd say she's pretty good.

>>42260574
She looks like that Russian woman

>>42261259
Who, Natalia Polonskaya?

>>42261259
>>42261704
Isn't there some axiom that all cute blonde Eurasian women look the same drawn in 2000s moe-style?

sometimes i think i'm finally getting some good results and then this

>>42261841
I think we need to go back to the old ways.

>>42261964
cave painting while dying of smallpox?

What do you guys feel about Udshew clothing brands?

uou

>>42259995
Are the Disney shills in the room with us right now, anon?

>>42263923
t. disney shill

why disney?

so what are you guys experiences using your own custom hypernetworks?

>>42259121
>Those threads are literal schizophrenic garbage
they are more active in discussing ai art than the actual ai art thread so im just saying...

>>42263923
>>42264110
>>42266521
It makes sense that they would seek to extend copyright laws as aggressively as possible and suppress any technology that threatens their market share. I don't think they want to completely illegalise it, only tax and overregulate it to the point that it it becomes a tool for the rich. And us criminals.
Not saying that Disney is the only company doing it (all the other Goycorps are probably going to jump on the bandwagon when they're told to) but they're the biggest candidate.
Either way I'm not that worried, it's not as if they can do anything about us pirating anime/vidya at the best of times anyway. All they risk doing is depriving their own country of a potential industry subsector.

>>42268229
>>42264110
Why do you believe everything must be part of some grand elaborate conspiracy to personally destroy our way of life instead of a simpler solution, that there are people who merely disagree with you? What's next, /pol/ is creating vaguely shaped jewish caricatures using AI and imploring the ADL to file a lawsuit based off antisemitism?

>>42269151
https://www.dailydot.com/debug/ai-art-protest-disney-characters-mickey-mouse/

>>42269211
A few bad faith actors =/= everyone who disagrees with you.

>>42269151
Well I don't believe that *all* opposition is orchestrated by megacoporates, most of it is probably just good ol' knee-jerk reactionarism, but it has been hijacked by the entities I mentioned to strangle AI image-gen in the cradle.

Anyway I don't like the feeling that I've stated a po-faced argument, so let's post some pretty girls in spandex and try to get along, hmm?

>>42248482
Basado

still doesn't look much like him but it's cute

>>42260120
Maybe start a war with drawpigs by posting AI in their thread?

Ironically the pictures the resident ai hater in my home general actually likes are ones I don't like.

>>42276419
Well do you mind pointing them out?