[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/jp/ - Otaku Culture


View post   

File: 119 KB, 430x486, 1251335139435.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3351401 No.3351401 [Reply] [Original]

Can someone translate the in-game Knox rules in umineko 5 directly from Japanese? They're a bit different from normal rules


ドラノール・A・ノックスの父が生み出した異端審問の戒律。

ノックス第1条。 犯人は物語当初の登場人物以外を禁ず。
ノックス第2条。 探偵方法に超自然能力の使用を禁ず。
ノックス第3条。 秘密の通路の存在を禁ず。
ノックス第4条。 未知の薬物、及び、難解な科学装置の使用を禁ず。
ノックス第5条。 (欠番)
ノックス第6条。 探偵方法に偶然と第六感の使用を禁ず。
ノックス第7条。 探偵が犯人であることを禁ず。
ノックス第8条。 提示されない手掛かりでの解決を禁ず。
ノックス第9条。 観測者は自分の判断・解釈を主張することが許される。

ノックス第10条。手掛かりなき他の登場人物への変装を禁ず。

>> No.3351410

>>3351401
>They're a bit different from normal rules
A bit different from the actual Knox rules, I mean.

>> No.3351425

/jp/ - Translations/General

>> No.3351451

witch hunt devs get out

>> No.3351444

>>3351425
I just thought /jp/ might be more interested in helping because it's /jp/ related. Especially since people assume the rules are the same and make bad judgments regarding theories because of that

>> No.3351453

>>3351425
japanese birds and bawson

>> No.3351574
File: 34 KB, 354x354, 1252025777201.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3351574

Please?

>> No.3351593

>>3351574
OP, I'd hate to be rude, but just translate it yourself, if no one else will.

>> No.3351597
File: 40 KB, 300x566, 1235705785274.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3351597

>> No.3351606

Knox Rule #1: You do not talk about Knox rules.
Knox Rule #2: You DO NOT talk about Knox rules.

>> No.3351617

The pleasure of being cummed on in 10 different ways.

>> No.3351628

1. Cumming inside is always pleasurable.
2. You must come inside, always.
3. If you don't cum inside, then the author sucks.
4. If it's not pleasurable, then the author sucks.
5. There is no rule #5.

>> No.3351648
File: 138 KB, 993x666, pUq2Q6bnLk8ZcTT03wVf.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3351648

>> No.3351655
File: 26 KB, 343x391, 1251421530099.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3351655

>>3351648
>detective is a criminal

>> No.3351680
File: 104 KB, 639x479, The death.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3351680

>> No.3351701

>>3351401

That you, piece-Battler?

>> No.3351707
File: 207 KB, 600x600, 1250906654562.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3351707

>>3351701
I have absolutely no idea what you mean.

>> No.3351708

DIE THE DEATH

>> No.3351711

>>3351648
ITS SO OBVIOUS FROM NUMBER FIVE

A CHINAMAN DID ROKKENJIMA MASS KILLING

UMINEKO SOLVED

>> No.3351719

>>3351711
Rule number 1. Rule number 5 says chinamen can feature and they do (Erika) but they can't be behind it.

>> No.3351722

>>3351707
Well, earlier, Piece-Battler wanted rules clarification.

...it's fine, I won't tell /a/ about this.

>> No.3351727
File: 16 KB, 223x223, 1250807913168.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3351727

>>3351722
And by that you mean you won't tell them because it would be a lie, because I definitely have no relation to that person.

>> No.3351737

>>3351719
Rule 1 says they have to be there at the beginning. The Chinaman is there at the beginning.

Rule 5 in Umineko says Chinamen can do it. Rule 5 is the only seriously modified rule.
The only reason to modify such a rule, is to ensure your culprit is legal.
Thus Erika did Rokkenjima.

>> No.3351738

>>3351737
Chinaman isn't there from there from the beginning. Red says she only exists in game 5.

>> No.3351739

Knox article 1. The criminal cannot be someone that wasn't present in the beginning of the story
Knox article 2. The detective cannot use occult or supernatural methods
Knox article 3. There must not be any secret passageways
Knox article 4. There must not be any unknown drugs or complex scientific contraptions
Knox article 5. Off the shores of Cinnabar Island
Knox article 6. The detective's methods must not have a "coincidence" or some kind of sixth sense.
Knox article 7. The detective must not be the criminal
Knox article 8. The solution cannot be from an unpresented clue.
Knox article 9. Observers in the story are allowed to assert their own judgments and explanations.
Knox article 10. There must be no characters disguised as other characters unless there are clues present that support it.

>> No.3351747

>>3351738
Damn.

>> No.3351749

>>3351739
>Off the shores of Cinnabar Island
Wait, what?

>> No.3351754

>>3351739
>Knox article 5. Off the shores of Cinnabar Island
IS THAT WHERE MEW IS?

