/jp/ - Otaku Culture

kanon time

>>42055174
>>42055180
Who is this semen demon?

>>42055184
kanon from umineko

>AIshit general on my jay
hang yourselves

>>42055180
>>42055315
This is NovelAI, right? Try making Kanon but with Stable Diffusion.

>>42055353
i don't know how to do anything so i can't

fuckoff Al shill

>>42055332
>>42055450
Calm down. Look, it's Reimu Hakurei from Touhou in Arizona! Don't you think that's cool, anon?

>>42055462
NO YOU FAGGOT UNINSPIRED NIGGER FUCK OFF

>>42055353
>>42055447
Anyone got any tips for generating good anime character art on SD? Most of what I get is trashy desu

When is this fad going to stop getting shilled on every fucking board?

>>42056284
I dunno. But what if your waifu barely has any fanart? And AI can recreate endless art of her so it's a good thing for this at least but if you're lazy hat who cant draw and still didn't learn how to draw for your waifu i guess we're not honest husbendos for our waifus?

>>42056284
It's not a fad, anon. It'll replace human artists. And guess what? That's a good thing.

>>42056284
>fad
LMAO!!!!

>>42055532
uh oh, not like this drawsistsers....

Touhou 19 will feature AI made characters by ZUN

Screenshot this post

nuke india

>>42055462
What model and prompts are you using?

>>42056123
Use a better model. I recommend anything v3.

>>42059478
I don't have the exact prompt right now but it was made using Stable Diffusion Anything v3.0

>>42060576
Next time you make one, include the prompt.

>>42056284
>>42057006
It's neither a fad nor will it replace artists. It's really difficult to get the AI to make what you want and you're getting way better results if you A) draw something yourself to go off of or B) clean up after the AI. It's still much easier to draw something straight onto a piece of paper if there is no easy way to describe it than to try to prompt it. Prompting adds another layer to the process that you will have to wrangle

Where is Momiji inviting you to?

>>42062987
Her hand is about to snap off

>>42063025
don't bully ai
it's trying its best

This isn't mind but I just had to post it

https://files.catbox.moe/trdz7l.png

>>42062767
>It's really difficult to get the AI to make what you want and you're getting way better results if you
Anon AI art is in its infancy right now. Who's to say how much AI art could improve literally 5 years from now? The potential for this AI art is endless. People from 1995 never could have invisioned that the computers they used back then could improve to the point where you could play the Witcher 3 on them. The thought had never even crossed their mind. The possibilities here are endless.

>>42063267
I realize that. What i'm saying is it easier to draw two lines that are supposed to be a street run off into the horizon and give that picture to the AI and tell it 'hey this is supposed to be a street' than it is to completely prompt all of that from the ground up. Obviously, that is a very simple example but imagine you're making a very complex picture with a lot of features. You would be better off to just select a tiny portion of the picture and tell the AI to add a, for example, fruit bowl there instead of making that up from scratch.
Also, how are you going to give the picture your style? Since the AI is trained on already existing pictures it finds on the internet, it cannot make up its own style. If you're ok with generic art that is good enough that might not matter but if you're trying to stand out from the sea of low effort AI art you need to do branding, an own style is just that.

>>42056123
Pretty much, NovelAI’s pruned anime model just mogs it desu

>>42063442
>Since the AI is trained on already existing pictures it finds on the internet, it cannot make up its own style.
Well then give it the type of style you want. Train the AI on an image set or give it a hyper network to work on. It's generic in the sense that it has to train on existing images, but since there is so much variety in existing images narrowing down what you want the AI to give you will allow for more unique generations.

>>42062987
>Stop dragging your feet faggot, the guillotine is that way

I've made quite a bit of touhou stuff in various styles, will dump a bit

>>42064933
God I wish this were me

>>42055447
>>42055315
These are okay but his face is pale white and his eyes are too blue. Also the clothes don't match with OG Kanon

>>42064933

>>42064955

>>42064990
The anons on the drawthread here >>41992534 must be really pissed off seeing art like this

>>42064999
many of them work out of love, no reason to tease them anon

>>42065016

>>42065046

>>42065064

>>42064949
yeah, the ai doesn't have much to work with and my prompt isn't very good

>>42065092
Reimu has a butthole on her face

>>42065836
looks like a bad scar to me, probably smells the same anyway

>>42055010
Don't you people have like 5 other threads on the site where you could discuss AI shit at?

Probably rather basic desu but here we are...

>>42066672
i'm not a filthy crossboarder so no

>>42066672
But this is an Otaku AI thread specifically whereas the other ones are not otaku. Just calm down and admire these amazing creations, anon.

>amazing creations
what a fucking stupid fag.

You just want to fellate AI and get your ego stroked.

>get your ego stroked
And yet when human artists draw art to get their ego stroked you have no problem with it, right? Hypocrite. I know /jp/ has a reputation for being hostile and aggressive but even for /jp/ this contrarian way of thinking is going too far. This AI art is here to stay and it's only going to get more impressive as time goes on. We should embrace it, anon. It's inevitable. Don't be on the wrong aide of history.

Imagine wanting praise for automated photobashing

You just don't fucking understand, Art is like a signature, no two styles are the same.
And here you have AI, with it's all too recognizable rendering.

Branding any criticism as "contrarian" just serves to prove that you are all too eager to keep shilling this literal soulless garbage to justify your long minutes in clicking buttons that does not improve any skill of yours whatsoever.

Embrace my hairy anus, cocksucker.

i just wanted to have fun making battler eat soap man

toilettler

>>42067694
Good boy.

battler butt
buttler

>>42067217
Okay, anon. You know what? We can agree to disagree and you can fuck off from these threads if you don't like the so-called soulless and unoriginal AI art. The big, vast majority of us enjoy it and understand its potential unlike you. If you can't see that then that's your fault. I'd love to see you hold on to that opinion 5 years from now. It's like the anti-printing press scribes all over again. Get with the times for your own good.


Having said that, you come up with points that don't hold up very well. AI's "recognizable rendering" differs depending on the model, prompting, image set, etc. Lumping all the AI work into this big group of unoriginality doesn't apply here. I've seen how the AI can grasp onto the art style of any artist, and is perfectly capable of doing so to any artist's style given enough images. This is the AI's "signature" or "seed". The AI threads outside of /jp/ support this. Go look for yourself.

Also, you can whine all you want about how this art is "soulless". It's a literal non-issue.

Also why do you even care about how much work or skill we put into making the art? That's not the point, anon. We're not patting ourselves on the back and sucking each other's cocks because we're so good at entering words in a program. You attacking AI artists for lacking "skill" is such a massive cope and I'm not even exaggerating. Nobody is asking for praise. You just pull that shit out of your ass like a strawman. You're the same fucker that would admonish the cotton gin for doing all the hard work that real, humans workers should do. Fuck off.

