/jp/ - Otaku Culture

>>19379574
You gotta have the courage to ask.

Try that red-white whore or the thot maid of the sdm!

easy because sanae is a slut

>>19379578
Sorry, meant nab as in abduct. Should've been more clear.

>>19379655
Eh, she'd enjoy it still, I'm sure.

>>19379655

Just tell her you want to abduct her and have sex, she'll either let you do it right away or tell you to come back later with a van and duct tape when she isn't busy.

>>19379578

You don't really need that much courage. She's not going to say no unless you did something to make her really dislike you.

convince her you have a robot she needs to pilot

>>19379578
welp

guess its time pack up and go home, cant deal with those kind of requirements

>>19379790
>>19379784
She truly is a good girl, isn't she?

>>19379874

Very

>>19379574
Impossible. She's a demigod, and you're a nerd. And even if you pull it off, you'll have to deal with 2 very angry and very powerful goddesses.

I would say "just ask her out on a date". But considering your personality, that isn't happening either.

>>19379910
it would be nice if you could pick up a girl like that at the supermarket and take home

>>19379932
You technically can, but it's both immoral and illegal. Really only flies in fantasies, sadly-ish.
>>19379927
>implying

>>19379910

Is this Sanae's method of stress relief?

>>19379932
Just do it to fairies

>>19379574
Not very. She's in the village a lot, she's kind of an airhead, and is pretty trusting. Easy mark. The difficulty is in keeping her; gotta find a way to counteract her abilities, and it's not entirely clear how those work.

>>19380071
This only causes stress, anon.

>>19380276
>only causes stress
That anon posted was sm, which can be very stress relieving for some folks, in short spurts, Nana to Kaoru is a good example of this. The other pictures have a more rape-y vibe, so those would definitely cause (dis)stress, which is sm if for fantasy purposes. Sanae is too beautiful to not pursue/be pursued with that second one, though.

>>19380504
It's that artist, anon. There's no short spurts or relaxing sm with him, no sir.

> Sanae is too beautiful to not pursue/be pursued with that second one, though.
That, however, is exactly right.

>>19380821
That artist definitely draws a cute Sanae. Some nice expressions on some of 'em, too.

>>19380888
Also exactly right. Extra busty too.

>>19379574
Why Sanae? Out of everyone in Gensokyo, why her?

>>19379969
>implying
Do you really think the people that browse /jp/ could abduct a goddess.

>>19382928
*Demi Goddess?

>>19382673
She's cute and lovely, a good and kind person, and she's a beautiful young woman.
>>19382928
Wasn't arguing that. Was talking more about that second paragraph.

>>19382928
Some goddesses aren't known for their ability to defend themselves.

>>19383915
More, please!
This goes straight into my "what the fuck am i doing with my life" folder.

>>19383608
>Wasn't arguing that. Was talking more about that second paragraph.
Rapist generally aren't viewed as people with a particularly endearing personality.

>>19383915
atleast sanae's body is ready to bear my children

>>19384839
as if women cares about "personality" in the slightest, for women, physical appearance is your personality

>>19384839
Neither are judgemental people. At least the victims are drawings of fictional characters or people who consent to the fantasy.
>>19384877
She's got her whole life ahead of her anon, don't ruin it with pregnancy!

>>19384877
>As if women cares about "personality" in the slightest, for women, physical appearance is your personality.
No. Your personality is your personality. If that actually matters depends on the person you want to date.

>>19384944
>At least the victims are drawings of fictional characters or people who consent to the fantasy.
1: People that want to rape fictional characters are usually still unlikeable creeps. 2: If you find somebody that consents to your weird fetish fantasy. That's a different matter.

>>19384133
Sanae could still kill you though. Easily.

>>19385088
I'm not denying that, she would wreck me.

>>19385161
Good. Then stop thinking about trying to abduct her. It isn't going to happen. And if you actually like her as a character, you should respect that.

thread

>>19385178
Different anon, abducting her would be a very good way of communicating your dedication and love for her. The amount of effort, time, and attention it would take to abduct her would show her just how much you love and care for her. As long as she's treated well, loved, and taken good care of, it's perfectly fine and respectful. It wouldn't be fine if she wasn't any of those things though.

>>19385325
>abducting her would be a very good way of communicating your dedication and love for her.
That's not how people work. Abduction is universally viewed as a bad thing. Especially nowadays.

>>19385088
>>19385161
Would she?
What are Sanae's abilities? She doesn't have super strength and stuff like that. She can summon miracles, but that seems to require ritualistic prepwork. She can shoot ofuda and do shrine maiden stuff, but can she do that without her gohei?
If Sanae's heavily restrained, which is doable, what can she do to escape it?

>>19384944
>She's got her whole life ahead of her anon, don't ruin it with pregnancy!
Don't worry. It's not like she's ever going to leave this place, so it's fine if she gets pregnant.

