[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/jp/ - Otaku Culture


View post   

File: 86 KB, 550x708, initiarudee.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18164209 No.18164209 [Reply] [Original]

READ THE GUIDE BEFORE ASKING STUPID QUESTIONS:
http://djtguide.neocities.org/

Alternative guide (not edited, ask for clarification):
https://neodjt.neocities.org/newguide.html

Don't give learning advice if you're a beginner.
Don't argue about learning methods if you're a beginner.
Don't feed drama queens.

Previous thread: >>18145572

>> No.18164222 [DELETED] 

Ohajou my fellow nihongo.
Today is a good youbi to learn nihonjin!
Let's all make much progress.
Itadakimasu.

>> No.18164232 [DELETED] 

1 hour left of work and I get to make some 焙じ茶 and study Japanese.

こことても寒いです。。。

>> No.18164237
File: 175 KB, 360x450, 1484317805099.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18164237

>> No.18164247

>>18164237
かわいい

>> No.18164262 [DELETED] 

>>18164222
first post worst post. fuck 4chan

>> No.18164263

dont procrastinate!

>> No.18164296

I hate how my new workschedule means I have to do reps at night, my retention is going down

>> No.18164302 [DELETED] 

>>18164296
When do you leave home for work?

>> No.18164315

>>18164302
I get up 5:30 am and have to be out of the house by 5:55 and I'm getting home roughly twelve hours later

>> No.18164318

If there is a verb + なきゃ it means you must do it right?
If you put いけない after it does that make it even more important to do that thing?
Like this なきゃいけない isn't that triple negative? Japanese sure love negatives don't they?

>> No.18164328

>>18164318
what?

>> No.18164335

>>18164318
All the added endings like いけない have a specific nuance about in what way or for what reason the thing must be done. Leaving it as なきゃ implies the double ending, but leaves the nuance unspecified. なきゃいけない is a simple logical double negative, like "can't not".

>> No.18164340

>>18164318
なきゃ often just omits the いけない part my dude

>> No.18164347

>>18164318
なきゃ with nothing afterwards implies なきゃ(なければ)いけない/だめ/ならない/etc. It's more casual than the full phrase, but the endings themselves carry different connotations and things like なきゃ and なくちゃ don't specify a particular ending, so it's not necessarily "less important".

>> No.18164384

>>18164335
>>18164340
>>18164347
Ah I get it so なきゃ is short for なければ and the いけない/ならない part is implied?

So should I ignore the different endings for now and wait until I get better or can you tell me where I can find more about that?

Anyway thanks for the advice.

>> No.18164387

>>18164222
dostedt

>> No.18164400

>>18164384
You should get good faggot

>> No.18164412

>>18164384
just read more
you're going to get conflicting info on basic grammar points that don't translate directly into english, the only way to truly understand them is to see them a lot or become fluent and look them up in japanese-targeted resources

>> No.18164417

>>18164384
ならない is more theoretical, like you're not allowed to do something because of some law/rule/convention whatever
いけない has more direct consequences for yourself or others and there maybe some necessity to do or not to do something

>> No.18164419

>>18164384
>>18164384
>Ah I get it so なきゃ is short for なければ and the いけない/ならない part is implied?
Yeah.
>>18164384
>So should I ignore the different endings for now and wait until I get better or can you tell me where I can find more about that?
Most grammar guides cover neg. conditional + だめ/いけない/ならない since it's pretty common, but this is just one particular use of the conditional form. You can use other negative words like 困る or more specific ones like 売り切れる as well, and, the conditional by itself can also imply them. As a beginner, I think all you need to know for now is that なきゃ with nothing afterwards implies a negative consequence, and thus, a need (with varying degrees of importance) to do something.

>> No.18164460

Why even learn Japanese if it's only spoken in Japan desu. Dumb

>> No.18164482

>>18164460
Everywhere the internet reaches becomes the spiritual property of the Japanese Empire.

>> No.18164484

>>18164460
When the Asian Century comes and Japan starts to colonise western countries that'll change for sure.

>> No.18164491

>>18164460
I feel like such a dumb fag for learning my native language now.

>> No.18164502

>>18164491
What? Are you a toddler?

>> No.18164508

>>18164491
>this retard can't even speak his native language
What, did your mom drop you when you were a baby?

>> No.18164521

>>18164460
I'm learning it because I'm a "collector" of languages. I have English, Spanish, German and French down already. Why do I waste so much time? Because I find it fun.

>> No.18164528

>>18164521
>"collector" of languages
>only 4 languages
What does it feel like knowing that Pajeets and people born in Switzerland grow up learning 4+ languages without collecting them?

>> No.18164530

>>18164491
I to am learning my native language. I'm a full blown Americanized Japanese. Makes me feel like a retard for not bothering til now.
>>18164508
>>18164502
In my case once my family left Japan to Europe they've spoken pretty much 0 Japanese.

>> No.18164534

>>18164521
I bet you think you're so special for learning Spanish, German and French, literally the 3 easiest languages for an English speaker.

>> No.18164540

>>18164534
I'll give you French and Spanish, but nani the fuck are you talking about, German is way more difficult. Replace German with Italian and I'll agree.

>> No.18164547

>>18164530
You're not Japanese, retard. You're American. Your race doesn't fucking matter here. Your native language is American English. Stop being stupid.

>> No.18164550

>>18164534
You're right. They are the easier ones. I just choose em because they interest me.

>> No.18164553

Okay, enough wanking about your language prowess and back to Japanese, thanks.

>> No.18164554

>>18164547
Then let me reword it. I want to learn the language my parents speak. If the thought of learning Japanese is so stupid what the fuck are you doing here?

>> No.18164557

>>18164553
Get off the internet mom, I'm hungry

>> No.18164559

>>18164557
haha your mom is a weeb

>> No.18164560 [DELETED] 

The things people do for (You)s never cease to amaze me.

>> No.18164562

So when do you all do your reps? I usually do them around the time I wake up but switched to doing em around noon. Been retaining them a lot better since then.

>> No.18164564

>>18164553
do it in japanese

>> No.18164574

>>18164562
I do them right after masturbating. Before you respond with a smug anime face calling me a troll, I'm serious.
I read somewhere that your cognitive capacity is increased by ~20% the hour after orgasm (be it through masturbating or sex), so that's why I do it this way.

>> No.18164576

>>18164564
はいはい、語学力の自己満足はそこまで、日本語の話に戻ろう

>> No.18164582

>>18164562
when I'm on the shitter

>> No.18164599

>>18164574
いわゆる賢者タイムってやつだろうな

>> No.18164606

>>18164599
Yeah me too man, my favourite anime is One Piece.
I understood this message because I do my ankis after jacking off.

>> No.18164661

>>18164574
I usually only feel depressed afterwards.

>> No.18164691
File: 285 KB, 917x719, 1497798737120.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18164691

Go to sleep or get 20 new cards in?

>> No.18164726

>>18164691
Get 10 in and add another 10 only if you feel like it

>> No.18164737

>>18164726
The words of a wise man. Guess I'll end up doing the whole thing, we'll see
Tomorrow I'm studying my reviews first thing in the morning to avoid this situation

>> No.18164749

I got about 1k into core before I started mining, and now I only really add cards from my mining deck while continuing to just do my regular reps from core. Should I just add the cards I've already learned from core to my mining deck to have it all in one place?

>> No.18164767

>>18164749
What does it matter?

>> No.18164769

At what point did you feel progress start slowing?

>> No.18164781
File: 147 KB, 1792x410, 1456457457484.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18164781

Been looking at various sources on how long would it reasonably take to learn Japanese. Around here I've mostly heard around 5-6 years. On /r/LearnJapanese they say you need 9 years minimal to have a perfect understanding or 7 years to be fluent.

Are people here low balling or is /r/LearnJapanese high balling?

>> No.18164782

>>18164769
At the very beginning

>> No.18164783

>>18164781
/r/LearnJapanese assumes you're going to be using study methods that don't work at all for at least two years, probably longer.

>> No.18164787

>>18164769
As soon as I started reading/trying to read, even when I was like 1 week into core2k I was already able to recognize more or less words depending on the media

>> No.18164798
File: 22 KB, 229x173, djt.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18164798

>> No.18164801

>>18164783
>assumes you're going to be using study methods that don't work at all
What sort of study methods are they assuming people are doing? Isn't it more or less
>Learn Kana
>Do Core2k reps
>Mine
>Practice reading easy shit.
>Listen to shit

>> No.18164803

>>18164801
College textbooks without any substantial input.

>> No.18164811

>>18164781
>puns
lmao, fucking redditors. They aren't even that hard.

>> No.18164812

>>18164801
Rosetta Stone is very popular for some reason.

>> No.18164818

>>18164798
Shut the fuck up anime lady.
I will become fluent in Japanese, move to Detroit and teach black kids to become fluent too just to spite you.

>> No.18164819

>>18164781
>N3 is 2k
Is this true?

>> No.18164823

>>18164781
Nine years?! Are they thinking people who are serious about studying need NINE fucking years? Isn't that place supposed to be known for it's N1 members and experts on the language? Why are they spewing such a long ass time?

>> No.18164834

>>18164781
Reddit is a complete piece of shit website where reputation is more important than factuality, I hope you don't actually take everything these sheep say at face value
Anyways these numbers don't make any sense, you'll achieve fluency whenever you're good enough period. And it heavily depends on your motivation and available time.

>> No.18164869

>>18164834
>where reputation is more important than factuality
As opposed to this thread where neither is important.

>> No.18164871

>>18164834
On the other hand, 4chan is a place where everyone wants to tell you that they were reading in two months, fluency in one year and were basically native by two and a half.

Pick your poison.

>> No.18164885

>>18164871
Who does this?

>> No.18164891
File: 154 KB, 540x936, 1427237810161.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18164891

>>18164871
I'll have you know I've read the last volume of my SoL manga and only looked up a word once, so I'm bascially fluent

>> No.18164895

>>18164871
>reading in two months

>> No.18164899

>>18164891
>tfw I am essentially and basically fluent but I will never be bascially fluent
TELL ME YOUR SECRET, SENPAI

>> No.18164926

>>18164885
I do it. Along with posting misinformation and incorrect answers to questions. Sometimes I start arguments with myself.

>> No.18164930

>>18164926
This is false. I'm responsible for all arguments that happen in DJT, so you cannot possibly start arguments with yourself here.

>> No.18164939

>>18164930
Actually, it is I, the great master bamboozler, who comes up with all the ruses here on DJT.

>> No.18164944

>>18164869
Still less obnoxious than basing your opinion off what's popular
Anonimity encourages lurkers to look things up and think for themselves (that's why the new guide needs to fuck off), and to convincingly win an argument you need to resort to logical thinking. Or do the complete opposite, depending on how much you care.

>>18164871
Said no one ever

>> No.18164954
File: 10 KB, 225x225, 2021163606.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18164954

>>18164944
>(that's why the new guide needs to fuck off)
sakubi defense force in 3...2...

>> No.18164957
File: 30 KB, 671x765, 1514540052579.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18164957

>>18164944
>Anonymity encourages lurkers to look things up and think for themselves
It does the opposite. Anonymity encourages people to join hiveminds because they empathize with anything that sounds right to them, because they don't know who's saying it. Communities like koohii and /r/learnjapanese have terrible opinions because they're full of normies, not because they have accounts. Just look at how terrible the DJT on the other board is.

>> No.18164963

>>18164954
i know you're having fun but this "sakubi is everything new that i disagree with" meme is pure cancer and you should feel terrible for acting like you believe it

>> No.18164964 [DELETED] 

>>18164957
>Just look at how terrible the DJT on the other board is.
except it's better

>> No.18164970

>>18164964
Yes, I too like it when beginners have long arguments about the merits of sentence decks and get other people to believe their made-up bullshit.

>> No.18164997

>>18164970
it's not like there was anything truly worthwhile in this entire thread so far

face it, language learning threads invariably suck

>> No.18165001

>>18164944
It is downright impossible for people who are beginning in learning a language to look things up on their own and think for themselves and come to the correct conclusions. You're just mad because the new guide says something you don't like, probably about kanji study or stupid flashcard formats.

At least be honest, jerkass. Be glad you're anonymous, because if you weren't, you'd have a history to look through to find the stupid shit you believe.

>> No.18165037
File: 242 KB, 2458x1279, cclm.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18165037

>>18164997
any learning thread sucks, for that matter, since 90% of the time it's the unconscious incompetent that don't know better talking.

>> No.18165047

Anybody know where I can find a not english patched Tsukihime? Checked nyaa and google.

I can only find ccd files that seem to be corrupt when I mount them or pre-patched archives.

>> No.18165069

>>18165047
I do.

>> No.18165085

>>18164769
When I started losing interest in what I was reading. I stopped having the will to look up grammar, and started reading sentences purely by context. Not great, man.
It sucks, because the only thing I'm super interested in is untranslated JRPGs, but manually looking up vocab is slow and painful.

>> No.18165103

>>18164769
when I don't encounter new words frequently enough to actually bother looking them up

I don't think my english has improved since middle school either 2bh

>> No.18165143
File: 67 KB, 750x1334, qVIU7sG.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18165143

How valuable is Japanese as a skill, I want to learn regardless but I want to know how hard I should go into it? Also is a college certificate worth it?

>> No.18165151

>>18165143
bragging rights
entire country to do business with
entire countrys worth of media to consume

basically the same reason you learn any language

>> No.18165154

>>18165143
If you're asking this you shouldn't bother.

>> No.18165159

>>18165143
fluent speakers are valuable

if you only read just treat it as a hobby

>> No.18165177

>>18165143
It's completely useless. Learn Mandarin instead.

>> No.18165181

>>18165143
Most people here learning it on this thread probably won't be learning it in 2 years time, that should tell you how "valuable" it is. We see ourselves in Tokyo, negotiating million dollar deals for breakfast while speaking fluent Japanese with JAV gf, but we won't.. and we're slowly learning that fact. And we're very, very pissed off.

>> No.18165204

>>18165181
>JAV gf
Do you seriously want to have a literal whore as your girlfriend? I knew you guys were degenerates, but this is a bit too much.

>> No.18165206

>>18165204
the person you're responding to is, in fact, trolling

>> No.18165211

>>18164834
They do give good advice there though. You shouldn't rely solely on online strangers regardless.
>>18165181
Are people really expecting that? Because that's retarded.

>> No.18165212

>>18165206
What if I told you that I'm trolling too?

>> No.18165216

I get it. Japanese is a hard language. It will take your sanity. It will destroy your soul. You've given up.
But please, keep this negativity to yourself. No one wants to hear you vent about how much of a loser you are.

>> No.18165225 [DELETED] 

We should really make a r/DJT subreddit, this general is way better than learnjapanese

>> No.18165229

>>18164781
How long should it really take with daily studying then? 9 years sounds about right to me.

>> No.18165235

>>18165229
If you need a whole decade to get fluent in a foreign language you're actually mentally impaired.

>> No.18165240

>>18165229
If you aren't capable of reading through the original Genji Monogatari in three months you should just kill yourself because you are a failure and will never be capable of anything.

>> No.18165280

>>18165211
I posted there for a while as if it was DJT, using DJT talking points (with a little more civility) and I got upvoted to the top pretty frequently. I felt like the community had good instincts, even if there were times where they were completely clueless.

The problem is when someone with name recognition posts and gets sent to the top automatically with horseshit or fucking responds to you with a completely unnecessary "elaboration" adding nothing of substance whatsoever, like an obnoxious leech.

It's impossible to call them out on anything; their biased idiot fan club will immediately drop you below 0, and then unbiased (yet clueless) onlookers will either just ignore your post upon seeing the negative score or downvote you further. The system is fucked up.

Also I'm pretty sure a lot of them were bullied out of early DJT, since several of them definitely know and fucking hate this place.

>> No.18165284

>>18165280
p*nnw*sedom is the worst

>> No.18165285

>>18165229
No one in this thread is that good, and 9/10 people bragging about their sugoi Japanese here probably still use Rikai and texthookers.

>> No.18165296

>>18165285
And you're the one guy who is actually chou sugoi~~ at japanese, right? Fuck off.

>> No.18165305

I was thinking of programming a online group telephone game: you'd get six people into a game, and then there would be six rounds where each person takes turn translating Japanese into English and vice versa. At the end you get back what you originally wrote, run through six amateur translators and see how badly they've butchered it.

Would anyone here be interested in playing if I ever got it off the ground?

>> No.18165312

>>18165305
I think you can already do that with google translate

>> No.18165314

>>18165305
I am 100% that's never gonna work. There are not enough people interested in learning Japanese, and even less people who are actually remotely good at it.

>> No.18165318

>>18164781
What the fuck is "perfect understanding"? Have these people ever spoken a language before?

>> No.18165319

>>18165314
The fun of telephone isn't getting back what you started with, it's watching how badly people butchered it along the way.

>> No.18165321

>>18165280
>bullied off an anonymous board where no one knows who you are
How fucking stupid are these people?

>> No.18165325

So who else is currently talking to j-babes on LINE? Why even post here?

>> No.18165327

>>18165296
I am very sorry. I did not intend to cause offense.

>> No.18165333

>>18165319
Well, go for it then. Such a game seems pretty easy to program. I don't know if there would be many people interested in playing it, though.

>> No.18165357

>>18165318
What they mean is someone who is able to read, understand and speak Japanese with 99% accuracy.
>>18165280
>The problem is when someone with name recognition posts
That's exactly why I stopped going there. A lot of those well known "experts" aren't experts at all. Some even post N4 level questions and take weeks to read a single manga volume. Plus they tend to give a lot of wrong information. One mentioned here before was "Women have to use Atashi and men have to use Boku or Ore in all situations.". Hell one even said you have to use Watakushi in all formal situations.
>>18165235
Depends on how you study anon. If you're really fucking lazy about it a decade seems about right.

>> No.18165369
File: 170 KB, 540x720, 1496506255682.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18165369

What sub groups other than RH provide jap subs alongside english subs?
I kind of don't want to use subs2srs.

>> No.18165371

Do you have to use the same account in order for J-CAT to give you different questions?

I've taken it 3 times with 3 different accounts and I'm pretty sure it's given me the same questions all 3 times.

>> No.18165377

>>18165371
No it gives you the same questions. I've taken it 3 times on the same account.

>> No.18165384

>>18165377
So there's no point in retaking it

>> No.18165385

>>18165377
What the fuck? Why do people like this thing?

>> No.18165424

>>18165384
I'd say taking it once every year or so is fine since the test will adapt as you get better. If you take it every 6 months like it says you can, you'll just get the same questions.

>>18165385
It's fun seeing a physical representation of your improvement.

>> No.18165428

>>18165371
It gives you different questions but the pool of questions is small.

>> No.18165470

Does anybody here play retro JRPGs at all? I want to try, but a lot of the time, the kanji in them are just completely unrecognizable blobs to me. This is especially bad with SFC titles, but even PSX era games have some words that are really hard to make out. I usually look up and learn stroke order when I encounter new kanji, but it hasn't really helped me with them considering they're basically just blobs of pixels at this point.
Is this something that I'll eventually just be able to manage once I know words better, or am I going to have to really strain and push myself to figure out what these words are?

>> No.18165473

>>18165470
Just play modern JRPGs, man.

>> No.18165481

>>18165470
>Is this something that I'll eventually just be able to manage once I know words better

This, but it takes a long time.

>>18165473

>> No.18165499

>>18165470
go import dq11 for PS4. Old school gameplay, HD text.

>> No.18165510

>>18165473
Most of the modern JRPGs that I want to play, I've already played. For example, stuff like Metal Max, some SaGa titles, some weirder niche stuff like Idea no Hi, and then on top of that Super Robot Wars which is gonna be hell no matter how you look at it with all the sci-fi and military vocab it introduces in addition to boatloads of unusual kanji for attack name style points. I guess it'd be fun to play a DQ title without having to deal with the stupid shitty accents they add.

But honestly, as long as I can rely on an "aha" moment coming through for me a few years down the line, that's alright, I guess. If nothing else, I'm only like 6 months into my studies, so I can still chalk stuff like this up to being a beginner.

>>18165499
I actually saw on the PSN store it was on sale the other day, I might have to try picking it up.

>> No.18165527
File: 6 KB, 256x192, 03.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18165527

>>18165499
lmao. DQ. Scripts are garbage though. May as well play original Phantasy Star

>> No.18165530

Do Gaijin names have to follow a certain pitch accent pattern, or can I say mine with whichever downstep I want?

>> No.18165542

>>18165527
-shrug- there's also persona, an a ton of Trails series games to try then, among others. Also he could replay classics in HD like FFX, FFXII or the HD releases of FFVII and others. Just throwing ideas out there.

>> No.18165577

>>18165530
>HURR DO KATANAKANA WORDS HAVE PITCH ACCENT???

>> No.18165601

>>18165577
My name isn't a defined katakana loanword like テーブル though, so it would make sense that names might follow an abnormal pattern or no specific pattern at all

>> No.18165608

>>18165601
Heiban is a thing.

>> No.18165615

>>18165608
So what you could've said is just "All gaijin names are heiban" and answered my question without being a douchebag?

>> No.18165622

>>18165615
Yeah, but it wouldn't have been funny at all.

>> No.18165630

>>18165622
I fail to see how whinging about someone asking a non-obvious question is funny either

>> No.18165633

>>18165577
>>18165608
Are you intending to imply all loanwords are heiban or are you just being an ambiguous dick?

>> No.18165639

>>18165633
Heiban is the default pitch accent. Therefore, words that don't have a established pitch accent like foreign names should follow the heiban (flat) pattern.

>> No.18165755

For those who read through tae kim grammar guide, how long did it take you?

>> No.18165769

>>18165755
2 weeksish of poking at it

>> No.18165770

>>18165755
I only used it as reference

>> No.18165776

>>18165755
It took me so long that I eventually stopped studying entirely because I was going through it too slowly, tried to memorize each section, and got burnt out by a lack of progress.
By the time I got back into my studies,
Sakubi had been created, so I just read that instead.

>> No.18165804

>>18165776
I wouldn't use Sakubi, it only gets pushed by shills around here. It's unambiguously absolute garbage, he even had to make a second guide for the OP in order to push his shit here.

>> No.18165809

anyone else write kanji by hand when they encounter it for the first time on Anki?

>> No.18165825

http://ttbj1.cegloc.tsukuba.ac.jp/apply/agree/

Same-day registration listening/grammar test if anyone wants to try. Not sure how it compares to J-CAT.

For the full option, select the bottom option when it asks you which test to take.

>> No.18165829

>>18165809
yes, it's good. leave the thread before the rabid autist attacks you

>> No.18165834

>>18165809
I do it until I start to get a feel for it, and I do it for cards that I fail.

>> No.18165840

>>18165809
Depends on the Kanji. If it's one that I know won't pop up too much I don't really bother.

>> No.18165861

>>18165809
Just started and I do this. I tend to write them if I have any trouble at all with remembering it

>> No.18165871

>tfw updated shit firefox
>rikaichan is dead
I found an alternative but the function I miss the most is the J>J dictionary. God forbid I have to open a new tab to look shit up now.

>> No.18165882

>>18165825
Any idea how long it takes?

>> No.18165886

Does using custom study in Anki mess up the spaced repetition thing? Or should I be fine to do that

>> No.18165889

>>18165809
Given the amount of obscure vocab I usually find by reading chuuni LN, that's an unreasonable thing for me to do.

>> No.18165907

>>18165882
The main feature of this test is the (very) short time limit for each individual question

Listening section: 90 questions (30 x 3 sections), 4 seconds per question*
Grammar section: 90 questions (30 x 3), 10 minutes per section
Kanji/Listening section: 50 questions (50 x 1), 4 seconds per question*

*starting from when the speaker stops speaking

~40 minutes if you let the clock run out on every question. So realistically, ~30 mins maybe.

>> No.18165915

What are some good games to study my japanese in. Trying to play Final Fantasy 7 but I'm pretty sure its aimed at teens. Reading manga is for fags.

>> No.18165921

>>18165915
dq

>> No.18165927

Anyone know why Yomichan audio on Chrome sometimes doesn't work? Works in my work computer but at home it's some weird sound for all words.

>> No.18165939

>>18165915
Dragon Quest IX has furigana and it's simple as fuck Japanese since it's aimed at kids. If you can read NHK Easy you'll be more then fine.

>> No.18165945

>>18164834
this. I started in 2016 but slacked hardcore after 6 months of learning and spent 2017 just hitting good on my anki every day just so I wouldn't pile up. I'm doing neet tier time on this language right now and I'm already doing better then that retarded list is saying.

It largely depends on YOUR TIME/MOTIVATION and how much effort your actualling putting in. 1 year is enough to get solid grasp of the language at the very least with atleast 4 hours a day to spare.

>> No.18165964

>>18164781
>>18164834
>>18165945
reddit learners stick to textbooks and never read real japanese aside from carefully picked readers (if you can call them that). they just seem to float from beginnner book to beginner book or spend all their time in kanjiland.

say what you will about steve, but this video si 100% right

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G5IPArDxO40&feature=youtu.be

i started reading (yotsuba, nhk easy) after doing half of tae kim and i've had no issues. you just need to not be afraid to not know stuff.

>> No.18165968

>>18165915
I've played about 70 games in japanese but I can't really point to a single one that helped more than others. They're just practice, like most everything else.

Be careful not to get stuck playing the same couple games for 100s of hours, at that point it's just brainless muscle memory and you're not learning jack shit.

>> No.18165975

>>18165968
Then it'd be better to play a game you're unfamiliar with?

>> No.18165976

>>18165964
Pretty much. You just need to dive and expect to fuck up over and over until it eventually just sticks.

Which is why I always tell people learning radicals is a fucking waste of time since its not guaranteed to work every time.

>> No.18165992

Do compound verbs have to follow a specific order, or can they be stacked in any combination?
I.E.: 止めて走っている=走って止めろ?

>> No.18165993

>>18165976
What do you mean not guaranteed to work every time? The point of radical study is to familiarize yourself with the components that Kanji are made up of firstly, and secondly to begin to pay attention to strokes, stroke order, etc., instead of just seeing them as a mess of lines that your EOP brain can't decipher as mroe than a picture or image of scribbles.

>> No.18166002

>>18165992
What? That doesn't even make sense

>> No.18166005

>>18165975
I'm not going to tell you how to enjoy your vidya, just use moderation and common sense.

Also don't call it "studying" anywhere but here; you'll be laughed at, probably for good reason.

>> No.18166013

>>18165993
Languages aren't math you can't find a logical answer with logical thinking. You just NEED to remember it period. When your speaking in english you don't put together the words your speaking because you did the steps properly in your head you just KNOW it. Stroke orders are fuck all useless especially if your reading kanji in Times New Roman font on the web like most of us since your gonna already see a mess of lines already (if you can even see the line of course)

>> No.18166014

>>18165889
Could you recommend your favorite, most engaging chuuni LN? I'm really starting to like reading LNs and don't have anything of that sort on my list

>> No.18166037

>>18165804
If you actually believe this you might need to be hospitalized.

>> No.18166038

>>18166002
How would I say stop running then, just 走るな? And that still leaves the meat of the question there.

>> No.18166049

>>18166038
走るのを止めろ

>> No.18166053

>>18166014
As a side note, I have no idea why someone hasn't re-made the LN general.

>> No.18166067

>>18166038
You can mix and match compound verbs, but the main part goes at the end.

For example, let's say you need to mix a salad before eating it.
「このサラダは混ぜて食べる」 (まぜてたべる)」
ー>Mix this salad before eating it.

vs.

このサラダは食べて混ぜる
= You mix this salad by eating it.


As for your sentence, if you say '走って止めろ!’ then you're saying something like 'run stop!' which makes no sense. '止めろ!’ or ’走るな’ (走らないで、止めてください etc) are all valid ways of telling someone to stop running.

If you want to chain verbs together, try and think of things that are actually done together.

>> No.18166072

>>18165993
I'm sorta just getting a feel for radicals/stroke order through practice as I learn vocab. Is that radical study or is it more involved?

