[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/jp/ - Otaku Culture


View post   

File: 92 KB, 1100x500, pantsukurabe2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2558892 No.2558892 [Reply] [Original]

What types of panties do you believe the Katawa Shoujo girls wear?

Misha would wear a thong, I bet.

>> No.2558896

thongs are for slu-
oh wait

>> No.2558901

derpers

>> No.2558914

ITT - diapers, touhou_pantsu_chart.jpg, inquiry as to what kind pygma chan wears followed by possible hijack and danbooru flood of striped pantsu images.

>> No.2558905

Rin would go commando to be free and easy.

>> No.2558922

Rin wears boxer briefs, for comfort and security.

>> No.2558936

>>2558914
Welcome to the weekend! xD

>> No.2558941

>>2558905
commando doesn't go well with periods

>> No.2558957
File: 1.16 MB, 2400x3871, Panties chart.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2558957

>>2558914
>touhou_pantsu_chart.jpg

Well... if you insist.

>> No.2558958

>>2558936
I'm here every day, all day, it's nearly exactly the same all through the week. The only difference is that at the weekend you get posts going, "weekend /jp/!"

>> No.2558977

femanons, all I'm posting in this thread for is to say one thing:

confidence in wearing comfortable underwear in the style of your choosing >>>>>>> feeling confident in your sexual prowess because you purchased underwear that makes you look like meat for sale.

>> No.2558986
File: 97 KB, 175x150, reg1166129060.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2558986

>>2558958

So am I. It's obvious that on the weekend there is a flood of more people posting who usually don't post (or spend little time here) during the regular week.

The main thing is that these people troll, and their bait hooks the other weekend people. So there is always lot of bad weekend users trolling other weekend users. This generally makes for an even lower quality /jp/. Yeah, that low.

On topic: which Japanese fan artist drew the OP pic?

>> No.2558999

>>2558977
No underwear is always a choice.

>> No.2558995

>>2558892

Shiccchan
Emi
Rin
Lilly
Hanako

>> No.2558993

>>2558977

here comes an athens post!

>> No.2558992

>>2558977
I don't understand what you're implying.

>> No.2559001
File: 69 KB, 700x542, crap.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2559001

>> No.2559008

>>2558986

zun your contrary for the sake of being contrary thing is getting old. Might I suggest a /jp/ hipster act?

>> No.2559012

What is the deal with this athens faggot anyways.

>> No.2559028

>>2558992
Females are free to wear and enjoy any form of clothing they want, but I would like them to be aware of the fact that some men are reserved and will write off slutty dressers forever simply because YOU LOOK SLUTTY THIS IMPLIES SLUTTINESS WHICH ONLY DUMBFUCKS WOULD REALLY VALUE

Dressing up hot is fine and all, but when she HAS to do it to feel confident or he EXPECTS it because "lol its so hawt", something is wrong somewhere.

Curse you, hard to find conservative and outgoing women.

>> No.2559030

>>2559008

Aren't we busy fapping to FF11 doujinshi?

>> No.2559048
File: 11 KB, 251x251, 1209672207981.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2559048

>>2559028
>conservative and outgoing women

>> No.2559054

>>2558892
Hipster briefs
Low-rise briefs
Boyshorts
Lacey little thing
Classic briefs

>> No.2559076

>>2559048
tell me about it

>> No.2559085

>>2558957
What does the Youmu text say?

>> No.2559089

>>2559028
>>2558977

Faggot.

>> No.2559096

I bet Rin wears men's briefs

*faps*

>> No.2559100
File: 39 KB, 300x308, bubblebobble.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2559100

>>2559030

u got me.

thank god my futa mithra doujins weren't here to see this.

>> No.2559116

>>2559089

Selfish, lust-obsessed, neckbeard with a rape manga collection and pseudo-intellectual commentaries on gender relations.

>> No.2559124

>>2559096
AS SAID BEFORE BOXER BRIEFS

>> No.2559140

>>2559116

Posting on 4chan.

>> No.2559144
File: 31 KB, 468x312, under5.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2559144

>>2559124

>> No.2559147

>>2559140
your point?

>> No.2559152

Lilly would have lacy and frilly panties because she likes feeling up the details.

>> No.2559171

>>2559116
>Selfish

No.


>lust-obsessed

Not sure really.


>neckbeard

Females don't have a beard. Faggot.

>> No.2559179

>>2559152


Lilly must give awesome handjobs....

>> No.2559186
File: 17 KB, 443x400, imse-vimse-%20fitted%20-diaper[1].jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2559186

Dude isn't it obvious?

>> No.2559198

>>2559116
>lust-obsesssed

Women are more sexually driven than men. Female sexuality is something that needs to be controlled.

>> No.2559202

>>2559152
Already listed here >>2558995

And Lilly is the Ojou-Sama. She has to wear frilly underwear.