>>19385420
She can channel the power of a goddess. It's quite likely she does actually have super strength. At the very least, she should be able to use those holy powers to smite humans.

>>19385161
I only wanted to make fun of Shinki, I didn't even read the discussion about abducting Sanae.

>>19385178
I only wanted to make fun of Shinki, I didn't even read the discussion about abducting Sanae.

>>19385467
And how does that work? Does she just go "boop, Suwa-sama powers on!" and that's that? I kinda doubt it. If she needs to perform rituals to use her own latent miracle-inducing abilities, channeling the gods can't be a simple thing. Again, does she need the gohei?

>>19385565
>Does she just go "boop, Suwa-sama powers on!" and that's that?
It's probably just on all the time. I don't think channeling the power of a god is something you can just turn on or off.

>Again, does she need the gohei?
I imagine it makes it easier. But isn't a requirement.

>>19385665
Of course it's something you turn on and off. Haven't you read SSiB?
And I dunno. Have we ever seen her summoning wind and seals and stuff without it?

>>19385565
Marisa points out to Sanae, in Wild and Horned Hermit chapter 19, that Sanae hasn't used her tool regularly

>>19385713
>Haven't you read SSiB?
It's been a while. And i should add that Sanae and Reimu seem to play with something different rules.

Either way. Assuming it is something she can turn off or on. I don't think it's that hard to do. It would be a bit of a fatal flaw if she could be ambushed that easily.

Whoops, pics.

>>19385726
Ah, well there you go.

>>19385729
>It would be a bit of a fatal flaw if she could be ambushed that easily.
That's the idea, yeah.

>>19385755
>That's the idea, yeah.
And like i said, the idea is kind of nonsense. If she can turn it on or off. It would probably only take a second or two. And she could do it whenever she wants. So, even if you could knock her unconscious and tie her up. She would still kick your ass from here to sunday the moment she wakes up.

Why is sanae constantly being put into bondage scenarios?

>>19385803
Yes, yes, and I'm not convinced.

>It would probably only take a second or two.
Of this especially. It doesn't seem like an easy on-the-fly thing at all.

Besides, even if that was the case, it's not like one couldn't come up with a countermeasure for that. Gensokyo is a magical place.

>>19385885

because some artists think its really hot

>>19385885
"Constantly" is overselling it.

>>19385885
It's something about her personality and how she presents herself that makes her feel perfect for it. Don't know exactly how to put it. As >>19380276 gets at, she's also one of the types that'd fit into a good noncon scenario.

>>19385886
Maybe one could find some countermeasure. But that somebody would probably be a master magician, or a ancient Youkai/god. Not somebody that browses /jp/. To think otherwise is the height of arrogance.

>Of this especially. It doesn't seem like an easy on-the-fly thing at all.
How do you know? She seems to have no problem turning it on in any of her appearances. Or do you think she spends two hours mediating between every stage?

>>19386171
It could be like it is for d&d clerics, not being able to use their abilities without their holy symbol/equivalent. Maybe her gohei is her holy symbol, so getting that out of her grip (and sight, to be safe), binding/gagging her, and keeping her away from her domains (what her abilities central themes are) would render her completely docile and helpless. A bit of vulnerability and helplessness isn't going to hurt her any.

>>19386729
Most clerics could still kick your ass though even without being able to use any spells. And going by D&D logic. Any holy symbol will do. Even a charm she carries around in a pocket.

>>19386171
I'm not saying it would be easy, but Sanae's worth the effort.

Not between every stage, of course, but before she sets out. That seems reasonable.

>>19386763
They kick your ass because they're physically fit, anon. Sanae's no slouch, but she's nothing you couldn't just restrain away. And just search her carefully. In this scenario you'd be doing both these things anyway.

>>19386821
>I'm not saying it would be easy, but Sanae's worth the effort.
There's a difference between "Not easy" and "borderline impossible". Let's not forget that she's also smarter than you. Knows more about her own powers. And very popular in the human village. You would have a bigger chance of getting her hand in marriage.

>Not between every stage, of course, but before she sets out. That seems reasonable.
How do you know she doesn't turn it on every time she leaves the shrine? That's what most people would do, considering what kind of a place Gensokyo is.

>They kick your ass because they're physically fit, anon. Sanae's no slouch, but she's nothing you couldn't just restrain away.
Again, how do you know that? She's a genetically perfect demigod. Her inherent strength might already be above a weak human like you. And it's not a matter of "searching her carefully", it's a matter of "She only needs about a second to cast a spell that will turn every atom of your body into dust". If you have to search her, it's already too late.

Most children dont even need to be abducted. They can be reasoned with, groomed and/or easily tricked. Years ago I met 11 and 13 year old girls that lived near me on a online game called Second Life. I groomed them for almost two years and eventually met up with them and we had great sex one summer like every third weekend. The other one I only met once and she moved to Germany.

It took alot of time, but I was younger (in my upper 20s) and I think I really helped them in their life. They rewarded me with the greatest physical lust I have ever known. The whole culmination of the experience when we were entwined was mind blowing.

