/jp/ - Otaku Culture

Juvenile Furry porn will dominate in Britain.

Also, /n/iggers.

Did you know violent video games like Super Mario Brothers turn kids into serial killers.

Thoughtcrime is doubleplusungood.

>prosecutions should be made for simple doodles
Awesome.

This "law" has been in the works for some time, it was first proposed over two years ago.

Come back when it's actually passed.

Like the CBLDF isn't already preparing to tear this shit apart if it passes.

>>2210390
>>2210369

>The UK
>Defense of civil rights

wwwwww

>>2210398
UK is shit

I know I live here

Nobody who lives here would defend it, it's awful

but this is not news, it's viral marketing of a shitblog which shitposts

So I see the UK is trying to become more like Canada.

Now, to really start up the shitstorm, I would point out that, while there was a court case against a guy who had oodles of loli doujin and pictures, it's still technically legal in the good ol' USA.

>>2210407
It sure must suck to have worse civil liberties than the US, despite the extremely high number of religious fanatics and other moralfags the US has.

>>2210423
Well, the US at least has to put forth the facade that they hate tyranny and like to promote civil rights.

>>2210423
We're all distracted by gay marriage at the moment. The time will come when we're dealing with the same bullshit again.

>>2210434

Even if gay marriage goes away there still Abortion, and abortion will always trump loli.

who knows maybe we'll get some justices that actually believe in the First Amendment.

>sankakucomplex also my shitty /n/ post.

I love how 2D paper drawings supposedly can be abused. Any appeal to emotion (ie: SOMEBODY PLEASE THINK OF THE CHILDREN) conveniently ignores this fact, and creates a false impression. Lolicons != Pedophiles.

I don't doubt that it causes some degree of harm, but I definitely think that it causes less harm than good. Certainly, if we argue on these terms, we should also consider banning alcohol, smoking, handguns, knives, and so on ad infinitum.

Times like this I love humans. Bleck.

So when are people going to stop saying 'Amerikkka' and start saying 'The UKKK'?

>>2210580
Because there's no KKK in the UK. That and the place is overrun with Muslims and Punjabs so it'd be pointless.

>>SOMEBODY PLEASE THINK OF THE CHILDREN

Won't somebody please think of the adults?

>>2210580
When the UK becomes the world troll that the US is.

They used to be though, in their glory days...

>>2210593
But adult men rape and molest children so why care?

>>2210593
NEVER!
Moralfags win because the world is full of idiots who think that loli is the same thing as real little girls, also someone should explain 3D = PIG to them.

>>2210610
I like both loli and small, slender, childish girls in real life.

>>2210622


Well you're fucking it up for the rest of us.

To be honest, I thought this was already the law here in England. Go figure.

Either way, LOL THOUGHT CRIMES.

Is there any chance the UK will become a self-admitted fascist state anytime soon and turn against the rest of Europe? Because that's be awesome.

Good thing Scotland wants independence..

>>2210635
Don't worry, I don't live in England, but the free-thinking, freedom-loving, only somewhat sexually repressed America.

>>2210610

Moral fags win in the same way feminists and some abortion groups win. Demonize anyone on the other side until the public would think you are for them if you aren't against them. March with a banner sized picture of a beaten women or aborted fetus regardless how much it is even relevant to the position. Win by not arguing with logic, but by arguing with emotions, the main problem with people is they can't change how they would feel so they would rather error on the side of caution when a choice could make them feel bad later even if it isn't logical.

Dude, Britain was always fascist, but they covered it good in educational and intellecutual terminology. Just see Darwin, a total fascist who even tried to interbreed in the establishment, and his teachings are still active today.

The british aristoracy and the groups in relation wtth them (banksters, intellectuals, military leaders, later on statesmen, intelligence folks and merchants, were as fascist as you can get, and with the rise of the British Empire they accomplished what Hitler tried to achieve. The british establishment loved Hitler, he was one of them regarding his world view.
Hitler's group, btw the real brains behind this maniac had their knowledge fom the anglo-american teachings that was higly praised and acclaimed and that time, what they did was to create a big apparatus that run on them as fundaments. Just see all the Nobelprize winners, and you will find one fascist after another, they are all fascist scum.

AT LEAST WE'RE NOT AUSTRALIA IMIRITE?
FREE WHITE RUSSIANS AND BLOWJOBS FOR EVERYONE!

>>2210646

I thought you guys had their own nanny state laws coming about. I can't imagine Scotland, independent or otherwise, being much better then England when it comes to these issues... though maybe they won't arrest simple protesters using anti-terrorism laws, but can't imagine anyone standing up for under age drawn porn.

Give it ten years and I wouldn't be surprised if most western countries followed suit in one way or another.

>>2210661
The problem here is that unless we can contact a high-profile convicted child rapist and get him to say 'if I had access to loli hentai I probably wouldn't have raped those kids', we don't have any emotional argument. All we have is logic, and everybody knows pathos beats logos when hordes fight.

>>2210682
Well, in the US at least, people keep making laws like that and the Supreme Court keeps overthrowing them after the ones who get convicted appeal.

Next stage: Reeducation camps for the convicted.

>>2210711

>>2210699

And those were defected by a good amount(I guess). 6-3 for one and 7-2 for some other one. I really shouldn't but I still have some faith in the supreme court

>>2210719

>defected

I don't care.

>>2210719
Obama is likely to appoint more liberal justices as well, so, in theory, theres nothing to worry about for a while.

>>2210684
>All we have is logic, and everybody knows pathos beats logos when hordes fight.
No clue what you are talking about there. It doesn't mater how many high ranking convicts we could get it would not help since they are first and foremost convicts. You would be shooting the whole defense in the foot and even then it would just be what one person says not any "real data" with how they would argue back. Even though they have no real data themselves, all they have is a giant fallacy when you get down to it but that doesn't matter.

>>2210723
Granted any justices die

We may just get unlucky

>>2210724
The pathos/logos thing is from the three types of argument: Pathos (if you don't do this, babies will die!), Ethos (you can trust me, I'm a good person), and Logos (you should do this because <legitimate sources>). While legitimate sources beats I'm-a-trustworthy-person almost every time, it stands no chance against BUT BABIES WILL DIE, whether the babies are real or not.

>>2210775
Too true. In the end the people who can make up the biggest threats that may not even be related when every time.