>> No.2559246

>>2559198
>Women are more sexually driven than men.

Not actually. Females are more selective, males are more active. This is what happens when females of a species have to invest more resources than males into creation of offspring.

That impression you have is probably caused by the fact that girls instincts tell her to leave you if a better male appears.

>> No.2559248

>>2559198
They are about the same, really. It's just guys just have the urge to have sex, which can be solved with masturbation. Women actually want to get pregnant.

>> No.2559263

>>2559198
...but then why do men fap so much in comparison?

>> No.2559293
File: 9 KB, 250x250, Image1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2559293

>> No.2559297

>>2559263
Because a vagina is more of a one time deal, the more you use it the less there is of it.

>> No.2559305

>>2559263
Because erections are fucking uncomfortable as shit. It's a utilitarian thing.

>> No.2559307

>>2559198
You probably have more beard than I do, "miss".

>> No.2559347
File: 38 KB, 640x480, Thread-Direction.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2559347

>> No.2559355

>>2559297
>more you use it the less there is of it

What?

>> No.2559374

>>2559355
This stuff looks all saggy and worn out when used.
Disgusting.

>> No.2559368

>>2558957
im saving this because wriggle

>> No.2559385
File: 17 KB, 429x360, borat.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2559385

>>2559355
LIKE WIZARD'S SLEEVE

>> No.2559406

>>2559263
>...but then why do men fap so much in comparison?

Females have a limited amount of egg cells. Males have practically unlimited amount of sperm cells. Men have evolved to be able to impregnate female whenever the suitable situation occurs. Sperm wants to get out. If it doesn't get out, body will have digest it as it gets old.

Think about it.

>> No.2559467

>>2559374
oh /jp/

>> No.2559486

>>2559406
Actually not digest, degenerate. Sperm cells decay over a period of time even if men do not fap.

>> No.2559512

>>2559406
Eh, that's kind of missing the point. For all intents and purposes, both sexes have FAR more gametes than they'll ever need.

Females being cautious about reproduction is more a result of the immense energy and time investment needed to form babby.

>> No.2559529

>>2559406
strangely, i don't think that fapping has terribly terribly much to do with reproduction so much as arousal response in the various genders.. i think a point was missed, somewhere along the line.

>> No.2559533

>>2559512
And males only need to expend a few calories creating and injecting some goo.

>> No.2559536
File: 37 KB, 450x350, 578956876.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2559536

>>2559512
>Females being cautious about reproduction is more a result of the immense energy and time investment needed to form babby.
lul

>> No.2559565

>>2559529
What now? The arousal response IS the reproductive drive. Fapping I guess could be described as the result of the sex drive being set higher than opportunities to mate could allow. I mean, it's better to be prepared for an abundance of reproductive opportunities and have to fap all the time than to only have sex when a female is present and not have enough to sperm to inseminate as many as possible.

>> No.2559569

>>2559512
>Females being cautious about reproduction is more a result of the immense energy and time investment needed to form babby.

That is true, the first sentence doesn't make sense in this context. However, the rest does.

>> No.2559584

>>2559565
>What now? The arousal response IS the reproductive drive.

Hear hear.

>> No.2559596

>>2559536
Yeah, and those babies were born with severe impairments. Plus, if it weren't for our welfare state, she wouldn't be able to feed them all. In the wild, she'd probably die in childbirth, and any that survived that would likely die not more than a few weeks later.

>> No.2559610

>>2559512
How is babby formed? How girl get pragnant?

>> No.2559611
File: 71 KB, 1361x343, women-not-ronery (2).jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2559611

>"For Nekayah [The Princess], in the mean time, insinuated herself into many families; for there are few doors, through which liberality, joined with good humour, cannot find its way. The daughters of many houses were airy and cheerful, but Nekayah had been too long accustomed to the conversation of Imlac and her brother to be much pleased with childish levity and prattle which had no meaning. She found their thoughts narrow, their wishes low and their merriment often artificial. Their pleasures, poor as they were, could not be preserved pure, but were embittered with petty competitions and worthless emulation. They were always jealous of the beauty of each other; of a quality to which solicitude can add nothing, and from which detraction can take nothing away. Many were in love with triflers like themselves and fancied they were in love when in truth they were only idle. Their affection was seldom fixed on sense and virtue, and therefore seldom ended but in vexation. Their grief however. like their joy, was transient; every thing floated in their mind unconnected with the past or future, so that one desire easily gave way to another, as a second stone cast into the water effaces and confounds the circles of the first."

>Samuel Johnson, Rasselas

>> No.2559623

>>2559596
So what you're saying is that in a free environment women would naturally be total sluts?

>> No.2559629

>>2559536
lol nigglet on the right.

>> No.2559644

>>2559623
Don't fucking start that.