Sometimes all they want is for someone to listen to them and talk.

>>19386996
Interesting story, but Sanae isn't a kid, she's a young woman. Besides, we love her too much to just settle for something as simple as seduction. Gotta put some effort in there, be creative!

>>19387079
I see. You actually meant *abduction there right?

>>19387194
Negative, abduction was the word intended.

>>19387389
Seduction. Seduction was the word intended. *something as simple as seduction

>>19386890
>Let's not forget that she's also smarter than you.
Now you're just being rude.

>>19387581
It's the truth, anon. Don't try to deny that Sanae isn't way smarter than everybody on this board.

>>19387628
Based on what?

>>19387699
The fact that she's a successful shrine maiden. Not wasting away on a shitty website dreaming about people that aren't real.

>>19387735
You got us there.

>>19387735
That has nothing to do with intelligence. And please don't act like Sanae doesn't have her head in the clouds too.

>>19388261
Intelligence is necessary to build a giant robot like that

>>19385364
>Abduction is universally viewed as a bad thing.
Objectively wrong

>>19387794
So small!

>>19387699
She did breakdown the science of cold fusion in one of the manga's

>>19382928
She's literally just a High Schooler with some gimmicky powers, it can't be that hard.

Tranq dart. Nuff said

>>19388261
>That has nothing to do with intelligence.
It kind of does though. She clearly knows how to be successful at life. Is surprisingly knowledge about a whole bunch of subjects. And while she can be a bit of a airhead, has a surprisingly decent head on her shoulder. She's better than you, anon. Especially when it comes to matters like holy powers.

>>19388801
If you want to be abducted. Then it's technically not even abduction.

>>19389444
She's a stage 5 boss. That would at least somewhat put her on the same level as somebody like Sakuya or Shou. Both of which could easily rip you in two.

>>19389624
>That would at least somewhat put her on the same level as somebody like Sakuya or Shou
Yeah, at spell card duels. Not in a physical confrontation.

>>19389635
It does still generally indicate a level of power far above average.

>>19389650
It literally doesn't. Stage placement ≠ powerlevel.

What a nostalgic thread.

>>19389685
>Stage placement ≠ powerlevel.
It kind of does though. Stage 5 bosses are on average stronger than stage 1-4 bosses. It's not hard proof that Sanae is as strong as somebody like Sakuya. But i do think it's worth keeping in mind whenever people like you get all arrogant. And seriously think you can abduct a demigod.

>>19389703
Your true thoughts are showing through, anon.

>>19389703
>Stage 5 bosses are on average stronger than stage 1-4

>>19389714
My true thoughts, which I have been pretty honest about, is that if you think you can abduct Sanae. Then you don't respect her character. Nor do you actually like her expect as an object of fetishzation

>>19389716
Not always. But usually.

>>19389703
>It kind of does though.
Yuyu confirmed weaker than Cirno.

Kuso thread.

>>19389742
Yuyuko in TD clearly wasn't trying though. Her appearance as a stage 6 boss is a more accurate indicator of her abilities when she actually gives a fuck.

>>19389723
OK let's see.
Alice - stage 3
Reimu - stage 4
Aya - stage 4
Yuugi - stage 3
Shou is an enigma.
Seiga - stage 4, Yuyu as a bonus mention
Seija is a weakling.
Doremi and Sagume - stage 3,4
Nice usually.

>>19389758
Cirno, Letty, Chen, Alice, Lily, the Prismriver sisters, Youmu and Ran in PCB weren't really trying. Only Yuyu and Gap heg went all out and lost and are actually two of the weakest characters.

>>19389760
>Alice - stage 3
Canonically never uses her full power.

>Reimu - stage 4
If you ignore her "I win" ability. She isn't actually that spectacular power wise.

>Aya - stage 4
Clearly wasn't trying that hard/

>Yuugi - stage 3
That is one of the bigger exception. Although you could argue she's just not very good at Danmaku.


>Shou is an enigma.
Why?


>Seiga - stage 4.
That seems about right.


>Seija is a weakling.
Why do you think that? Especially considering Impossible Spellcards exists.


>Doremi and Sagume - stage 3,4
The power levels in that game were pretty ridiculous anyway

>>19389770
Chen, Lily, the Prismriver sisters, Youmu, and Ran were actually trying. Only Letty, Cirno, and Alice weren't going all out.

>why do you think that
Whelp.

>>19389823
I'm genuinely curious. Seija never struck me as a weakling. Not exactly tough shit, probably above most other stage 5 bosses. But still not a weakling.

>>19389902
*probably below most other stage 5 bosses.

>>19389723
That is a load of bullshit. We do very much respect and love her, as a person and character. Sex is a natural part/extension of that love, and even though that sex is deviant fetishes, doesn't make it any different than straight up lovemaking, as far as it's significance goes. Really, would you go through the effort of finding a way to abduct her if you didn't love her and care for her? There's easier 2hus than her, so it's got to count for something.