>another shit brained tech faggot sheep that just wants instant gratification and mental gymnastic to worship Algoyslop instead of just take a pencil and learning to draw

truly NGMI

>>42068950
>truly NGMI
lmao, the people creating fanbox accounts to make money off their AI generations are doing really well, just sayin'. ALl the retarded drama comes from westerners, Japs are more than happy to pay for AI Art as long as it makes their dicks hard.

I work hard running images through dreambooth, merging models, and testing prompts all to make cute aesthetic styles.
What do I have to face after posting my hard work? People saying "soulless", "the hand has six fingers", "it's not real art", and "生足魅力的".
It's all so tiresome.

YWNBAA

>>42069928
>make money off their AI generations
>Japs are more than happy to pay for AI Art
Fool and his money are soon parted.

>>42068950
>>42070111
>>42070600
You're not going to get any brownie points for this.

>>42071547
I'm just saying that someone who doesn't have the minimum hardware required for Stable Diffusion (which is almost 9 years old now) and chooses to pay someone else any substantial amounts of money to feed their computer prompts instead of buying even the cheapest capable GPU of their own makes poor financial decisions.

>>42068950
>instead of just take a pencil and learning to draw
>lololool you should grind fundies for years if you want funny picture of waifu lolooolololol
fuck off

>>42072260
no u

suppose it was only a matter of time before paid sd shills came to spam this board as well

>>42072528
You can use NovelAI or Midjourney or anything else really I just used Stable Diffusion because I preferred it

>>42072547
novelai uses sd dumbass

>>42072552
It's based on Stable Diffusion just like ChromeOS is based on Linux

>>42072552
You could also use DALL-E if you're into that

>>42072528
I'm trying to be reasonable with you but you just wanna be pissed off for the sake of being pissed off I guess. A masochist at heart lol

>>42072528
ikr, its either those AI shiIIs or simpIy some brainIess Iazy goysIop worshipping retards that are simpIy enamored with this niggertech and wiIIingIy spams severaI boards even without profit

>>42069993
Don't give up anon-chan, I wanna see your art, it doesn't matter what the haters say..

>>42071702
Fair point desu, runs just fine with some tweaks on my scrounged-together $400 bargain-bin machine.
Also Reimu looks cute even as a nigger.

I think there is one big problem with A.I. art, and it's that it "trains" by using drawings made by other artist, presumably without an agreement or consent.
Otherwise, if there is a market for it and it doesn't involve exploiting the works of those who don't support this trend, then I don't see what is the problem, but that is not going to happen.
>>42069993
You say that you work hard but aren't you just playing/killing time? You complain about people pointing out that your "drawing" has six fingers yet you didn't even bother fixing something as simple as that manually by yourself. Something like that doesn't even take much time at all to do or even to learn to do.

>>42064955
Post full prompt and such, please. Need to steal style.

>>42074158
>go to art school
>spend years looking at other people's art (without their agreement or consent)
>learn to create your own art, which involves replicating the techniques and styles of others either purposefully (from a 'how to draw' book), consciously (from seeing 'hmm, today I will paint in the style of Picasso) to subconsciously (sculpting a sculpture that critics will come to regard as 'inspired' by Palozzi)

Well, anon, what makes it fine and dandy for a human being to spend years of their life doing this, and wrong for when AI-chan does it via computer in ninety-five-point-seven seconds?
Is artistic 'legitimacy' only derived by making life difficult for yourself?
Because if so, human-created art will be relegated to a niche for the rich, like 'handwritten novels' (they exist, I went to a posh school; they were fucking illegible) and 'travel by horse and cart' (also still exists in Europe but bone-shakingly uncomfortable and you can never quite ignore the smell of shit). I for one am happy with my iPad and Chevrolet to replace the quill and Dobbin; convenience trumps authenticity.

I'm not trying to pretend I'm morally worthy of being considered 'a great artist', I'm just interested in the end result, means be damned.

All I care is that before I die I want to play a fully-integrated AI-generated Medea route for Fate Stay/Night, self-inserting as Shiro and with the porn scenes very much intact.
Goodnight anons

Aya

I generated a lot of these but man did they look generic

>>42072658
it is always the same arguing points see >>42074386
"drawing takes too long"
"ai is convenient"
"well humans copy what they see so why is it bad for a computer to do so" humanizing a machine to beg for VC money

>>42074478
I mean those are legitimate points but you do you anon lol

Not him btw

>>42074160
This.

While we're on the topic of alleged "stealing" is there a way I can copy the artstyle of an artist using hyper networking or image training or something using Stable Diffusion?

>>42074386
I see a couple differences, for one, A.I. is a tool and not a human being, I will explain why that matters to me.
Another difference is that creating one's own art does not need to involve copying another's at all. There are certain influences of course, such as being introduced to the broad "anime" style of art, but from that point on, you can independently invent your own style, which I believe A.I. may be incapable of.
But I really just see one problem and one problem only. A.I. is a tool which works by using other people's work. It is not a question of whether or not A.I. has a "right" to learn from other drawings, it's about humans, who tend to be exploitative in nature, using this tool for personal gain (or any reason really) which relies on other people's work.
I have nothing against A.I. technology in itself and I hope you will get your wish fulfilled once the A.I. is capable of achieving such things without using the works of people who do not consent to such use of their work.

>>42074496
j- jessica.......

>>42074522
>I have nothing against A.I. technology in itself and I hope you will get your wish fulfilled once the A.I. is capable of achieving such things without using the works of people who do not consent to such use of their work.

1. You're on /jp/, are you saying you actually buy your eroges and don't pirate?

2. The way "AI" works is not that far removed from the mechanistic workings of the human imagination, your unconscious mind is a prediction machine and it will generate things it has seen, thus you can imagine the same things. The differences are twofold: "AI" can't steer it like you do with a self (a temporary limitation that while seems hard to you now, will be overcome in the next decade if things go without major hiccups), you can't share the output of your imagination directly, while nn's can be trained to give desired outputs.

AI using it is fair use and humans using it is fair use, it's utterly dumb and hypocritical for everyone to become a copyright maximalists when some artists jobs are hypothetically threatened.

>>42055010
>aifart
pick up a pencil retard

>>42074851
No I don't think I will

>>42074851
Make me.

>>42074838
1. I'm no stranger to piracy but I don't play eroge.

2. There is an element of randomness to creating one's own art, I'll compare it to slamming random keys on piano and getting an interesting pattern and then refining it into a melody. There are many, many possible approaches to art.
I don't know what will be the legal outcome, whether it will remain as fair use or not, but my belief is that it is not fair use due to the arguements presented in my previous post.
I haven't expressed any concern for people whose jobs are threatened, work is work, and they will probably have to adapt to whatever new work they can do.
I'm no activist nor do I do art professionally but I, for one, don't want to have my work bastardized by a machine hence I will withdraw from showing my work on the internet.

and then sometimes the ai just adds a little horrorman in the background

oh god

>>42075267
What the fuck what the fuck what the fuck what the fuck what the fuck what the fuck

fuckin little duende in the mansion hallways

>>42075267
Bro why you gotta input Slenderman like that

>>42075163
Consider you'd be in the same situation if we suddenly had a machine that could dump the output of your imagination into a picture.
Now suddenly people would be imagining things and it'd be instantly done. The actual output would be worse, maybe some pictures are out of focus, on the corners, or they lack the right details except where you're paying attention.