>> No.18166074

>>18166072
Radical study is spending all of TWO WHOLE WEEKS doing a radical deck

>> No.18166080

>moved to Japan
>got a job
>am fairly good at speaking, reading, and writing through a computer/phone, but have completely forgotten how to handwrite kanji like I learned in school
>probably somewhere around N2 level but have no idea how to progress from here
help

>> No.18166081

>>18165992
I think you're looking for 走り止めろ not 走ってやめろ

>> No.18166084

>>18166080
first tell me who you're quoting

>> No.18166089

>>18166084
sorry, it's my own story.

>> No.18166091

>>18166080
Start by committing sudoku

>> No.18166092

>>18166037
You're either him or someone he's paying to shill for him.

>> No.18166093

>>18165804
I know you just got another response after like an hour of nothing, but I just got back from work and I don't really care if this looks like a samefag.

There's no evidence or justification for any of the /int/djt sakubi memes. You can maybe argue that the writing style is bad because it's subjective, but everything else is complete bullshit. If you believe conspiratorial memes that have no evidence or justification, you're probably seriously sick in the head. Take mood stabilizers, lithium, or multivitamins, stop taking stimulants (especially nicotine and amphetamines) and stop consuming alcohol, and get your psychological profile evaluated. This might seem like a passive awareness or some great evil to you, but it's a serious pathology. Seek medical attention.

There are a lot of serious mental problems, but this particular fixation that you have is unambiguously absolute illness, you even had to involve unrelated people in your sickness in order to push it here.

This is no different from the sakurautist or "DOJG deck maintainer" boogeymanning and I'm telling you now the same way I told them back then. It's extremely unhealthy and you're only hurting yourself. People that already know a lot about what you're talking about don't believe you. You don't want to be that guy.

>>18166074
One week max if you're not using a terrible deck with way too much info on it. 30 new cards a day is nothing when each card takes maybe ten seconds max.

>> No.18166095
File: 231 KB, 542x537, 1504616974085.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18166095

>>18166092
>he's paying to shill for him

>> No.18166099

>>18166093
>One week max if you're not using a terrible deck with way too much info on it.

it makes for a good intro to kanji study though considering a good number of them are also kanji by themselves.

>> No.18166120

>>18165871
What alternative are you using?

>> No.18166165

>>18166093
This is what I mean. No one who isn't a shill tries this hard to prove that all this Sakubi love developed organically through a grassroots movement of people looking for something to replace old terrible Tae Kim. Nobody asked for what Sakubi is pushing, and we're all sick of hearing about it. I hope the next OP also stops putting this stupid second guide up there, nobody wants that either.

>> No.18166185

>>18166165
he didn't say anything about any of that, just you being sick

>> No.18166197

>>18166013
>your

>> No.18166212

>>18166185
I was just telling him why this isn't paranoia, just like the Sakura autist was disruptive and easily identifiable. This guy speaks the same way government officials speak to the population when they take to the street. On the one hand, any criticism is unjustified, and all people saying that it's shit is either raiding anons from /int/ or mentally unstable people. Who's the real paranoid person in this scenario? I feel that shill is.

>> No.18166217

>>18166212
the sakura autist wasn't identifiable at all anon

>> No.18166226
File: 70 KB, 305x357, 1515094400798.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18166226

>>18166013
Jesus christ I advocate against learning radicals because you'll be learning them naturally while going through vocab/kanji anyways but you're a fucking retard, holy shit.

All languages have a certain "logic" to them. It's not just random, mindless memorization, and the sooner you tell your brain to stop being retarded and wake the fuck up the sooner you'll begin learning at a much faster rate.

I always wondered why the fuck 落ち着いて was labeled as N2 vocab, and your post might just be my answer. God.

>> No.18166237

>>18166212
there are at least three people we called sakura autist
>>18166226
good post

>> No.18166238

Imagine spending more time arguing over which is the best way to learn a language instead of actually learning it

>> No.18166244

>Don't argue about learning methods if you're a beginner.
>Don't feed drama queens.

>> No.18166252

>>18166226
The logic isn't nearly as complicated as radicucks make it out to be. The only """"logic"""" you could use in languages is probably past and future tense or things like that.

>> No.18166262

>>18166252
radicals aren't complicated
now, autosegmental metrical theory? that's complicated. and real.

>> No.18166271

>>18166237
>there are at least three people we called sakura autist
How the fuck would you know, unless you're a mod and can see IP adresses? Fuck off, even if it was people imitating Sakura, they were being disruptive exactly like him so it's more the behavior that we called Sakura. If you don't understand that, maybe you need reddit, where people are all linked to accounts.

>> No.18166282

>>18166271
baiting them onto webpages of my own design with image access logs

>> No.18166284

>>18166271
Two different people admitted to trolling by pretending to be the guy that posted the really ugly gray-background Sakura OP image.

>> No.18166287

>>18166226
I'd agree he's wrong that languages have no logic, but some shit in every language is just "memorize this" to some degree

>> No.18166289

>>18166287
x memorize this
o learn this

>> No.18166293

>>18166289
Same thing up to a relabeling. it comes down to "you can't logic your way to the solution here. learn the info and move on" for a few things.

>> No.18166303

>>18166293
Having to be learned from scratch doesn't mean it's illogical. It just means that it's an axiom. Nothing is truly arbitrary, and any perceived complexity is a result of attempting to structuralize things that have no taxonomy.

>> No.18166320

>>18166287
There's exceptions to otherwise logical rules and certain finnicky details that require some degree of learning in every language, yes. But you're foolish if you don't approach your time of learning and/or reading the same way you'd approach a puzzle.

You can pretty easily infer meanings, compounds and even readings of quite a few words through logic alone, if you have the base knowledge necessary to do so. If you're not further learning through exposure (be it reading or anything else) and instead you're just reviewing and looking things up constantly for anything other than confirmation, then you're doing it wrong.

>> No.18166325

>>18166320
You don't even have to approach it like a puzzle. Enough exposure will give you the solution just like that.

>> No.18166337

>>18166320
I totally agree. not saying that you can't ever puzzle things out, just that sometimes you can't.

>> No.18166345

>>18166226
天井 is listed as N1 vocabulary. These occurrences only suggest those lists being mostly BS

>> No.18166354

>>18166320
>You can pretty easily infer meanings, compounds and even readings of quite a few words through logic alone
Yeah, you CAN do this, and sometimes you're even right, but very often when you try to "logic out" the meaning of a phrase based on parts you end up dead wrong thanks to some splendid fuckery of the the Japanese language. Even basic shit like 無念 will fuck you over.

If nothing else you should learn all the radicals so you can actually name the parts instead of saying "that one thing," since often the radicals themselves are kanji that aren't often used in their own right.

>> No.18166393
File: 41 KB, 998x815, 1514828426958.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18166393

>>18165825
>>18165907
Took about 40 minutes, including loading times and such.
Is this decent?
By the way, I don't know if it's just me, but the first option only shows up after I click one of the options.

>> No.18166406

>>18166345
Yeah they don't even put out official vocabulary lists anymore. Anything remotely up to date is pure guesswork. Have some garbage "N1" words according to whatever tags tagaini jisho and jisho.org use:

借り (かり): borrowing, debt, loan.

向き (むき): direction, orientation, aspect, situation, exposure, suitability, tendency.

反する, 叛する (はんする): (1) to be contrary to, to be inconsistent with, to contradict. (2) to act contrary to (rules or guidelines), to violate, to transgress. (3) to oppose, to rebel, to revolt.

大部 (たいぶ, だいぶ): (1) lengthy (of a book, etc.), voluminous. (2) most (e.g. most part), greater, fairly, a good deal, much.

群 (ぐん): (1) group, bunch, crowd, throng, swarm, band. (2) group.

叫び (さけび): shout, scream, outcry.

任す (まかす): to entrust, to leave to a person.

助け (たすけ): assistance, help, aid, support, reinforcement.

病む (やむ): to fall ill, to be ill.

最早 (もはや): (1) already, now. (2) no longer, not any more.

The noun versions of verbs are basically cheating but the total stuff you can find that's super ultra common is pathetic and shows how bad every level below N1 is.

>> No.18166410

>>18166393
Given that the kanji woman was speaking at about the level of the 2nd listening section, I would've expected a similar score in both

nice job though

>> No.18166414
File: 38 KB, 566x209, 1490893128119.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18166414

Putting new cards at the end fucked my retention.

>> No.18166423

>>18164818
Good luck.

>> No.18166425

>>18166414
doing that does that

>> No.18166428

>>18164818
my public middle school teaches japanese and it takes a year to learn hiragana

>> No.18166429

>>18166428
woah i didn't know you were 12

>> No.18166433

>>18166429
I realized after I typed it that it sounded like that

though they probably replaced it with mandarin by now

>> No.18166435

>>18166429
Everybody on the internet is a loli

>> No.18166442

>>18166410
Yeah, I made a few really dumb mistakes. Not too sure how to interpret my score, though. This test seems way, way easier than J-CAT.

>> No.18166537

>>18166238
This thread is here to discuss the process or ask questions, not as an aid to learning. Simmer down.

>> No.18166543

>>18166244
Apparently discussing learning methods as advanced learners gets reported anyway, so I don't know what we're even allowed to do here anymore.

>> No.18166551

>>18166543
maybe try not reiterating the exact discussions that have been going on for the past multiple years and can be accessed via archives

>> No.18166555

>>18164781
This chart is total bullshit except for hours and word numbers are somehow corresponding for me.

>> No.18166557

>>18166442
The only thing I like more about it is how speakers 2 and 3 sound closer to actual people and not NHK newscasters in an insulated sound booth, which is why I can't take N1 seriously.

though 3 had some grammar I've never heard anyone say aloud, which sounded a little artificial

>> No.18166575

>>18166551
Dude people didn't stop being born when you were born. New people who haven't been here for 10 years don't know everything that's been discussed on this website. Are they supposed to go in the archives and read every edition of DJT before posting? Fucking idiot.

>> No.18166581

>>18166575
advanced learners aren't new people

>> No.18166587

>>18164781
>400 J-CAT
>6500 Kanji
does J-CAT actually contain 1級 kanji or is the author just imagining shit

>> No.18166590
File: 102 KB, 1280x720, 1477056459557.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18166590

>>18164781
>6k words
>functional
>appropriate book : 青い鳥文庫
Haaa.. These people have no fucking clue. 10k words is the bare minimum required to be "functional".

>> No.18166603

>>18166590
I wanna fuck a girl's number.

>>18166587
J-CAT is an adaptive test.

>> No.18166609

Reading shit in Japanese for long periods really fucks with my head. My brain feels overloaded

>> No.18166614

>>18166609
Same. But that's how it was reading as a little kid, too.

>> No.18166615

>>18166590
You can't even get through children's books without knowing at least 20k words.

>> No.18166619

>>18166609
Good. It means your brain is slowly getting used to information in japanese format.

>> No.18166624

>>18166619
I feel like I'm making progress but it's so slow. I'm at least better than I was a month ago.

>> No.18166638

>>18164547
Only whites are American. It's just a place to shop or parasitize for everyone else there.

>> No.18166677

>>18166638
Calm down there, /pol/tard.

>> No.18166901

>Core 10k vocab
>Has 20k cards
Not whining but fuck thats misleading.

>> No.18167081

>>18166901
just be like the non-writers and turn off recall

>> No.18167139

>>18167081
non writers recall?

>> No.18167141

>>18167139
not accurately, they're just "recalling" vague shapes and then telling themselves they were correct subconsciously because they recognize the shape.

>> No.18167323
File: 26 KB, 283x314, mmmm.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18167323

Each time I read try to read FSS I notice that nagano uses すィまセン instead of すみません
Is this how hip people said excuse me in the 80s or what

>> No.18167329

>>18166067
膣内で出すぞ!

>> No.18167336

>>18167329
すけべ

>> No.18167552

>>18164957
This might be true to some extent, but I think that this doesn't apply to everyone. At least I like to think so.

>>18165001
I actually agree with with most of the "new" guide but it is way too opiniated, the old guide was much better because the focus was on introducing the different learning methods and being overall useful. Some might argue that it focuses too much on individual kanji study because of the text distribution and they'd be right, but if you're able to look past that it's still pretty good.

>> No.18167596

>>18167323
that particular 仮名遣い seems rare but すいません is not outdated or uncommon

it's not dialect or slang or anything, just a slur

>> No.18167630

Do you mix new cards and reviews? I'm thinking this might be somewhat better to test your retention, because if you do reviews at a separate time the information that you've already studied it might make "fake-memorization" easier

>> No.18167668

>>18167630
yes but because when I tried new cards last my retention was actually worse

>> No.18167685
File: 129 KB, 640x480, 1486263970508.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18167685

Are older VNs harder to read or is it essentially the same?

>> No.18167688

>>18165871
Furigana Inserter was a harder blow since it has no replacement.

>> No.18167760
File: 52 KB, 251x134, Help.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18167760

Is this 好か or 女子か or something else?

>> No.18167768

>>18167760
じょしか!!

だよ

>> No.18167776

>>18167768
Thank you very much.

>> No.18167803

>>18167776
よんだことあるかも

りょうこかな

>> No.18167852

>>18167630
>Do you mix new cards and reviews?
Yes, since the first day I started using anki. I was afraid of the same thing.

>> No.18167853

私の妹はどこですか。。。
寂しい。。。

>> No.18167860

>>18167852
Isn't it moot anyway, since you can tell just by looking at the bottom if the card is new or not?

>> No.18167873

>>18167860
You can also hide this

>> No.18167955

>>18167860
I remember where I've seen a kanji first or a ward first for tons of my cards, of course I'm gonna remember that I added a card today or a few days ago.

>> No.18168005

おなかすいた

カロリーメイトたべたい

>> No.18168082

>>18167853
俺のベッドに
裸で

>> No.18168277

I hear this in anime a lot, this saying that's equivalent to "now's my chance" or "take this," they'll say "いまだ!" before doing their big attack.

is it actually or いまだ or いいまだ? Am I right about the meaning? Or am I mishearing what they're saying entirely?

>> No.18168286

>>18168277
いまだ! just means "now!"

>> No.18168293

>>18168277
stop trusting subs

>> No.18168296

>>18168286
thank you

>>18168293
right, I know they take creative liberties so that it's easier for stupid westerners to understand. thank you too.

>> No.18168308

>>18164209
>http://djtguide.neocities.org/
>https://neodjt.neocities.org/newguide.html
Instead of having two separate links in the op, why not combine them adding a link to /jp/ guide under the main guide?
Change
>you can [not] learn japanese
>guide [start here]
>guide resource list

to
>you can [not] learn japanese
>guide [start here]
>guide [alternative]
>guide resource list

No?

>> No.18168313

>>18168308
How about deleting the """new guide""" altogether?

>> No.18168320

>>18168313
this

>>18168308
stop forcing this shit, nobody was asking for it in the first place

>> No.18168392

I find I'm slow at processing long strings of kanji compounds (usually technical terms pertaining to a specific semantic field) when spoken, even though I'd probably recognize the majority of the words in written form.
I think it's one of those things you just get used to after a while.

>> No.18168603

Nice blog.

>> No.18168666

>>18168603
y-you too

>> No.18168675

Anon, I have a favor to ask.. Do you mind filling out this questionnaire? It consists of 12 questions related to keigo usage in media, and should roughly take 2-3 minutes to complete.

https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSeSrBXeHQrwbuQHgbznsJ3eRpNyQjKeiExjo4eixqbww_ErCA/viewform?usp=sf_link

よろしくお願いします ^^

ps. I'm sorry if some of the questions do not make sense or grammatically bad. I'm still a beginner Japanese learner after all.

>> No.18168718

>>18168675
What's the questionnaire for?

>> No.18168736

Whatever it is for, it doesn't belong here.

>> No.18168772

>>18168675
I'll have my men working on it right away

>> No.18168783

Does anyone know if there are scans of the second edition of the Genki Workbooks?

>> No.18168816

>お縄とは罪人が縄で縛られること。つまり、逮捕されることを意味する。「ついにお縄」、「○○が詐欺でお縄」といったように、お縄だけでも逮捕といった意味になる他、「お縄になる」、「お縄にかかる」、「お縄につく」といった使い方もする。現代では手錠と言った方が現実的だが、言葉としては今もお縄が使われており、定着している

I think I understand the whole thing apart from

>「お縄になる」、「お縄にかかる」、「お縄につく」

Does anyone know what this part means? I don't understand what it's trying to say.

>> No.18168819
File: 6 KB, 200x200, 1462267931780.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18168819

>saiga-jp died
rip in piece

>> No.18168852

Why is the new guide isn't recommending isolated kanji study?
In my experience studying kanji in isolation made it MUCH easier for me to remember words

>> No.18168873

>>18168816
It means 逮捕されることを意味する
Instead of just "rope" it also becomes "the state of being arrested".
So
>お縄になる
To "become" arrested
>お縄にかかる
To be involved in an arrest
>お縄につく
To be arrested (not sure of the nuance on this one)

>> No.18168874

>>18168783
Let me know if you want the answer key too.

https://mega.nz/#!ddUlmALD!i_WmkvfAWm93bsw_YwSKJRjHBgaYIhEkRDJizXvpdWQ

>> No.18168876

>>18168816
Pay attention to what follows those
>といった使い方もする
It's listing expressions used to describe the act of cuffing a thug. Refer back to といった

>> No.18168899

>>18168874
Thanks anon, that's a big help!
I found the answer key relatively fast on Google, but couldn't found the actual workbook. Thanks!

>> No.18168905

>>18168873
>>18168876
I get it now, thanks guys.

>> No.18168906

>>18168852
Because Heisig's method is dumb as shit. I'm all for individual kanji study along with grammar, but studying 2400 kanji meanings (some of which are made up) BEFORE learning a single word is pure social "scientist" wankery and was never proven to work at all.
Anyways the new guide is way too opiniated, it needs to fuck off

>> No.18168909

>>18168873
1. the state of being arrested/captured, as in you're stuck inside a cell for a while
2. what you said
3. the act of getting arrested, as in the police just caught you

>> No.18168961

Do you add names to your deck? Or do you have a second deck consisting of names, places and stuff like that?

>> No.18168976

>>18168906
I think that the point that the new guide is making is right, recommending a good specific method is better than listing countless options to a beginner. But it should really talk about all the different options that there are.
Also I was not advocating for starting with isolated kanji study, for me the sweetspot was starting after being somewhat done with core2k and after I started reading. I'm following KKLC and it's more or less good, I only wish it took frequency into account more, as I'm halfway done and there's still a few common characters I didn't encounter.

>> No.18169029
File: 392 KB, 860x710, Screen Shot 2018-01-06 at 11.02.01 AM.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18169029

>> No.18169038

>>18168976
The alternative guide is for absolute beginners. It feels like it was written in a single sitting which I'm pretty sure is why the OP says to ask for clarification now.

>> No.18169162

>>18168961
I have a few with jinmeiyo to boost my E-peen since they don't appear in ordinary words (like 諏) but I never bother aside from that. Most of the names are easy to read but if even if you don't read it properly nothing changes.

>> No.18169178

Is it bad if I barely remember kanji writings?
I can recognize most words I'm learning but give me 2 characters with one differing stroke or something and I'm incapable of telling which is which

>> No.18169192
File: 103 KB, 1280x720, 1472846904222.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18169192





綿




Learn radicals.

>> No.18169206

>>18164209
Someone mind explaining steps 6 and 7 in the Anki guide for me?

They're very confusing in the way they're worded, and I can't add any images to the cards, nor can set the review limit any higher.

>> No.18169207
File: 78 KB, 280x320, 1494695792480.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18169207

>>18169192
will do

>> No.18169225

>>18169192
That shit's too tiny on my screen anyway so I couldn't read it if I knew radicals

>> No.18169233
File: 23 KB, 260x258, 1512901217478.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18169233

>>18164222
>>18164232
>>18164262
>>18164302

>>18164560
The things they do indeed

>> No.18169242
File: 65 KB, 531x598, 1492877346827.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18169242

>>18169225
ctrl + mouse wheel up

>> No.18169253

休ませていただけますでしょうか
I don't quite understand this example sentence from TK. Why is 休ませていた in the past progressive form and what's だけ even doing here?

>> No.18169265

>>18169253
Come on now
休ませて いただけます でしょうか

>> No.18169278

>>18169265
Oh, so it was a humble form. This sucks

>> No.18169295
File: 126 KB, 1440x2560, Screenshot_20180106-105855.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18169295

>>18169206
Keep clicking around and you'll find deck options, have you made imported a deck yet?

>>18169225
I increase the scaling factor my display. High rez is great but retarded for reading

>> No.18169391

>限定区域飛行指導員制度

Do you think this is Japanese?

>> No.18169411

>>18169391
Yes.

>> No.18169443

>>18169391
that's probably some serious officialese, but yea

>> No.18169555

>>18167630
I'm unsure if you mean not putting them at the end, or not at the beginning either. I do new cards before reviews to get some dedicated focus on what I'm adding for the day. In case anyone hasn't used this setting, after the initial appearance, the repeats during learning phase are mixed with the normal reviews. They are slightly easier since they are fresh in my mind, but obviously the next day will no longer have this effect, so I'm not worried about a negative impact. I wouldn't put them at the end, but I wouldn't worry about day one retention being slightly easier from putting them at the beginning.

>> No.18169686
File: 795 KB, 1028x605, mya.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18169686

>>18169391
Japanese is good.

>> No.18169797

>>18164315
Same here. I fell asleep doing Anki last night.

>> No.18169827

>>18167685
>Koreans translated this thing and ported it to MS-DOS

>> No.18169838

>>18169686
Is this a Chinese Muramasa translation? Or am I never gonna read it?

>> No.18169901
File: 972 KB, 1030x605, nya.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18169901

>>18169838
What do you think?

>> No.18169911

>>18164534
actually the 3 easiest languages for an english speaker are french, dutch and german.
>>18164540
The rules are a bit more complicated because it has some grammar rules english dropped centuries ago, but if you aren't a brainlet and can work through the silly spelling and see through the pronunciation shifts to connect the words together, you'll see that they're practically the same language. It's just that most of english's germanic words became the lesser or crude versions of words that have french synonyms. IE: stool vs chair.

>> No.18169937

>>18169901
I might be remembering this wrong but I swear an anon said that the reason it looks like Chinese in this picture is because it's lots of insults strung together.

>> No.18169960

>>18169937
>the reason it looks like Chinese in this picture is because it's lots of insults strung together.
That's right. >>18169686 written the same way. Just a lot of kanji words together without any kana.

>> No.18170049

明日は暇じゃないです。
明日暇じゃないです。
I know the second one is right, but is the first one grammatically correct?

>> No.18170057
File: 228 KB, 358x408, 1465884542975.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18170057

>>18170049
For fucks sake dude.

>> No.18170079

>>18170049
you should not be producing before even knowing reading, it will reinforce bad habits

>> No.18170109
File: 676 KB, 450x571, 1428521843001.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18170109

>>18170057
I'm sorry, I know I'm bad.
I don't get alle that shit with は and が

>>18170079
I've been reading for years. I guess I just don't see mistakes when I make them. Is it that bad?

>> No.18170129

>>18169960
Thanks anon, that kind of gives me hope maybe I'll be able to read stuff like Muramasa one day.

>> No.18170151

>>18170109
i dont believe youve been reading for years if you dont know は and が my man

>> No.18170153

>>18170109
This is what you get for not giving grammar proper attention.

>> No.18170242

>>18170129
There are quite a bunch of VNs that top muramasa in terms of difficulty. If you aren't against using a dictionary often and a fair amount of historical terms you could get there faster than you think.

>> No.18170246
File: 587 KB, 933x720, 1455034296905.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18170246

>>18170151
>>18170153
Can anyone at least give me a hint why the first one is wrong? Looking at explanations of は right now and still don't see it.

>> No.18170300

>>18170242
I really should read more historical stuff it eould help reading Muramasa a lot, my problem most historical stuff looks good and I don't want to read it until I get better. But I'll probably just have to force myself to read something or I'll never get better.

>> No.18170309

>>18170246
you're getting baited by people who know less japanese than you

>> No.18170329
File: 36 KB, 1664x110, Screen Shot 2018-01-06 at 12.25.57 PM.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18170329

>tfw jut finished a 3 hour study session

>> No.18170345

>>18170109
>I've been reading for years
Are you lying? Surely you'd know a better word for "not free" then

>> No.18170350

>>18170246
It isn't wrong.

>> No.18170380

How far into the core 2k/6k deck should one get before reading becomes somewhat doable?

>> No.18170389

>>18170345
I'm working through genki right now so I'm using their phrases even though they use awkward words and are way too formal.
And before you tell me to change the book, I'm doing it in a class(free and makes it way easier and cheaper for me to study a year in Japan) so I can't.

>>18170350
Thanks friend.

>> No.18170400
File: 30 KB, 431x171, 1455574872856.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18170400

So guys, a little off topic, but I want to learn programming. I want to get really, really good at it. The problem is, I don’t know where to start. But you guys got me to pass the JLPT N1 in a year and a half so there is definitely a lot of sound theory being promoted in DJT. As such I thought I’d ask here since there are probably several solid programmers who can offer good advice.

Because I am a total beginner at programming, I can’t tell what is good advice and what’s shitty reddit advice. Good advice would be like getting a good grasp on kana, basic grammar, and basic vocab via an SRS then jumping into mining with reading and listening. Shitty reddit advice would be like placating yourself with placebo programs like Duolinguo and Rosetta Stone, trying to compose and speak broken sentences from day one and forming terrible habits. I want to be able to find the good advice for learning programming amidst all the snake oil. And if anyone has good ideas how without actually knowing your stuff beforehand, I’d love to hear them.

DJT may not be perfect, but with the guide and resources that have been built here it is absolutely the #1 place to learn Japanese, and maybe the best place to learn a language in general. So basically, I am looking like something but DJT, but for programming (and CS). A guide, resource list, and potentially community based on getting someone to the highest programming skill level possible as efficiently as possible, no bullcrap. Or, in lieu of that, just a list of helpful resources that any highly skilled coders in here have used. If any of you could be of assistance I’d greatly appreciate it.

>> No.18170403

>>18170400
>But you guys got me to pass the JLPT N1 in a year and a half
嘘くさい

>> No.18170414
File: 39 KB, 274x359, 1491848187953.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18170414

>>18170309
More like I don't want to explain how a topic marker works. God forbid somebody ask him the difference between 明日は暇じゃないです and 明日が暇じゃないです

>> No.18170420
File: 889 KB, 320x240, proof.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18170420

>>18170400
>you guys got me to pass the JLPT N1 in a year and a half
[ X ] 怪しい

>> No.18170426

>>18170380
Around halfway through, I found basic stuff like NHK easy level to be less tedious, with a lot less time taken to look shit up. From there progress starts accelerating since you can easily read through all the articles they post every day, which makes for good practice. You just add that as another daily essential thing you do alongside Anki.

>> No.18170436

>>18170400
I'm not a very good programmer, intermediate at best, but I will give you some DJT style advice.

If you want to get better at reading, read more.
If you want to get better at programming, program more.

I will never get better because I only program 1-2 times a year.

>> No.18170439

>>18170400
Find something to program, try to make it. If you can't make it, try to make something else. Repeat until you're a skilled programmer. That's REALLY all you can do. Advice from language learning doesn't apply to programming. Here's some different advice, though:

- Yes, most libraries really are as terrible as you think they are
- No, good programmers don't avoid looking things up
- You get good at programming by figuring out how to do the thing you're trying to do, not by reading lots of code
- Reading about programming helps a lot, unlike reading about languages, but you need to avoid falling for cult-like beliefs even more than you need to avoid them in language learning
- Things that seem like they should be really simple, like "draw this image at this point on a window on the screen", are actually either really complicated or use libraries that hide all the good stuff from you
- Weird special-purpose toolkits like Game Maker are actually really good places to naturally learn a lot of really basic common programming things, like how to store and use data for different purposes, but don't do anything for teaching you data structures or preparing yourself for the hell that is programming with terrible libraries
- Data structures are your friends.