>>19390193
>We do very much respect and love her, as a person and character.
Then stop claiming you can abduct her. It's not going to happen. To claim otherwise is to show that you don't actually like the character.

Also, there's a massive difference between role playing abduction. And actually trying to abduct somebody. The former is a choice made by two consenting adults. The latter is something serial killers, rapists, and vikings do.

>>19390268
>There's a massive difference between the two
Not arguing that at all. But part of this fetish is raping her, and there's not going to be any killing or violence or anything like that involved or planned at all. We do very much care about her and love her, even if we didn't, those things still wouldn't be involved at all. We have very different opinions on this, I guess, but I would think the fact that the wannabe nabbers in this thread are willing to go through all this effort to debate and argue and share pictures and such shows just how much we are dedicated to her, loving and liking her. Besides, rape is much hotter than regular sex anyway, in the fantasy/roleplay sense, not the actual real-world sense.

>>19390308
I think this mentality is called "Being fucking insane". Seriously, you sound like a actual yandere. And not the cute kind either.

Either way though. It's still not going to happen. You are too weak to abduct somebody as powerful as Sanae. Either respect that, or find a different character it like that more matches what you want from your... victim.

>>19390392
Already posted this picture, but take a look at Sanae in this picture, how many of the 2hus can match this sheer level of beauty? Her hair, her body, everything. Wasn't meaning to sound like a yandere at all, not quite at that level of crazy. If that's a 10, than more like a 4 or 5. Just a normal level of fixation on a character as much as anyone else on this board.

>>19390587
You claim to enjoy her beauty. And that, i might actually believe. But as a character? You couldn't care less about her. You would rewrite her entire personality if you thought it would make her easier to fetishize.

>Wasn't meaning to sound like a yandere at all, not quite at that level of crazy.
Thinking that abduction is love is at least a 9, anon.

>Just a normal level of fixation on a character as much as anyone else on this board.
Most people on this board are creepy and insanely fixated on one character. So, that's not saying much.

>>19379790
I want to rape this belly

>>19390713
You never will.

>>19390740
Why fucking live then

>>19390699
>rewrite her character for easier
No, not at all! She's fine the way her character is supposed to be, we're debating the specifics and the details of her person specifically related to her abduction, that's all.
>a 9
A 9 or 10 would probably be mirai nikki or yandere sim. An 7 or 8 would be somewhere along the lines of kotaro no hibi. A 6, at most.

forgot to spoiler.

Alrighty, here we go. Sanae is a shrine maiden, but differently then Reimu. Reimu can rely just as much on her Miko abilities as she can on her physical capabilities. Sanae is just a plain human without her divine abilities. In memories of phantasm, we see her struggling carrying containers, she seems to have gotten roughed up a bit on the way there, maybe by tripping or such, and she is very naive, bubbly, and has her head in the clouds. She's very smart and very creative without a doubt, she's a very bright and capable girl, but she's not streetsmart (neither are most of us, likely). Without her gohei, and without access to her divine powers, which she seems to need her gohei to use (whenever Reimu uses her abilities, or she's fighting, she's has her gohei, and same with Sanae), and we have never seen Reimu use her powers without her gohei. Unless there's details missing, or info is wrong, she'd be easy. I've only watched memories of phantasm, read a few doujins, and a few of the games (haven't completed any of them, though), so there's probably stuff missing.

>>19390818
I don't know. That depends on you.

>>19390847
>A 9 or 10 would probably be mirai nikki
I agree. Most of the people here are on the same level asf mirai nikki. Like, once you cross the "show your affection by abducting them" line. You aren't going to get away with anything lower than eight.

>>19391152
Memories of Phantasm isn't canon, anon. We don't know how physically strong she is in canon. But considering she is apparently drawing power from peoples faith. I would say "stronger than you".

>>19391152
>In memories of phantasm

>>19391152
>In memories of phantasm
Sanaefags, everyone.

>>19391784
These people don't actually like Sanae. They just view her as a object of fetization. I do like her, and i know i would never be able to abduct her.

>>19391832
*They just view her as a object of fetishization.

>>19391784
>Sanaefags

>>19391152
>In memories of phantasm
please be bait

>>19391832
>just as a object for
Not at all, the fetish itself may rely on objectification as one of it's main elements, but that doesn't cancel out loving, liking, and caring for the character in anyway, shape, or form, no more than applying any other fetish or sexual desire does. How you judge whether or not someone truly cares about that character, do they still care and have intense or significant feelings for the character, after they finish masturbating to the character. If yes, they continue to do so afterwords, they truly care about the character, if no, then the character is no more than a object for sexuality for them. That's moe, moe feelings are truly caring for the character.

>>19391152
>In memories of phantasm

>>19391939
>How you judge whether or not someone truly cares about that character
By looking at if they actually care about the character as she's portrayed in canon. Not some fetishized fanon version that only exists for your wish fulfillment fantasies.