Maybe some people imagine things more clearly, and some worse. Maybe some people would use drugs and find that the output is better. Maybe those with aphantasia can't do it. For most people they stop drawing with their pencils, the quality can be worse than the hand drawn work because imagination is imperfect.

Someone's imagination dumps from their dreams may have less artifacts, but then you will have wrong anatomy sometimes not unlike your AI.

Artists lament that they are drowned in a sea of "soulless shit" that didn't involve much effort. Maybe some commision artists can't make a buck.

Some still do their work, some more commercially inclined quit. Quality drops a little bit, but the average person is happy they can share a lot more than they could before.


What you get with various image generation models is the exact same stuff, they work in a similar predictive way as our brains do, but they are much smaller and lack a self or a way of steering or interating like you do with hand or computer drawn images.

I used to think copyright was absurd and contradictory for at least two decades, and was happily awaiting the time when the human brain could be digitized into a computer (and to a lesser extent the imagination dumping thought experiment above, some ideal brain computer interface), and in that case, a lot of these silly laws stop making any sense and become uneforceable.

Instead we get neural networks that can do something similar before we get mind uploads. That's okay. Maybe people will try to bandaid their current crisis to their absurd laws for a few years, but longer term the same question will arise tenfold, until copyright dies or we as humans don't make it.

Human nature was always based on improving on previous things in the past, that's learning, and it's how we function - even more directly because we have to process the information and we remember it.

Some people try to not even look at some copyrighted works because they are afraid they will accidentally reproduce it in their works, it's that absurd. Copyright is a barrier to human progress and a to me an undesired limit to human progress.

Still, for now, you looking at a picture is fair use and a neural network doing the same is also fair use. In both cases the network (biological or artificial) are updated and the recall is faster. It's not really automated photobashing, it's building internal representations that are highly compressed, exactly the same thing the human neocortex does when it remembers sensory input.


If you're so afraid of being "copied", you should consider never sharing your work with anyone, since they can reproduce it in their imagination. But what's the point then if not to share something with someone? Why draw at all when you can keep it in your mind?

>>42074160
>>42074496
Reading his >>42069993 (love you) post I assume he dreambooth'd qqqrinkappp's art. Good idea, I'll try that some day.
However, I managed to craft a prompt that consistently generates similar style with just plain old EverythingV3.

>>42074441
All you need to do is add "sketch" and it'll look a whole lot less generic. Good enough for a personal booba generator >>42074160
https://danbooru.donmai.us/wiki_pages/tag_group%3Aimage_composition
https://danbooru.donmai.us/wiki_pages/tag_group%3Acolors
https://danbooru.donmai.us/wiki_pages/traditional_media (most of these do nothing tbf)
Combine creatively.
Try different shows and IPs. One of my favorites is to add a weak [Clannad], instantly transports you back to 2007, eg >>42062987
There's a lot you can do without resorting to hypernetworks and such.

>>42075461
>love you
Do you actually love that anon?

>>42075363
I don't have a problem with everyone being able to "draw" nor am I concerned with whether it looks good, bad, better or worse than what I can make.
I do not care about some work of mine being copied either, so I will make myself more clear.
If you are a true waifufag or something similar, you might understand this. I am emotionally connected to my work, I create that which I desire and which I see as the only thing that is pure to me in life. Just imagining it or bringing it into existence, it is not the same. Having it fed to an A.I. would certainly feel like defilement of something that I care for and would rather not have that happen. That is the reason why I hold my stance.

>>42075496
Hell yea. Without their inspiration I wouldn't have found this awesome set of keywords.

>>42075643
masterpiece, best quality, absurdres, ((hakurei reimu)), (touhou), (dark brown hair), (long hair), 1girl, (miko uniform), shrine maiden, (red and white outfit), (white detached sleeves), (red ribbon on head), dark brown eyes, solo, 4k resolution, daytime, (frown), (armpits), mountains, dry, full body, detailed eyes, (intricate:1.3), sidelocks, 2010s anime, studio ghibli, makoto shinkai, kyoto animation, (shrubs:1.4), (arid:1.4), village, sparse trees, white socks, brown shoes, gohei, purification rod, shrine, mexico, new mexico, ((joshua tree)), ((cacti)), arid, canyon, mesa, (sand)

Negative: deformed, mutated, detached, malformed, asymmetrical, oddly shaped, bad proportions, strange hands, asymmetric eyes, (ugly), poorly drawn, big nose, ugly face, extra limbs, deformed fingures, deformed fingers, poorly drawn fingers, badly shaped legs, ugly legs, mutated limbs, ugly lips, morphed face, distorted face, hideous, third leg, long dress, detached leg, anatomically inaccurate, (bad anatomy), elongated hands, elongated legs, three legs, three knees, extra knee, third knee, long neck, long body,malformed hands, out of focus, poorly drawn hands, missing limb, floating limbs, disconnected limbs, mutation, disfigured, poorly drawn face,missing fingers, extra digit, fewer digits, (extra_limb), (((deformed))), [blurry], (poorly drawn hands), messy drawing, broken legs, fused limbs, fused arms, fused legs, merged limbs, merged arms, merged hands, merged legs, (elongated torso), (((asian))), bad hands, text, error, cropped, worst quality, low quality, normal quality, jpeg artifacts, signature, watermark, username, earrings, necklace, monochrome, four fingers, six fingers, ((2girls)), ((3girls)), ((4girls)), ((5girls)), ((multiple characters)), ((multiple girls)), ((several characters)), ((several girls)), ((3d)), lowres, hair ornaments, green, grass, trees, stockings, thigh highs, pantyhose

I sure wish I saved the prompts I made for Flan-chan here...

Keep in mind that prompts like "Higurashi no naku koro ni" and Kyoto Animation", Studio Ghibli, etc completely change the art style of these pics.

>>42075581
>If you are a true waifufag or something similar, you might understand this. I am emotionally connected to my work, I create that which I desire and which I see as the only thing that is pure to me in life.
Maybe I am a waifufag in a certain way, but I don't think anyone can ever take my waifu from me, she's mine forever and even if I saw someone draw her in some way that was not how I see her in my mind, it wouldn't bother me. I know some people are different about this, just I don't believe theres anything anyone can do to my waifu...

>Just imagining it or bringing it into existence, it is not the same. Having it fed to an A.I. would certainly feel like defilement of something that I care for and would rather not have that happen. That is the reason why I hold my stance.
I suppose some people imagine AI differently than I do, but if you actually follow the field and people's work on understanding how the networks work, they often generate similar structures as the human brain does despite being implemented fairly differently. Don't fool yourself into thinking people that make these things actually "understand" how they work, it's more about designing structures flexible enough to actually provide the functionality needed, what emerges is not trivial and understanding it is a natural science like any other.