>> No.18170445

>>18170439
>like how to store and use data for different purposes
state, temporarily, in objects and stuff*

>> No.18170463

>>18170400
What's important when learning anything is knowing yourself as best you can. Now that you know what's optimal for you, just find some book/ressource for programming, read through it and use the same techniques that you learned on DJT. Stuff like Anki's SRS can be transposed by reviewing what you read regularly. Stuff like practicing reading can be transposed into practicing programing and testing if your shit compiles, at first with the help of a textbook, then without the textbook. Do what feels right, you seem to know what you're doing anyway if you got to N1 after a year in a half. Be confident.

>> No.18170469

>>18170463
>just find some book/ressource for programming, read through it
Don't do this.

>> No.18170474

>>18170463
>Stuff like Anki's SRS can be transposed by reviewing what you read regularly
Also don't do this. SRSing programming is extremely pointless. The "language" parts of programming give no effort in memorizing what they are, the problem is only in understanding them conceptually, and that's impossible to forget. If you ever need the knowledge you will remember it within a few minutes max, it's not like language where there are 100000 tiny facts you have to recall so a few minutes of recall time on each one is mindbreaking.

>> No.18170489

>>18170469
>>18170474
I meant when going through the basics, just to understand the logical aspects correctly, like do while loops or whatever. But most of learning goes though practice.

>> No.18170498

>>18170489
There is so little and it's so systematic that there's no point. Like you can maybe read a three-page tutorial for a new programming language, but programming *books* are universally garbage, because they fill themselves with abstract borderline philosophical garbage that doesn't have anything to do with how you actually create code that does a particular thing.

>> No.18170543

>>18170049
If anything, the first one is better.

>> No.18170545

>>18170426
>halfway through
>look at my seen cards
>250/6000
fug

>> No.18170561
File: 106 KB, 1170x876, 1463722412811.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18170561

Hey DJT I just finished reading Hanahira, wondering what should read next.
I still remember the initial struggle when I first started reading Hanahira, considering it's supposed to be so piss easy how much will I struggle with a normal VN?

I heard 時計仕掛けのレイライン is easy, should I go with that?
I already prepared some eroge for when I'm done with Hanahira, but I'm not in the mood for those same for manga.

>> No.18170567

>>18170545
Surely he meant halfway through core2k
Are you doing grammar on the side? You can already try testing yourself
The "new guide" explains how to get started reading pretty nicely

>> No.18170570

>>18170561
Read Flyable Heart so you can feel how ridiculous Hanahira is. Leyline is fine too.

>> No.18170608

>>18170561
Just go for something you think is interesting as long as it's not some chuuni game or stuff that's generally known for being hard.
The first VN will always be hard, and the second one probably as well. But that's just because you're not used to reading. Small differences in difficulty won't make it much harder.

>> No.18170616

>>18170567
Nah I meant halfway through 6k. I hate looking up 3-4 words per sentence, and that started happening less around 3k for NHK easy level. Just go look up any article, there are a ton of words not in the first 1k, so it certainly isn't enough to read ''comfortably''.

>> No.18170620

>>18170570
May I ask what you mean by ridiculous?
Is Hanahira such a joke difficulty wise or do you mean the VN is better?

>>18170608
Well I'm kinda interested in Leyline, I just want to avoid doing a mistake by picking something that is either too hard or too easy.

>> No.18170629

>>18170620
>May I ask what you mean by ridiculous?
>Is Hanahira such a joke difficulty wise or do you mean the VN is better?
Hanahira is really bad and not actually that easy in an objective sense. It looks easy because it's really short and consists entirely of voiced dialogue, but aside from that, it's a bog standard (and bad) moe game, writing-wise.

You could also look at http://wiki.wareya.moe/Stats - "VNFreqList 90% target" and "modified Hayashi 2" are good references for first games.

>> No.18170631

>>18170620
>too hard
Not him but don't worry about that, you'll know if it's too hard, which is good and humbling, and it's not like you can't come back to it later.

>> No.18170653

>>18170616
Of course you won't read fluently at 1k, the point is reading makes learning vocab MUCH easier than pure rote

>> No.18170657

>>18170653
Not just easier but you learn each word better because you actually learn how to "read over" it rather than just memorizing a definition and pronunciation.

>> No.18170660
File: 1019 KB, 1536x2048, jlpt4.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18170660

>>18170403
>>18170420

Here is where I first posted the certificate when it arrived: https://archive.whatisthisimnotgoodwithcomputers.com/int/thread/80233178/#80235251 And in the attached pic is one with slightly less censoring so you can see I have the original. Would just go take another pic but I'm out of the house right now.

>>18170436
>>18170439
>>18170463

To the rest of you, thanks for the advice. I'll keep in mind that hands-on application of knowledge is appreciably more important in programming than in language learning and try some of my own projects. I may try out a few CS textbooks though.

>> No.18170673

>>18170567
I took a couple of semesters of japanese in college before I continued afterward. The way they taught was really weird where they focused super hard on hiragana/katakana and grammar, while failing to acknowledge kanji so much as exist. So I've kind of been kicking the grammar can down the road, but my grammar I think is in a pretty okay spot (compared to my kanji/vocab at least).

>>18170616
That's pretty much what I was going for as well. I don't want to look up everything and constantly interrupt the flow to bombard myself with new information. If reading could serve as practice, as well as review for words I already know (by the time I start reading) that would be ideal. If that's halfway through 6k then it is what it is, I'll get there.

>> No.18170674

>>18170653
Yeah but it's too tedious to read NHK easy level before 3k, you end up spending too much time looking up shit and instead of consolidating vocab you've already seen, you're constantly trying to learn new words. Maybe graded readers or shit like that could be read with decent ''time spent to positive return'' ratio with only 1k words.

>> No.18170680 [DELETED] 

>>18170660
CS textbooks are good if they talk about data structures and complexity and how they affect designing programs. They're bad if they talk about stuff like test-driven development and declarative programming before you even understand why array sorting is hard.

>> No.18170682

>>18170674
I started reading after seeing like 1300 words in Anki and never looked back.

>> No.18170688

Most of it is so opinionated that it sucks but the FAQ in the new guide is really good.

>> No.18170713

>>18170680
>test-driven development
Well you've got a software engineering textbook if it's covering that

>> No.18170714

>>18170660
They include the percentile rank now?
I passed N1 with 133 points 2 years ago, and the result sheet didn't have that field.
It's probably close to your result though, due to the way they score the test.

>> No.18170719

>>18170682
It's certainly doable, but like the guy said in >>18170673 , some people just don't want to sink as much time into reading without having a good return on it. Reading should be more of a review tool for vocab you've already seen, and not a dictionary look-up mini game. This read more meme is detrimental to beginners, because it forces them into a tedious activity that most people can't stand. It's a lot less hellish to do this activity at 3k instead of 1k, and it's not that much more time spent in Anki. It's simply a good way to not get discouraged early on, but you can still try reading stuff here and there.

>> No.18170720 [DELETED] 

>>18170713
I had a CS instructor for a free course that started with unit testing and then moved into how TDD works before they taught hash maps, sets, linked lists, array trees, etc.

>> No.18170725

should i remove grammar from my anki deck? I cant remember many of these and im not reading anything that will use them so they just end up filling my reviews with the same goddamn thing daily over and over and it never sticks to me.

>> No.18170727

>>18170714
just checked again and it was 137/180, not 133

>> No.18170728

>>18170720
>unit testing and then moved into how TDD works
Software Engineering
>hash maps, sets, linked lists, array trees
CS

He's just an idiot or mislabelled the course

>> No.18170733

>>18170719
>Reading should be more of a review tool for vocab you've already seen, and not a dictionary look-up mini game.
That means you're reading material you don't really understand or that you're torturing yourself instead of enjoying the story. You don't need to have 100% certainty as to the definition of each word in each line of what you're reading, you just need to know what it says. Your subconscious will do the rest. I didn't have to look things up all the time and I ended up like learning a thousand or so new words a month after I started reading, no SRS attached.

>> No.18170736

>>18170688
Fuck off Sakubi, it fucking sucks and should be dumped. It doesn't take into consideration that people are all different and learn differently, it's just one size fits all bullshit like academia does. The original guide is way better, gives all decent options and lets people figure out what's best for them. Nobody wants or needs the new guide, and it's detrimental to beginners. Stop putting it in OP please.

>> No.18170739

>>18170728
It was a "real" course. Yes, I know he was an idiot. Fact remains that some people making CS resources think that SE is CS.

>> No.18170743

>>18170736
分かりません

>> No.18170750 [DELETED] 

>>18170736
ingest symptom suppression substances

>> No.18170756

>>18170733
>you just need to know what it says. Your subconscious will do the rest.
You need to know what the words roughly mean in order to do that. I'm not saying you should know every word in everything you read, but looking up half of every sentence isn't viable and burns people out easily. Also, the more time you spend looking shit up, the less you're spending understanding the grammar structures of what you're reading.

>I didn't have to look things up all the time and I ended up like learning a thousand or so new words a month after I started reading, no SRS attached.
That makes no sense. You mean you were guessing half of every sentence? That's retarded, you might as well do 1-2 months more of Anki and not having to do that.

>> No.18170764

>>18170719
>3k is not that much more time spend in Anki over 1k
I feel like I've been at Anki a long time already with 20 new kanji a day and I'm only recently past the 1k mark. How many new words should I have it set to, is the default 20 considered too low because I'm looking at about 100 more days to get to 3k at this rate

>> No.18170770 [DELETED] 

>>18170750
>>18170743
This is getting so tired. You shills always give the same few word replies, no substance or arguments, and always mention medication or something similar. Just fuck off and go push your shit on reddit instead, they love shitty, time-wasting resources.

>> No.18170772

>>18170674
I mean you have to pick the right material. Newspapers/websites are an awful way to get started to be honest.

>>18170673
Is this your first learning a foreign language? I'm genuinely asking, because you don't seem to grasp the point of reading. Of course you don't want to look everything up, which is why you start by learning vocab and grammar. But you definitely shouldn't treat reading as a tool to "test yourself", but more as a way to expand your general knowledge of the language.

>> No.18170779

>>18170764
I think 20 is about the recommended rate for RtK. Vocab can definitely go higher because it's much faster to move through than new kanji

>> No.18170784

>>18170764
Yeah I would leave it at 20 if I were you. But I meant in the grand scheme of things, it's not that much more time spent considering it's time saved eventually when you'll be reading, since you won't have to look everything up as much. Use this time to read Tae Kim or some other grammar things.

>> No.18170798
File: 1.04 MB, 1255x915, file.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18170798

>>18170756
>You need to know what the words roughly mean in order to do that.
No you don't. How do you think people learn their first language?

>That makes no sense. You mean you were guessing half of every sentence? That's retarded, you might as well do 1-2 months more of Anki and not having to do that.
There's this magical thing called context and it really does wonders. I had no trouble with things like picture related (in higher quality of course). Even though I didn't know like half the words when I went in it's still obvious what they could mean here.

You know what? No, this is way too self-evident for anyone that's gotten to a basic intermediate level. You're a beginner. Don't argue about learning methods.

>> No.18170799

>>18170772
>Newspapers/websites are an awful way to get started to be honest.
It's better than slangy Yotsuba which gets recommended constantly as first reading resource.

>But you definitely shouldn't treat reading as a tool to "test yourself", but more as a way to expand your general knowledge of the language.
It isn't only a tool to test yourself, but that's certainly part of the reason you're reading, to consolidate vocab you reviewed.

>> No.18170810

>>18170798
>There's this magical thing called context and it really does wonders
You need to know the reading of words, and context isn't always clear like that. Stop being retarded. News articles don't have the same context as manga offers either. Some of us are learning for reasons other than comicbooks.

>> No.18170813

>>18170660
How long did it take to pass N1 from when you started learning?

>> No.18170819

>>18170810
>You need to know the reading of words
Read manga with furigana until you develop a basic vocabulary. Easy.
>and context isn't always clear like that.
It is. If you think it isn't then you just don't actually understand what you're reading, or it's terribly written.
>News articles don't have the same context as manga offers either.
Reading news as an absolute beginner is a terrible idea.
>Some of us are learning for reasons other than comicbooks.
You don't have to be learning for it to use it to learn. You're retarded.

>> No.18170824

>>18170798
Ask any beginner to make sense of the pic you posted, they won't get most of it. Stop lying to beginners, making them think they're mentally impaired if they can't magically guess a language they're unfamiliar with.

>> No.18170831

>>18170824
If you can't make sense of what I just posted then you haven't even started learning Japanese. You're not ready to "read" at all. Either that or you have asinine standards for understanding things.

>> No.18170855

>>18170819
How the fuck does the picture of a smug anime loli help you guess, through your magical process of ''context'', the meaning of 不採用確実? Fuck off with your lying bullshit.

>> No.18170864

>>18170831
You simply don't remember how little 1k known words is. That page would still look like a bunch of squiggles for anyone with just 1k, I'm sure the 1k known words guy would agree with me on this,

>> No.18170865

>>18170855
Different anon, wasn't sure what that meant until I read 面接, that made it pretty clear. More context as to who that guy is and why he's sitting there would've probably made it even clearer.
But I wouldn't call myself a total beginner.

>> No.18170868
File: 26 KB, 384x384, 1514475936631.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18170868

>drilling core2k

If the words are so common, you should be seeing them all the time while reading, no need to have Anki cards for them.

>> No.18170879

>>18170855
There were pages before that, it's not the start of the story

>> No.18170889

>>18170772
I didn't realize I was implying that reading was a tool to "test myself" but that's not what I meant at all and isn't my view on reading whatsoever; so maybe my post was worded poorly.

I absolutely think that reading is a way to expand my general knowledge of the language because it lets you see words used in various contexts, and different ways words might interact or be used in actual japanese.

I simply don't think my level of vocab, or kanji knowledge is high enough to get that out of reading yet. Because the process of reading would ultimately boil down looking up 9 out of every 10 words (and even that is being generous) - it would be very slow and tedious and detract from the other benefits of reading.

So no I don't view reading as a "test", I just don't see how reading would be time efficiently spent, when I can only actually "read" a maximum of 250-300 words. Other responses I've seen around DJT seem to support my mindset toward reading where its not as valuable super early into the learning process, and is significantly more effective after you have a strong base of vocab and grammar understanding.

But to answer your question, yes this is my first time learning the language.

>> No.18170901

>>18170865
>But I wouldn't call myself a total beginner.
Which is my point entirely. We were talking about someone with only 1k vocab, which is nothing.
>>18170879
I get that, 1k still isn't enough. it's not enough content words, and more importantly, it isn't enough grammatical words to make sense of things.

>> No.18170911

>>18170868
Yeah it's doable by reading, but it's a lot longer and more tedious reading when you have to look up 9 out of every 10 word to make sense of things. You might as well do a bit of Anki, then come back and read it smoothly. You need to work off of a base at least, you guys are talking like you start off at intermediate level. It's a common problem, advanced learners are shit to give advice to beginners because they forgot what it's like being one.

>> No.18170920

>>18170911
You are wrong, because I know exactly the issues beginners have!
Buy Japanese from Zero, great book.

>> No.18170926

>>18170864
im at 2k and cant read most of the words with kanji

>> No.18170928

>>18170855
不 negation prefix, top 200 vocabulary
採用 no certainty at the time but knew it ended in something that has to do with utility, use, etc. that shows up all the time in top 1000 words. The first kanji looks a lot like 探, from the top 500 word 探す, so it should imply that it's very vaguely related to searching. But it's not the same kanji, and I knew that, so it had to only be tangentially related. Taking something up? Being useful? Applying yourself?
確実 knowing reality/making confirmation/having certainty, top 1500 vocabulary frequency wise but it's made of kanji that have obvious uses in very common grammatical phrases that you will certainly learn before reading if you're not using garbage resources (確かに, 実は) and its meaning and reading reflect those common uses of its kanji exactly.

Like >>18170865 said the meaning of the phrase as a whole was confirmed by the time I got to 面接 again. Not because I needed the context that it was a 面接 (that was clear from earlier pages) but because I needed something to imply that the five-kanji compound was related to the 面接 directly.

>>18170864
I read this very page when I had only seen like 1300 words in Anki so far. After a few pages in I realized it might be hard to find pirated (I was using a preview site) so I switched to something in the CoR.

>>18170879
Yeah, I forgot to describe the context, sorry. Basically this little girl is trying to get a job and talks about being the maou and wanting seifuku. Then the guy's monologue picks up for real on this page.

>> No.18170933 [DELETED] 

>>18170920
go back to Redd*t you goddamned shills

>> No.18170938

>>18170928
>(確かに, 実は) and its meaning and reading reflect those common uses of its kanji exactly.
Sorry, meant to refer to 確認 here too.

>> No.18170955

>>18170928
>不 negation prefix, top 200 vocabulary採用 no certainty at the time but knew it ended in something that has to do with utility, use, etc. that shows up all the time in top 1000 words. The first kanji looks a lot like 探, from the top 500 word 探す, so it should imply that it's very vaguely related to searching. But it's not the same kanji, and I knew that, so it had to only be tangentially related. Taking something up? Being useful? Applying yourself?確実 knowing reality/making confirmation/having certainty, top 1500 vocabulary frequency wise but it's made of kanji that have obvious uses in very common grammatical phrases that you will certainly learn before reading if you're not using garbage resources (確かに, 実は) and its meaning and reading reflect those common uses of its kanji exactly.
You see all this bullshit you posted? This is what I mean, imagine having to reason everything out like that 9 words out of 10. It's absolutely retarded and time consuming. Might as well do more Anki and come back later. Hell that time would be better spend reading grammar ressources. What you're doing is analysing roughly, and maybe even wrongly guessing meaning. It's pants on head retarded.

>> No.18170962

>>18170955
I'm describing ~why~ I understood it, not my thought process when I ran into it, anon. Work on your English reading comprehension.

>> No.18170976

At this point I should probably just delete sakubi before one of the people that argue about it whenever its name comes up breaks and kills themselves. I mean it's so bad that they're projecting it onto unrelated shit like the alternative guide and >>18170688.

If crazy people didn't fall for trollbait so easily I wouldn't really care but I'm seriously worried that they might kill themselves or something. It's probably for the best if someone else throws it up on a different website somewhere, I don't even really touch anything DJT related, all I do these days is read and post memes.

Nothing wrong with Tae Kim's grammar guide btw. I was originally just going to take it and put it all on a single page with some changes to the two or three bad explanations, but I gave up after a couple days. (I'm aware of the outdated single-page version. It's outdated.)

>> No.18170979

>>18170962
As a beginner, you would have to go through this ''why'' process in your head, so either way it's not something you should recommend to beginners. The fucking 1k guy agreed with me, I don't see why you're still arguing your bullshit. Is learning Japanese your secret club and you're simply trying to discourage people so that they give up? It certainly seems so with what you're going on about here.

>> No.18170980

tbqh I don't even get the "read more" meme to new learners
Even if I load up a game or something with japanese text and try to read through it by looking up all the words and kanji I don't know it doesn't help me learn anything. At best I come away with the gist of what a particular section of text is trying to say. At worst I still have no conclusive idea what it actually means. And on top of that there's a bunch of other random shit in the mix like maybe its just a phrase or figure of speech, or slang, or made up word for the particular work and trying to commit things like this to my learning feel like they might just give bad habits or incorrect foundation.

>> No.18170987

>>18170979
Well, you're wrong, because I didn't have to go through the "why" process. I just glazed over the words, and by the time I got to 面接, I understood what was being conveyed by 不採用確実. I couldn't possibly write a dictionary definition for 不採用確実, but knowing what it conveys is all you need to learn from reading.

>> No.18170988

The guide recommends to do the 2k then go to a mining deck. It seems you guys talking about 3k disagree with this, can you explain why?

>> No.18170992

>>18170976
As long as you leave and stop pushing your shit here, Sakubi.

>> No.18170994

>>18170988
2k is an arbitrary number. The ideal point to stop memorizing shared decks is different for everybody.

>> No.18171000

>>18170992
I really don't, though.

>> No.18171003

>不採用確実

そんなことありません

あのんならうかるよ

>> No.18171010

>>18170987
You're either lying or a savant if you ''subconsciously'' understood 不採用確実 in a second when you were at 1k words. I'll guess the former since this an anonymous anime themed website.

>> No.18171011

>>18171003
i now know what 不採用確実 means
thanks imouto

>> No.18171015

>>18171010
Who said it took a second? Maybe it took like 20~40 seconds to read the whole panel. Doesn't mean I was intentfully thinking about everything I was bringing into my head.

>> No.18171020

>>18171015
Sorry, the whole half of the page. It came out wrong.

>> No.18171021 [DELETED] 
File: 964 KB, 1200x1600, SakubiCancer.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18171021

>>18171000
Well how did you become a meme so quickly if you're not pushing it that much.
pic related

>> No.18171025

>>18171021
I have no idea and I'm not really comfortable with it.

>> No.18171033

>>18171020
>>18171015
Exactly, so that's 3-4 seconds for 不採用確実, which again is unreasonable when at 1k words level. Again, why are you arguing this when the 1k guy IS at 1k level and agreed with me.

>> No.18171041 [DELETED] 
File: 919 KB, 1700x3981, SakubiCancer2.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18171041

>>18171000
pic related too
What was this shit you were saying about not pushing it?

>> No.18171044

Is the guy who is complaining about looking up 9 out of 10 words using a paper dictionary or something? If you are using yomichan like it's suggested it barely takes any time to look up a word. Even using an electronic dictionary with manga is super quick. If someone is learning 20 words a day, if they take your advice they will hold off on reading for two extra months which is retarded. Read the OP people. Don't give advice if you're a beginner

>> No.18171047

>>18171033
Dividing it like that doesn't make sense. People spend most of their reading time with the hard parts. I maybe looked at 不採用確実 for 5-8 seconds before moving on.

However, I never said that this was my first experience reading Japanese text. I'd been doing sentence decks before that.

>> No.18171055

>>18171041
No idea how any of that happened, sorry. I'm seriously uncomfortable with how people trolled by pretending to shill it.

>> No.18171056

>>18171041
Guy is probably jewish.

>> No.18171059

something not being considered is someone at 1k does not have the retention of awareness of his vocab like someone more experienced, so using many of the context clues explained earlier to figure it out with built up knowledge will often fall flat on its face for someone whos reviewed the words maybe 10 times in his life

>> No.18171070

>>18171059
Even if they get it wrong at first it's a skill set that they need to develop before they'll be able to read, and it really doesn't take that long, maybe a week at most if you're looking at stuff you care about.

>> No.18171073

>>18171055
>with how people trolled by pretending to shill it.
>hanlon's razer
yeah people maliciously went out of their way to pretend to shill your guide nobody gave a fuck about
surely wasn't stupidity on your part, i'll totally buy that :^)

>> No.18171078

>>18171073
Sorry, I don't really know what else to say.

>> No.18171079

>>18171044
Even with rikai or whatever, it's not conducive to smooth reading to get out of your sentence to read a definition, then go back to your sentence only to have to go read another definition on the next word, repeat ad nauseum.

>>18171047
5-8 seconds is still fast, and you're still only ''roughly guessing'' when you're at 1k.

>> No.18171082

>>18171070
it would be easier for them for sure to just look it up and go "ohh i see how that connects" and move on, i think such a skill like that will come naturally with experience whether you read or not, not something that needs to be trained early on

>> No.18171083

>>18171073
considering how much you guys fall for it it was really funny

>> No.18171090

>>18171056That is possible, since they would have the free time on their hands, they don't have to work part time jobs when their young since they get like 30k in enveloppes at their bar mitzvah.

>> No.18171091

>>18171079
>5-8 seconds is still fast
5-8 seconds to read a single word is extremely slow anon.

>> No.18171109

>>18171041
i don't know if it's more disturbing that some american is putting so much effort into shitposting, or that some brazilian is putting so much effort into trying to "fight" it.

>> No.18171111

>>18171109
This is DJT, the place where people make entire fonts and learning resources for the express purpose of upsetting other people.

>> No.18171112

>>18171091
Not when you're at 1k and have no inkling of how to go about things, like what >>18171059 described. It's an intuition that develops later on in the learning process, and more importantly only when you have accumulated a lot more vocab than 1k.

>> No.18171119

>>18171112
Define a "lot more", anon.

>> No.18171123

>>18171112
read more

>> No.18171160

>>18171079
Reading never gets smooth until you have a lot of practice. Flash card video games are not language learning. Stop posting

>> No.18171166

I'm having trouble remembering all the grammar rules in Tae Kim's guide - theres so much exceptions to words and dropping/adding words when it comes to nounds, verbs, etc.

At what point did you guys have no trouble with the grammar and can just remember it by heart?

>> No.18171169

>>18171166
after i started reading

>> No.18171176

>>18171112
Explain when you started reading, personally, or stop posting useless combative shit that helps no one.

>> No.18171178

>>18171119
Like I said earlier, at 3k I started feeling better when reading and started to actually progress quickly when doing it. Before that it felt like bumping my head against the wall.

>> No.18171179

>>18171166
>this question again
Just give up.

>> No.18171180

http://www.strawpoll.me/14780632

>> No.18171187

>>18171178
I don't know what you think 3k means but chances are the deck you were using was really bad if you couldn't understand stuff like >>18170798 until the 3k mark.

>> No.18171192

>>18171160
That's like saying ''practice x sport'' when you don't even know the rules yet. Is it better to learn the rules beforehand, or guess them and do whatever?

>> No.18171197

>>18171192
This is the stupidest post I've read all day. Please come up with a comparison that makes anything remotely close to sense.

>> No.18171198

>>18171176
I already said, a bit before 3k words, but mostly after 3k. Not my fault if you can't read a reply chain.

>> No.18171200

>>18171198
They're asking for more than the number of words you counted you knew.

>> No.18171201

>>18171011
おー

がんばれおにいちゃん

>> No.18171208

>>18171180
Horrible poll. Can you actually do one that's germaine to the conversation, like ''After how many words does reading get easier'' and have the answers be ''1k'' ''2k'' ''3k'' etc.

>> No.18171210

>>18171208
This is actually for something from way earlier, just took a while to get around to it.

>> No.18171218

>>18171187
Like I said, I hate looking things up and I certainly won't start guessing meaning like some morons in this thread. You could run the danger of consolidating a very wrong meaning in your memory, which helps no one.

>> No.18171221

>>18171218
If you hate looking stuff up then you will be "guessing" no matter how much Japanese you know. Don't project your insecurities on other people.

>> No.18171226

>>18171197
The stupidest one I've read all year is >>18170928 and how it's better to guess meanings while reading way above your level. That's the definition of stupidity.

>> No.18171227

>>18171218
nobody ever said that you need to know every word
in fact, thinking that you need to know every word is damaging to your ability to learn
stop being retarded

>> No.18171228

>>18171192
You do practice and learn the rules by reading through your grammar guide of choice and acquiring basic vocab. Words through flashcards are more akin to conditioning. They're something you do alongside sports practice and competition, which is experiencing raw native content, but not the most important part. Now stop giving out bad advice because you were too much of a bitch to read at 1k words and are trying to justify your learning delays by pushing your mistakes onto others

>> No.18171231

>>18171226
Everything you just wrote in your post is complete bullshit. Just wanted to let you know.

>> No.18171238

>>18171200
He asked ''when'', I told him the amount of words I knew, because saying shit like ''after 3 months'' means nothing since everyone studies at a different pace. What answer was I supposed to give?

>> No.18171241

>>18171238
the time

>> No.18171246

>>18171238
You're supposed to say "I haven't yet".

>> No.18171250

>>18171221
>Wanting to know words before reading them is being insecure
I guess wanting a physics degree before working at the supercollider is being insecure as well.

>> No.18171259

>>18171227
I already said that there's a difference between looking up 1-2 words in a sentence and looking up 9 out of 10 words every sentence. Read the reply chain.

>> No.18171261

>>18171250
You don't know the words just because you "memorized" them in Anki or something. You only know them when you know what a character is conveying by using them, and what words are used in what situations. Definitions are like four levels of abstraction removed from what words actually do when they're said. Reading is the only way to acquire them.