>>19392024
Had no idea it was non-canon. Admitted newfag.

>>19392034
This is your average Sanaeposter

>>19389723
Oh. You're one of those people. Forget it then, can't argue with dipshits who think only one kind of affection is real and legitimate.

>>19391152
>>19392034
Anon, why?

>>19392188
>Forget it then, can't argue with dipshits who think only one kind of affection is real and legitimate.
Multiple kinds of affection exist. The point is that they need to be aimed at the actual character. Not your own fanon version.

>>19392034
Way to oust yourself as a filthy newfag

>>19392188
Whaddya mean, "why"?

>>19392223
Don't make us look so bad by citing fucking fanime. We don't need any help in that field.

This whole thread's gotten off topic. It's supposed to be about abducting Sanae and doing horrible, wonderful things to her! Not if that's canonically viable or not and how respectful it is to her character and all that crap. Much of that is my fault, though.

So, better question. You've successfully abducted Sanae, now what? Weren't doing this just for kicks, right? Must have something planned, right?

Worst Sanae thread.
Even worse than Sakuya's slutposting.

>>19392382
I agree. It's especially bad considering Sanae is one of the few Touhou you might, MIGHT actually have a chance with in canon.

>>19392382
Nah. Rape/bondage guys are much more respectful to Sanae than slutfags, and are nowhere near as obnoxious.

>>19392428
Until this thread. I might have agreed with you. But after newfags spectacular reveal, i'm a bit more unsure.

>>19392488
Don't be so dramatic.

>>19392318
Well, sor-ry! What planned, hmm?
Well, for first things firsting, she'd have to be restrained and out of sight/mind. Either lower floor, interior closet, basement, or cellar. For the gag, a wadded up sock in her mouth, probably my own so that all the sweat worked up in the excitement so far would be pretty nasty in her mouth, taste/smell wise, then her own panties lightly tied around her mouth, covering her lips, then a few piece of duct tape to keep it all in place. The sock would have to be bundled up tight/compact, so it wouldn't be too uncomfy. For binding, a soft but durable cloth, tied around her ankles, and around her knees, with a belt of a bit or rope securing the ankle and knee binding together. For the wrists, cloth as well, but secured in place with some duct tape. She'd have to have a leashable collar on (the collar would have to have a bit of length on it, so she's not stuck in a sitting up position), which would need to be secured to some immovable part of the wall, or something connected to it. For aesthetic purposes, she'd keep the skirt part of her miko outfit on, but the top would either be removed or replaced with a t-shirt that's sized too big for her. She'd have a mattress under her, with a bedsheet for her to sleep under. Next to her bed, she'd have a food and water bowl, on a lunch tray, the kind you'd give a dog. As far as sexytime, lots of vaginal, and it'd be pretty often, no doubt. No matter what she said or did, she'd be penetrated, over and over. The gag would be taken off when she's alone, so she can lean over and get a drink or eat some of her food. Because her wrists are restrained, though, she'd be eating and drinking exactly like a dog or cat does. If she's good, every now and then I'd leave my own dog with her to comfort her and help her cheer up a bit. Sounds like a whole lot of fun, eh?

kuso thread

>>19392510
That's very detailed.

>>19392510
I've played this mission in Swat 4.

What a fucking mess this turned out to be. Oh, /jp/, how much you've changed.

>>19393180
This thread was doomed to be terrible. But it was fun pointing out how fucking stupid you have to be to think you can abduct Sanae.

>>19393303
It's one guy out on a mission to ruin Sanae threads, the same way Iori threads just turned into "anal idol" jokes for 310 posts
I think that we touched a nerve by insulting his favourite touhou Sakuya which sent him into full autism mode

>>19393360
A shame. Since i do like her. Even if Sakuya is the better character.

>>19393360
It's nothing like that, anon, at least not from me. Presumably not from the newfag either.

>>19393397
Them's fight'n words.

>>19392428
Nah. Slut is still better than rape/torture

>>19395478
Can't agree with that. With rapefags Sanae's a good girl at least up until the bad stuff starts and possibly after it's over. With slutfags she's a ridiculous cum-guzzler from the very start. The former is much more respectful to her as a character.

>>19395515
>actually defending rapefags

>>19395531
Sure am.

Slutfags are annoying but at least Sanae is enjoying herself as a slut.

>>19395959
Slutty Sanae is barely even Sanae though. Step one too a slutfag's fantasy is completely changing her character to suit their tastes. Rapefags sometimes do that too, won't deny that, but nowhere near as severely.

>>19392510
I'm curious. How much do you insert yourself into your fantasies? Do you fantasize about Sanae being kidnapped, bound, and raped, or do about you yourself kidnapping, binding, and raping Sanae?