>> No.2559664

>>2559623
In a 'free environment' patriarchy naturally emerges.

Landed gentry > Bad Boyz

>> No.2559694

>>2559623
No, humans care for their infants and given how much energy it costs for the woman to both give birth to and raise the child she wants a "healthy" man who will both increase the chances of survival of her child by passing on superior qualities and will be able to care for her and the child.

Even in species who don't show child care, there are mechanisms to ensure only the fittest males get to mate - fighting contests in certain rhinoceros and stagbeetles, for example.

A particularly interesting example are in the Acillus genus of water beetles, where the male drowns the female until she is unable to resist and then rapes her - of course, that's no mean feat by itself, the females having a variety of mechanisms to avoid the male's grasp, so it becomes a bizarre rape ritual to see which male is fit enough to drown the maiden beetle and have his way with her while she's barely conscious.

>> No.2559777

>>2559623
gender, and the way it behaves is based a lot on society and its effects on the person within it. You stick a girl in a house full of brothers and she may become a tomboy, or she may turn outward from that, to sate a need to be more feminine and the like, or any combination there of.

just an example, but point is, it really depends on the society and other factors like that. most of gender is in the mind.

>> No.2559782

>>2559171

Enjoy pretending the attention men shower you with because of your hip, sexy attitude and clothes show is fucking going to keep you company the rest of your life.

Also, major lulz for implying men who value things in women besides their looks are "faggots" while being so obsessed with superficiality you end up with some other insecure faggot, unhappily ever after. Its even funnier because it shows you think women are basically mens eye candy, and men are womens self-worth.

>> No.2559799

>>2559782
>major lulz
get the fuck out

>> No.2559835

Google says YOU LIE! Links or it doesn't happen!

>> No.2559842

>>2559799
We are discussing penises,
do you want to join?

>> No.2559857

Women are disgusting, their only appeal to man is the same as the appeal of heroin to the druggie.

>> No.2559864

>>2559857
That analogy is unfair to heroin.

>> No.2559867 [DELETED] 

>>2559864
True, and I apologies to all drug users around the world.

>> No.2559875

>>2559864
True, and I apologise to all drug users around the world.

>> No.2559879

>>2559799
Thanks for the great reply, now I know that using an internet euphemism, in a debate nobody will really pay attention to, is a major gaffe, that should be avoided at all costs.

>> No.2559902

>>2559879
I don't think you know what the word "euphemism" means, bro.

>> No.2559903

no diaper scene = not interested

>> No.2559934

>>2559879
With the recent septic tank explosion and widespread fallout of fecal matter known as /b/tards all over the other boards irritation directed toward use of expressions mainly associated with those is more understandable than normal though, don't you agree?

>> No.2559954

>>2559902
Laughter is offensive, didn't you get the memo?

>> No.2559961

>>2559934
stop being such an overly verbose nerdlinger

>> No.2559972

>>2559954
I don't think pretending to be joking enables one to use words he doesn't understand.

>> No.2559987

There are girls in the thread

>> No.2560006

>>2559972
I'm not him, actually.

>> No.2560039
File: 30 KB, 452x339, thats_the_joke.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2560039

>>2559902
>>2559961

>> No.2560065

>>2559961
Never!

>> No.2560066

ITT wapanese do what they do best: side step and sometimes blatantly ignore the discussion and use every derail possible to aid in this.

>> No.2560071

>>2559842
nah an old catchphrase isn't going to redeem your posting man

get out

>> No.2560169

This is the shittiest excuse for a ronery thread that I've seen in a while, and I see them everyday.

>> No.2560310

>>2559782
>>2559116
>>2559028
>>2558977

No. The point is, that it is highly unlikely that you are demanding ugly and/or dumb sluts to be "conservative" and stop advertising their value as a mating partner. What you want is that attractive females stop showing their attractiveness to other men and instead focus on faggots like you who couldn't really compete with more desirable males. You wan't women to be less active and preferably not able to choose, because you would lose otherwise.

Women try to look attractive as possible. They try to look sexy ( young, fertile, etc. ) and perhaps like a individual of higher social status. World around them pretty much requires this. Their looks or value as a mating partner may not be their only and most valuable asset, but it usually makes a person happy to know that they are sexualy desirable. If no woman has ever looked at you twice, you probably won't know what I'm talking about, but you should be able to understand this at least at theoretical level. Also, men try to look masculine, of higher social status and self confident etc ( or alternatively like feminine yaoi faggots if they are trying to attract that type of females). Whatever the gender in question finds appealing.

This is how life works sonny. Complaining how it is hard to find "conservative and outgoing women" sounds just fucking stupid, even more considering that wearing sexy underwear is what makes a slut in your world.

>> No.2560324

>>2560310
enjoy walking around without underwear

>>
Name
E-mail
Subject
Comment
Action