>> No.18171265

>>18171259
>looking up 9 out of 10 words every sentence
then you don't even know 1k words

>> No.18171276
File: 39 KB, 692x797, file.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18171276

>>18171265
Spreadsheet time.

>> No.18171277

>>18171228
It's way more logical to see the word in Anki first, then practice and condition the word by reading afterwards. But reading is tedious if you don't know 9 out of every 10 words, so you need a base vocabulary before practice gets conducive to learning. Piano classes work the same way, you spend a lot of time learning how to read sheet music and having proper form before you actually practice music playing.

>> No.18171281
File: 23 KB, 757x409, file.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18171281

>>18171276

>> No.18171282

I can't learn shit tonight, I'm stuck on the same 7~8 cards that I can't remember at all for some reason
Has this ever happened to you?

>> No.18171285
File: 34 KB, 850x618, file.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18171285

>>18171281
1k leaves you at 77% coverage.

>> No.18171286

>>18171282
Nope. Make a mnemonic.

>> No.18171287

>>18171246
Apparently, people here seem to short circuit when they can't give their stock reply ''read more'' to someone.

>> No.18171288
File: 32 KB, 835x552, file.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18171288

>>18171285
2k gives you 85.5% coverage.

>> No.18171294

>>18171261
No, you don't need a smug anime character in a frame showing me an apple to know that りんご is apple. Stop with your nonsense.

>> No.18171295
File: 24 KB, 879x392, file.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18171295

>>18171288
You reach 90% coverage a little after 3k, which is consistent with anon feeling like that's the point where they didn't have to look up words every single sentence, but not consistent with his feeling that he needed to learn like 3k words to look up "half" instead of "90%" of words.

>> No.18171299

>>18171265
Go on NHK easy and try it out for yourself. 1k is nothing, you won't even know 99% of the verbs they're using.

>> No.18171300

>>18171294
りんご includes Malus sieversii. Apple does not. You should know this.

>> No.18171301

>>18171299
>>18171285

>> No.18171302

>>18171288
>>18171285
>>18171295
What does this mean exactly? If you have 100% knowledge of 1k you will be able to recognize/read 77% of words in a newspaper or something?

>> No.18171307

>>18171277
I've never heard of a piano teacher who waits 3 months before they let you play twinkle twinkle Little Star

>> No.18171310

>>18171300
ごりら

>> No.18171311

>>18171302
At 1k words you should already know 77% of instances of non-grammatical words in normal adult reading material.

This list was drawn from relatively hard stuff btw, if you're using actual easy reading material it would be higher.

>> No.18171317

>>18171295
Thank you for this. My main point was that at 3k, you start being confortable, even if you don't know 100% percent of what's being read. 90% coverage is what 3k felt like, and reading started being fun.

>> No.18171320

>>18171317
The difference between 77% and 90% is, like, spending 2.5x the effort, anon. So let's say that means you read at almost a third the speed. You're still better off reading than memorizing words, because you're exposed to words based on commonness, and you're Actually Learning them as opposed to memorizing crappy definitions.

>> No.18171327

>>18171307
Dijkstra was against the use of computers in computer science classes

>> No.18171330

>>18171327
he was wrong

>> No.18171331

Does it really matter what kinds of things I use for mnemonic devices or should I just use whatever is getting me results?

Most of the stuff I have been coming up with as mnemonic reminders are completely unrelated to anything about the word and are just randomly sexual or offensive. But they have been working surprisingly well to help me retain the words meanings. Is this okay or will it become bad later on when I have 20x the words to remember?

>> No.18171334

>>18171327
He sounds like a fuckin nerd to me

>> No.18171335

>>18171331
As long as it doesn't bubble up long after you stop using it it's fine. I still can't remember the order of the months without singing the song. I'm pissed.

>> No.18171338

>>18171327
that's because computers were extremely unfriendly and expensive at the time

>> No.18171341

>>18171320
It's the difference between looking up 1 word and 3-4 words every sentence (without including the grammar points you sometimes have to look up). It gets tedious very quickly.

>> No.18171347

>>18171311
Interesting. I expected it to follow a much more linear progression like 1k would be 16% and 2k closer to 33%. I definitely didn't expect to be anywhere near 70% let alone 77% at only 1k

>> No.18171348

>>18171341
You can """guess""" a majority of words without any harm to your understanding of the story. And guess what, if you guess word enough you'll automatically know it. Just like in your native language.

>> No.18171350

>>18171347
Really common words are a lot more common, who knew?

>> No.18171353

>>18171331
Stupid mnemonics haven't caused me any problems after 17K words. I normally forget the device and just remember the word after a few months.

>> No.18171363

>>18171317
>>18171341
May I ask what content you are reading? Because if you think 3k words makes your reading experience comfortable, you might want to think about increasing the challenge to increase dividends. I could read Yotsuba and other easy manga all day and feel great about my skill level, but that's not going to help propel me nearly as much as reading harder material to eventually get to my goal of reading literary fiction and poetry

>> No.18171377

>>18171330
Says who?

>>18171334
Oh that he was

>>18171338
You obviously have no idea what you're talking about

>> No.18171383

>>18171320
I never understood this logic.

>exposed to words based on their commonness
Fair enough, but the order of the core decks do this as well.
>actually learning them as opposed to memorizing crappy definitions
This doesn't even make sense at all though. Does anyone actually learn the definition of words in anki past maybe 1-3 basic words? Being fluent in english already gives you almost every definition so long as you can make the connection from a japanese word to an english one.

>> No.18171384

>>18171348
In your native language, you either get told by an adult or look it up (unless it's blatantly obvious, which isn't the case for abstractions). The only things that are more intuitive are grammar words, and even then you learn the proper usage in school, and a lot of people notice they've been using certain structures in a wrong way. Guessing is stupid and detrimental in the long run. Stop trying to fuck over beginners.

>> No.18171391
File: 118 KB, 404x404, 1497592786380.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18171391

>>18171384
>In your native language, you either get told by an adult or look it up
You learned more than 30k words as a little kid by being told what they mean or looking them up?

>> No.18171402

>>18171383
anon, relating a japanese word to an english one is the very pinnacle of a crappy definition. japanese is not english and you cannot express common japanese words using any list of similar english ones. the meaning conveyed by doing so is always wrong.

>> No.18171403

>>18171383
>Fair enough, but the order of the core decks do this as well.
Not the one in the OP. The more you know!

>> No.18171410

>>18171363
I'm not at 3k level. Someone asked at what level does reading get more comfortable, I told him that NHK easy level, 3k was good to not have to look stuff up for the most part. It was only to give him a rough idea, but everyone started spazzing out, saying you should be reading when you have less than 1k vocab and just guess meanings, when the initial conversation had nothing to do about when you should start reading. It's the ''read more'' meme running rampant again, making autists here lose their minds.

>> No.18171418

>>18171410
>saying you should be reading when you have less than 1k vocab
Nobody said this.
>and just guess meanings
It's not guessing. You're not supposed to know the definitions of individual words. If you're reading quickly you don't know the definitions of individual words in English either, you just recognize patterns and your brain automatically constructs an idea with the right meaning.
>It's the ''read more'' meme running rampant again, making autists here lose their minds.
You don't know Japanese.

>> No.18171422
File: 41 KB, 802x1200, とらドラ!_1_012.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18171422

>>18171383
https://vocaroo.com/?upload

>> No.18171429

>>18171422
Is this a pitch accent or a kana test?

>> No.18171433

>>18171429
this is a "do you know japanese like at all or are you just blowing hot air with sub-n5 everything" test

>> No.18171441

>>18171391
It takes you 15 years of your life to get a decent vocabulary lexicon so that you can write and speak in your language without sounding like a child. The amount of reinforcing parents and schooling does is often forgotten by nitwits like you. Which is the same reason you're having trouble relating to beginners in this thread. My aunt is a teachers, and 12 year olds don't have a lot of vocab compared to adults, and use a lot of words in a wrong way because they're guessing like the other moron in this thread is doing.

>> No.18171442

室内写生勘定

>> No.18171443

>>18171410
How the is anyone supposed to read something new without having to look up lots of words? Sure they can stick to reading easy stuff all their lives but when they try something new it'll be really tough. Even if you read chuni shit all your life you would probably have to look up a lot of new vocabulary if you tried to read some SoL baseball manga. Starting reading at 3k words might feel a bit easier than 1k but it doesn't make that much of a difference if you actually read stuff you're interested in and not kids books.

>> No.18171448

>>18171441
>The amount of reinforcing parents and schooling does is often forgotten by nitwits like you.
Scientific studies show that this has, like, zero effect. The only thing that has an appreciable effect on your native vocabulary is reading a lot.

>> No.18171459

>>18171448
And in case you're wondering, yes, before writing, everybody had terrible vocabularies and used words "wrong" all the time. Literacy slows down internal language evolution.

>> No.18171460
File: 69 KB, 558x799, 226aee94.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18171460

>>18171310
ごはん!

>> No.18171461

>>18171422
Damn, now I kinda want to read Toradora. That page was enjoyable to read.

>> No.18171464

>>18171461
がんばれ、アノン!

>> No.18171465

>>18171402
Except you literally can.

>> No.18171468

>>18171418
>Nobody said this.
At least 2-3 people in this thread said this and started attacking me by saying 3k was wayyy to late for reading comfortably, >>18170928
saying he could internalize all meanings at roughly 1k words knows.
>English either, you just recognize patterns and your brain automatically constructs an idea with the right meaning.
Not when you're learning the language as a child. You only comprehend patterns later on, and it's way easier developing that skill at 3k than 1k, which was the point of this conversation.
>You don't know Japanese.
Read more

>> No.18171469

>>18171465
present one (1) common japanese word that can be expressed accurately by listing english words

>> No.18171472

>>18171468
Nobody said that you should be reading when you have LESS than 1k vocab. Do you even know what you wrote? Do you even know what OTHER people wrote?

>> No.18171477

>>18171465
The only way to accurately relate most Japanese words to English is to enumerate every unique sentence where a word appears and give its meaning in English

>> No.18171478

>>18171410
You didn't answer the question. What are you reading, nerd?

>> No.18171481

>>18171477
I hope you sentences with unique usages of that word.

>> No.18171483

>>18171418
>should be reading when you have less than 1k vocab
>nobody said this
Not him, but I've personally been posting and browsing here over the last couple months since I've started learning japanese and my vocab is not (and hasn't been) a 1k level, and have had several people suggest that I need to start reading right away.

>> No.18171488

>>18171464
ありがとう!いつかは絶対読みます。

>> No.18171490

>>18171483
That's because there are people who know lots of words that still haven't started reading, and people are assuming you're one of them.

>> No.18171495

>>18171448
>The only thing that has an appreciable effect on your native vocabulary is reading a lot.
Which is done in school, where reading comprehension gets tested and you have to practice making sense of things, over a period of a decade. You're implying a child on a deserted island with all the books in the world could learn the language automatically if he couldn't look up words. That's ludicrous, languages are first and foremost oral, not written. Reading isn't the minimum necessary to learn a language.

>> No.18171496

Is there a reason the stroke orders for the upper left parts of 右 and 左 are different?

>> No.18171497

>>18171481
Yeah, it's highly unrealistic and stupid
Figures

>> No.18171499

>>18171497
Sorry, meant to write "hope you mean" but it didn't come out right.

>> No.18171501

>>18171469
most nouns have a one to one mapping?

>> No.18171508

>>18171472
The guy I replied to at the beginning had less than 1k, and everyone told him to read more, while I told him that it was more comfortable reading at 3k, which was the actual answer to his question. Did you read the fucking thread?

>> No.18171509

>>18171495
>Which is done in school
Fact: most schools don't give enough reading practice to kids. Most kids that develop literacy do so because their parents or friends gave them interesting reading material, or because they spent a lot of time on the internet.
>where reading comprehension gets tested
Science shows this is useless.
>over a period of a decade
Most people only need to read regularly for a couple years to become truly literate.

Stopped reading there. Educate yourself about this topic before you try to argue about it. Everything you think you know is wrong.

>> No.18171512

>>18171501
name one (1)

>> No.18171513

>>18171496
First and third stroke go in the same direction.
This is true for most words using that enclosing thing on the left

>> No.18171516

>>18171478
Right now I'm reading うさぎドロップ

>> No.18171518

>>18171433
>>18171422
So if I can't even read this, I shouldn't even consider starting to think about reading right?
Admittedly I recognize more kanji and words here than anything else I've tried reading, but there are still a bunch I've never seen and some I know I've seen but can't recall.

>> No.18171519

>>18171508
That didn't happen. They have around 3k. >>18170616
If this isn't what you're referring to then you need to quote the exact post you're referring to.

>> No.18171525

>>18171518
That page is actually above the level of "easiest reading material". If you want the easiest reading material you want to look for manga with furigana that are actually interesting (and not full of kiddie slang like yotsuba).

>> No.18171530

>>18171490
Exactly my point, but it's detrimental to say this to beginners who don't have enough vocab, because reading takes too much time when you don't have enough base knowledge. This is the same one size fits all advice that the shitty second guide gives, and it helps no one.

>> No.18171537

>>18171513
Oh wow, I was expecting there not to be a reason. Thank you, that makes it a lot easier to remember

>> No.18171543

>>18171495
>You're implying a child on a deserted island with all the books in the world could learn the language automatically if he couldn't look up words.
No one said you never look up words. They said you don't need to look up every single word that you haven't already reviewed for a week in anki. They said that you can infer meaning from context, or association with other known words, in a lot of those cases and that you don't need to look up ALL of the 23% of words from the spreadsheet that you haven't explicitly studied. They didn't say "lol you don't need a dictionary at all". If you are the same person, you have been stretching every single statement made into an extreme and it is really fucking irritating.

>> No.18171546

>>18171530
Let's be real, you need to expose yourself to Japanese early on or you're never gonna make it.

>This is the same one size fits all advice that the shitty second guide gives, and it helps no one.
Wait a minute.
>last couple months since I've started learning japanese and my vocab is not (and hasn't been) a 1k level
You're an absolute beginner. You really have no place to talk about what methods are good until you've reached a low intermediate level.

>> No.18171554

>>18171543
But anon, reading is an elaborate form of self-torture where one must identify the EDICT definition of every single word, even if you just saw it in the last sentence!

>> No.18171560

>>18171525
don't suppose you might have some recommendations?

>> No.18171564

>>18171560
Someone keeps posting panels from Zettai Reiiki asking for help. It seems pretty easy to understand. Might have trouble if you're the kind of person that needs to understand all the subtle linguistic nuances though, instead of just understanding the story.

>> No.18171579

>>18171519
Posts like
>>18171160
>>18171082
>>18170928
>>18170868
and others, but all these are pretty much saying ''don't worry about shit and read more'' instead of giving proper advice. Some guy even said here >>18170926 that at 2k he couldn't make sense of the page posted here >>18170798 , but the morons kept insisting that at 1k, you can just guess meanings if you don't know.

>> No.18171586

>>18171579
Post the exact post where someone told someone else with less than 1k words to read more, or someone said that people should read more even if they know less than 1k words. I don't care about your butthurt misinterpretations.

>> No.18171591

the only good way to learn japanese is to argue about how to learn japanese every day

>> No.18171592

>>18171579
>these are pretty much saying ''don't worry about shit and read more'' instead of giving proper advice
That's because that is the only proper advice. Reading a lot is the #1 indicator of eventual success learning the language, no matter when you start reading.

>> No.18171594

>>18171422
>the part that trips me up is actually the 2DK in english letters
what did they mean by this? some unit of measurement/distance?

>> No.18171595

You're a beginner.

Yes, you, the one reading this.

>> No.18171598

>>18171546
>You're an absolute beginner.
And there we go with the ad hominem attacks because you can't argue your point for shit. Of course reading is good and essential to the learning process, I've said so many times already. But when you don't know enough base vocab, it's too time consuming and not worth it for the return you getting. It's a simple fact that everyone here has agreed with besides 1-2 autists.

>> No.18171600

>>18171594
It's a type of floor plan.

>> No.18171607

>>18171598
Anon, if you know less than 1000 words, you really are quite literally an absolute beginner. There's nothing "ad hominem" about it. It's not an argument. Read the OP.

>Don't give learning advice if you're a beginner.
>Don't argue about learning methods if you're a beginner.
>Don't feed drama queens.

>> No.18171615

>>18171598
No, there are two autists (you and one more I believe unless you're samefagging) stubbornly arguing a point about which you have no perspective on language learning and don't see how you are wrong

>> No.18171616
File: 180 KB, 411x371, 1488214575349.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18171616

>>18171595
He knows

>> No.18171618

>>18171543
>They didn't say "lol you don't need a dictionary at all".
This guy did >>18170928 , he said you infer everything from context, ''feeling'' your way through smoothly and easily even with only 1k vocab. Like a fucking jedi trick.

>> No.18171622

>>18171598
If you spent the time you've been arguing here trying to read instead you would've learned all sorts of stuff.

>> No.18171629

>>18171618
Please quote the place where he said that you don't need a dictionary at all.

>> No.18171634

>>18171586
This one >18170928
The guys tries to give proof that you can ''deduce'' the meaning of every part of a word with only 1k under your belt.

>> No.18171635

Does it really matter if you have to look up almost every word if you're having fun and understanding what's happening? The first two manga I finished was Nickelodeon and Voynich Hotel both by Dowman Sayman, with the exception of a few chapters I had to look up at least 5 words per page but I still had enjoyed it and I got a lot of new vocabulary too. I know it's just one poster bitching about having to look up words but that's not a bad thing since it means your learning anyway, I would only be worried if you had to look up a word you just saw on the last page.

>> No.18171639

>>18171634
That post doesn't say that.

>> No.18171641
File: 203 KB, 296x660, onna.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18171641

Anyone know what the first kanji is?
Can't find it for the life of me. Context is he just found a naked girl floating in the river and shes the only one alive among heaps of dead bodies

>> No.18171644

>>18171592
I agree partly (some people are fluent and can't read, therefore reading isn't necessary to learning the language), but when you don't have enough vocab, it's not as beneficial to spend a lot of time reading. Simple facts mate.

>> No.18171648

>>18171641
かのじょだ

がんばれおにいちゃん

>> No.18171652

>>18171594
2 Rooms+ dining + kitchen

>> No.18171653 [DELETED] 

>>18171635
It doesn't matter how you learn as long as you have success with it.
/djt/ just likes to bicker about what's the best for the whole day, every day.

>> No.18171658 [DELETED] 

>>18171607
Nice deflecting, pointing to the law tablets in the town square instead of arguing to convince. Fuck off, you lost already.

>> No.18171659

>>18171644
There's no difference between memorizing words with anki and learning them through exposure by looking them up while reading until you don't have to do so anymore.

Oh, wait, one of them is an isolated artificial environment devoid of the ability to fuck yourself over by stressing yourself out about things that don't matter at all.

>> No.18171664

>>18171658
It's not deflection, I'm telling you that you literally don't have anywhere near enough experience to understand what you're talking about. You're embarrassing yourself. You have no idea how stupid it is to watch someone who literally doesn't even know 1000 words argue about whether people who know more than that should be reading.

>> No.18171667

>>18171615
I already know 3 languages and have studies linguistics, whereas you and the other people arguing with me are probably monolingual amerimutts who don't understand shit about language learning, and acting smug about it nonetheless.

>> No.18171670

>>18171667
You don't know 3 languages nor do you know linguistics.

>> No.18171678 [DELETED] 

>>18171653
That's a r/learnjapanese attitude and you'll never learn Japanese if you follow it

>> No.18171680

>>18171629
>>18171639
The guy implies he's not looking it up in a dictionary, since he's having to guess the meaning of the kanji he's never seen before. If you couldn't figure that out, you might be retarded, or didn't bother reading his post at all.

>> No.18171685
File: 2.44 MB, 307x202, 1445811557913.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18171685

>>18171667
>appeal to authority
Grow up kiddie.

>> No.18171688

>>18171680
He does imply that he didn't look this word up in a dictionary.

That doesn't mean he refuses to use a dictionary at all. Just that he didn't need to use a dictionary to know what this word is conveying. And to be honest, if he tried, he wouldn't been more confused than if he guessed. The EDICT definition for the middle word is terrible at conveying what the compound means.

>> No.18171694

>>18171659
There is a difference. Doing so through Anki saves time and makes reading less discouraging and tedious later on. Reading while having to look everything up isn't fun and makes motivation run out fast when you're starting out.

>> No.18171695

>>18171680
Anon, you use dictionaries when you're confused. When you don't understand what something is saying.

In order to know that you have to read it first.

If you read it and understand it then you move on even if you're not sure what one of the words means.

>> No.18171697
File: 43 KB, 232x374, 1465051158782.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18171697

>>18171667
>I'm so great at languages I made two grammatical errors in a tiny post!
(you)

>> No.18171698 [DELETED] 
File: 120 KB, 500x500, 1420482156554.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18171698

>>18171678
Yeah, it's way better to discuss the whole day if you should start reading with 1k words, 2k, 3k or not at all.

>> No.18171700

>>18171641
彼女
I'll give it to you the writing is absolutely awful

>> No.18171703

>>18171694
>Doing so through Anki saves time
Citation needed.
>makes reading less discouraging and tedious later on
Anki is more tedious than learning by reading and looking up words, and there's nothing discouraging about learning words by "reading" if you know that it's completely normal for you to be really slow.
>Reading while having to look everything up isn't fun
That's because you're torturing yourself and preventing yourself from having fun.
>makes motivation run out fast when you're starting out
Motivation runs out no matter what. Especially if you're told to ankidrone for a full two months before you're allowed to open up a manga and try to understand it.

>> No.18171709

>>18171664
I've done 6k a long time ago and have been mining for a while now. You keep repeating that I only have 1k even though you're basing it on nothing, instead of arguing my points. That's pretty much admitting defeat. I haven't attacked you personally or the amounts of words you know yet. You're a small man, and I can smell your insecurity from a mile away.

>> No.18171714
File: 24 KB, 366x380, 1472946375262.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18171714

>>18171697
Three.

>> No.18171716

>>18171709
>You keep repeating that I only have 1k even though you're basing it on nothing
>last couple months since I've started learning japanese and my vocab is not (and hasn't been) a 1k level

>> No.18171717

>>18171685
The guy accused me of not knowing linguistics, which is an ad hominem. Why would I not reply to such stupidity with sophistry? Maybe I made the whole thing up anyway. How would you even know?

>> No.18171721

>>18171717
Describe the genitive case.

>> No.18171722

>>18171703
/thread
please no one continue arguing. This anon has utterly BTFO'd ankifag

>> No.18171725
File: 92 KB, 250x238, 1387674754022.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18171725

isn't the whole idea about anki vs reading purely dependent how much much you tolerate dictionary use?

meaning it's entirely, 100% subjective

>> No.18171729

>>18171717
Describe English's genitive case.

>> No.18171733

>>18171717
I wouldn't. All I know is that pulling an appeal to authority without posting any proof of your linguistic knowledge means you got triggered.

>> No.18171735

Poll time to settle this once and for all. I recommend choosing what it was for you in reality, and not what you think it should be.
www.strawpoll.me/14781241

>> No.18171736

Does anyone has some trick to remember the stroke order for シ, ツ, ソ and ン? I can easily recognize them but I always forget which one goes from the top to the bottom and which one from bottom to top.

>> No.18171741

>>18171736
シツソン
SHIT SON
2211
-||-

>> No.18171742

>>18171725
Yes, have fun pulling out the dictionary every sentence.

>> No.18171744

>>18171736
>>18171741
alternatively
しつ
シツ

>> No.18171745

>>18171735
But I didn't count my words before I started reading.

>> No.18171746

>>18171742
Read the OP. Dictionary access should be nearly instantaneous.

>> No.18171756

>>18171735
>no 10+k
Are you even trying to make a serious poll?
6k is nothing unless you're reading picture books for kids.

>>18171746
Yes, because you can use yomichan and rikaisama on a scan or physical copy of a LN.

>> No.18171766

>>18171725
It is, which is why I said that at 3k words, I felt comfortable because I hate looking up stuff a lot in dictionaries. Which is when I got bombarded with replies saying you can read at 1k words without looking stuff up, just by guessing what the kanji mean and reading off of furigana.

>> No.18171773

>>18171756
>10k
how does it feel to be allergic to reading

>> No.18171775

>>18171756
>scan
KanjiTomo
>physical copy
I'm pretty sure people who choose physical copies are willing to spend more time on looking up words.

>> No.18171776

>>18171756
Comfortable for a beginner, not fluency level comfortable.

>> No.18171779

>>18171741
That's great, thanks man.

>> No.18171785

does flying witch have less slang and contractions than yotsuba? i know theyre kind of useful to learn but I still cant read shit because of the awkward kana salads that I cant grasp

>> No.18171790

>>18171785
have you looked at the yotsuba reading pack

>> No.18171792

>>18171773
>what are mining decks
HURR DURR

>>18171775
Pretty sure that's not necessarily the case.

>>18171776
10k isn't even close to fluency. You/he posted a poll, I made a comment on it, that's it.
Again, 6k is nothing.

>> No.18171791

>>18171790
not them but it's basically garbage

>> No.18171803

>>18171790
i completed both, but the pack doesnt really handle the slang usages save for a few, im a bit ahead of it now

>> No.18171807

>>18171792
6k is nothing, but you should start reading before that. The question was when does reading get comfortable enough to be viable as a studying tool. You're reading too much into it.

>> No.18171811

>>18171807
They're not reading too much into it, they're pretending to know way more than they actually do. They're a beginner.

>> No.18171814

Well well, looks like 3k words for comfortable reading has won the poll. Case closed.

>> No.18171816
File: 34 KB, 490x333, 1364694786830.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18171816

>>18171811
Nice engrish.

>> No.18171820

>>18171816
What?

>> No.18171844

>>18171792
>When does reading start getting more comfortable?
>start
Poll is clearly talking about beginner material, you're not going to move to more interesting shit when reading is not at all "comfortable" as it is.

>> No.18171849

>>18171816
I read the post four times and I have no idea what you're talking about.

>> No.18171855

>>18171849
Plural is so hard isn't it.

>> No.18171858

>>18171820
>>18171849
I think he meant that a non ESL person would say ''They're beginners'' and not ''They're a beginner''

>> No.18171859

>>18171858
No? Only an ESL would do that. "They" is a singular pronoun here, just like it has been since before "you" was a singular pronoun.

>> No.18171863 [DELETED] 

>>18171859
t. ESL monkey

>> No.18171865

>>18171863
No anon, you're just plain wrong.

>> No.18171868

how can you claim to know linguistics when you're just a prude grammarian who thinks that singular they is fake grammar

>> No.18171870 [DELETED] 

>>18171858
English is not my 1st language either but I can easily spot such trivial mistakes.
These are the people trying to tell you what's what.

>> No.18171872
File: 352 KB, 1300x1300, DSgC82TVQAANqLU.jpg:large.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18171872

>> No.18171873

I'll even act as a guinea pig to prove just how inefficient reading is, as a complete beginner level shitter. I'll use >>18171422 as an example of reading and go through my literal interpretation of how I would take in this text if I were to attempt to read it.

(....shit)
Morning, 7:30.
Clear weather, however, indoor night vision. (??)
Made of wood, two-story detatched house
2 floor section house for rent.
Walking distance from the private railway station,
South-facing 2 DK. (?)

So that small ass segment took me almost exactly 15 minutes to get through. I still don't understand what two of the parts were trying to say.

The only words I knew how to read without having to look up at all were
>morning (asa)
>the time
>weather (not the clear part, just tenki)
>station (not the private railway part, just eki)

There are other kanji I recognized, but the words I knew them from were not these ones specifically so I still couldn't read/pronounce them without looking up the new word.

All the rest needed to be written into google translate to get the kanji. Then copied to a dictionary to find the word's pronunciation and meaning. From which point I would presumably throw them into a reading deck for later review and use the context of reading this as some kind of recollective tool.