>> No.3351760

>>3351749
ノックス第5条。 (欠番)

>> No.3351764
File: 330 KB, 1565x1168, 1250628813417.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3351764

>>3351739
Thank you.

>> No.3351765

>>3351727

I completely understand, Piec-..... anon.

>>3351739

So, no MissingNo on Rokkenjima?

>> No.3351766

>>3351749
>ノックス第5条。 (欠番)
欠番 = missing number
This rule was excluded for some reason...

>> No.3351772

>>3351739

See, no Kanon=Shannon.

>> No.3351782

>>3351772
>unless there are clues present that support it

>> No.3351788

>>3351772

Thank fucking god.

...it might bring up a problem with Beatrice's umbrella in ep 1, but Battler didn't see it, so...

>> No.3351789
File: 78 KB, 212x178, 1252643143101.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3351789

>>3351772
>unless clues present that support it.

>> No.3351794
File: 422 KB, 1024x1024, 6058671.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3351794

I. The criminal must be someone mentioned in the early part of the story, but must not be anyone whose thoughts the reader has been allowed to follow
II. All supernatural or preternatural agencies are ruled out as a matter of course
III. No more than one secret room or passage is allowable. I would add that a secret passage should not be brought in at all unless the action takes place in the kind of house where such devices might be expected
IV. No hitherto undiscovered poisons may be used, nor any appliance which will need a long scientific explanation at the end
V. No Chinaman must figure into the story
VI. No accident must ever help the detective, nor must he ever have an unaccountable intuition which proves to be right
VII. The detective must not, himself, commit the crime
VIII. The detective must not light on any clues which are not instantly produced for the inspection of the reader
IX. The stupid friend of the detective, the Watson, must not conceal any thoughts which pass through his mind; his intelligence must be slightly, but only very slightly, below that of the average reader
X. Twin brothers, and doubles generally, must not appear unless we have been duly prepared for them

>> No.3351800
File: 47 KB, 1231x393, 1249457628425.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3351800

>>3351749

>> No.3351803

>>3351794
As you can see, the original rules you've posted are different from the translated in-game rules. >>3351739

And that's why it's been causing trouble

>> No.3351804

1. The culprit cannot be outside of the first characters in the story.
2. The investigation method cannot use occult abilities.
3. There cannot be any secret passageways.
4. Heretofore unknown medicines, and also unintelligible scientific devices cannot be used.
5. Missing No.
6. Investigation method cannot use chance or the sixth sense.
7. The detective cannot be the culprit.
8. There cannot be solutions with unpresented evidence.
9. It is permitted for the observer to claim his own judgment/explanation.
10. Other characters cannot be disguised without a clue.

Tried to keep the Japanese wording as much as possible, since that's the point of translating this translation.

>> No.3351810
File: 116 KB, 640x800, 6034396.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3351810

>>3351794
N°2: It doesn't state supernatural things are prohibited: the commandement prevents the detective to use any supernatural means (so, red text)
N°3: There are no secret passage at all.
N°4: the commandement doesn't contradict being drunk: the effect of alcohol are known and they can cause a very powerful effect, especially for those who are not used in drinking it. Long scientific explanations are however subject to author discretion.
N°5: Not used at all (and since Erika is considered as "no influence to Beato's game", it doesn't contradict with Knox original commandement)
N°6: the wording prevents any assertions or lucky elements.
N°7: Battler is not the detective in Episode 5, which was proved thoroughly in the ura tea party
N°9: This rule is totally different from the original commandement. The ninth rule allow the observer to insist on their own interpretation.

>> No.3351812

>>3351794
we surely have followed kanon's and shannon's thoughts before... but that's omitted in the op's rules...

>> No.3351815

>>3351810
N°1, it says nothing about the culprit's thoughts.

>> No.3351816

>>3351812
Shannon = Kanon is useless if the culprit can't be outside the original 17 anyway.

>> No.3351821

>>3351804

Piecanon! Someone did it! Look, look!

>> No.3351822

>>3351739
Number 8 is going to fuck Battler up.

>> No.3351828

I guess the original ninth rule didn't apply as there's no real "Watson" character.
But why rule out rule 5?
Does Werika count as a Chinaman since she comes out of nowhere offering help?

>> No.3351830

>>3351800
trippin balls

>> No.3351836

>>3351804
Beato-Knox 1: "Beatrice" isn't formally introduced in ep1.

Thus Beato didn't do it.

>> No.3351840

>>3351822
I don't think so. It's saying Battler (in the game) isn't allowed to solve the mystery by using a clue that was never shown to the reader.

>> No.3351849

>>3351836

Key Item: Formal Introduction Letter.

>> No.3351859

>>3351840
Knox article 8. The solution cannot be from an unpresented clue.