If the reason that bothers you is that anyone can now "use" it. In that case, consider the mind upload example in my previous post. If someone saw your picture and somehow extracted the part of their mind that generated it and shared it with everyone, it'd be the same kind of defilement.

Where do you draw the line? Biological neural network? Embodied one like humans or animals? Non-embodied but spiking (biological-like design)? More artificial designs (most current)?
But most of them converges to very similar internal representations even when you make many changes! This is something people have shown again and again by doing interpretability work on current neural networks.

Honestly it's so fun putting these characters in absurd scenarios and adding mixed prompts just to see what the AI can come up with and how it mixes them together. Next I'll put Reimu or Marisa in a mosque in Saudi Arabia

>>42075730
I have brought up a personal reason for why I hold my stance, but I believe that anyone should be able to choose whether or not they want to participate in this.
Where do I draw the line? This is not something that I thought about and if I tried to answer, I'm not certain that I can answer truthfully at this time, however, in this current real situation, it feels like I am being forced to be part of something which I don't want to be a part of.
bottom line: I and everyone else should have control over that which we created.

>>42075883
Alright. I guess the disagreements are clear. I've always been strongly against copyright and I don't mind giving away my work for free. I see this as finally pointing out the contradictions in that. My stance is that people shouldn't share that which they don't want others to make derivative works of.

>>42075461
>>42075582

The AI can't seem to understand that Flandre has ((one)) pair of wings

>MMry Mristnse
W-What?

>>42076156
that broken-ass spine holy shit

>>42076163
Flan-chan's anatomy is all sorts of messed up. Someone get her a medic!

played with inpainting a while back to put pachi and koakuma in a library

Rika sitting in the forest~

>>42076213
This one is good Rikafag

Another Rika sitting in the forest.
This is using a new paid model from Holara. It creates more realistic looking background but eyes get fucked and you have to struggle to get it to not make dumb poses.

>>42076227
I love this extremely realistic model. I didn;t hink you'd go this far, Rikafag.

>>42076232
I'm already paying a subscription to NovelAI and plan on also subscribing to nijijourney. I'm also using anything v3 and cylcing through those three to combine and edit optimal Rika drawings.

>I didn't think you'd go this far
Imagine not going far for your waifu.

>>42076253
Why does Rika mean so much for you? WHy not any other of the Higurashi/WTC characters?

>>42076265
not the same Rikafag..

Rika in a sunflower field~

Well, say what you want but some of these are indeed quite good (the qt lolies). I guess it's not different from the industrial revolution: machines replaced the average and hand-made can only compete when we talk about high-level stuff (like italian shoes, swiss clocks and that kind of stuff).

>>42055010
Normally I don't like AI threads because they seem to spread pervasively and always end up in some back and forth shitshow where they shit on certain "artist personality" type strawmen and AI prompters not being able to take criticism, but this one actually seems relatively civil and some of the AI art here looks more different than the average stuff I've seen.

Describe to me the process in detail. I don't have the specs to run this, but I want to know what its like to use it. How exactly does it work? How hard is it to finetune what you want into changing things around? What is the learning curve like?

Bump

>>42076483
>I don't have the specs to run this, but I want to know what its like to use it. How exactly does it work?
If you install the Web UI your program will look a little something like pic related. You enter what exactly you want the AI to generate for you in the "prompt" section and what you do not want to see in the negative prompt section. The sampling steps allows the AI to spend more time generating the image from the prompts you inputted. The sampling method is the type of algorithm the AI uses to interpret the prompts. I usually use DPM2 a Karras. The width and height tells the AI the dimensions of the image(s) you'd like to generate. The batch count tells the AI how many images you'd like to generate. The process is honestly too complicated for me to explain in depth but it would be much easier for you to just try it out yourself using the Google Cloud Hosted Install here:

https://colab.research.google.com/github/camenduru/stable-diffusion-webui-colab/blob/main/anything_3_webui_colab.ipynb

It needs a Google Account and the GPU usage is limited but unless you have a problem with it it works fine for creating the images you want.

>neural network "AI" garbage
utterly soulless vomit for soulless bugmen
you could've gotten ARTISTIC with it to produce funny shitposts but NOOOOO let's slurp the slop
trash

>>42083272
>you could've gotten ARTISTIC with it to produce funny shitposts
so my attempts to get battler pissing himself are artistic?

>>42083332
What do the anons on the /07/th Expansion Thread think about this?

>>42076483
>>42082498
At the risk of being an absolutely dull fag, I shall copypasta this explanation from plebbit, which explains it in simpler terms that I still don't understand well enough to paraphrase desu.
As far as I'm concerned it opens a portral into a reality marble full of embyronic spirit-waifus it then collapses into corporeal form and entraps on a sheet of virtual paper. Raildex's third law and all that.

>>42083529
Also, it would have helped if I attached the goddamn file

>>42083529
>>42082498
Thanks for the explanations, they seem thorough enough for me. (I am not making a Google account.)

My next question is why are people so sure that AI is definitely going to improve at the astronomical pace they say it will? Large growth isn't sustainable and will eventually hit diminishing returns. In similar fields, machine translations haven't improved significantly nor has replaced translators. CGI still looks jarring at times and deals with issues such as clipping. A stock that makes daily 10% gains for a week doesn't mean it will be worth investing long term. AI in its current state, while impressive, seems largely overhyped.

>>42083742
>My next question is why are people so sure that AI is definitely going to improve at the astronomical pace they say it will?

Because, all blob-hand related jokes aside, it has improved ENORMOUSLY in the past year. This time last year the most sophisticated AI generator I had on my PC spat out unconvincing images of burnt, blobby semi-naked women over several minuites' runtime; six months ago we had the DALLE-MINI craze of a 3*3 grid of postage-stamp images (that were terrifying body horror at any greater size); at the start of fall improvements to SD made it run *much* more reliably and consistently in terms of outputs, and since the NovelAI leak a few months back countless new and specialist models have been released (you see other anons discussing them on this thread, I think most will have been created in the last few months) for every conceivable purpose.

The field IS advancing enormously fast in the last few years, and while yes, we will hit diminishing returns sooner, I think there are some serious improvements (mostly in performance, reliability, and consistency rather than qualitatively completely new content, though some of the animation done with SD frames looks very impressive). So although you're right in that the rate of advances continues to slow, new advances will always continue to be made, merely over the course of years rather than months.

Also though I hate to be the 'well AKSHUALLY' guy, both CGI and MTL have improved enormously over the best 5-10 years, to the point that even mass-market films 'deepfake' in dead actors (Star Wars anyone- and that was about six years ago, people already complain it looks unrealistic now because of how fast the standards are advancing), and MTL is now good that some of my friends with foreign language degrees (even in French and Chinese, which you'd think would be in high demand) can't get a job because it's cheaper to employ MTL and get a few natives to iron out the bugs anyway. Technology marches on indeed, although I agree sometimes the hype writes checks the future can't cash.