Overall I just don't see how reading and "exposing myself to the language as early as possible" is any way to get better in japanese. Given that even a shitter such as myself was able to identify multiple kanji or words I've seen in this page, I can only imagine that if I were to continue doing vocab work prior to reading this I probably would have been able to discern a lot more of the text.
And ultimately I just can't see how the 15 minutes I spend reading that section of a page helped my japanese progress more than if I had used it to learn 15 brand new words and get them into my cognition.

>> No.18171875

>>18171873
Toradora is not absolute beginner's reading material. Someone even said that earlier on.

>> No.18171877 [DELETED] 

>>18171858
i think that anon was just being gender neutral.

>> No.18171879 [DELETED] 

If you think "They're a beginner." is bad English then you don't know English.

>> No.18171881

>>18171868
It's certainly not used when casually speaking as a fluent native. You would know that if you weren't ESL. You're pretty easy to spot, since we don't speak or write that way. No need to get all defensive, just accept the correction.

>> No.18171882

>>18171855
>>18171858
>>18171863
Native here, context does wonders. "They're" isn't exclusively plural, and the post is talking about a single person. Maybe you should hang out on /det/.

>> No.18171883

>>18171879
"They're beginners" would LITERALLY BE COMPLETELY WRONG.

>> No.18171886
File: 63 KB, 500x283, 18.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18171886

>>18171872
温泉
才能
現実

>> No.18171890 [DELETED] 

>>18171881
I'm native. If you think that "They're a beginner." is ungrammatical then you don't know English. No buts. You are as wrong as JSLs who say that "いいです" is ungrammatical, if not wronger.

>> No.18171891

>>18171877
Saying ''they're beginners'' is also gender neutral. Just accept your mistake dude.

>> No.18171893

>>18171886
I got 魅力 努力 徹夜

>> No.18171894

>>18171881
What pompous family raised you where you've never used the singular they in casual speech? Is this bait?

>> No.18171895

>>18171881
>It's certainly not used when casually speaking as a fluent native
Yes it is.
>>18171891
It's also completely wrong. You cannot say "beginners" to refer to a single person, no matter what plurality the subject appears to have on a surface level.

>> No.18171899

>>18171894
They're latching on to this because they've been getting devastated for the entire previous rest of the thread and want something to feel good about. Don't feed them.

>> No.18171902

>>18171873
You need to be more than 1k words into core2k to have a valid opinion, not 200

>> No.18171906

>>18171902
to be honest they did really well for 200 words

>> No.18171910

>>18171890
Being grammatical is not sufficient to be fluent. Being fluent is knowing how common people would formulate a sentence. You used a formulation that's not the common one, hence you don't sound like a native, fluent speaker. If you are a native speaker, I'll guess that you're American since your education system sucks, and therefore we here forgive you and your mistakes.

>> No.18171912

>>18171902
im 2k in and can read little more than he could, i recognized and knew many of the kanji in isolation for the first "paragraph" but not how they worked with the words.

>> No.18171913

>>18171910
There are zero (0) native speakers who would refer to a singular person as "They're beginners" without being aware that they're constructing something that is ungrammatical. In fact, they would default to "They're a beginner" if they did not know the gender of their other.

You don't know English.

>> No.18171914

>>18171893
Looks like you need to stay up late doing whatever the hell you feel inclined to do.
At least your found words make sense.

>> No.18171917

>>18171899
Oh the people saying it's wrong are the read more people from the previous conversation? That figures.

>> No.18171922

>>18171917
No, the person (singular) saying that it's wrong is the "These people are saying that you need to read even if you know less than 1000 words" person (singular).

>> No.18171923

>>18171913
You're good people.

>> No.18171925
File: 12 KB, 593x192, file.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18171925

>>18171923

>> No.18171928

>>18171875
I don't see what makes that relevant. The advice given to me was simply "read more".

>>18171902
The valid opinion isn't mine, its that of the people who have told me (the 200 shitter) to read more. By your own logic, the opinion of telling a 200 word anon to read more is in fact valid, because it was given by someone with (presumably) more than 1k words into core2k.
I merely provided a log of sorts, to document the experience of this valid opinion in action.

>> No.18171932

>>18171928
>The advice given to me was simply "read more".
"Read more" does not mean force yourself to read things you have no chance of understanding.

>> No.18171934
File: 44 KB, 543x405, 1458398207241.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18171934

Daily English Thread

>> No.18171939

Is 子 ever used on its own to mean child? If yes, what is the difference with 子供?

>> No.18171940

>>18171922
>only one person could ever disagree with me because i'm always right
I didn't participate in this discussion and if you're not ESL you are surprisingly stupid for a native.

>> No.18171941

>>18171922
Actually based on >>18171816 and >>18171855 compared with the timestamp for >>18171858 , as many people are saying is wrong as people that are saying it's right.

>> No.18171942

"They're a beginner" is 100% completely unambiguously fluent, idiomatic, and grammatically correct, and has the right meaning.

>> No.18171943

Every time I pop into this thread what is obviously the same guy, who has been here for years, is mid-way through a four hour long argument about some meaningless beginner shit. Don't be that guy. Close this thread now.

>> No.18171945

>>18171941
The first two are the same person. The third is someone explaining what they think.

>> No.18171949

>>18171939
Use a dictionnary
This will save time for both of us

>> No.18171957

>>18171940
No, anon, this one person segued from raging against "read more" to raging against "they're a beginner" because they thought they had something to grab onto to prove the other side wrong. They were wrong. They have nothing.

>> No.18171963
File: 109 KB, 735x960, okay grandpa.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18171963

>>18171913
this is (You)

>> No.18171965

>>18171932
No of course not, it mean doing so while completely guessing and making of the meaning of whatever you don't understand, all based on the context given from the manga frame depicting a smug anime loli.

>> No.18171971

>>18171963
Have fun being literally completely wrong until you die.

>> No.18171972

>>18171932
Correct. But it also doesn't provide any insight into what constitutes skill-appropriate reading material. The most genuine and honest takeway I'd have from the advice "read more", would be to instinctively pick up a manga, game, or whatever else that interests me and begin to work my way through reading it.

>> No.18171975

>>18171957
All participants in your autistic slapfist are on the same side of never learning Japanese.

>> No.18171976

>>18171965
It doesn't mean that either.

>> No.18171977

>>18171942
Keep repeating it, it'll be more true that way. Oh and read more.

>> No.18171983

>>18171957
I was never about read more. What the fuck is going on ITT

>> No.18171986

can we go back to learning japanese

>> No.18171987

>>18171983
Not you.

>> No.18171988

>>18171963
i tagged the wrong person but i'm sure they'll see it regardless

(oh shit there's another common instance!)

>> No.18171991

>>18171943
He's the local mascot though. I call him Sakura-autist or Sakubi, depending on his tone.

>> No.18171995

>>18171949
Then what's the difference between 人の子 and 子供?

>> No.18171996

>>18171991
unrelated people from different eras

>> No.18171997

>>18171986
DJT isn't about learning japanese anon, this is where we fling shit at each other over the pettiest shit.

>> No.18172001

>>18171957
Take your meds you paranoid dip.

>> No.18172004

>>18171997
No, this is where people have four-hour arguments about things they don't have a place to talk about, then jump on the people they're arguing with the moment they say something that fake grammar says is incorrect.

>> No.18172008

>>18171943
Can you imagine how much better at Japanese, or even English, he could be if he put those 4 hours per day into language?

>> No.18172014

>>18172008
anon, arguing is the #1 source of my english competence

>> No.18172015

>>18171995
i imagine just like synonyms in any language that you pick the one that feels more appropriate given the context. and you learn those contextual instances by reading more

>> No.18172018

>>18172001
Nothing paranoid about it when they admit to it, anon.

>> No.18172019

>>18171996
It could entirely be the same person. How would you know? But seriously, it's only because I always get our boogeymen mixed up. You know, lack of medication and all. Read more

>> No.18172021

>>18172019
i'm one of them

>> No.18172030

something i dont grasp is tenses of words, I see things like "塗り” on twitter or just now ”浮かない" and they arent progressive tenses, so what are they saying? "not float" and "paint"? i understand this is thinking in english but am I wrong in thinking that the tenses are necessary in japanese too?

>> No.18172038

>>18172030
塗り is tenseless
浮かない has no logical tense because it's a present negative
tl;dr: read more

>> No.18172043

www.strawpoll.me/14781641

>> No.18172045

>>18172043
Wrong. It needs to say "to describe a single person".

>> No.18172052

>>18172045
http://www.strawpoll.me/14781652

>> No.18172054

>>18172043
>fluent native person
Oh boy, I wonder whether the person who made this poll is a native speaker of English?

>> No.18172056

>>18172043
What does this even mean? One is plural, one is not. It depends entirely on the context.

>> No.18172061

>>18172056
The intention is to describe a single person.

>> No.18172063

>>18172038
oh wait, i forgot nuri is a noun.
is 浮かない "doesnt float" then? even though the context is people literally currently sinking?

is there cases where a verb is being spoken in an affirmative non-progressive tense while currently occurring then?

>> No.18172066
File: 13 KB, 200x255, 1419776798781.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18172066

>>18171872
>自我
>母
>性欲

I don't like the ring of this

>> No.18172067

>>18172061
Then the plural is completely wrong. Why is this even a question?>>18172063
>is 浮かない "doesnt float" then? even though the context is people literally currently sinking?

>> No.18172070

>>18172063
Autoreply fucked up.
>is 浮かない "doesnt float" then? even though the context is people literally currently sinking?
Yes. "They're not floating". They're sinking.

>> No.18172072

any advice for getting back into a routine /djt/? i got back from a long trip recently during which i tried to keep up with anki reviews (and did so decently enough), but since returning I've utterly lost my tolerance for it even though I didn't mind it at all for the first couple months. i haven't really replaced it with anything else either

>> No.18172076

>>18172072
>/djt/
Stopped reading

>> No.18172077

>>18172052
Protip: if you answered "They're beginners." on this poll and you weren't trolling, you don't know English.

>> No.18172085

>>18172077
You're just mad that this poll http://www.strawpoll.me/14781641/r has ''They're beginners'' winning.

>> No.18172086

http://lmgtfy.com/?q=is+they+singular+or+plural

>> No.18172087

>>18172085
That poll is a strawman though.

>> No.18172088
File: 473 KB, 1125x720, 1447056283315.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18172088

>>18172066
You read the pic, you know what you need to do.

>> No.18172089

>>18172076
thanks for the response

>> No.18172094

>>18172086
It doesn't matter whether the subject is a singular or plural noun. Number agreement in English is entirely based on logical number, not grammatical number. The United States of America is a country. The United States of America are not countries.

>> No.18172096

>>18172086
And the first result says:
>According to standard grammar, “they” and its related forms can only agree with plural antecedents. But English sorely lacks a gender-neutral singular third-person pronoun, and “they” has for centuries been pressed into service for that purpose, much to the grammarians' chagrin.
ESLs in this thread BTFOd. It's improper grammar, deal with it.

>> No.18172100

>>18172096
It's not improper grammar. It's completely grammatical. It has been used this way since at least the 1500s.

>> No.18172104

>>18172096
Grammarians are literally always wrong. They were wrong about the nature of language, they were wrong about syntax, and they were wrong about grammaticality too.

>> No.18172105

>>18172086
>One common bugbear of the grammatical nitpicker is the singular they. For those who haven't kept up, the complaint is this: the use of they as a gender-neutral pronoun (as in, “Ask each of the students what they want for lunch.”) is ungrammatical because they is a plural pronoun.
Well that settles it.

>> No.18172111

>>18172105
Presenting a group's opinion is not stating that opinion.

>> No.18172115

>>18172104
>>18172100
>Grammarians are wrong
>Virgins in their basements are right
DJT never lets me down.

>> No.18172120

>>18172115
Grammarians are just fake linguists, anon. Linguistics entirely agrees with singular they being correct.

>> No.18172129

>>18172105
from the same article
>We will note that they has been in consistent use as a singular pronoun since the late 1300s; that the development of singular they mirrors the development of the singular you from the plural you, yet we don’t complain that singular you is ungrammatical; and that regardless of what detractors say, nearly everyone uses the singular they in casual conversation and often in formal writing.

>> No.18172134

Did you know? "You" is plural too. That's why you use "are" with it instead of "is", "am", or the dead singular second-person "art".

>> No.18172135

>>18172096
Language is defined by the times and they is, and was in common practice as both depending upon context.

Someone fluent would be able to grasp both easily and both are perfectly acceptable within professional writing, which is really what matters more than a hardcore grammarian arguing upon extremely old metrics for what is "right" and not.

This whole debate is pretty stupid in that both of the poll choices are perfectly fine English if the one with "beginners" was intended to be plural.

>> No.18172150

>>18172111
He has done this at least twice in this half of the argument alone, he doesn't know English or Japanese, stop responding to him.

>> No.18172152

>>18172135
But you're wrong people. My grammar textbook says so. If it uses "are" it has to be plural. No buts!

>> No.18172161

>>18172120
So based on arguments such as >>18172100 , if nignogs use ebonics long enough, it'll be considered proper grammar in standard English? Fuck off, you look ridiculous. Grammarians aren't making things up, they look at where English comes from and establishes rules steeped in Germanic origins, and try to prevent the language's inherent structure from being affected too much, which English runs the risk of with French seeping in the language for a millenium now.

>> No.18172160

>>18172134
So it should actually be "They art a beginner".

>> No.18172167

>>18172161
There is nothing at all ebonics-like about singular they. It's completely accepted in every register of English everywhere that it's spoken as a native anglo language.
You don't know English, get over it and learn from your mistakes.

>> No.18172169

>>18172129
Fine, so we better start using ebonics and bad chat-room writing, since that's what the majority of people are doing.

>> No.18172171

>/djt/ - Daily Jenglish Dgrammar

>> No.18172183
File: 111 KB, 400x318, 1459544843204.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18172183

And now I remember why I decided to lurk djt again after almost a year of not doing so.

>> No.18172184

>>18172134
Because of Norman French influence. It isn't inherent to what English is supposed to be. Back then they didn't have grammarians protecting language. Today we do, so we're better off following their advice.

>> No.18172192

>>18172184
Singular "they" predates singular "you".

>> No.18172194

>>18172169
see >>18172167
>>18172183
glad to entertain

>> No.18172197

>>18172167
It started off with a small group of people deforming the language's grammar though. How can you not see this? That's why prescriptivism is important today, it prevents the loss of a language's main grammatical traits.

>> No.18172199
File: 160 KB, 1280x720, 1493522101974.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18172199

>>18172169
>and often in formal writing

>> No.18172202

>>18171422
/i/s11BUl6LV7nR
I tried, drunk and stuck in intermediate hell please be nice

>> No.18172220

>>18172192
Exactly, and today both of them can be singular or plural, because historically we let the way people speak deform the language's grammar and precision, making it a bad mutt language, which speakers of any other language can clearly see, especially Romance languages which are more precise. Hell, even the other Germanic languages have retained their capacity to be precise. English has lost all these traits.

>> No.18172245

>>18171785
>>18171803
I flipped open my copy of flying witch to double check, and i would say it has less slang and is easier than Yotsuba. Papa san is nearly impossible to understand at times. otherwise kei kun and one chan use some slang but it's easy to decipher, makoto speaks very clearly in polite form and the liquor girl and chinatsu speak clearly in both polite and short form. It's very fun to read, especially if you like the anime

See >>>/int/83888404 and >>>/int/83889615 for a discussion of the one crazy point in the first manga volume, I can't remember the last time I cross linked so I hope that works

>> No.18172260

>>18172245
Hey they're actually discussing Japanese on the other board. That sounds like good times.

>> No.18172265

>>18172245
Thank you!

>> No.18172315
File: 36 KB, 512x384, 1427236592009.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18172315

>>18171872
>肉体
>動物
>温水
tfw I was unironically hungry when I read this

>> No.18172376

>>18172197
Speak Old English or you have no argument.

>> No.18172392 [DELETED] 

>>18172245
So int is actually better than jp?

>> No.18172394

>>18172392
No, they have just as toxic arguments.

>> No.18172408

風香ちゃんに結婚したい!

>> No.18172409

>>18172408
同様

>> No.18172435
File: 16 KB, 640x480, 1513721781698.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18172435

I started tae kim and c2k just under a month ago and today I successfully read my first few pages of よつばと. It was pretty satisfying for me and I can't wait to read further.
thank you for listening to my blogpost please subscribe

>> No.18172472

>>18172435
How many core2k cards a day?
I'm at 300 and thought about giving reading a try next week

>> No.18172508

>>18172392
Pretty much goes without saying
>>18172394
As opposed to here? Have you even read this thread? It's 100% toxic arguments.

>> No.18172515

>>18172472
5722 remaining on c6k. Give it a go. You'll get a lot wrong at first.

>> No.18172517

>>18172508
It's not 100% anon.

>> No.18172529

>>18172472
Have fun looking up 9 words out of 10 every sentence. 3k words is the consensus on when reading should begin, as was proven in this thread.

>> No.18172534

>>18172408
x 誰かに結婚する
o 誰かと結婚する

ちなみに風香を孕ませたい

>> No.18172542

>>18172517
Maybe not 100% toxic, but certainly 100% arguments.

>> No.18172551

>>18172534
Cant you use に if the other person doesnt want to marry you and is forced to do so?

>> No.18172593

>>18172551
に doesn't have that meaning

>> No.18172623

>>18172534
i am terrible with all the particles that have multiple usages

>> No.18172631

>>18172551
You can in sentences like 彼女は親に俺と結婚させられた, but the に indicates who forced her into marriage, not who she was forced to marry. 結婚する is a reciprocal action or relationship (see the second DoBJG entry for と), so the particle which marks the marriage partner (or, in a more general sense, the other side of the reciprocal action or relationship) is always と.

>> No.18172647

>>18172623
so... all of them?

>> No.18172684

>>18172551
maybe you got that impression from 友達に会った being explained in a previous thread, but unilateral doesn't mean forced

>> No.18172687
File: 23 KB, 190x179, zpiodu.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18172687

>>18172647
yeah

>> No.18172689

>>18172647
Stuff like まで is pretty straightforward in its usage.

>> No.18172699

>>18171872
忍者

友情

練乳

あたしはことしなにになればいいの

>> No.18172719

>>18172699
牛の忍びだ

>> No.18172728

>>18171872
忍者
体力
冷静

>> No.18172736

>>18171872


>> No.18172744

>>18172736
ホモ

>> No.18172863

>>18172719
あたしが忍者になるの?

どっちかというとせんぞはサムライだけど

うし?

>> No.18172879

>>18172863
そう
練乳で陰から世界を守ってください

>> No.18172893

>>18172863
>せんぞはサムライ
嘘つけ百姓

>> No.18172899

>>18172879
ちょっとつぼった

>>18172893
さむらいだよ

ちゃんと二つ名もあった

「人斬り」

>> No.18172900

>>18171525
>yotsuba
>kiddie slang
It's garden variety spoken Japanese, the sort of dialogue found everywhere. Why do I get the feeling that those who react this way to suggestions of reading yotsuba haven't read any manga or watched any anime?

>> No.18172916

>>18172900
Spoken Quebec French is garden variety in Canada, but people learning French should learn it from more neutral material at first. Starting language learning with the slangy oral version of the language is really retarded. You should be ashamed for propagating such stupidity.

>> No.18172923

What's up my dudes? I don't really come here anymore as I've "learned" Japanese, have Japanese friends, bang Japanese girls, and consume Japanese media without subtitles now, but I like to shitpost here once in a while.

Has anyone else transitioned into learning Chinese? We all know that the great thing about learning Japanese is all the interesting media there is to choose from. What do you use to learn Chinese?

>> No.18172938

>>18171564
Zettai Reiiki is full of the same "kiddie slang" as yotsuba, but with less visual cues and a higher text density. In future, please refrain from handing out advice to beginners regarding things you clearly aren't familiar with.

>> No.18172941

>>18172899
百姓の木こりジジイにいきなり斬られる人の気持ち
こわいな

>> No.18172946

>>18172938
Not him but beginners should shut the fuck up and stick to the guide.
That's how it works for everyone, posting here doesn't do shit for one's japanese learning.

>> No.18172990

>>18172946
>posting here doesn't do shit for one's japanese learning.
Neither does replying ''read more'' to everyone. This is pretty much a thread where as a beginner, you're better off swiping the guide and never look back, never come here again.

>> No.18172999

>>18172938
>less visual cues
But the subject matter is a hell of a lot more coherent if you don't understand Japanese daily life.
>higher text density
That's a good thing because it means there's more language context.
>full of the same "kiddie slang"
Not really. Yes, it has contractions like ちゃう and なきゃ, but no, the characters don't speak like illiterate five-year-old children.

>> No.18173003

>>18172990
Nah, you're supposed to come here to shitpost and tell beginners to read more because that'll be much better than sticking around these threads.

>> No.18173008

>>18173003
This basically.

>> No.18173021

>>18173003
No, telling beginners with less than 1k words to read more isn't beneficial for them. They'll bang their head against the wall constantly looking up shit in dictionaries, and end up giving up. But I guess it's what petty, pathetic people like you want beginners to do. This thread is like your secret club, isn't it?

>> No.18173024

>>18173021
Banging your head against a dictionary is a better use of your time than arguing about learning methods.

>> No.18173032

>>18173024
Using Anki until reading becomes less discouraging is a better use of your time than listening to your awful advice.

>> No.18173035
File: 41 KB, 480x622, 1473315736286.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18173035

>>18173021
Banging your head against the wall is something ALL beginners go through in any language learning. Giving up or breaking the wall is what decides who gets to learn this forsaken language.

They should stick to the guide, which means getting at least core2k done, etc.

>> No.18173040

>>18173032
Sure, if you need Anki, go for it, but reading remains a better use of your time than arguing about learning methods. Yes, I mean you, the person I'm responding to.

>> No.18173044

When you did 2k, how many new cards did you do a day?
I know there's no correct answer, I just want a reference on what I should aim for.

>> No.18173052

>>18173035
>which means getting at least core2k done
At least we can agree on that. People here have to stop saying ''read more'' to people who haven't at least hit this checkpoint. Reading before this point is torture and a beginner can make better use of his time, like reading Tae Kim or JTMW.

>> No.18173058

>>18173044
20-25 is a solid pace, any less and you won't make much progress, any more and you'll be struggling to keep up.

>> No.18173061

>>18173040
I'm arguing about learning methods because you people are telling beginners to read before they know enough words for it to be beneficial as an activity.

>> No.18173067

>>18173052
Even if you don't know anything, reading is an effective use of your time. The reason you go through Tae Kim and Core 2k is so that you can read for longer, earlier, without burning out. Arguing about learning methods in these threads is a worse use of your time.

>> No.18173070

>>18173061
It's always beneficial dude. Like half the people I know that read untranslated VNs never memorized any vocabulary after the first couple hundred most basic words (stuff like 木). No, they don't use reading assistance tools, they know Japanese.

>> No.18173072

>>18173058
I feel you can go down to 10-15 if your schedule is busy for like 2 weeks, and just go back to 20 after the busy period. The important thing is to never go down to 0, or not do your reps. Better to lower than stop completely.

>> No.18173080

How accurate is this if you're not a brainlet?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Japanese-Language_Proficiency_Test#Estimated_study_time

>> No.18173085

>>18173072
Yep, agreed. It's a balancing act between the daily workload and your overall sense of how much progress you're making.

>> No.18173088

>>18173080
Anything about language learning that doesn't come out of a governmental or military agency, or upper academia, can be assumed to be complete bullshit.

>> No.18173092

>>18173067
>The reason you go through Tae Kim and Core 2k is so that you can read for longer, earlier, without burning out.
Learning grammar isn't like an energy drink. You actually need basic grammar knowledge in order to make sense of what you're reading. You can't just guess, unless you already know a grammatically similar language like Korean.
>>18173070
Not a lot of VNs are structured with simple phrases only using basic kanji like 木.

>> No.18173093

>>18173058
>>18173072
>>18173085
Cheers guys.

>> No.18173096

>>18173061
The problem with Anki'ing your way to more vocab is you aren't getting much context or experience with the actual language. Anki is a huge energy drain, too, and gives you a false sense of accomplishment.

>> No.18173098

>>18173052
Could you fuck off? You were already completely destroyed earlier and outed as a moron, please stop pushing this

>> No.18173099

>>18173092
>You actually need basic grammar knowledge
This is true, but only in the very broadest strokes. You don't need to memorize the various ways of saying "but" or "even". You just check them with your dictionary.

>> No.18173104

>>18173072
Top shitpost m8.

>> No.18173105

>>18173092
>Not a lot of VNs are structured with simple phrases only using basic kanji like 木.
So? There are these things called dictionaries, anon.

>>18173098
This.

>> No.18173107

>>18173096
It is, but if you're not a brainlet, you can at least get to 2.5-3k before reading and still retain everything fine without having to see it in the wild to consolidate that vocab.

>> No.18173108

This >>18173104 was for you >>18173070

>> No.18173112

>>18173107
The problem's not retention, the problem is how half the words you're memorizing are only used in specific ways and you're not going to pick up what they actually mean until you see them a shitton when reading. You're going to have a false sense of understanding until you re-learn from exposure.

>> No.18173114

>>18173108
That's not a shitpost, I'm in the same boat. We all came out of DJT, in fact. Half of us dropped Core at like 500 words and only ever bothered to mine like 1000.

>> No.18173117

>>18173098
The survey results say otherwise amigo.
http://www.strawpoll.me/14781241/r
>>18173104
We're not all NEETs in our parents basements. End term uni exams can fuck over your retention so much, you're better off lowering new words for a week or two.

>> No.18173122

>>18173105
And looking up every 9 out of 10 words can be tiresome. Reading isn't worth it when you don't have enough vocab.

>> No.18173125

>>18173117
It wasn't ever about comfort, it was about what's good for you. A lot of people really hate exercise and taking care of their personal hygiene at more than a basic level. They do it anyway. Got half an hour to spare? Forcing your way through 20 lines of a VN will do you more good than adding 20 new cards to Anki and doing your reps, at least if you're using really bad shared decks.

>> No.18173127

>>18173122
You stop looking up 9 out of 10 words once you learn like four words. >>18171281

>> No.18173129

>>18173117
im at 2k and voted 3k, however im going with the 6k dudes opinions personally

still going to read a bit beforehand because I dont want to spend a whole year on anki, but it's certainly not comfortable and i agree with you primarily, anyone who screams to read instantly can get fucked; at least buffer a month or 2 beforehand with 1k words and tae kim. reading a volume of yotsuba with the reading pack immensely helped my understanding of simple sentences, cant say much else tho.

>> No.18173131

>>18173125
Apparently, 6 out of 9 people answering the survey think YOU'RE full of shit, and agree with me that reading starts being more comfortable and beneficial when you have at least 3k words. Don't be so mad that the survey didn't go your way.

>> No.18173132

>>18173114
I Anki'ed about 10,000 words years ago like an idiot.

>> No.18173134

>>18173129
>at least buffer a month or 2 beforehand with 1k words and tae kim
This is what everybody has been saying. The idea that you should read before 1k words is a strawman.

>> No.18173142

>>18173132
It happens.
>>18173131
Can you read?
>It wasn't ever about comfort
Making a poll about comfort doesn't mean that other people were arguing about comfort.

>> No.18173153

>>18173142
It certainly is about comfort, because when it ''starts'' feeling comfortable is when you read faster, and therefore can read more stuff, and more importantly you actually feel like you can understand more and everything snowballs from there. Before that, it's only discouraging and it's where most people burn out and give up learning Japanese.

>> No.18173165

>>18173153
It's only discouraging if you think you're supposed to be able to read "for real" yet.
>it's only discouraging and it's where most people burn out and give up learning Japanese.
No, most people burn out on RTK or Core. If they at least read before burning out they'd have real fundamentals when they come back years later.

>> No.18173169

>>18173134
You don't know what a strawman is.

>> No.18173174

>>18173169
A strawman is a fictitious position invented by someone on one side of an argument to present the other side of the argument as having the fictitious position.