>rape Sanae is okay because that Sanae is not a slut

>>19396057
>rape Sanae is okay
I think you're missing my point a bit! There is no "rape Sanae." The interpretation of Sanae rapefags use in their fantasies is the same one...uh, how to put this, normal Sanaefags support. Good girl Sanae, I guess. She's pretty and nice and a bit of an airhead and a bit of a nerd and loves her goddesses and is a little more confident than she should be, you know the drill, the Sanae we all know and love.
Rapefags are superior to slutfags in terms of respect and love for Sanae. That's all!

>>19396077
>Rapefags are superior to slutfags in terms of respect and love for Sanae.
No they don't. Rapefags are worst because they want bad things happen to good girl.

>>19396093
These two statements are not mutually exclusive. You're still off-target, anon. Yeah, rapefags are definitely crueler than slutfags, but that's not what I'm talking about.

>>19396110
>rapefags are definitely crueler and worse than slutfags
FTFY. And no, i'm a normal Sanaefag but i won't support "their rape fantasies" even if in their fanaties that Sanae is a good girl.
Slutposting is just a joke and sometimes funny to read, but rape is a serious problem and itsn't comfortable to see those Sanae is getting hurt

>>19396057

I hate it how people bother to go lengths to justify their fetishes instead of just settling with "it makes my dick hard"

>>19396146
>>19396180
Oh for fuck's sake now there's two of you? I'm not trying to get you too support rape fantasies or justify a fetish or anything like that.

>Rape/bondage guys are much more respectful to Sanae than slutfags, and are nowhere near as obnoxious.
>With rapefags Sanae's a good girl at least up until the bad stuff starts and possibly after it's over. With slutfags she's a ridiculous cum-guzzler from the very start. The former is much more respectful to her as a character.
>Rapefags are superior to slutfags in terms of respect and love for Sanae. That's all!
Read that green, Sanae-like text. That and only that is the point I'm trying to make!

>>19396202
I don't care about that "your Sanae" is a good girl or not.
It's just rapeposting is bad, no matter how do you respect her as a character.

>>19386996
what the fuck dude

>>19396009
Generally, in non-h, can't fucking stand blank-slate self insert type characters, but in fantasies? Hell yes, self insertation out the wazoo. Some of the turn on of the overall fantasy comes from the initial resistance she would put up during the abduction, so it's fun to imagine having my hand over her mouth, physically restraining her, etc.
>>19396077
I don't know about the other folks in the thread, but that "getting her pregnant!" thing is a massive turn off. "I'm impregnating you" in those romantic, vanilla, lovey dovey pre-existing relationship things, is one thing, but in rapr/captivity shit? Continuing after she's been impregnated feels wrong, like it's even worse than actual rape. Don't really get why everyone on 4chan is so ubsessed with impregnation. Sorry for blogposting.
>>19396093
Those "bad things" are actually good things. She just can't tell in the moment, I guess.
>>19396146
We don't support real rape at all, and the fact that we're venting these fantasies here and such means we're dealing with them in a healthy, non-harmful way. You can understand real rape is wrong, but desire fantasy rape from here to sunday.
>>19396263
It was an interesting story, but it was random. Guy needed to vent or something? Dunno. If it's not bullshit, at least he helped them out? Dunno.

>>19392645
Also, something about this picture just seems really, really cute. Don't know how to place it, but it's really cute as well as being hot, and something about
>>19392645 is funny in a weird, ironic way. It make-a-me raff! Sorry for blogposting this much.

>>19396801
Meant >>19396009
this picture.

>>19398013
Kuso thread award.

>>19396242
Oh good lord, I give up. You're not even trying to listen.

>>19396584
Using my crops for such smut...
>Hell yes, self insertation out the wazoo.
Hm, noted. I don't do self insertions at all. They're weird.

>>19396801
Followup. Someone will appreciate this, assuming they're still around.

>>19398700
>follow up
No thanks, blogposting is the worst kind of attention whoring. Let's get back to discussion.
Why did she have to end up being rescued in pic related? That's not sugoi.
Your crops? What does that mean?
>they aren't listening at this point
They're just as deadset in their standpoint as us rapefags are. They don't understand the beauty of noncon, but different strokes for different folks. The slutfags are really fucking obnoxious though. Not funny, either, but they sure do think they are. >>19379637 3rd post in the thread.
Sanae sure is a sweety, though. She's definitely asking for it, the poor girl.

Disgusting

>>19400747
Don't call Sanae disgusting, anon, that's bullying, you'll hurt her feelings.

>I "respect" Sanae so I'm better than slutposters
>You are not even trying to listen!
>You don't understand the beauty of my fetish!

I give up. Even slutposters are not this annoying.

Well, both sides of this debate aren't going to agree or change each other's mind anytime soon, so...agree to disagree?

Also, if this thread is upsetting you, that's not the intention, sorry if that's the case. We just want to do horrible, amazing things to/with Sanae and share pictures that support the fantasy, not out of malicious or trolling purposes, with this thread.

>>19400859
>I give up.
Same.

>Even slutposters are not this annoying.
Not on this, though. Fuck right off with that; you don't see rapefags filling up like 70% of Sanae threads.