Battler's hypotheses are wild claims requiring unpresented clues.

>> No.3351860

So is it possible to solve the mystery now?

>> No.3351862

>>3351849
The letter appears much later than all the other 17 are introduced

>> No.3351864

>>3351859
As soon as he stops using small bombs that rule won't be so bad.

>> No.3351869

How global do the Knox rules apply in Umineko?

>> No.3351888

>>3351862

But, before the murders began.

>>3351859

Beato is maaaaaaaaagic. She doesn't cooooooouuunt.

>> No.3351892

>>3351869
Presumably they apply to everything in it.

>> No.3351969
File: 155 KB, 513x480, 1252019452101.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3351969

>I. The criminal must be someone mentioned in the early part of the story, but must not be anyone whose thoughts the reader has been allowed to follow

The first Battler? The guy on the boat? Kuwamasa? We were able to know the thoughts of all but them. Hell, we even knew Eva was the culprit before anyone else! Who is that person whose thoughts we weren't able to follow? Genji? What the shit?

>> No.3351984

>>3351969
"The Butler Did It" is usually banned.

>> No.3351985
File: 212 KB, 640x480, a1252028666337.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3351985

Who is the culprit? Take a guess

>> No.3351990
File: 87 KB, 700x700, 6035645.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3351990

>>3351985
Natsuhi.

>> No.3351996

>>3351985

THE BATTLER DID IT!

>> No.3352004

>>3351985

Goddamnit. You guys post this theory one more time, and I'll show you how to cut hair with your feet.

>> No.3352009

>>3351969
Notice how the Umineko Abridged Knox Rules omits the "must not be anyone whose thoughts the reader has been allowed to follow" clause.

>> No.3352058

>>3352004
She doesn't love you, she loves Kanon. A narcissist, really.
By the way, ever wondered why did she broke the shrine? 'twas the spark that started the fantasy fire. Someone forced her to do that? Who? Beatrice? She's DEAD.

>> No.3352071

>>3352058

That never happened. Heh, and I thought you were anti-fantasy, anon.

>> No.3352087

>>3352058

>>loves Kanon
>>narcissist

I didn't catch it, but... fuck, you're even willing to go that far?!?!!

THEY'RE DIFFERENT PEOPLEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

>> No.3352111

The (translated) Knox rules were all written in red over Battler's dawson-crying face by Dlanor, so they are valid for the whole game.

>> No.3352122

>>3352111

Wait, do they only apply in game 5 then?

>> No.3352130

>>3352122
Correct.

>> No.3352136

>>3352130

It's like we've been discussing nothing at all, then. Shit.

>> No.3352138

>>3352122
That's a good question. I don't remember about any red text saying it applies to the past games too.

>> No.3352153

However, Battler found the truth by trying to find the criminal while looking at the Knox rules, so I guess they will help.

>> No.3352158

>>3352136
I thought it should be obvious. I don't recall anyone ever saying the rules apply to previous games. Just like how Erika appears in game 5 but isn't in any previous ones and doesn't affect them.

>> No.3352165

Oi.

>>>/m/3810699

>> No.3353125

>>3352071
So, a thunder really did break the shrine? Come on, what are the odds? Zero, that's what they are. A thunder can move diagonally and impact into a wooden shrine.
Someone broke it and it must be Shannon, otherwise that scene was 100% fake and, no matter what you believe, there aren't 100% fantasy scenes on Umineko -Metaworld doesn't count tho-

>> No.3353866

Other things that EP5 stated:

The detective can mistake what he/she saw, but can't tell a lie about it.
In other words, when the observer isn't the detective, scenes may contain his/her circumstances, wishes etc. But when the observer is the detective, it isn't allowed.

The detective of EP1-4 was Battler.

The detective of EP5 is Erika.

>> No.3353950

And it said we can find all of WHO, WHY and HOW, in EP1-4.

>> No.3354650

>>3351597
宣室求賢訪逐臣,賈生才調更無倫。
可憐夜半虛前席,不問蒼生問鬼神。

this is a poem
it is takeing about the king' s superstition

>> No.3354752

Dlanor use her rules to cut down Battler's blue when he was refering to the older episode as well. So I think it's implied that Knox rule probably will hold for older episodes.

>> No.3354752,1 [INTERNAL] 

Umineko Ep 5 thread
Some translation can be found, spoilers as well.

>> No.3354752,2 [INTERNAL] 

I don't get it.
Why is reality supposed to be bound by Knox rules? I understand that it's supposed to be a mystery, but using them to refute events seems far too meta. I'm sure I'm missing something from not reading Ep5, so if someone could explain...

>> No.3354752,3 [INTERNAL] 

>>3354752,2
Didn't your mama ever teach you the use of spoiler tags?

>>
Name
E-mail
Subject
Comment
Action