>> No.18173182

>>18173134
i think in some cases it is, but as i was in these threads the past few months I saw "begin reading IMMEDIATELY" plenty of times.

i ignored them and went through tae kim and the reading packs since that basically hands the words to you on a plate and doesnt make the entire issue with reading + core/mining a thing, also just finished the entire dojg deck and I think it established a really good foundation or library of what I need to expect while also solidifying a few other things.

I still suck though, 4 months in and I dont think it's enough despite spending hours a day reviewing. i have about 2300 words as of today exposure including a few hundred grammar word concept things I mixed in, i need to apply it

>> No.18173183

>>18173174
Which means that telling people to read more is not a strawman.

>> No.18173186

>>18173183
I didn't say it was. Nice strawman.

>> No.18173192

>>18173165
If you burn out before 2k words in Anki, this language isn't meant for you anyway. Also, being impatient and ''playing pretend'' trying to read VNs you can't understand isn't a good use of your time when you're an absolute beginner. The language is very different from European languages, and people have to be patient and rid a bit about grammar and learn enough words before going on to read things.

>> No.18173195
File: 140 KB, 1000x1086, DH9zUhcUwAE9SGQ.jpg orig.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18173195

>>18173182
>also just finished the entire dojg deck
I can't believe people still fall for grammar decks.

>> No.18173196 [DELETED] 
File: 14 KB, 277x280, 1451130023286.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18173196

>>18173186
HO HO HO

>> No.18173202

>>18173195
yeah but i dont have to come here and ask why suru is used to say someone has blues eyes and im very proud of this incredible achievement

>> No.18173203
File: 82 KB, 802x1200, とらドラ!_1_013.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18173203

>>18173192
https://vocaroo.com/?upload

>> No.18173208

>>18173202
What DoJG told you about that is wrong. There isn't really a "why".

>> No.18173212
File: 152 KB, 362x480, dMecNcX.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18173212

Can we stop arguing about when other people should start reading. People might have brain damage and need 3k words before being able to read. Stop bullying handicapped people.

>> No.18173213

>>18173212
Cute gif.

>> No.18173218

>>18173212
>People might have brain damage and need 3k words
Again, you're being condescending, making beginners feel like they're retarded if they can't comfortably read before 3k words, even though the survey shows that the silent majority in this thread think otherwise. Stop trying to get beginners to quit, and stop trying to control what DJT thinks about language learning.

>> No.18173222

>>18173208
it said that suru is used for owning attributes, youve clearly never read it so dont tell people what is or isnt right

>> No.18173225

>>18173222
>it said that suru is used for owning attributes
Yeah, that's wrong.

>> No.18173226
File: 171 KB, 1225x1763, 170.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18173226

>>18173212
READ NIGGA READ

>> No.18173231

>>18173226
tfw I can read this

>> No.18173236

>>18173225
do tell then, assuming you arent just being intentionally obtuse and semantic

>> No.18173238
File: 1.79 MB, 270x270, 1504753812835.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18173238

>>18173213

>> No.18173242

>>18173231
Beginners can't, which is the fucking point of not shitting on them for being beginners.

>> No.18173246

>>18173236
Post an example sentence where する is being used in the sense that DoJG is trying to define and I'll tell you what's actually happening.

>> No.18173250

>>18173242
Beginners shouldn't spend time in the thread unless they have specific questions that can't be answered by a dictionary, like "these two resources contradict one another, please tell me which one is right or how to figure out the right answer", in which case the answer is sometimes "read more" anyway because the explanation is too complicated to understand until you have enough of a grasp on the language to tell which resource is right in the first place.

>> No.18173251

>>18173218
> the survey shows that the silent majority in >this thread think otherwise
wow 3 people is the silent "majority"
>making beginners feel like they're retarded if >they can't comfortably read before 3k words
if you can't read easy shit like yatsubato or nhk easy before 3k you might actually be retarded.

>> No.18173255

>>18173250
Then tell them to fuck off and stick to the guide you dense fuck.

>> No.18173256

>>18173246
彼女かのじょは青い目をしています

>> No.18173266

>>18173256
This is translationese.

>> No.18173269

>>18173255
If I tell them to read the guide they might find the DoJG deck. I don't want to do that to them.

>> No.18173273

>>18173256
Anon >>18173266 is asking you to post something from native media in case you can't tell.

>> No.18173274

>>18173251
No, 3 people said 3k, and 3 people said 6k. That's 6 people saying at least 3k out of 9 answers. Now fuck off you autistic gatekeeper.
>you might actually be retarded.
Of course they are. Take your meds.

>> No.18173276

>>18172916
We advocate starting with more neutral material first. It's in your fucking grammar book. Are you the guy who wants people to learn 3-6k words before reading? Do you also want everyone to use graded readers for a year?

>> No.18173277

>>18173274
>you
>they
Those have different pluralities anon.

>> No.18173282
File: 243 KB, 812x810, 1482383486282.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18173282

>>18173269
DOJG deck is for those too stupid to use proper grammar books.
Let the brainlets suffer anon.

>> No.18173291

>>18173277
Don't know, the survey's still out on that one.
http://www.strawpoll.me/14781641/r

>> No.18173298

>>18173276
So the only existing reading material is either Yotsuba or graded readers? You're pretty dumb.

>> No.18173310

>>18173256
あおのカラコンはしゅみわるい

>> No.18173311

>>18173273
i posted it from a question from the last thread asking what する meant in it because "do" did not make sense, guess the other guy forgot to remove the furigana

I don't know what he expects from someone who has barely read yotsuba to go find someone using the word in the exact usage its defined as for it to be picked apart. He should be able to clarify everything wrong with it just by reading the dojg piece on it explaining what he clearly knows better

>> No.18173312

Not reading until it's "comfortable" is a terrible idea. Here's why.

- Reading is always going to be uncomfortable until you try to read for quite a long time
- Reading gets more comfortable the more you do it, no matter how few words you know
- Waiting until you have X vocabulary before you try to read is a really stupid idea. I mean, yeah, you should probably have a core vocabulary of several hundred words at a bare minimum, but waiting until something like 3000 words is a really bad idea. Whatever you're reading is not going to have the same distribution as the deck you're learning from, no matter what. Because the deck is not constructed from what you're reading, diminishing returns happen way, way earlier than they seem like they do.
- If you manage to do it for two months without quitting or skipping days, Anki becomes very addicting and you start to lose sight of your long term goals outside of it, and it gets more and more tempting to put things off. This includes losing track of reading and listening.
- You're way, way more likely to have tons of leeches in any vocabulary deck if you never expose yourself to native text.

>> No.18173315
File: 458 B, 15x23, help.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18173315

助けてください。

>> No.18173318

>>18173218
Please stop extrapolating things that were not said. Read what the survey asks, do not infer that the people who answered interpreted it with your same insane filter. Or make YET ANOTHER FUCKING STRAWPOLL that is VERY CLEAR that no one will fucking answer because you need to stop embarrassing yourself.

>> No.18173320

>>18173311
DoJG is very badly written so trying to figure out which sense it's describing when you didn't learn from it is very hard.

>>18173315

>> No.18173322

So the strawpoll faggot is also the "gatekeeping" faggot. Makes sense.
>>18173315

>> No.18173325

>>18173318
You're responding to the same person that made the deceptive "they're beginners" strawpoll, don't bother.
>>18173322
I know, right?

>> No.18173326

>>18173315

Perhaps 缶

>> No.18173328

>>18173203
Still waiting.

>> No.18173334

>>18173298
Yeah, after you can get through yotsuba you're fluent. It's the hardest material known to JSLs. Need to finish core6k though first and the grammar will slay you.

>> No.18173335

>>18173320
i dont need to figure out which sense its describing because its literally spelled out and obvious in dojg, i dont understand what youre talking about.

tell me whats wrong about suru being used for this meaning according to them

>> No.18173337

>>18173312
>if you never expose yourself to native text.
Literally nobody advocated for never reading. Who are you even arguing against? You're like these ''Women against rape'' movements. Nobody is for rape, it's ludicrous.

>> No.18173338

>>18173326
>>18173322
>>18173320
thank you, will i just recognize these better with time and practice or is it the font size being small/or having a poor scan

>> No.18173341

>>18173337
>Literally nobody advocated for never reading
>if you never expose yourself to native text.
never expose yourself ... before you arbitrarily decide to start "reading for real"*
Happy?

>> No.18173345

>>18173274
I am not gate keeping, if anything you are. You responded to someone who said they want to read with just 500 words saying wait till you have 3k. Postponing the enjoyable part of a language (i.e. reading) is the biggest cause of burn out. Sorry my words hurt your feelings.

>> No.18173348

>>18173322
More than one person has been using ''gatekeeper'' here this past week. Let's not turn this gatekeeper guy into the new Sakura-autist boogeyman.

>> No.18173354

Gatekeeper-schizo is a concept. An idea.

>> No.18173355

>>18173338
It's obviously less than ideal but absolutely readable. You will recognize it better in time.

>> No.18173359

>>18173318
You make the strawpoll. You seem to have a better idea how to formulate it, and I don't want to be blamed once again of obfuscating the matter by having a shitty question.

>> No.18173362

>>18173338
Both. You learn to recognize kanji by their general shape.

>> No.18173373
File: 16 KB, 478x370, 1484089083892.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18173373

>>18173362
Sure. Until you run into a set of very similar kanji.

>> No.18173374

この門から先は、誰も通さぬ!

>> No.18173381

>>18173345
No, the guy I replied to originally said it was hell reading and was asking when does it get more comfortable. I then replied 3k, because that's what it was for me. I never said you shouldn't read anything before reaching 3k, just that saying ''read more'' to everyone before they reach 3k isn't the remedy for every problem a beginner could be having.

>> No.18173386
File: 53 KB, 372x363, 2826394_1340657703802.11res_372_363.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18173386

>>18173274
>Now fuck off you autistic gatekeeper.
>3k word-kun is the same person gatekeeper shitposting Canadian

It makes sense. It all makes so much sense now

>> No.18173387

>>18173374
しまった

>> No.18173388

>>18173381
Obviously if they quit reading right then and got to 3k and came back to reading it wouldn't work at all.

>> No.18173390

>>18173373
in that case just use context

>> No.18173391

>>18173345
As a beginner, this. I was getting burnt out doing core and I started mining at 800 words. I wont argue if it's the most efficient use of my time or not, but it feels much better to do, and I think staying interested is the most important part. "Don't tell people to read early, tell them not to read early" is at least equally harmful if not more so.

>> No.18173393

>>18173386
Worried that he might be suicidal tbqph

>> No.18173402

>>18173359
http://www.strawpoll.me/14782862

>> No.18173404
File: 785 KB, 1080x1080, 1492102407957.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18173404

>>18173390
>when that happens just guess LOL
We should include that in the guide, this is revolutionary.

>> No.18173405

>>18173386
Take your meds. I'm sure this evil 3k gatekeeper Canadian is twirling his moustache right now, scheming and trying to figure out how to ruin your lives.

>> No.18173407

>>18173405
Why are you so obsessed with telling people to take their meds?

>> No.18173411

>>18173404
you can't learn japanese

>>18173407
maybe he's a pharmacist

>> No.18173419

>>18173388
Why not? Also most people agree with me based on posts such as this >>18173391 , and based on the poll results http://www.strawpoll.me/14781241/r
I don't even know why this is still being argued as if I was wrong. Clearly I was right all along.

>> No.18173421

>>18173348
How many different people do you figure made these posts?
>>/jp/?task=search2&ghost=yes&search_text=gatekeeper%7Cgatekeepers%7Cgatekeeping&search_subject=&search_username=&search_tripcode=&search_email=&search_filename=&search_datefrom=2018-01-02&search_dateto=&search_op=all&search_del=yes&search_int=dontcare&search_ord=new&search_capcode=all&search_res=post

Or these, for that matter?
https://archive.whatisthisimnotgoodwithcomputers.com/int/search/text/jp%20djt/country/CA/order/asc/

Just wondering.

>> No.18173422

>>18173419
see >>18173345 and >>18173318

>> No.18173425

>>18173404
Apparently it's what DJT does, simply make it up as you go along, and if anyone asks, just tell them you know Japanese, they won't know you're lying.

>> No.18173427

>>18173402
One shitpost answer was enough, did you really need four?

>> No.18173432
File: 46 KB, 394x370, 5176813-george-costanza-ocbd1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18173432

>>18173405
What has happened in your life that makes you shitpost this thread, day in and day out, under different personas? Why do you feel the need to do this? Why don't you go post on Reddit or kanji koohii where you would fit in so much better and where so many more people would agree with you? You lose every here argument but use the typical "if I post last I win!" troll autism and make up for what you lack in creativity with sheer effort.

>> No.18173433

i was supposed to be reading for an hour but i spent 2 here arguing

>> No.18173434

>>18173427
There are nine shitpost answers actually.

>> No.18173435

>>18173411
>maybe he's a pharmacist
This rabbit hole is pretty deep

>> No.18173438
File: 56 KB, 600x398, 1448652540987.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18173438

>>18173411
I can guess words though.

>> No.18173439

>>18173433
we told you to read more anon
you didn't listen
why didn't you listen

>> No.18173446
File: 124 KB, 358x272, 1449638198585.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18173446

>>18173433
>not listening to jap music or jap podcasts while you're shitposting your ass off here

>> No.18173450

>>18173432
It's really too bad he never posts screenshots. I remember when I broke the anonymity of one of the people that basically ruined the thread for months by posting a bunch of screenshots they took based on their window decorations and font rendering. They never posted again. That was so much fun.

>> No.18173452

>>18173421
Definitely more than one, the writing style isn't consistant throughout all posts. But I'd say 3 people tops.

>> No.18173461

>>18173452
There's a canadian and a brazilian that basically share exactly the same paranoid beliefs and bounce their narcissistic delusions off eachother outside of DJT.

>> No.18173462

>>18173452
The truest of shitposters mix it up.

>> No.18173463

>>18173402
That question is stupid, this conversation started with how comfortable reading get. A better question would have been ''When does the time/benefit ratio get advantageous when reading?''

>> No.18173466

>>18173463
>this conversation started with how comfortable reading get
No it didn't.

>> No.18173473

>>18173432
>What has happened in your life that makes you shitpost this thread, day in and day out, under different personas
I was afraid of this. The Sakura-autist samefagging paranoia is back. Maybe the flags on /int/ aren't that bad, because they actually prevent this from happening

>> No.18173476

>>18173463
The shitposter has been saying that responses to "when does reading get comfortable" were intended to answer the question "when should i hold off on reading until because it's a waste of time and will make me quit otherwise", so the new question is accurate to their insane shitposting.

>> No.18173479

>>18173462
this, not saying I shitpost or samefag but I frequently change my punctuation and word choice to contrast against other people in a conversation so the other person can easily identify me in the short-term

>> No.18173490

>>18173479
same

>> No.18173496

>>18173462
Were dealing with Moriarty tier shitposting now.

>> No.18173519

>>18173479
And you people call me the shitposter. You really are next level autistic.
>>18173466
It did, I'm the one who replied to the original guy and who started the whole conversation. I think I would fucking know.
>>18173476
>"when should i hold off on reading until because it's a waste of time and will make me quit otherwise"
I'd like for you to quote the fucking post that says that

>> No.18173523

>>18173519
>It did, I'm the one who replied to the original guy and who started the whole conversation
The conversation started before you and the person you were responding to isn't in the position you think they are.

>> No.18173528
File: 7 KB, 213x236, download.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18173528

>Me trying to pretend I did not participate in the shitposting

Let's change the topic. What is /djt/'s favorite Japanese singer/band and do you find listening to music beneficial to learning.

My favorite is prolly れをる。

>> No.18173530
File: 209 KB, 400x400, 1506837293558.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18173530

>>18173446
I'm watching some Japanese nerd smearing hot sauce on his sunburnt back on Youtube. Worth 3 years of learning.

>> No.18173536

>>18173530
That sounds amazing.

>> No.18173542

>>18173519
that was my first post in the conversation actually

unless I'm literally the only person on this site who does that, I'm just saying most ""analyses"" of writing styles from internet detectives can't be trusted

thinking always lowercase = samefag is something a 2-year-old would fall for

>> No.18173546

>>18173523
>the person you were responding to isn't in the position you think they are.
What the fuck is that supposed to mean? And the conversation started with the guy asking the question here >>18170380 , and me replying to him here >>18170426
The reply chain goes no further, stop lying.

>> No.18173567

>>18173546
>doable
This is not a synonym for comfortable, and your response doesn't say anything about comfort. Stop lying about the position from which they were asking their question.
>The reply chain goes no further, stop lying.
If you go two posts higher you will notice another reply chain about when to start reading. Conversation != reply chain.

>> No.18173568

>>18173528
none

no

>> No.18173571

>>18173528
ariabl'eyes
yes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=45QC449cvHI

>> No.18173576
File: 100 KB, 802x1200, とらドラ!_1_014.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18173576

>>18173546
https://vocaroo.com/?upload

>> No.18173582

>>18173402
8 votes from a thread with 89 unique posters. Conclusion: arguing about learning methods is a worse use of your time than studying.

>> No.18173585

>>18173582
I voted twice

>> No.18173588

>>18173567
I know it's not a synonym, but the way you guys go on about synthesizing the language through context so much, I would think that you people could figure out that the gut obviously meant ''when does it get more comfortable''.
>If you go two posts higher you will notice another reply chain about when to start reading. Conversation != reply chain
The debate started because of my standpoint on the whole thing, so it did start with me. I didn't read the previous conversation on the subject.

>> No.18173591

>>18173585
Good job.

>> No.18173594

>>18173588
Anon, "doable" and "comfortable" are different words with completely different meanings. You can't pretend that they mean the same thing.

>> No.18173598
File: 65 KB, 802x1200, とらドラ!_1_015.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18173598

>>18173588
https://vocaroo.com/?upload

>> No.18173605

>>18173576
>>18173598
we should make a DJT audiobook where each person reads a page

>> No.18173606

So now that I've actually started reading, there's one thing I'm confused about: what actually *is* the logic for when to use kanji, hiragana or katakana? I've started reading Hanahira and I see the weirdest shit, like using katakana for Japanese words, hiragana for English words, or shit like
>わかってない。ちっとも分かってない
(using both hiragana and kanji for different occurrences of the same word in the same sentence)

>> No.18173613

>>18173598
This is animal abuse. Poor inko-chan is doing his best.

>> No.18173614

>>18173606
With very common words there isn't really such logic.
If you really want an answer, using kanji as a contrast to using kana like your example emphasizes the meaningfulness of using the word.

>> No.18173619

>>18173594
Alone they have different meanings. In an expression like the way he used it in his question, it's obviously used in the same way comfortable would be used. The reason for that is that is makes no sense if he literally meant doable, since he already does read, only with some difficulty. Reading is never not doable if you have a dictionary.

>> No.18173625

>>18173619
Doable is much weirder than comfortable and using it instead of comfortable necessarily means that there is an aspect of the word comfortable that they were avoiding conveying. Therefore you cannot act as though they meant comfortable.

>> No.18173630

>>18173606
There is no logic, some fag authors even love using katakana instead of kanji.

>> No.18173636

>>18173546
>8 hours

I hope you remember how you chose to spend your youth in 5 or 6 decades when you're bedridden in a hospital and dependent on a minimum wage nursing assistant who hates you to change your catheter and shift your position constantly so you don't develop nightmarish incurable sores.

>> No.18173639

>>18173606
katakana seems to be used frequently with specific nouns like animal names, also saw it with grapes and etc. otherwise i have no clue

>> No.18173643

>>18173625
>using it instead of comfortable necessarily means that there is an aspect of the word comfortable that they were avoiding conveying.
You're inferring an awful lot. A lot of times words can be interchanged, and you simply use the first suitable one that comes to mind. Not because they have some weird autistic aversion to the other word like you seem to experience when you run out of meds.

>> No.18173645

>>18173643
Okay. "Comfortable" means "Possible at all" then.

>> No.18173649

>>18173636
And I loved every minute of it, I hope you did too.

>> No.18173660

>>18173645
It doesn't. The other hint in his formulation is that he said ''somewhat doable''. That and the fact that the guy didn't correct my use of the word comfortable as the conversation went on. Can you guys not understand simple communication if you don't have a manga panel giving you visual cues of what's going on? Subhuman cunt.

>> No.18173661

>>18169901
Man, I really hope that line is voiced.

>> No.18173662
File: 903 KB, 1280x720, 2018-01-07 05_07_35-(2) 【危険】日焼けした背中にデスソースぬってみた! - YouTube.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18173662

>>18173536
Would be better if he didn't get his cues from typical overacting Youtube faggots desu.

>> No.18173665

>>18173660
Anon, you said words can be interchanged. Therefore I can say that it means whatever I want it to mean. Just like you're doing.

>> No.18173674

>>18173665
Yeah, but people are free to correct you when you're wrong. Which the guy didn't do for me. So I guess I was right in my interpretation, wasn't I?

>> No.18173675

>>18173639
kana over kanji because most people can't read the official kanji for animals and plants

katakana over hiragana because katakana is the proper scientific nomenclature

>> No.18173677

>>18173674
Someone not doing something doesn't mean it wouldn't be correct for them to do so.

>> No.18173680

>>18173473
This actually is one autist stirring the gatekeeper shit and everything in this thread, he's Canadian and posts on int and has a very specific style

>> No.18173684

>>18173677
this thread really has no shortage of people to tell others theyre wrong

>> No.18173685

>>18173684
and they have been

>> No.18173686

Range ban Canada.

>> No.18173687

http://www.strawpoll.me/14782862/r
So even with the second survey, with the question formulated by someone other than me, the results are unambiguous, and the majority of people think you should have at least 3k words when reading. Case closed. Time to add this info to the guide.

>> No.18173689

>>18173687
Everyone who answered "over 10k" can have their answer discarded.

>> No.18173691

>>18173685
More people agree with me anyway, based on all the surveys. Case closed. Add it to the guide.

>> No.18173692

>>18173691
false

>> No.18173695

>>18173680
What style is that? I think we established that you can't go by writing style that much.

>> No.18173702

>>18173689
>Discard the answers I don't like
Good job winning your side of the argument.

>> No.18173704
File: 86 KB, 509x501, 1493345105258.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18173704

>922 / 85 / 90
いやはや~

>> No.18173705

>>18173702
They're troll answers so yeah. Also you really might want to check the poll again.

>> No.18173713

>>18173606
When it comes to whether to write a word in kanji or hiragana, there isn't really a consistent set of rules. This choice may be used to build a character's personality (e.g. a childish character using kanji very sparsely), or because a work is targeted at younger audiences, or because the author likes writing せい as 所為, or it might just be completely random.
Katakana can be pinned down to more specific situations, like animal/plant names as >>18173639 said (particularly when the kanji is not contained in the jouyou kanji list, also worth noting that katakana is used for scientific terms like ネコ科, similar to Latin nomenclature), and of course words that are meant to be written in katakana, like loanwords or slang. However, like hiragana, it can be used for stylistic purposes or at random.
tl;dr: 考えるな、感じろ

>> No.18173714 [DELETED] 

>>18173692
Nice Trump-tier argument there.
>>18173705
>Everything I don't like is a troll answer
Good job winning your side of the argument.

>> No.18173718

>>18173714
Please explain how someone saying to learn 10+ words before it's time to seek out native content for reading practice, however little, could possibly not be trolling.

>> No.18173721

>>18173718
10k+ obviously

>> No.18173726
File: 99 KB, 275x418, ybzxco.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18173726

what does なんです・なんだ mean in this?

>> No.18173729

>>18173614
>>18173630
>>18173713
I see, it's what I've come to expect of the Japanese language: "fuck you, that's why"

>> No.18173730

>>18173718
A lot of people have said over the years that they did 10k before reading because they didn't know how to go about starting to read. They answered the survey honestly based on their experience. I don't see why we should discard their answer just because they didn't go through the same process you did.

>> No.18173731

>>18173730
The question asks "should".

>> No.18173734

>>18173726
な is due to the preceding noun. んだ is in Tae Kim.

>> No.18173735
File: 24 KB, 694x627, file.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18173735

5+3+3 > 3+3

>> No.18173736
File: 1.38 MB, 1099x1195, 1459903530876.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18173736

>>18173726
なのですよ

>> No.18173739

>>18173731
It does. And a few people saw fit to start after doing 10k, which they did. It's their choice, even if it's not optimal for you. No need to be condescending about it.

>> No.18173740

So for morning, do I just add all the words I don't know? That's what I'm doing right now but obviously I'm adding words many times faster than I can study them in Anki. Isn't that a problem?

>> No.18173741

>>18173739
Have fun continuing to pretend to believe that trolls are on your side anon.

>> No.18173743

>>18173740
for mining, not for morning

>> No.18173745

>>18173735
10 votes just got added in the last 10 minutes right after I pointed out that it was slanted for my viewpoint. I feel shenanigans have been carried out.

>> No.18173747

>>18173606
>>18173729
Oh yeah, forgot to mention that katakana is also often used for stiff-sounding speech, like foreigners or machines.

>> No.18173749

>>18173745
If they were, it wasn't me.

>> No.18173754

>>18173741
http://www.strawpoll.me/14781241/r
This poll still makes me right, so I'm not worried about it.

>> No.18173757

>>18173754
Not at all. The results din't mean what you were asking for.

>> No.18173759

>>18173730
>A lot of people have said over the years
Maybe you shouldn't believe everything you read.

>> No.18173760
File: 22 KB, 280x280, 1450912397335.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18173760

>>18173754
>starts getting comfortable != should start reading

>> No.18173761

>>18173740
Yes. But you can and should be a little selective. Adding words that contain one kanji you know and one you don't is a great way to learn kanji, but adding words with no kanji you know too early is just going to give you a new leech.

And no, it's not a problem.

>> No.18173764

>>18173757
You're just guessing that people didn't get the question because the results don't suit your viewpoint. You're the definition of cognitive dissonance.

>> No.18173766

>>18173754
>This poll still makes me right, so I'm not worried about it
you sound like a 10 year old with this argument.

also I voted words are not real and I think this 3k+ is bullshit so 12>6

>> No.18173769

>>18173764
Your argument is about when to start reading. The poll that you said makes you right is about reading becoming comfortable. Different things.

>> No.18173774

>>18173760
The original question was when does reading start being ''somewhat doable''. My question about comfortable is better formulated for that context than ''when should you start reading''.

>> No.18173781

Do you guys really like arguing about pointless shit so much that you've spent hundreds of posts "arguing" with someone who backs up his "opinions" with strawpolls or are you just playing along?
http://ttbj1.cegloc.tsukuba.ac.jp/apply/agree/
http://j-cat.org/

>> No.18173783

>>18173769
I actually have never once said in this thread ''you shouldn't read before 3k''.

>> No.18173788

>>18173783
Your entire argument was, however, about the sentiment that telling people to read before 3k is bad. After all, words about what are conveyed by the statements in which they are used, not their precise meaning one by one.

>> No.18173794

>>18173788
>words about what
just in case anyone is wondering this is just really weird grammar, not a bungle

>> No.18173795

>>18173781
It's a slow 土曜日.

>> No.18173801

>>18173795
日曜日

>> No.18173805

>>18173788
It's never bad in the sense that it ingrains bad habits in your language learning process. Rather the time/benefit ratio make it non advantageous before around 3k. Which is what ''reading comfortably'' does, make that time/benefit ratio finally advantageous and less tiresome or conducive to burn outs.

>> No.18173813

>>18173726
>ソウナンデスカー

>ホントウデスカー

あんきしてね

あいづちにつかうよ

>> No.18173814

>>18173805
This post is completely incoherent anon.

>> No.18173817

>>18173794
It's fine grammatically, but the following word has to be ''is'', not ''are'' for it to be correct.

>> No.18173819

>>18173805
You're lost in your own shitposting at this point.

>> No.18173821

>>18173817
no "words about what" is a complete noun phrase followed by "are"

>> No.18173824

>>18173801
>The entire planet is in my time zone
I always say to my friends, this thread is smart, smart, smart!