>>19401406
This single thread is worse than any slut thread x10

>>19402081
Save the hyperbole and quit bumping this shit.

Apparently mods tolerate spoilered Sanae bondage, but if I hijack one Kaguya thread with spanking I get banned.

>>19391152
God damn.
Obligatory Sage. This thread is a travesty.

>>19402229
It's because it isn't explicit, and more importantly, on topic. Raunchy threads are fine as long as they behave, I'm reminded of that lilish Youmu thread from a few weeks back, but hijacking threads with fetishy shit is bad.

>>19402229
Mods aren't know across the site for being smart.
Maybe some spankfag was spamming shit and you were mistakened for it.

Sometimes this ends in rangebans. Just be happy you can still post.

>>19402260
Spanking isn't particularly explicit either, but me and the other guy who did the hijack also posted other Touhous getting spanked in a Kaguya thread, so I guess it wasn't on topic.

>>19402263
Or this. Could always be this.

>>19402229
>mistakened for it
Mistakened for being him if he went board to board with that shit

>>19401406
>Not on this, though. Fuck right off with that; you don't see rapefags filling up like 70% of Sanae threads.
No.
He's right.

>>19402276
Look, anon, there is maybe one consistent Sanae rapefag on the entirety of /jp/, and it's me. There's MAYBE one or two others who have cropped up recently, usually orbiting around Honehone's art, but for the longest time it's just been me. And I don't post this shit very often, because that'd be rude. See >>19402260. Maybe a bit here and there, I know I've posted that >>19387581 pic a few times with some "what do?" bullshit, and that's pretty much it. This thread is the first of it's kind in...I can't even remember the last one.
Rapefags can't be more annoying than slutfags because they barely exist and don't post. It's physically impossible.

>>19402295
You seem to be going for "they aren't a majority here" over everything else.
That won't take you far.

You could do the opposite and have rapefags more prevalent than slutfags and you would argue that slutfags aren't as obnoxious as rapefags.
>look
No. I perfer to look at touhous, not some smelly NEET on the other side of the monitor.

>>19402295
>"what do?"
Also, there is nothing wrong in hating template threads and posts.

>>19402313
It's less "they aren't a majority" and a lot more "they're an extremely small minority."
Maybe I shouldn't say it's physically impossible, and more I don't see how they possibly can be.

Those occasional kinky posts? Usually no response. Maybe one or two bites here or there, more if it's Honehone, but mostly nothing. Nobody cares about this shit. Meanwhile "normal" Sanaefags gripe about slutfags all the time in every thread, counter-memes develop and spread, "man Sakuya sure is shitposting again," you know the drill. So how can the former possibly be more annoying than the latter? How can it be more anything than the latter? It's got no presence and gets no attention.

Know what I think? I think you just don't like the idea of Sanae being tied up and/or raped, which is completely understandable, and so you're taking it out on the overly-defensive rapefag. That's all.

>>19402318
No argument here. I did call it bullshit.

>>19402347
Now I know you're bullshitting.
Have a nice day.

>>19402347
If you don't like it, then leave and never come back.
Things will proceed like they always do.
If you want to waste your time policing threads and expressing discomfort with how posts are made or what they imply, then hide the damn post. It's that easy.

>>19402392
Nope.
You too, anon.

>>19402399
...what? You lost me. Policing threads?

>>19402260
afaik, as long as the nipples and vag are covered by clothing, meido is fine with it. Maybe the spanking thing is because of the bare ass? Dunno.
Look, this thread wasn't meant to turn into any kind of big argument like this, just wanted to have a fun thread filled with the wonders of Sanae rape and captivity. Can we get back on topic and stop arguing now?
So, how would you react to Sanae's begging? If she was begging for you to let her go, or she was trying to fish for an opportunity to escape, what would your response be?

>>19389802
>>Seija is a weakling.
>Why do you think that? Especially considering Impossible Spellcards exists.
Seija is objectively and an admitted weakling (as are all amanojaku). The whole point of DDC is that she, as a weakling, got her hands on the miracle mallet and someone able to use it, which would make her, as a weakling, able to rule over the strong.

ISC is about her literally cheating simply in order to survive.

>>19391784
Head up the ass dumb as rocks.

>>19403164
Play along, of course. Mess around with her, throw her a bone with an actual conversation, make her think there's some hope of talking her way out of this, that kind of thing. Negotiation is fun when you hold all the cards.
Have a gag handy. A big, intrusive, really uncomfortable one. Reach for it or finger it a little when you want to shake her up a little. If you've got vibes in/on her, you can do the same with those. Do things that keep Sanae on her toes. To her talking means delaying all the torment, a possibility of escape, and some real human contact, so she'll desperate to keep it going. Take advantage of that.