Anyway, I'm a windbag, so enjoy a picture of sexy curvy Rei

>>42083742
NTA but you can run basic 512^2 images on your own pc fairly easily with even a low end GPU, so well worth downloading and playing with to see for yourself. Even if you don’t have a compatible system you can still run it on CPU by following the instructions but that's very slow. So maybe you could try it out without needing a google account

>>42083332
>>42084139
Also can you please take the one with curvy Rei and get her to piss herself, that would be really nice

>>42084256
You claim it's so easy anon, do it yourself

>learn to draw
I could not in a million years produce anything like this. And even if I could, that time would have been far more efficiently spent at things I'm actually good at, like programming and engineering. I'm just utterly hopeless at art and design, my mind is not built for that.
So to me being able to produce something like this after a week of learning SD is like a blessing from Satan. A deal with the devil.
I'm scared shitless of the future, but pandora's box has already been opened. Might as well abuse it.

>>42083272
Anon, we're all secretly just generating endless booba with this AI. It's amazing at that.
Too bad we're on a blue board.

>>42076125
Cute

>>42085348
If electricity didn't cost so god damn much I'd leave this prompt running for a couple days to get something absolutely perfect

>>42084139
That seems like a more reasonable response than I expected and you have brought up very good points. However, even as technology improves, how can you be certain that progress will stay unimpeded? Unlike AIDungeon and CharacterAI, can you say for certain that the technology will remain uncorrupted and freely open to the public and not shackled by the morality of its creators? There is a greater public interest than ever before and people will stand in the way of long term progress for short term cash. For example, the technology to make lightbulbs that last for a hundred years exist, but they have a shorter artificial lifetime so the companies that run them don't go out of business. I like to be optimistic about the future, but progress is not a straightforward path.
>>42084256
You underestimate my technological literacy and my computer.

>>42085499
*I meant to say future versions. I am aware that the current models are already out there and available. What I am concerned about are the future versions staying that way and following the same path.

I got this one that says "Merry Christmas" on it lol

>>42085348
>>42085363
Give prompt NOW! I DEMAND it!!

>>42085348
>>42085363
What model are you using? Leaked NAI or something else?

>>42085623
The secret sauce is a strong negative "cell shading" combined with positive "scan", "high contrast", "sketch" and a few others.

>>42085952
Good old Anything-v3.0.

>>42086043
>Anything-v3.0.
Is Anything-v3.0. good for lewds or is it NG?

>>42086043
>and a few others.
Anon why can't you just copy and paste the entire prompt + negative prompt here? If someone asked me for my prompts when making an image I'd be more than happy to provide them with it.

>>42086048
It's absolutely amazing at tits. I haven't tried anything else, I love softcore,
So I don't really know, but it doesn't seem anything was filtered from its training. If it's on danbooru this can do probably it.

>>42086052
Because I want you to do something unique instead of copypasting *my* prompt as-is.
Most important discovery is that negative cell shading prompt. Gorgeous results.

>****my**** prompt
Wow, okay. I see how it is.

>>42086104
yea I know im being an asshole
teehee

>>42086091
>Because I want you to do something unique instead of copypasting *my* prompt as-is.
Not him but even if I copypasted your prompt as is results would be very, very different, always happens with the ones I try from other boards.

>>42086104
lmao wait until you find out the places where people are charging money for their prompts.

>>42086043
>>42086091
>>42085348
Why is Yukari wearing Ran's stupid-looking hat?

>>42076289
Do you think the Rikafags love each other?

>>42086199
Because they share a surname and the AI gets confused. And I didn't realize Ran had shorter hair. Kind of like Ran with long hair desu.

But look at that this thing even understands strap_gap.

>>42086113
If you use the same model with the same settings, you get more-or-less the same result. Unless there's xformers or such involved. Which I don't use.
>lmao wait until you find out the places where people are charging money for their prompts.
Don't give me ideas

Just jacked it to Ai art. That fap felt magnificent. Man, AI art is great, guys.

I doubt AI art is going to replace artists in the near future but it is fun to mess around with and make coomshit. Here's some Tewis I made months ago.
https://litter.catbox.moe/zsp4kn.png
https://litter.catbox.moe/znxob2.png
https://litter.catbox.moe/rzvs7c.png
https://litter.catbox.moe/87t4lh.png
https://litter.catbox.moe/jpxnth.png

>>42087602
>I doubt AI art is going to replace artists in the near future
I'm a drawfag and I'd rather AI generate my ideas and then clean up the glitches manually. Beats spending several hours doing tedious coloring.

>>42087692
This is honestly what I expect is more likely to happen in the near future. Artists who have developed a critical eye through traditional methods will adapt and adopt the technology, refining any flaws and gaining an edge over people who have only mastered only one aspect.

>>42087066
>>42087602
Absolutely degenerate

Up

>>42091779
Down. Not /jp/ even if you add otaku to the subject.
>>>/g/sdg

>>42091816
Not otaku because you said so? Yeah, no. Suck a cock.

>>42086113
>lmao wait until you find out the places where people are charging money for their prompts
so this is like koikatsu card making but even more of a tardslop

>>42086113
Their prompts will be pirated and spread all over the internet like wildfire.

>>42092154
This NovelAI is so fucking impressive. Try adding more abstract prompts like "masterpiece", "high resolution", etc.

>>42092175
i would but i'm running out of anlas and my supplier hasn't responded to my pleas

So many angsty artists ITT and it shows. Bow down to your AI overlords.

>>42092521
Try to generate 3 characters interacting without fused mutations, go ahead. :^)

You're very very much welcomed, friend. If you're on jaypee and see this i just letting you know that i wish my freaking AI thingy or model brought back my most perfect Rika gens before i self-destruct myself.
My friends in this thread, don't you mind to helping me out with bringing back my best output gens with Rika? I miss them. How do i fix this shit? It always but always gens Rika pictures with pinkish feel to it and my prompts and tags don't have any pink here are my prompts, I even put pink on the negative and it still gens with pinkish feeling. All of that happened after I changed something in the settings. DID i ruin my perfect algorithm gens via changing something in the settings? Now it's so much different to the point it gens unrecognizable Rikas. i might just end it all. what do you think guys how can i fix this crap? this crap that can end your life.

example positive prompts:
masterpiece, (portrait of furude rika 1.5), ((higurashi no naku koro ni)), child, flatchest, solo, hime cut, (blue hair), (long hair), (blunt bangs), (sidelocks:1.5), white shirt, ((black suspenders)), (short sleeves), purple eyes, ((pink bow)), sad, ((black skirt)), good hands:2.5, (black)

example negative prompts:
lowers, bad anatomy, bad proportions, (parted bangs),hair intakes, ahoge, ponytail, twintail text, error, missing fingers, more than five fingers,extra digit, fewer digits, cropped, worst quality, low quality, normal quality, jpeg artifacts, signature, watermark, username, blurry, extra eyebrows, (hat)) (hair ornaments), eyes, hands, evil, smug, sad, (3d), black bow, pink skirt, pink suspender, ((looking at viewer)), ((pink background))

I just miss those perfect Rikas i gen'd.