>> No.18173825
File: 19 KB, 294x294, 1333028590638.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18173825

>back to english grammar

>> No.18173831

>>18173805
My experience is the total opposite, drilling anki is what makes me burn out and reading is what keeps me going. I burnt out twice (talking longer than a month of doing nothing) before I ever got to 500 words but ever since I've been reading I've been putting in multiple hours a day with no problems

>> No.18173832

We're going to hit 1k soon. You've all been getting baited for at least six hours by this prick. Under the extremely minute possibility that it isn't bait, he's absolutely delusional beyond help. Stop posting. All of you. It's okay for an idiot to get the last word. I promise. You don't need to prove to the beginners that he's wrong. It's clear to all. You don't need to prove to him that he's wrong. It's clear to all. Don't give in when he gets desperate for attention and says something new and stupid in a different direction like with the English tangent. You can do it. I believe in you. Dekiru.

>> No.18173838

>>18173832
It's okay, I do this to entertain.

>> No.18173840

>>18173814
>>18173819
Let me reformulate then. It takes too much time to read before 3k for it to be a beneficial use of a beginners time. At 3k, the time/benefit ratio shift and it starts being a very good use of your time. This tipping point is what was meant in the expression ''reading comfortably'' in the survey question.

>> No.18173842

Anyone here completed Tobira? Wondering whether it's appropriate for self-study and how to get use out of it. I'm probably pushing myself a little starting it but I think I can just about manage.

Also I've been adding words to a notebook that I've encountered then looked up with the intention of anki'ing it later and I think probably now I should actually get round to it. What's a good system for building up a vocab deck? The ankiconnect system on Firefox with the addon?

>> No.18173843

>>18173842
If you can read Tobira it's much more effective to spend your time reading native material meant for entertainment instead.

>> No.18173844

djt should return to /a/, this much shitposting belong there.

>> No.18173848

>>18173821
''What'' is conveyed is singular. Something ''is'' conveyed, not ''are'' conveyed.

>> No.18173850

>>18173848
the nexus of the noun phrase is "words" and therefore the noun phrase is plural

>> No.18173851

>>18173842
I think Epwing2Anki is the best if you want to make J-J cards.

>> No.18173852

>>18173832
But if I stop I won't have an excuse to not actually study Japanese. Arguing about pointless shit is what lets us pretend we're working hard, it's the white lie upon which DJT is founded

>> No.18173853

>>18173840
but reading is fun, anki is not.

don't take away new people's fun with your mouth diarrhea.

>> No.18173856

>>18173831
Maybe that's your situation, but most beginners in this thread agreed that reading and stumbling on every word was way more tiresome and made them lose their motivation more.

>> No.18173857

>>18173856
it's just you anon

>> No.18173861

>>18173840
Ok, I can agree with that.

>> No.18173863 [DELETED] 

>>18173832
>EVERYONE STOP USING THE INTERNET NOW FOR MY FEELS
>he's absolutely delusional beyond help
Yeah, I'm the delusional one.

>> No.18173868

>>18173863
who are you quoting

>> No.18173876

>>18173853
You're forgetting what it's like being a beginner and not knowing 90% of every sentence. Reading is not fun in that context.

>> No.18173878

this time zone needs a janitor

>> No.18173879

>>18173842
>What's a good system for building up a vocab deck? The ankiconnect system on Firefox with the addon?
Yup. Ankiconnecr, yomichan import, and a blank Google doc. Type all the words from your notebook into it and then importing them is simple. I did that for about 400 words in Genki 1+2 that I didn't know the kanji for to start off my new mining deck. There is a walkthrough on how to set up real time import in the guide

>> No.18173881

>>18173876
that stops being the case after you learn like literally four words

>> No.18173884 [DELETED] 

>>18173844
>/a/ DJT was shitposting free
Hi redd*t

>> No.18173895

>>18173884
What's it like having such shitty reading comprehension?

>> No.18173896

>>18173895
to be fair the post they're responding to is ungrammatical

>> No.18173905

>>18173895
blissful I'd imagine

everyone else either agrees with you or is an idiot

>> No.18173923

>>18173881
Sure it does.
>>18173857
Nope, see here >>18173861

>> No.18173928

>>18173923
pretty sure it's just you

>> No.18173936

>>18173881
which four

>> No.18173941

>>18173843
I'm only just. I know the pre-req kanji - Tobira seems to include exercises too which I'm seriously lacking in because I threw genki out of the window at chapter 4 or so and went for other guides and reading. I'm not finding much material at my reading level I actually enjoy - Stuff like とらぶる I can manage back-and-forthing with a dictionary plopping words on my notebook but I don't really like it.
>>18173879
Thanks, I'll do that on Firefox because I normally use chrome and Rikaikun which I assume I can't make work with this?

>> No.18173940

>>18173936
する
いる
ない
言う

>> No.18173948 [DELETED] 

>>18173928
Survey shows that you're a minority. This is the same cognitive dissonance that democrats who voted Hilary have. They think they're in the right and the majority, even after losing the election. The survey didn't lie, and obviously people don't find what I say to be that absurd.

>> No.18173950

>>18173941
you can read it if you really want but reading would be better for you
once you get past the initial hurdle of your brain adjusting to reading without being able to access the precise nuances of every single word and grammatical phrase (this is what reading was like when you were a little kid btw) it stops being annoying

>> No.18173952

As the 1000th post let me just say that this entire thread is a ruse.
A RUSE I TELL YOU

>> No.18173953

>>18173948
false
http://www.strawpoll.me/14782862/r

>> No.18173957

>>18173953
raise your hand if you voted more than once

>> No.18173958
File: 345 KB, 687x663, 1487109397223.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18173958

>>18173957

>> No.18173959

>>18173950
>(this is what reading was like when you were a little kid btw)
Aye but i was reading children's books as a kid and anything I'd like to read now in JP like World's End Economica would definitely be frustrating. If I can find the right stuff I'd keep reading.

>> No.18173962

>>18173953
Faulty question, nobody ever argued against reading entirely.

>> No.18173964

>>18173959
中学生向け漫画

>> No.18173968

>>18173962
they did however argue against seeking out native content for reading practice

>> No.18173970

>>18173964
幼稚園児向け

>> No.18173974

>>18173970
なんてない

>> No.18173975

>>18173968
I'd like to see that post, I've been reading everything for the past 10 hours, I haven't seen that.

>> No.18173976

>>18173970
胎児向け

>> No.18173977
File: 124 KB, 1080x1920, Screenshot_20180107-135129.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18173977

I finally created a mining deck. It's something that I regret not doing earlier. Excuses prevent you from reaching your goals.

>install anki
>install Japanese Support addon
>create deck and card layout
>add sentences

Was that really so difficult?

>> No.18173978

>>18173975
that's funny because i'm pretty sure you've read your own posts

>> No.18173981

>>18173976
精液向け

>> No.18173985

>>18173977
why on earth would you mine sentence cards

>> No.18173987

>>18173977
>sentence deck
into the trash

>> No.18173990

>>18173981
遺伝子向け

>> No.18173991

>>18173987
now that's just rude

>> No.18173994

>>18173977
>sentence deck
Oh boy.

>> No.18173995

>>18173978
Quote the post if it exists. It obviously doesn't, or else you would have produced it. That's the thing with you people, if you're losing an argument, you just make up shit in order to win.

>> No.18173996

>>18173990
原始スープ向け

>> No.18174003

>>18173991
into the trashお願い致します。

>> No.18174004

>>18173996
シンギュラリティー 向け

>> No.18174007

>>18174004
>that space before 向け
失敗した

>> No.18174009

>>18173941
Yomichan is on both chrome and Firefox. I just use it on Firefox because it has clipboard inserter in case I feel like playing VNs with a text hooker.

>> No.18174012
File: 134 KB, 1080x1920, Screenshot_20180107-140255.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18174012

>>18173977
Here are my fields. Expression and Reading are from the default Japanese Support card.
I added a field for the word by itself for better sorting and formatting as well as easier importing.
I also have two meaning fields for when I go j-j.

>> No.18174014
File: 253 KB, 347x427, 1472585637432.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18174014

>>18174007
My IME was not collaborating.

>> No.18174020
File: 788 KB, 1080x1080, 1489337271105.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18174020

>>18174014

>> No.18174025

>>18173987
>>18173994
Would you care to debase yourself enough to share your superior format?

>> No.18174028

>>18174025
spelling of word on front
everything else on back
don't mine ambiguous cards

>> No.18174030

>>18174025
It's called having just the word in the front, answer in the back.

>> No.18174036
File: 12 KB, 647x449, Capture.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18174036

>>18174025

>> No.18174052

>>18174028
>>18174030
>>18174036

So the Japanese support addon is essentially useless? B-but those ajatt youtubers use it though!

Ok great, I'm going to rethink this a little and edit my card template.

>> No.18174054

>>18174052
i think it was meant for a time when anki was bad and didn't display ruby text at all

>> No.18174078

>>18174052
The thing that will happen with sentence cards is that you'll eventually come up with "brain" just by seeing 「もう少し」. If a bird suddenly shit on your screen and covered everything but もう少し, you could probably pass the card without even reading the rest of the sentence.

It's not a desirable association at all.

>> No.18174128

>>18173824
your friends must think you're weird

>> No.18174289

>1000 posts in a day
Fucking weirdos.

>> No.18174294

>>18174289
it's been more than a day

>> No.18174415

What the best model for cards to use on Yomichan ? It says you can add 7 values in the guide but I can only do one for each field value.

Wanted to make it more or less similar to Core10k decks model.

>> No.18174539

>>18174078
this only happens if you only read inside anki. you should be doing like 99% reading and 1% anki.

>> No.18174554

>>18174539
wrong about sentence cards and irrelevant

>> No.18174572

(翌年の授業料を先行投資してのスタート)

(元手、たった10万円から始めた取引が、あっという間に100万円になった)

(大学に行くのも忘れて、パソコンの画面にはりついた)

(数字の波を泳ぎ――)

(専門書を読みあさり――)
can someone explain to me what (数字の波を泳ぎ――) would be? Is it like riding the waves? Context is above, if it's not enough, he's becoming an online stock broker trying to pay for school

>> No.18174574

あしたじしんがおこって

にちじょうがなにもかもこわされるとして

きょうなにをやっておきたい?

>> No.18174583

>>18174554
>irrelevant
what do you mean?

>> No.18174587

>>18174572
It means exactly what it sounds like.

Japanese doesn't have to be literal.

>> No.18174598

>>18174583
reading doesn't have anything to do with sentence cards

>> No.18174600

>>18174572
or if you're confused about the verb stem it serves the same purpose here as て form.

i.e. might as well be 泳いで

>> No.18174604

>>18174587
>>18174600
oh so it's more like 'swimming in the waves of numbers?'
im still very new to reading japanese so a lot of this is lost on me, especially grammatical stuff like this

>> No.18174613

>>18174604
it's not a grammar issue, you're just being a little too inflexible in your thoughts

I have no idea whether it's a good simile (metaphor?) but an accountant could easily write something that in their blog in English.

if you understood the first 3 sentences without help, you're well on your way, ganbatte anon

>> No.18174616

>feeling good because I nailed my core2k anki session
>lose any positive vibes because I once again realize I'm not even 400 cards deep yet

>> No.18174618
File: 356 KB, 763x554, ganbaruzoi.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18174618

>>18174613
oh no i'm using a text hooker because there's a lot of vocab i dont understand
but in terms of just understanding the sentence i got the first 3, yeah

>> No.18174619

>>18174616
How long did it take you? 400 cards isn't that insignificant. If you did it fast it should actually motivate you more.

>> No.18174626

>>18174619
20 new cards a day. So I guess 20 days.
But in the grand scheme of things its 400 cards out of 2000 (or 6000)

>> No.18174628
File: 148 KB, 1080x1920, Screenshot_20180107-171720.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18174628

Thanks /djt/

Updated with word on front only.
Feilds for auto furigana generated sentence, Japanese definition, English definition, and extra notes field at the very bottom.

Also spent way too long playing with css. I think it looks badass and I'm in my late thirties.

>> No.18174629

>>18174626
in the grand scheme of things you're going to be eaten by bacteria and forgotten

don't undervalue your achievements

also who were you quoting

>> No.18174634

>>18174626
So in 20 days you're already 1/5th of the way. Good job. Just 100 days, which is just a bit over 3 months, and you've done 2000 cards.

>> No.18174636

>>18174628
looks a lot better, except I would change the word to 「脳味噌」

It's not meme kanji or a meme reading at all and you will encounter it. I can also imagine failing this card a couple times by accidentally answering そう instead of of そ (or maybe that's just me), so it would be good to learn that too.

>> No.18174638

How should I go about learning Kanji?

>> No.18174639

>>18174636
but then again it's only one card so w/e

>> No.18174643

>>18174636
そうかいそうでもないのかい

>> No.18174646

>>18174626
20 new a day is great anon, i finished 2k in like 4 months at that rate
don't worry, it goes by WAY faster than you'd think
then again i'm only about 7 months into learning but it feels like i've hardly scratched the surface, i can still barely read manga/VN without a texthooker can somenoe tell me if this is very common?
but we'll all make it one day im sure

>> No.18174654

>>18174638
first describe what you've done and what you're unsatisfied with

>> No.18174662

>>18174654
I just learned the kana. The alternative guide says you can't learn kanji, as they are representatives of actual words you need to know first. But when vocabulary, shouldn't you learn what the kanji is for certain words at the same time?

So that's why I'm asking when I should be learning the kanji.

>> No.18174670

>>18174646
>can somenoe tell me if this is very common?
This is common. It takes years of diligent daily reading to be able to randomly grab different things to read and rarely look anything up, because there are tens of thousands of commonly used words scattered across a plethora of genres, time periods, etc.

>but we'll all make it one day im sure
Most anons wont but even a failed endeavour is more rewarding than the regret of not having tried in the first place.

>> No.18174673

>>18174639
>>18174636

I will, thanks.

Unrelated: I just noticed I'm not showing mincho on Ankidroid despite declaring it in the card layout.

>> No.18174681

>>18174662
Did you read this?

http://www.guidetojapanese.org/learn/you-cant-learn-kanji/

>> No.18174687

>>18174673
Try placing the font in the collection.media folder and selecting the option to use custom fonts, if you haven't already.
As an example, to get the stroke orders font working on Ankidroid, this is what was pasted into the card template
>@font-face {
>font-family: KanjiStrokeOrders;
>src: url('_KanjiStrokeOrders_v3.001.ttf');
>}
Making sure that the font file itself was reflective of the _KanjiStrokeOrders_v3.001.ttf file name and placed in the collection.media folder. It may even sync the font file over without issue, removing the need to manually copy the file over.

>> No.18174693

>>18174662
Ignore the alternative guide.

>> No.18174699

>>18174681
Ah, thanks. Should've looked at that.

>> No.18174731

夕方 晩 and 夜

what is the difference? I think 夜 is more like late night If I'm guessing it correctly but what about the other two?

>> No.18174743

>>18174699
I like writing kanji and I use correct stroke order but I would ignore what he says about it being essential. Learn it if you want.

>>18174731
Google it.

>> No.18174745

>>18171166
My advice is to just read through it briefly and start reading.
When you come across a grammar point you don't understand go back and read that part again.

>> No.18174746
File: 111 KB, 767x828, explorer_2018-01-07_04-16-37.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18174746

>>18174731

>> No.18174767

>>18174743
>>18174746
I actually googled it right after I asked. Should have done it first. Thanks anyway

>> No.18174783

ぐーぐるせんせいがいじめる

>> No.18174785

>>18174783
うーうーwww(^p^) ← お前

>> No.18174826

>>18173977
>furigana
Why?
If you don't have furigana you are forced to learn all the words in the sentence, which makes fucking sense if you add whole fucking sentences.
Not to mention that automatically generated furigana will always have mistakes.

>> No.18174847

>>18174616
nice blog

>> No.18174892

I tried googling this, but I got no answer. I have two decks with the same structure. I want to merge deck 2 in deck 1, but I want the cards from deck 2 to come after all the new cards from deck 1. When I copy and paste the cards, they get mixed. Order is important.
Does anyone know how to do it?

>> No.18174973 [DELETED] 

おなかすいた

おこのみたべたい

>> No.18175060

>>18174826
Cognitive overload. Testing yourself on one word is enough using anki as a supplement to reading.

>> No.18175134

>>18164460
For the same reason I learned English. To partake in culture.
I don't even have to leave my country for that as if I ever had ability to

>> No.18175135 [DELETED] 

>>18174973
で?っていう

>> No.18175206
File: 202 KB, 1080x1920, Screenshot_20180107-202308.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18175206

>>18174687
This did the trick

I decided to compromise and just put both the word and the sentence in the front. I'm not sure how I'll go in the long run, but it's easy enough to modify now that I've gotten into the Anki card formatting business.

>> No.18175254

Do the Japanese use ee in place of ii sometimes in casual speech?

>> No.18175420

>>18175206
>This did the trick
Good to see.

>I'm not sure how I'll go in the long run
The format is something which may end up changed a few dozen times but it certainly is easier to tweak once you've gotten your hands dirty a few times. As a throw away bit of advice, keeping a copy of your card layout in individual text files along with a corresponding screenshot of what it looks like can save headaches later on if you are the sort of person to tinker.

>> No.18175457
File: 25 KB, 643x363, 1485808209472.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18175457

庇護欲

>> No.18175485 [DELETED] 

>>18175254
pretty sure it's kansai dialect

>> No.18175496

>>18175254
pretty sure it's a dialect

>> No.18175525

>>18175457
発情

>> No.18175565

is tae kim's meant to be overwhelming and hard to follow/remember? There's just so much material and I'm only part way through it

>> No.18175571

>>18175565
It's supposed to be a guide, not an instruction manual. Read more and use it as a reference.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G5IPArDxO40

>> No.18175572

>>18175565
take notes if you want to on the first run but youre going to be going back to it or other grammar resources for quite a while when you read anyways.

>> No.18175573

>>18175565
Try Japanese: The Manga Way
https://mega.nz/#!xdg01AxA!L6rsoZESvl_C8jHyHIwgM7q9BFhr0jIHSPuOR1t8x1k

>> No.18175582

has anyone here used FujiTV website for streaming Japanese TV? there was an exploit that let you watch it without an account without restrictions but ledditors publicised it and I'm not sure whether it has been patched up or just I fucked up something reinstalling my software

tl;dr does the fujitv exploit still work for you?

>> No.18175608
File: 779 KB, 1244x783, eaevge.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18175608

>> No.18175701
File: 58 KB, 762x388, 1510846285408.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18175701

Core2k is a nightmare, how am I supposed to remember what 10+ new kanji look like every day and their associated words?
My retention isn't even that bad but I'm slowly but surely burning out, and I'm not even that far into it.

>> No.18175718

>>18175701
Reduce your new cards if you're having trouble keeping up. The only thing that matters is that you keep doing it everyday.

>> No.18175731

reminder that 'm' + dakuten should be 'b' and not 'h'.

>> No.18175740

>>18175701
I honestly don't get why people have such problems with this. I didn't learn any kanji to start and I was doing 50 words a day by week 2. I started slow because I was scared I would become overwhelmed, but after I wasn't I kept increasing. I even remember adding 100 words a day later on when I added the missing words from the 25k from my completed 10k deck.

>> No.18175747

>>18175731
Why? Because you don't like handakuten? If you want to make a such change, p should have its own kana and p + dakuten should be b.

>> No.18175748

>>18175740
ill take things that didnt happen for 500

>> No.18175758

>>18175748
Some people just learn fast.

>> No.18175759

>>18175740
How long did you put into anki per day, especially during 100? When did you stop? I could possibly do 50, but I think I'd get really fucking burnt out from the time put into anki every day.

>> No.18175761

>>18175747
No because that makes it consistent across the other dakuten characters.

か -> が
ka -> ga

さ -> ざ
sa -> za

ま -> ま" -> ま゜
ma -> ba -> pa

は -> ば doesn't even make sense.

>> No.18175763

Why is this thread so active? Is it full of newfags who made it their new year's resolution to learn Japanese?

>> No.18175765

>>18175759
Maybe like 90 minutes including adding new words. When I was doing 100 it was easy because it was a lot of characters I already knew. I didn't do 100 when I first started.

>> No.18175766

>>18175740
I have no idea how you could possibly learn 50 words such as 書く or 電車 a day without prior exposure
Maybe my memory is deficient or something, but it takes me a long ass time (2 to 3 hours) to get 20 new cards in and not forgetting half the next day

>> No.18175772

>>18175763
autistic petty fights over english grammar

>> No.18175774

>>18175763
It's been like this for a month, mostly pointless beginner arguments
Scroll up to like 10 hours ago, there was a 400 posts-long debate about whether it's best to start reading at 1k or 3k words. It was complete garbage.

>> No.18175776

>>18175766
What I would do is I would suspend everything, then I would unsuspend the next word in order, then I should search for example "vocab:*電*" (if it was a new kanji or something) then go through and unsuspend some of those ones too. Then move onto the next word and repeat.

>> No.18175777

>>18175763
Mostly because it's full of people who love arguing about inane shit.

>> No.18175794

おっぱい is beautiful word

>> No.18175810

>>18175776
Guess I'll try this out, this sounds like a better way to commit individual components into memory and might help make sense off some kanji. There's no way I'd know 電 means electricity if I only studied 電車

>> No.18175815

今日、皆はちゃんと勉強ことが出来るように祈っているよ!

>> No.18175819

>>18175810
You should start with a bigger deck then. I started with core6k when I did this, I don't know if there'd be as much overlap with characters in a smaller deck.

>> No.18175821

>>18175810
After learning 電気 and 車 you might know but good idea to look up individual new kanji as well

>> No.18175853

>>18175819
I'm also doing core6k, if I'm not wrong core2k simply refers to the first 2000 core6k words
By the way, is there a way to only suspend cards that I haven't reviewed yet?

>>18175821
I probably would have known then, but I had never come across 電気 before. It appears at position 620 while 電車 appears at 170

>> No.18175868

>>18175853
deck:deck_name is:new

>> No.18175877

>>18175868
Thanks a lot. I'll need to read Anki's manual more carefully at some point.

>> No.18175881

>>18175853
Also since you already did a bunch of words to start, you could take a few minutes and find combinations of characters you've already learned and unsuspend those, they are basically 'free' words in a way and they help you with the words you already know.

>> No.18175901

>>18175881
Yeah, I planned on trying this method for words I had trouble learning and those for which the components are still unclear to me. Thanks for everything anon

>> No.18175973

>>18175747

>> No.18175988

>>18175761
I get that the mouth position starts the same, but I think k->g and s->z are much closer than m->b regardless, unlike p->b.

>> No.18176052

>>18172435
Good job, I will get there soon. Did you finish Take Kim before reading? I just finished Basic Grammar section and I am able to sorta read some NHK Easy (looking up words all the time though but that is fine).

>> No.18176059
File: 88 KB, 1716x444, Screen Shot 2018-01-07 at 11.03.29 AM.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18176059

Got a big Amazon gift card. Should I do it bros?

>> No.18176103

>>18176059
Try the pdf version before pulling the trigger

>> No.18176125

>>18175988
I mean not even the Japanese think so. How many characters have readings like もく and ぼく? Basically any character than has on-yomi m-something will also be sometimes pronounced b-something.

>> No.18176196

>>18176059
No, buy https://www.amazon.com/Classical-Japanese-Grammar-Haruo-Shirane/dp/0231135246 and scan it!

>> No.18176345

Speaking of which, when is it a good time to start readign about classical Japanese? Any recommended sources?

>> No.18176347

>>18175206
6h learning interval? For what purpose

>> No.18176351

>>18176059
Have you started using it yet? Have you read the introduction? I have a copy and it was nice while I was doing it because it's really, really helpful to write down the kanji when thinking of the mnemonic for it. Also, if you're going to do the anki deck for this, disable all the recognition cards and only use the production cards

>> No.18176356

>>18176351
And by write down I mean have the book open on part of my desk and have my notebook right next to it.

>> No.18176361

>>18176345
When you're comfortable with modern Japanese.

>> No.18176395

>>18175988
If you get into etymology, you'll realize most of the words with 'm' anywhere inside them evolved from the words containing 'b'. And basically what >>18176125 said, look at the >>18175973 example.

>> No.18176411

>>18176345
You could do it fairly early. But what do you mean by classical japanese is the real question. If you want to read kanbun you could just learn chinese. But I think it's a must to learn 旧字体 and old grammar for anyone who is into japanese.

>> No.18176434

>>18176196
Is it worth it? I just checked and my local bookstore can get it for me. I always wanted to get into classical Japanese, but I thought that when I'm ready I'm gonna be able to read legit guides in Japanese. I don't want to waste money if half of this book is "well, yeah, watch out, 体 is spelled 體 and せう is actually read as そう", I'd rather learn on my own using online references. But if it's good for an intermediate who knows his shit, I'm gonna buy it.

>> No.18176460
File: 416 KB, 483x6319, 20180107漢字.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18176460

>>18176411
>But I think it's a must to learn 旧字体
I still don't get why people don't learn them as they go with regular forms. For most of the 常用 you just have to learn the simplification patterns and only remember the extreme cases, like in >>18176434 , aside from that it's pretty straightforward. Pic related is my grid, most of the "probably Chinese" are traditional forms and some variants. They're really easy to get into and they make me remember the regular forms better.

>> No.18176536 [DELETED] 
File: 41 KB, 1686x112, Screen Shot 2018-01-06 at 12.28.41 PM.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18176536

https://www.reddit.com/r/LearnJapanese/comments/7oqjns/2_years_of_self_study_resources_as_a_beginner_i/dsbh3lb/

>2+ years of self studying
>Only knows 400 words

>> No.18176552 [DELETED] 

>>18176536
>I also work about 60 hours a week and have a wife and 2 young children
Why do people always make excuses when they suck?

>> No.18176573

>>18176434
I've heard good things about it, but I haven't checked it out myself because it hasn't been scanned yet.

>> No.18176576

Why the FUCK is 話し合う at position 600-ish in core6k and 話し合い at position 4200-ish

>> No.18176593 [DELETED] 
File: 21 KB, 880x170, .png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18176593

>>18176536
Reading this hurts physically.

>> No.18176600

>>18176576
because they are essentially the same, so you either drop one of them alltogether or set them apart

>> No.18176603

>>18176460
Because they aren't practically used in modern japan outside of a bunch of exceptions like 燈 and 龍 (if we're talking about 表外字 there are a lot more ones like 遙, 檜, 鰺, 塡, etc.). It's not not nearly a priority. You could just as well do it with ease later (probably even easier). Also, all the 常用漢字 in your deck tell me that this numbers don't mean much.

>> No.18176604

>>18176576
because it got reordered
話し合い is supposed to be at 2400-ish

>> No.18176605

>>18176573
Hell, I might try it. I just hope it assumes at least some Japanese knowledge and doesn't waste time with hundred-page introductions and roumaji all over the place.

>> No.18176629

>>18176603
>(if we're talking about 表外字
Well, apparently I meant non 常用漢字 because those are actually in 人名用

>> No.18176631
File: 963 KB, 878x1080, 1512259898944.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18176631

>>18176603
But they look cool.

>> No.18176642

>>18176600
Why wouldn't you put them together? I mean this makes learning one of the two cards trivial

>> No.18176644

>>18176605
>I just hope it assumes at least some Japanese knowledge
Seems so: https://books.google.com/books?id=M5-vVlcVEDkC

>> No.18176664

>>18176593
whats wrong with that post? 2 years for 9000 seems like a more relaxed but still decent metric

>> No.18176666

>>18176631
Yeah, you will have to know them anyway sooner or later but your decks are mining ones or you started one lately.

>> No.18176676 [DELETED] 

>>18176664
9000 in 2.5 years is about 10 words a day. It's not unreasonable if you are studying very leisurely but the fact that he thinks it's exceptional or something ticks me off.