>>19404925
>a big intrusive gag
Ball gag? Probably a ball gag. As far as the vibes, it'd be interesting how she would react to that. If they actually brought her to orgasm, wonder how she would feel? Ashmed, disgusted with herself, confused, it'd be an interesting avenue to play with her.
If she tried to escape, that'd definitely be where the fun would be. Leaving her alone for a while with a vibe on maximum would be pretty interesting. That'd be her punishment, having to orgasm over and over, all by her lonesome, against her will, until you decide she's learned her lesson. Her not wanting that, and her having to go through it, her delicious lack of consent, oy vey. The discomfort of the physical sensation against the backdrop of her current situation...oy vey, oy vey. She'd definitely need a bath afterwards.

>>19406398
You're pretty cringy, anon. Even more than me.
Careful with the intensity. Futile attempts at escape are pretty fun, you want her to keep making them. Punish her for the attempt, sure, but don't go so hard that she doesn't try again latter. You want to find a sweet spot where she dreads failure, but not enough not to try. Sanae's tough, so you don't have to worry too much, but still, be careful. Broken toys are no fun.

Leaving her with the vibes on is patrician taste. Definitely do that regularly. Consider leaving them on low during other activities. Vibes are good shit.

>>19408537
>broken toys are no fun
Good point. It'd take a lot of creativity to keep a good and fun balance there, though. One of the fun parts though would be bathing her. That'd certainly be fun, and very uncomfortable for her, to be in such a vulnerable, helpless, and exposed situation. She'd need a very thorough cleaning, every nook and cranny after everything she goes through. She'd probably need her wrists bound while she's in the tub, just to accentuate her helplessness, and her discomfort with the cleaning. That could be used as a potential escape attempt opportunity, her bathtimes.

>pretty cringy
How is this cringy exactly?
>Sanae's tough
That makes it so hot. Tough yet feminine and sensually vulnerable is 11/10. Imagine if you got someone like Zero from DoD3 in a situation like this...oy vey~

>>19410244
I don't really care about baths. Arms up, bound at the wrists, on her toes, hose down and rub, that'll do. Alternatively keep her partially bound and let her do it herself, would be nice to just watch. Maybe drug the soap and water? I dunno. I don't care about baths.

>>19411526
>oy vey
>delicious lack of consent
>that's not sugoi
>They don't understand the beauty of noncon
And so on. Pretty cringy.

>>19412684
>arms up, bound on the wrists, on her toes, hose down and rub
A bit too cruel for comfort, but agreed on the letting her do it herself while still partially bound, would be very cute to see. Drug the soap and water? Why, and what with? Eh, different tastes, seems like you prefer to keep it more impersonal, maybe? Kind of takes the fun out of it, lack of connection or intimacy (in a very weird, uncomfortable, and creepy way, or not, circumstances depend) makes it feel like you might as well just not even bother pulling this off and just masturbate instead. Impersonal a bore.

>>19412973
I am pretty impersonal. I'm more in it for the show and interaction than the hands-on experience, so to speak. Much more a bondagefag than a rapefag, if we're being honest. And I did say I don't self-insert into these things, usually. If I do, it's almost always overseeing her in some cruel predicament or bondage setup, lotta talking, twisting the knife, maybe some groping and tickling, that sort of stuff, but very rarely any actual sex.
The two things aren't mutually exclusive, you know. Can be intimate one moment and impersonal the other. Stamina management is important; being all touchy and feely and rapey all the time is going to tire you out. On the other hand, yeah no, probably wouldn't be settling for masturbation with Sanae sexually secured in the next room over. That's just ridiculous.

>>19413371
>twisting the knife
Hope you're not being literal with that.
So you're meaning you're more of a standard SM person, and the rape-scenario is just an extension of the that, not the focus? Are you into things like whipping, spanking, candles, that kind of thing? That's interesting, actually, if that's the case. The reason for the "settling for masturbation" thing was that it doesn't seem worth it to abduct and enslave Sanae if it doesn't have that intimate, relationship/human element, even if it's in the weird/deranged/taboo variant that goes with captivity and such. That's really the reason to seek out a partner or relationship, to add the human element that's missing in simple masturbation, the intimacy and contact, so impersonal sounds redundant and nullifying the point.
>Tickling
Cute! Seems hard to turn it into a noncon themed thing, though.
>cruel predicament or bondage setup
Hardcore predicamentbondage is just really cruel. The milder forms, sure, but pic related, it's just really cruel. Kind of flatlines the meatstick, because of how overly cruel it is. Sorry, rambling and (borderline) blogposting again.

>>19403853
Even if you are right. The fact that she had the miracle mallet does still make her stronger than the previous 4 bosses.

I mean, Sakuya would be a lot weaker without her knives as well.

>>19413576
Something like that. Sex toys are wonderful things. Drugs, whips, that sort of thing too, maybe. I dunno. Again, when I fantasize about Sanae going through hell, I'm not the one putting her through it.

>Seems hard to turn it into a noncon themed thing, though.
How naive.

>Hardcore predicamentbondage is just really cruel.
Wuss.