>>42092674
Thank you so much for providing your prompts unlike 90% of this thread. You are the best and cutest, Rikafag.

>>>/g/90069515
>>42092674

That's how it used to gen them

>>42092707

>>42092728
and here is that one

>>42092751
And that's how it mostly gens my Rika pictures from now on. Not matter what i do it always gens something similar to this and unrecognizable Rikas. Please help me out.

>>42092702
You're welcomed

>>42092674

>>42093246
A very cute Rika I like it but do you have any idea how can i fix my problem? Because what I once had really was amazing.
As you see in this pic related of my Rika has this pink layout on her.

>>42093368
I have no idea. I can give you my prompts though. What sampling method are you using? Also, how many sampling steps?

>>42093422
Euler a or DPM2 a Karras for sampling methods and sampling rate usually in-between 40 to 50.
I think my problem is something else entirely and it saddens me that i will have to reinstall my stable diffusion and i don't want to.

>>42086091
I'm trying to generate ones like yours but they're all blurry and filled with random colors and stuff

>>42093654
>>42092773
>>42093368
Maybe if you still have the settings in your log.csv file from your original Rikas, you could dump those here along with your current prompts and we could check them off against each other

>>42093836
You will have to elaborate more on how to get into these log files and i think i never saved the original settings i also don't know how to save. I did restart gardio after i did the initial mess.
How do i perform this?

>>42063267
Daggerfall 1996 way better game than Witcher 3

Rika by the riverside~
https://files.catbox.moe/c5ermw.png

>>42094397
So I don't know exactly how your system's configured but if you're using the same webgui that I am then whenever you save an image with the save button, the prompt, seed, model and settings you used to create it are added to the 'log.csv' file in your log/images folder by default. So if that wasn't erased/deleted irretrevably when you reinstalled you can check there, find the #number generated of the Rika pics you like, and copypaste exactly what you used to get them (I know how you feel, I can never get the exact details right, too many options).
Alternatively, by default textual information about your prompts is saved embedded in the .png files' metadata as chunks, so you can read that by dropping the relevent file in the 'PNG info' box, which does the same thing. However you lose this if you compress your files into .jpgs and don't save the originals.
Hope this helps anon, and sorry if your configuration's too different from mine for this to apply

sleepy kanon...........................

>>42092563
Admittedly, it's difficult albeit not impossible to add multiple characters in an AI-generated image. I can tell you're grasping at straws to try and discredit AI, though. Calm down, anon. Take a big breathe and relax a bit. This is really happening. You need to accept it.

>>42092563
>>42095585
Generate them separately and out paint, that’s the way

>>42095485
>>42095537
>>42092426
You can try the NovelAI leak in the OP. download that one.

>>42095974
i don't have good pc

>>42096065
You can even run it on a potato using the lowvram config, or even go full CPU rendering if you're willing to wait. You get a lot more control over the specifics you want, and you don't have to pay any more! So long as you can follow the instructions in the guide, you should be fine, seriously... we're here if you have any questions desu.

>>42096065
>>42096131
Just don't get tied up in all the options or you'll end up like picrel

My heart can't take this

>>42093828
(scan:1.025), (high contrast:0.8), (sketch)
Negative (cel shading:1.4)
Should get you started. Use AnythingV3.

>>42092274
>>42092292
Unholy

using anything v3 huggingspace. pretty gud but the nsfw filter is more overactive than my bladder at 2am

god i wish this one had come with a face i need kanon cock

how make thing work on intel iris xe

>>42097092
>>42097100
>>42097128

>>42097137
this answers all my questions thanks

Okay what the actual fuck is happening here. It seems entering "Ran Yakumo" as a prompt makes the AI have a stroke or something. These are some of the worst, distorted, mutated and deformed AI pics I've generated yet. I haven't even changed anything major from my other AI pics.

What is she even sitting on?

>>42097244
>>42097252
>>42097258
>>42097265
It's the high 1024x1024 resolution that causes the AI do funky things.

creepy

768x1024 is the highest resolution that really works consistently well.

I want her to sit on my face

Ran diffusion general

injecting kanon into ran general

>>42097570
What do WTC anons feel about the 2hus

Literally buckets of cum

>>42097837
Buckets of cum for small and flat women please

https://files.catbox.moe/iean2i.png

Imagine how much better this would be if those "fox tails" were omitted

https://files.catbox.moe/catcio.png

https://files.catbox.moe/u15se1.png

https://files.catbox.moe/dguhtv.png

https://files.catbox.moe/wfbsv3.png

https://files.catbox.moe/yuafig.png

https://files.catbox.moe/54mnii.png

https://files.catbox.moe/vpp5o7.png

https://files.catbox.moe/pr9u66.png

>>42097964
Lolis please you normal

>>42098038
I like lolis and mature woman like Ran but I prefer Ran since she has more body to offer like bigger breasts and a supple figure.

>>42098201
Based
Lolis are nice, but there's no resisting nice soft fox tats.
Though I still prefer a bodytype more on the skinny side https://files.catbox.moe/x5r51z.png
I don't like the overly exaggerated "thiccness".

>>42098753

I need some sexy flats

>>42098782
What you really need is this

>>42098782
Man of culture /ai/non

>>42098782
Here

https://files.catbox.moe/iqxxge.png

>>42098201
The real question anon, is can such a thing as a lolistacy exist? I'll try to think of one
(pic is Franchesca O'Hara from V Gundam btw. yeah crossboarding much)

>>42098782
https://files.catbox.moe/u73up0.png

https://files.catbox.moe/zvcqin.png

https://files.catbox.moe/zan1a2.png

https://files.catbox.moe/kervxf.png

>>42102358
>>42101556
>no rika
>all this budding and nontrue flats
AI is finished

>>42102390
If you wanted Rika why didn't you just say so (or you could go back to the cancerous /07/th Expansion Thread)

Can I get some Suikas?

>>42102416
I am fighting the cancer there

>>42102430
No you're not you spamming idiot. You make multiple threads on the catalog with your waifu and spam the threads that have a Satoko OP in them. Literal morons, why don't you go to /a/ or something where you fit in better

god i wish i could get this to look more like kanon

>>42102443
And fags will keep on making shitoko OPs i have no problem with shitoko I just have problems with her cancerous fuckups and you're completely oblivious about what is really going on. i am trying to better the threads i have no problem with true shitokofags nu and fake shitokofags are pure cancer and mostly are hornyniggers posting exclusively shit like"sext*ko sext*to!" and many more garbage shit, at least they toned down with the cancer now there are more different type of cancer like Epersonalityfags and discordfagging, which are much harder to combat. i can doo all of this by myself i have no life either way. blame the new 2020 show and ryu

>>42102506
I don't care if you sperg out and spam you're no better than them fuckwad

>>42102425
It's too hard choosing which ones to upload.

