/jp/ - Otaku Culture

>Angry Type-Moon Fag !MOONmNft4g
Rude sage

Your name is Angry Type-Moon Fag but you're never really angry. Rude sage for lies.

>>3880290
>>3880291
2 RUDE SAGES IN A ROW!!

>>3880307
Are you angry now?

>>3880290
>>3880291
I still laugh at how 4chan doesn't understand what sage means.

If only I knew moon so I wouldn't have to spend time on a board that imports foreign concepts and then DOES IT WRONG all the time.

Using sage as a way to "insult" someone's post or thread is just completely wrong and a retarded misuse of a good feature that is so popular in sites like 2ch and Futaba. Fuck, iichan and 4-ch do it right. It's just 4chan and 4chan's lame knockoffs that fail at using sage.

The true meaning of sage means that YOUR POST isn't worthy enough to bump the thread. It's ironic, because you think that you're insulting others while you're just, in fact, insulting yourself. Yes, sage can be used when posting a derogatory comment in a thread that you don't want to bump, but posting with just the word "sage" accomplishes nothing but contribute to spamming the board. The trend of replying with the name of a tripfag and sage is even worse, as it accomplishes nothing and only serves to increase the e-penis of whoever you're "attacking".

The sage feature was never meant to serve as an implied insult or general disagreement! Why people started using it that way is beyond me. There are plenty of reasons why one would choose not to bump a thread with his reply. For example, bumping threads with stupid one liner replies should be discouraged and those people should be coerced into using sage instead.

I want to use sage, yet I almost never do it on 4chan because people will jump on me thinking I'm insulting their post or something.

>>3880317
It's like you just discovered this copypasta.

>>3880317
Fascinating.

>>3880317
I'm saging you so hard right now that your knees are shaking.

>>3880317
Believe me Suigin I know how it works. Yet I choose to use it that way as I wanted to express the dislike I feel at such a shitty thread.

>>3880319
actually it's the increase of people that make simple "sage" posts on /jp/ that has been bothering me lately

sages don't vote down threads, faggots.

sage

>>3880351
They don't bump them either, which is good in your case.

>>3880350
sage for angry tripfag

sage to oblivion and filtered at full force

>>3880351
Sage goes in all fields.