Model hash: cd391015 (Anything-V3.0-pruned.safetensors)
Steps: 32, Sampler: Euler or DDIM, CFG scale: 10; Restore faces: enabled

Original PNGs:
https://files.catbox.moe/i0lsz7.png
https://files.catbox.moe/eg1k6n.png
https://files.catbox.moe/0ibxp6.png
https://files.catbox.moe/ab30up.png

Those 4 and 12 more with full prompts .txt:
https://files.catbox.moe/7o0gi7.zip

I love this damn AI thing, can't stop generating cute girls.

>>42103923
Thank you so much for providing the prompt. I love you anon just like I love Suika

>>42103923
this is getting scary.

>>42104049
>this is getting scary.
You ain't seen nothing yet.

CHHEEEEENNNNN!

https://files.catbox.moe/2ro2ci.JPG

https://files.catbox.moe/w32aqq.JPG

https://files.catbox.moe/8h9v0x.JPG

I don't know if this is weird or not but I hope other anons are fapping to my AI creations

>>42104415
lol. Why would anyone when they can generate their own stuff?

What cloud solutions for training textual inversion or hypernetworks for artstyles exist currently? Nicolai256's Colab stopped working for me a while ago. LORA produces garbage. Dreambooth is definitely not what I want.

this model keeps complaining about nsfw and then making sexo bare chest outfits like this

>>42104520
You have to train the AI that takes a lot of time. If people shared we'd save a lot of time going through trial and error. QRD I'd kill for a model trained on ojamajo doremi, disgaea and etrian odyssey.

>>42097370
It's actually the perfectly square canvas. Use landscape or portrait size, never square.

>>42109895
Can you explain to me like I'm a retard why a square canvas doesn't work? I've been using square canvases since I've been making AI art

>>42109895
>>42109912
Afaik the AI is trained on 512x512, so squares are actually the default.
The fact it can do higher resolutions at all is pretty neat, 768x768 still works well but 1024x1024 is quite iffy.

>>42095193
Shit i never used that save button, damn

>>42109912
I guess the algorithm simply has more space to fill with the same amount of informations for a 1024x1024 picture than a 512x512 one. Vertical images often work well for a single character, but Okuu's wings take space so a square or even landscape format might not be that bad. You could try adding more details about the background so the space with no Okuu can be filled with Okuu-related things like "crow", "flame" or "underground". But I actually do like the style of chose Okuus.

After making those Suikas I wanted to try some of my favorite characters, so here's some Seigas. Took some time to make her outfit close enough, but I think she's recognizable.
https://files.catbox.moe/w85l1e.png
https://files.catbox.moe/vfmlns.png
https://files.catbox.moe/9a7l5m.png
https://files.catbox.moe/uhi63r.png

Seiga wearing more modern clothes, I like those mostly because the hair loops are almost perfect. Did not manage to produce someting with both those hair loops and the correct dress unfortunately.
https://files.catbox.moe/wngv21.png
https://files.catbox.moe/8txgb6.png

Kutaka. Need more details but she's recognizable at least. One wing seems to be missing so maybe she's Sagume in disguise.
https://files.catbox.moe/k4qp67.png

Early attemp at Kutaka, dress actually looks more like Mystia but I think the result is beautiful.
https://files.catbox.moe/k39geg.png

My amazing wife, Sekibanki. Too bad the red and blue of her cape are inverted on the first one, she's almost perfect.
https://files.catbox.moe/gx9vy8.png
https://files.catbox.moe/8p6yoo.png

(full prompt available in the EXIF data of each file)

Sakuya is happy with her power ups.

>>42115450
OH GOD YOU CAN'T PUT THAT ON A BLUE BOARD

>>42115450
Hot

OP here. This thread is a lot less popular than I expected it to be. I'm not a shill for Stable Diffusion or any of the other AI competitors. I simply wanted to make a thread where we could all post specifically AI art that featured characters or backgrounds from some of our favorite manga, VNs, video games, etc. It's Otaku related! The /g/ threads don't offer that. I care about what /jp/ created. I mean, why do you think there is a /jp/ OC thread and drawthread up on the catalog? This is also an OC thread, just with a different style, I guess. I imagine the hostility harbored towards me and other AI artists was to be expected. This is /jp/ after all, and the drawing artists here would clearly have some sort of irrational hate towards me and other AI artists for alleged "stealing" of their artworks. I'm willing to bet they would not have had a single problem with a human artist taking innovation and making their own artwork inspired by yours. This is just hypocrisy. Many of the attacks here have been against my person, claiming that I'm doing this out of selfishness, or that I'm creating this art because I think I'm worthy of praise. This is not true. You guys need to get it together. Calm down, try out some meditation or try some calming exercises.

>>42116452
>This thread is a lot less popular than I expected it to be.
This is by far the most comfy /sdg/ on the site, exactly because it's so much slower. Our OC doesn't get flushed to the archives the same day we post them like on other boards.
Even the arguments have been far more respectful than on other boards, eg /g/ is just filled with cancerous wojakspam.

>>42116452
Take it easy.

>>42116452
This is a new thread so it will take time to grow.

birb

>>42116452
I'm not an artist so I have no horse in this race. My only issue with AI art is deluge of it in various places that comes off as shilling and intentional demoralization, plus smarmy cunts that think they're hot shit and baiting butthurt artists. I'm not saying you're any of those things, but in my observation that's what AI threads attract and /jp/ doesn't need more cancer than it already has.

why is anything v3 so fucking horny

>>42119633
>>42116452
I'm an artist and it is really, really demoralizing seeing how the coloring that takes me 10 hours at least can be done on seconds by it. But AI ain't going anywhere so I gotta adapt and either do something that the AI can't do (yet) like animations or be all "welp can't beat em, so join em" and integrate it and make it do the hard work for me.

>>42116452
Like the other anon said, this is by far the comfiest AI thread on the site. If you have seen ai threads on /a/ or /v/, you will understand. So just take it easy.

>>42116452
lmao. Is this what all AI "artists" are like?

>>42122372
Elaborate, please.

Rika on the road~

>>42116452
You made an AI thread with an "otaku" theme as a flimsy excuse to keep it on topic and you expected it to not attract the AI cancer plaguing the rest of the site with constant 24/7 bait threads? You might as well start a Japanese politics thread because "at least its Japanese and therefore /jp/ related". Lurk moar.

>>42074522
>Another difference is that creating one's own art does not need to involve copying another's at all.
AI art doesn't copy so it doesn't matter. Synthesizing between multiple sources isn't copying. It's trying to make the case that AI traces and plagiarizes art the same way a human does when it doesn't. Admittedly, a large limitation of AI is that you have limited control over the aesthetics you can have it create and a lot of it comes down to lottery chance, but through the continual trial and error, an emphasis on specific aesthetics through prompts, selective curation, and possible editing cleanup afterwards, you can get the AI to create art that matches style that you falls in line with your sense of values.

>>42101556
>>42102358
What model and prompts are you using to get those?

>>42122499
But anon the only people shitting up the thread are the anti-AI people whereas the pro-AI anons are posting OC and generally being quite calm and composed. Nothing ITT is cancer or offtopic. Cool your jets and relax. Make sone creations yourself.

>>42122573
no, fuck off

AI art is a nearest-neighbors model on other people's art ++

it's pretty great looking at times but i suck artist dick and they don't like it so i feel obligated not to like it either

itt: retards

>>42122625
lmao. Is this what all drawing "artists" are like?

kanon crotch.....

suddenly, green kanon

>>42122697
It's funny to see AI retards trying to use the same insults again real artists. It doesn't work that way, buddy.

Tried to make all 3 grassroot youkai in the same picture, accidentally made them into a single character instead.
Don't know who's on the left but I like Imaibanki Kagihime on the right.

>>42123352
Looks like Orin on the left. Cute hime anyhow.

>>42122558
Doesn't it save the prompts in the metadata?

>>42116452
Good morning sir. Let me increase the post count sir.

Rika on a mountain with flowers~

i wish i could make these look more like kanon but god damn the ai's fashion sense is... something

Remi

>>42124584
Using stable diffusion, right? Use these prompts: (masterpiece),(illustration),(best quality),(highly detailed), (extremely detailed),(finely detail),(colorful),(ultra detailed)

> anything v3: wah wah stop making nsfw you stinky stinky pervo!! uwu
> also anything v3:

>>42124598
i'll add it, but i'm more bothered by getting the hairstyle right right now

>>42122573
Why feign ignorance and paint yourself as an oppressed victim? The fact that you dismiss all blame towards a single opposing entity is dishonest when both sides are to blame, and the unwelcome thread naturally draws unwanted attention.
>>42064999 AI poster clearly attempting to troll
>>42083742
>>42085499 AntiAI poster trying to have a rational discussion

Rika in the countryside.

I love both real and AI art. Stable diffusion will not be able to produce even something relatively simple like picrel in a loong time.
But being able to conjure up infinite permutations of perfect booba is amazing too. It's fast food art, really.

>>42074160
I didn't mean to ignore you I was doing maintenance on my pc for the past few days.
positive: Masterpiece, Best quality, maximum quality, best work, master artist, beautiful face, traditional art, film grain, sitting on bed, from below, feet focus, feet, bare feet, unbuttoned shirts, black-laced bra, exposed breasts, happy, blush, dramatic shadows, , eye focus, detailed eyes, pointy ears, black hair, (red eyes), (short hair), (Shameimaru Aya:1.2), (black wings:1.3), feather wings, (bird wings), (black feathers), dramatic shadows, kind, white button up shirt, skirt, colorized, colorful, cinematic light, gold dust, dust
negitive: schizo prompt https://rentry.org/dd5up4

>>42075461
>post I assume he dreambooth'd qqqrinkappp's art.
yes

>>42116452
I know this thread's slow OP, but that's what makes it comfy. Nice to see other anons' creations without (too much of) the screaming that infests the other AI threads.

>>42126529
Alice has an apple for you anon b-but not because she's concerned about y-you or anything
(she's just only interested in meat)

>>42129028
Alice who?

>>42129253
Alice (You)

>>42125939
>AntiAI poster
He doesn't seem anti-AI to me, just skeptical.

>>42116452
>This thread is a lot less popular than I expected it to be.
Traitors usually are hated a lot more than outsiders.

>>42133696
>Traitors usually are hated a lot more than outsiders.
Yet we still have dozens of vt*ber generals. Curious!

>>42134185
>Yet we still have dozens of vt*ber generals. Curious!
That you obviously hate. I'm glad we agree.

>>42133696
Uh...? Anon, what are you saying?

>>42134286
OP is obviously not a crossboarder, so he is expected to act with a higher standard. As he has failed in this, he is more worthy of contempt than he would have received if he were some clueless troll.
Do you require any further clarifications?

>>42132282
That anon here. I don't like AI, and I especially don't like AI threads, but I rather argue against people's logic rather than attack the person himself. Perhaps I come across as skeptical because I don't immediately devote myself fanatically to a side.
>>42116452
The road to hell is paved with good intentions. There is no point fanning the flames when the damage is done. If its any consolation, this thread turned out better than most AI threads, but its probably a good idea not to make it a reoccuring thing in the future.

>>42055010
This is only semirelated, but I heard there was a coding AI. Has anyone tested it out? Is it possible for someone who never programmed to create a simple game like a shmup?

>>42134421
>Is it possible for someone who never programmed to create a simple game like a shmup?
how are you going to correct errors if you don't know what the code says?

>>42134431
Extensive googling? You have a point and its a good thing I asked first instead of jumping head first.

>>42134454
AI is more of a time saver than a problem solver. You still need to know your stuff to get anywhere.

>>42134421
No, AIs will not be able to program proper programs on their own for at least two decades still. Copilot and such are only fancy autocompletes currently, output of which needs to be carefully scrutinized by a skilled engineer.
Just learn to code, things like shmups are relatively easy to make from scratch.

Can someone make a new thread?

>>42134364
>Do you require any further clarifications?
Uh, yeah. How did OP commit treason?

>>42129253
Best girl Alice of Pandora Hearts desu, a shining B-rabbit of light in an otherwise dubiously yaoish abyss...
>>42137792
I will after Christmas if no-one else does desu

>>42139686
>I will after Christmas
Thanks, AI friend.

>>42139686
Careful when yoy make the general, you don't want to attract the seething artfags who are going to be replaced.

>>42139873
>artfags
That implies that AI artists aren't real artists. They are. We should seperate between AI artists and drawing artists.

>>42065016
Is this you?

https://www.pixiv.net/en/artworks/103442153

>>42137881
By trying to use the word otaku as a casus belli to create an off topic thread, then proceeded to do nothing but spout his off topic ideologies and chase personal validation.
You dumb monkeys all engaged in the political shit flinging as well so it’s not like I think he’s the only piece of filth here, it’s just that throwing the first stone makes him the biggest one.

>>42140888
>casus belli
>ideologies
>political shit flinging
None of which I see here. This is a thread for otaku pictures created by AI, it's quantitively no different from the draw threads, just a different medium. If you don't like it we're not forcing you to stay here
Remind me, which board do *you* come from again?

>>42141021
>None of which I see here.
Then read the thread, nothing but zealots arguing.

>>42141021
Ironic how you immediately jump to accusing him of being a crossboarder when OP himself admits to browsing /g/ in >>42116452.