>> No.18176711
File: 427 KB, 484x5731, muramasa.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18176711

>>18176666
Yeah, it's a mining deck. I want to complete all the kanken levels; if I don't have any weird 表外 in my buffer, I mine them up from visual novel scenario files of the VNs I have. Pic related is Muramasa, for example. When I run out of VNs, I'll probably go down the Pre-1 and 1 to complete it.

>> No.18176739

問題: 人間の共同生活の総称はなんですか?
例文: これは大きな____問題になっている。

>> No.18176747

>>18176644
As I thought, it really goes wild with roumaji. I always had the feeling of the author mocking me or using it to gain a wider audience (people might be less likely to buy the book if all they see is kanji+kana). I'm really glad Kodansha decided to drop them completely. But other than that, based on those few pages, it looks really nice. Thanks for the recommendation.

>> No.18176762

>>18176676
>but the fact that he thinks it's exceptional or something
Getting annoyed over something imagined here, anon. Maybe don't dump Reddit garbage here anymore.

>> No.18176775
File: 211 KB, 765x766, 1444524076442.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18176775

>>18176739
人道?
人道問題だね~

>> No.18176786

>>18176711
>I want to complete all the kanken levels;
But...why? You already know how useful this is (aka amount of your "probably chinese kanji")

>> No.18176807

>>18176711
Also, I would recommend to use https://pastebin.com/MfRJEW6T for the good. I check this list a lot and you could study at least first 5000 characters from here without studying a lot of garbage.

>> No.18176809

>あとで電でんわします。
shouldn't あとで be written 後で?

>> No.18176815
File: 50 KB, 1085x760, de3e89291ac009cf06268ae1003e755f.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18176815

>>18176809
Why?

>> No.18176830

>>18176739
Do underscores always take half of a CJK character?

>> No.18176843

>>18176830
Because they're using ascii/half-width underscores.

>> No.18176844
File: 48 KB, 453x411, 1510730826519.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18176844

>>18176815
Because that's how I learned it in my vocab deck tehe~
More seriously, this is a sample sentence from core6k so I couldn't tell if this is correct or not. So there are words that you can write in kana even when they'd normally be written with a (very) frequent kanji?

>> No.18176850

>>18176844
You can almost always interchange kanji for just writing out the pronunciation.

>> No.18176855

動かねば
闇にへだつや
花と水

What does 闇にへだつや mean here? The translation of this poem is "In the dark, flowers and water cannot be discerned unless they move". I don't understand how that means "discerned".

>> No.18176879 [DELETED] 

>>18175774
I remember winning that argument, 3k is the sweet spot.

>> No.18176882 [DELETED] 

>>18176879
that didn't happen

>> No.18176885

>>18176855
闇 に へだつ や
https://www.weblio.jp/content/%E9%9A%94%E3%81%A4

>> No.18176892 [DELETED] 

>>18176879
You need to get banned, along with the other shitters who made this thread untelligible for us people actually learning Japanese

>> No.18176902 [DELETED] 

I mean, you can't really read anything until at least 6k anyway, and even then it's a stretch to assume you'll understand much.

>> No.18176905 [DELETED] 
File: 59 KB, 646x916, start reading.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18176905

>>18176879

>> No.18176910 [DELETED] 
File: 64 KB, 802x1200, とらドラ!_1_016.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18176910

>>18176902
https://vocaroo.com/?upload

>> No.18176919

Anki bros, how do you batch edit the style of all slides in a deck? My mining deck that I use w/ Yomichan has ant-sized text.

>> No.18176924 [DELETED] 
File: 32 KB, 636x398, 1.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18176924

>>18176910
You should only post that when people actually make claims to be proficient. I simply speak from experience as I have 6k words in my deck.

>> No.18176926 [DELETED] 

>>18176879
Doesn't it depend on your goals? I read native content to learn new words. Maybe you should rephrase it as "when can you read regular content without a dictionary every 5 seconds"

>> No.18176928 [DELETED] 
File: 81 KB, 802x1200, とらドラ!_1_017.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18176928

>>18176924
>Don't give learning advice if you're a beginner.
>Don't argue about learning methods if you're a beginner.
https://vocaroo.com/?upload

>> No.18176939

>>18176928
I still misread 部室 as 部屋 to this day because I read too many highschool-setting doujinshi early on as a learner.

>> No.18176945

America wakes up, thread turns into shit
Surely there's a 俳句 for this

>> No.18176948

>>18176739
社会?

>> No.18176952

>>18176945
america's here
the thread is turning to shit
america's here

>> No.18176957

>>18176928
I wasn't giving advice, I was just saying that you lack the raw vocabulary to understand anything aimed at native speakers at and especially before 6k. Whether you should read despite a lack of solid comprehensible input is another discussion.

>> No.18176959 [DELETED] 
File: 86 KB, 802x1200, とらドラ!_1_018.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18176959

>>18176957
https://vocaroo.com/?upload

>> No.18176962
File: 353 KB, 483x8072, anon-list-cropped.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18176962

>>18176786
https://my.mixtape.moe/qkunay.webm
>>18176807
Pic related is your list (without 常用, the image resolution is too large). It contains most of the Pre-1 and 1 anyway, so it's compatible with my goal. Thanks for the bottom ones, I'll mine them at some point in time as well.

>> No.18176967

>>18176885
So it's distant, in the darkness, making it unable to be discerned? I think I get it now. But why couldn't I find へだつ in the dictionary?

>> No.18176978

>>18176967
classical/archaic japanese
it would be like looking up breken instead of break

>> No.18176985

>>18176978
I see. Thank you for for your help!

>> No.18176988

>>18176967
Because it's archaic, like 忘る vs. 忘れる.

>> No.18176996

>>18176959
How about you record one?

>> No.18177003 [DELETED] 
File: 96 KB, 802x1200, とらドラ!_1_019.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18177003

>>18176996
https://vocaroo.com/?upload

>> No.18177011

>>18177003
Are you planning to post the entire book or something?

>> No.18177013 [DELETED] 
File: 84 KB, 802x1200, とらドラ!_1_020.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18177013

>>18177011
https://vocaroo.com/?upload

>> No.18177018

>>18176962
Actually, it may contain even more probably Chinese ones. I run it with my old grid that doesn't support +0xFFFF UCS (and I see some of the characters are beyond the BMP). I don't have time right now to set it up properly and debug, so I might do a proper report another time. There actually are some compatibility ideographs, you can see them with solid borders around them.

>> No.18177024

>>18176762
>my study pace is on the upper end of the spectrum

>> No.18177026

>>18177018
Compatibility ideographs are because of encoding duplications in the native encoding schemes (JIS, etc) used by China and Japan. Unicode is supposed to make it possible to convert from any common encoding to unicode and back without losing information. It's not guaranteed to be able to convert From unicode To any other encoding and back, though.

>> No.18177032

>>18177026
I know what they are. If I didn't, I wouldn't have set up the grid to display them. The black border is the feature I added, because the vanilla grid only looks for regular characters.

>> No.18177034

>>18177032
That's fine, I was trying to add more of an explanation on what "compatibility" means here.

>> No.18177039
File: 326 KB, 672x738, 1484791414988.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18177039

>>18177013
Man, I'm gonna buy myself a physical copy of toradora's LN.
What you posted so far was fun to read.

>> No.18177040

>>18177039
Glad to help, anon.

>> No.18177049

>>18177034
That's fine. You can check the original grid I posted (my mining deck), I also have a lot of them. Mostly traditional forms, as the difference is simply one stroke or the old altar radical.

>> No.18177071

>>18176676
>it's exceptional or something ticks me off.
Well it is in the sense that more than 50% of Japanese language learners give up before reaching 2k words.

>> No.18177075

>>18177018
How do you even know if a character is chinese or not if it isn't simplified chinese form? I've come across kanji a few times that weren't in jisho but they had japanese readings in furigana.

>> No.18177089 [DELETED] 

>>18176892
Because we disagree on learning methods, I need to be banned? Redd*t has that level of censorship thanks to the mods, and even has a convenient upvote/downvote system I'm sure you'd appreciate.
>>18176905
Faulty question. Also shenanigans.
>>18176926
It does, but actually the whole argument was subjective, mostly based on how much you're willing to look up words in a dictionary while reading.

>> No.18177095
File: 431 KB, 831x831, 1460363674806.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18177095

>>18177040
Thanks for giving me something that I want to read.

>> No.18177102

>>18177075
I don't, the addon just thinks every CJK beyond kanken is "probably not Japanese", thus "probably Chinese". I might change the wording somehow, because it started to tick me off as well.

>> No.18177165

What does ど mean in words like どM or どすけべ?

>> No.18177179

>>18177102
There are gems like this http://www.aozora.gr.jp/cards/001341/files/49664_39423.html . Some of the black characters were supposedly not supported by unicode\on some PCs hence images but if you actually look them up by radicals some of them aren't even in jisho or any online dictionary.

>> No.18177187

>>18177165
Super, uber, "to the bone", etc.

Like in you are some fucking どnerd

>> No.18177198

>落ちて48人が亡くなる

Here, the -te form is the kind used to have two actions right? Like "falls and 48 people died"?

RIP 48 people.

>> No.18177213 [DELETED] 

>>18177198
The 48 sobs who fell are dead.

>> No.18177214

>>18177187
Ok, thanks. Is it short for something?

>> No.18177225

>>18177179
澥 is in Basic Multilingual Plane, I expected them to be in the Supplements if they weren't around back then. Thanks for the link, I see there's a lot of cool stuff to be found here.

>> No.18177259

I CAN'T LEARN ANYMORE I CAN'T REMEMBER THE KANJI OR THE VOCABULARY PLEASE HELP ME

>> No.18177269

>>18177198
Actually nevermind. What's the context?

>> No.18177288

>>18177071
Not him, but please stop suggesting he's misinterpreting words that are very clear. The post in the image says "my study pace is probably on the upper end of the spectrum". Key word: pace. The poster claims that their "study pace" is not just above average, but "on the upper end of the spectrum". It has nothing to do with achievement. It has nothing to do with not quitting. It has to do with pace. Did I summarize this clearly enough?

>> No.18177291

>>18177269
http://www3.nhk.or.jp/news/easy/k10011278451000/k10011278451000.html

>> No.18177294

Does anyone have the DOJG without the latin script?

>> No.18177310

>>18177259
Be more clear about what you are attempting and how badly it is going.

>> No.18177316

>>18177291
Retarded bus falls off a cliff and 48 sobs are dead.

>> No.18177324

>>18177310
I'm doing the core2k anki and I can't rmerember anything rrom it.

>> No.18177330

>>18177324
How long have you been doing it? What else are you doing?

>> No.18177332

>>18177291
>>18177316
"died/became dead" is a more literal translation, but you should get the meaning now.

>> No.18177335

>>18177330
2 months. Nothing.

>> No.18177346

>>18177089
>Because we disagree on learning methods, I need to be banned?
No, you need to get banned because you're polluting the threads with stupid garbage, giving misinformation, and not being able to let go.

>> No.18177350

>>18177259
Obviously you're doing something wrong.
Cards per day?
Can you distinguish similar looking kanji?
Have you tried looking sentences including those words?

>> No.18177356

just getting back into learning japanese and wanted to know what are some easy to read light novels to start off with? was thinking of starting with konosuba since I'm probably more familiar with it from the anime and It might use more modern or common words.

>> No.18177369

>>18177350
>Can you distinguish similar looking kanji?
No, I don't even remember them from imagination. I was thinking about starting writing them out. Do you know where can I find stroke order for kanji?
>Have you tried looking sentences including those words?
No, show me the path of light.
>Cards per day?
No idea, it usually just repeats the one I have seen.

>> No.18177372
File: 56 KB, 640x467, 1451175596115.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18177372

>>18177356
>easy to read light novels
There are none. It's literally nothing but fag authors with different levels of passion for obscure vocab.

>> No.18177375

>>18177324
>>18177335
How many cards are you in? How much time do you spend on new cards? How many new cards a day? Are you trying?

>> No.18177387

>>18177335
Multiple things, just grinding Anki doesn't help because you aren't reinforcing it in any way except flash cards. Apply it via reading or try writing a little bit for the more difficult ones, learning what the kanji mean in general helps recall a lot.

>> No.18177388

>>18177369
RTK / Kanji Damage. Learn radicals.

google / kotobank

Stay away from computers.

>> No.18177392

>>18177372
Different levels of autism, you mean.

>> No.18177395

>>18177375
> Are you trying?
no

What do I do to try harder? I think I'm useless.

>> No.18177427

>>18177372
really?
well ,gonna read anyways just because, probably gonna read some manga first though, better to start with that probably anyways.

It'll take longer to learn rather than just bashing my head in with kana and kanji all day, but I'll still be able to learn more words and phrases this way.

>> No.18177431

>>18177356
>>18177395
Sounds to me like you're rushing things too much
Here's a realistic study plan: for the next two weeks, dont do any new core2k cards but still do your reviews though, do the radical deck (don't spend too much time on the first hundred cards or so, it is ordered by ascending stroke count so it gets harder) with the correct stroke order for each radical, MAKE SURE you can visualize everything correctly. Do Tae Kim if you haven't already. Don't prioritize quantity over retention.

Good luck.

>> No.18177441

>>18177427
Don't tell me you actually want to read without knowing kana

>> No.18177442

>>18177427
You'll learn nothing by reading stuff way above your level.

>> No.18177482

>>18177431
Thanks, anon. Just a question, am I supposed to write them down?

>> No.18177488

>>18177441
>>18177442
yes, I AM

>> No.18177532

>>18177482
If you're struggling with remembering kanji's shapes then yeah, probably. You don't have to but it can help you make sure you actually know what a character is like.
Don't bother learning a character by writing it down until you memorize it, as this is terribly inefficient especially for adults. Instead, make sure you have a clear picture in your mind: "where does this stroke start? is that stroke in contact with this one?". If you can picture all that for a given kanji you'll remember its associated meaning(s) and vocab much, much easier

>> No.18177583

I read earlier in the thread that the TK pdf version is outdated, is this true?

>> No.18177606

Does いくふり mean shaking orgasm?

>> No.18177611

>>18177606
What's the context? It could also mean faking it.

>> No.18177615
File: 16 KB, 620x374, Untitled.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18177615

>start anki in september
>only came to 400 matured at new years

>> No.18177640

what keywords should I use when googling to read untranslated manga online? 漫画 usually returns amazon links and stuff. Especially hard when it comes to more obscure mangas

>> No.18177642

>>18176919
Edit one and they all change. That's how card templates work.

>>18177288
When considering all Japanese learners, what percentage do you think consistently learns 10 words per day? I would say that probably is on the upper end of the spectrum, at least 75th percentile.

Even here on DJT, where people regularly claim to learn 100 new cards per day, it is probably on the upper end.

>> No.18177643

>>18177615
At least it didn't take you 2 years like in >>18176536

>> No.18177644

>>18177615
If you didn't start at all it would be 0.

>> No.18177651

>>18177615
That's normal.

>> No.18177658 [DELETED] 

Mining is a meme. All forms of anki is a meme. The best way to learn Japanese is to look up every word and grammar point over and over again. 30+ minutes in anki a day is a waste of time.

>> No.18177659

>>18177611
"goshujinsama mo chanto ochinchin de ikufuri shite kudasai ne"

>> No.18177661

>>18177658
stop posting

>> No.18177665

>>18177441
You can learn kana by reading

>> No.18177677

>>18177658
>The best way to learn Japanese is to look up every word and grammar point over and over again.
it's not and I'm actually speaking from experience

>> No.18177693

What is the difference between 始まる and 始める

>> No.18177701

>>18177659
Then I suppose your guess is correct, although I am not 100% sure. Was there shaking?

>> No.18177704

>>18177693
>始まる
for the subject to get started
>始める
for the subject to start something

>> No.18177711

>>18177693
>める
you're starting shit
>まる
shit is starting on its own

>> No.18177716 [DELETED] 

>>18177659
What language is this? I have never heard of a language like this. Maybe you mean Japanese? Japanese is not written with the latin script.

>> No.18177741

>>18177658
Why do the Japanese themselves mine in school then

>> No.18177745

>>18177741
is minecraft that popular between japanese students?

>> No.18177754

>>18177741
Because schools have to give tests and vocabulary tests are something they use. Are you trying to learn Japanese or pass Japanese 6th grade?

>> No.18177762

>>18177711
>>18177704
thanks senpaitachi. I also got these two new ones today, would I be correct to assume they work the same way?
>終わる (you end something?)
>終わり (end that occurs on its own?)

>> No.18177770

>>18177658
30 minutes of Anki is indeed a waste of time, 2 hours minimum

>> No.18177774

>>18177762
first is a verb, second is a noun

>> No.18177778

>>18177762
one is a verb, one is a noun

>> No.18177784

>>18177716
It's called romaji, baka

>> No.18177805

>>18177762
No. Your previous question was about 2 verbs, with one being transitive and one being intransitive. In this case one is a verb and the other is a noun.

If you are using Rikaisama, the letters in parenthesis before the definition tell you what kind of word it is. n is noun, vt is transitive verb, vi is intransitive, etc. I assume Yomichan does the same thing, but I haven't used it yet.

>> No.18177818

>>18177774
>>18177778
>>18177805
thanks anons

>> No.18177831

>>18177762
>I be correct to assume they work the same way?
like they say >>18177774 >>18177778
it's a noun, but if you ever come across a verb in it's stem-form like 歩き or 食べ for example at the end of a clause, it could also serve as an "and" similar to the て-form

if verbs have an え instead of an あ like the ending がる and げる for example, they basically work the same way as with 始める 始まる

>> No.18177835

>>18176948
正解

>> No.18177896

>>18165964
I actually found this to be a really insightful video, and he brings up a good point. However he doesn't really go into the detail I'm looking for.

It might sound like a dumb thing to ask, but does anyone know if there are video(s) out there that show how someone would actually approach something like reading with only a beginner level of reading? Like after seeing that video and being one of these beginner book fucks I actually want to try and and move onto actual material but I just have no idea how to approach stuff like that like what process they would take or how to progress through content you actually don't know or understand. The only thing I could maybe think of is to have a dictionary open and just google translate every word and look it up in a dictionary but that sounds like it defeats the purpose. I would love to see someone showing how to approach reading advanced material as a beginner.

>> No.18177909

>>18177896
Just go through Tae Kim and the first DOJG and you're ready to start reading something simple. Always pick something you're interested in, even if it's just a minor interest like a moege's heroine it's important to like what you read.

>> No.18177924

>>18177896
Looking up (and mining) words you don't know is one of the main points of reading.
When I encounter a word I don't know I open a jisho tab to look it up and leave it open to later mine it.
When I encounter grammar I don't know I open the DOJG and look it up.
That's how I approach my reading at least.
It's not that complicated, you're treating it like rocket science when it's clearly not.
Just take it easy.

>> No.18177932

I have encountered a few words not in the dictionaries I have (rikaichan's dictionary files and JMdict) and I'm feeling extremely unnerved.

>> No.18177937

>>18177896
how does looking up words defeat the the purpose of reading?

anyway, you start with manga so even when you're not exactly sure about the sentence you still have the visuals
and use a texthooker if you're reading something without furigana, but try to actually read the kanji before using it or else you can pretty quickly develop a bad habit of overusing it

>> No.18177950

>>18177932
care to post it?
also you can google it, even if the meaning is off you can somewhat guess through context

>> No.18177971

>>18177950
딱다그르르딱다그르르하다

>> No.18177990

>>18177971
>korean
there's your problem

>> No.18177997

>>18177896
I will tell you a few ways that I did it.

When I was learning German I read Harry Potter on my Kindle. I would look up all the words I didn't know and try to piece together what it meant. If I wasn't sure about it, which was most of the time, I'd highlight the sentence or sometimes the entire paragraph and Bing Translate it (Kindle uses Bing, not Google). The translation is not reliable or accurate, but it is useful because it usually helps you figure out the actually meaning of the sentence. Sometimes I would look up grammar points, but not that often.

When I started doing this I had planned to switch back and forth between the English and German books, reading a chapter at a time, but it was really boring reading the same thing twice so I just stuck with German.

For Japanese, I read a VN and looked up every word I didn't know and sometimes the grammar. I'll usually skip looking up the grammar if I don't think the line is that important, but if I do think it is important then I will look it up and maybe ask about it here.

Don't use Google Translate for trying to understand Japanese, it sucks. But, it has the best handwriting recognition, so you should use it for that.

I quit both German and Japanese about 1.5 years ago, but I'm going to try to get back into Japanese. Just started reading Zero no Tsukaima #2.

>> No.18178000

If a picture of a word comes up in my head but not the English translation, would you mark that as right? I have this issue in English too where my "production" is weak and I have trouble finding words even though I can type them out just fine, since it's slower, and can read everything perfectly clear.

>> No.18178012

>>18178000
Of course. I'm pretty sure associating Japanese words with non-verbal images is actually better than associating them with English words.

>> No.18178013

>>18178000
in many ways that's better, at least if you're doing the reading by yourself

>> No.18178015

>>18177997
I really, really like reading on Kindle but it's a complete pain in the ass to mine from it.

>> No.18178018

>>18178000
As long as you have a clear idea in your head of what the word means it's doesn't matter if you can't find the "right" translation (assuming there's one)
I remember going through this phase when I was starting to get somewhat decent at English, though it got better over time.

>> No.18178026

>>18177950
It's not that I can't understand them, it's that I've become so dependent on automated word mining through pop-up dictionaries that I feel extremely uneasy once it doesn't work.
I encountered 給弾不良 in the cutscene in MGS3 when snake wanks over the custom 1911 he gets and it obviously means "failure to feed" by looking at the kanji and judging the context, but I'm not sure if I should make an extremely shitty card manually or not.

>> No.18178035

>>18177909
Yeah I have been through all the preliminary stuff. I chose a game (because its something I'm interested in like you said), I don't really know if its simple or not. The particles and grammar are, ironically enough, the part I do understand.

>>18177924
That's fair enough. I think its just because when I tried reading something (a game, in my case) after seeing the video it wasn't just a few words I don't know its like at least 80% of them.

>>18177937
>how does looking up words defeat the purpose of reading?
I guess its just a semantics thing. When I think about looking up so much of the the text in a dictionary it doesn't really seem like reading to me so much as just looking up random words constantly. And if that's what it takes to get through something, am I really actually reading it at all?

>> No.18178048

>>18178000
You could use this might as well to move over to a J-J dictionary.

>> No.18178057

>>18178015
I like being able to read while holding it in my hand, but the lookups were always too slow for me, especially when I had to look up multiple words in every sentence.

I thought it would be faster to use the Kindle app on a tablet, but the dictionary lookups are broken for Japanese so it is completely useless.

>> No.18178073

>>18178035
Well, the more you mine, the lower that percentage will get, we all started at 100% and slowly reduced that number by studying and mining.
You will never get better if you avoid material with new words.

>> No.18178088

>>18178035
>And if that's what it takes to get through something, am I really actually reading it at all?
I understand but eventually you'll have to look up shit no matter what you do. it basically comes down to your preferences, I always preferred the more "adventurous" route than learning voab

please just don't think that you'll be able to read well just because youf finished core6k or something

>> No.18178123

>>18178015
>>18178057
I just got a Microsoft surface book, and it's godly for reading in tablet mode. For words I don't know i can just hover over them with the digital pen and tap the yomichan import button if I want to mine them.

>> No.18178197

>>18177997
Thanks. And yeah I don't use google translate for translating really, I just use it on my tablet to to sketch out kanji so I can type the word into a dictionary on my computer. Writing kanji with a mouse will legitimately make me quit the language, absolutely fuck that. The whole process of looking up words is a huge pain in the ass in general, unless its actual text I can copy/paste directly (which isn't the case for games, VNs, pretty much anything I'd have interest in reading).

>>18178073
Yeah for sure. Even recognizing some of the kanji I've learned and being able to take a guess at what it might be (and then seeing its in any way close when I look it up) is a pretty good feeling.

>>18178088
Yeah I get that. Its just like english that I've been speaking for over 20 years and I still have to look up the occasional word. Its just amplified 10-fold here, so it feels weird to essentially google translate the book at call it reading, but it should get easier the more I do it.
I've hardly started core6k either (like 8 days into it) so I don't expect to be able to read well with or without it.

>> No.18178255
File: 144 KB, 1280x720, DJT reading Hanahira.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18178255

>>18178197
I wouldn't recommend starting with a game because it is too hard to look up words. I tried reading through Persona 4 before but gave up after a few hours.

>> No.18178273
File: 185 KB, 895x156, [].png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18178273

クソ作家

>> No.18178283

>>18178255
what kind of things might be better to start with?

>> No.18178292

>>18178273
Is this Chuunibyou?

>> No.18178298

>>18178273
>read 管理
>cool, spotted it
>comes up literally as next card in SRS
>cool

very cool

>> No.18178302

>>18178283
VNs with a texthooker or LNs with Rikaisama/Yomichan.

>> No.18178312
File: 31 KB, 639x480, 1460704749928.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18178312

>>18178292
Yup. It threw me off at first but it's actually quite simple to understand.
Still a クソ作家 though.

>> No.18178369
File: 42 KB, 740x530, image.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18178369

I would greatly appreciate it if someone could help me to understand this passage.

「気持ちばかりのもてなし、いくばくかの金銭の融通。それらは言わば『必要悪』じゃろう。……そう思わんか!?」
「は、はぁ。まぁ、多少であれば」
自ら『必要悪』と弁護し、同意を求めてしまった時点で、後ろめたさがあるように思える。
きっとユッシ殿の言う『気持ち、いくばく』は年月と共に大きくなり……感覚も麻痺してきているだろう。

To specify I think I have trouble with properly grasping the following sentence.
自ら『必要悪』と弁護し、同意を求めてしまった時点で、後ろめたさがあるように思える。

>> No.18178411

>>18178369
The fact that the character defends those things as a "necessary evil" and seeks the narrator's consent gives the impression that he feels pangs of guilt about it.

>> No.18178442

What do I do if there isn't a single thing in the world that I'm capable of enjoying "reading" in a language I don't know? If I stop reading until I get through the 3000 words I've mined so far and came back would it help? I've reached my limit, I don't have the willpower to make myself seriously try to comprehend the lines anymore.

>> No.18178448

>>18178442
gibbu appu

>> No.18178453

>>18178442
dekinai

>> No.18178468

>>18178442
what did you try so far?

most people recommend Yotsuba, but I'd actually go with Aku no Hana instead, it doesn't get much easier than this

>> No.18178478

>>18178468
It doesn't matter what it is, "reading" a language i don't know can not possibly be entertaining to me, no matter what the content is. I'm not 14, I don't get excited about fiction.

>> No.18178484

>>18178197
>(which isn't the case for ... VNs

Resource guide.

>> No.18178496

>>18178273
あのんはただしいことをいう

>> No.18178520

>>18178411
Thank you for your explanation. Actually since the game I'm playing has got an English translation I was able to find a text file with the translation of this line but it somehow does not seem to fit the Japanese text for me. It is translated as "As he merely sought affirmation of his own opinion, I agreed with him without thinking, though guilt arise in me soon after." Isn't that translation an obvious mistake?
Here the link if anyone wants to see it themselves https://tlwiki.org/index.php?title=Katahane:kr03.txt

>> No.18178532

>>18178478
>I'm not 14, I don't get excited about fiction.
that's not the question, you start learning with something easy and move your way up

>"reading" a language i don't know can not possibly be entertaining to me,
well, you can't learn japanese then, because you start with "reading" until you actually read

>> No.18178561

max the cat sat on the mat

>> No.18178572

>>18178478
Stop being a little bitch and just give up. You sure whine a lot for an adult, this language is beyond you so just stop.

>> No.18178577

>>18178478
>I'm not 14, I don't get excited about fiction.
That's an oxymoron my dude, you don't have to be a kid to enjoy fiction.

>> No.18178594

>>18178520
Seems like a mistake to me, the narrator would use 思える to talk about his own 後ろめたさ. To me it's more like the fact that he cares enough to defend it as a necessary evil and seek agreement about it shows that it weighs on his conscience and that's why he tries to convince the narrator.

>> No.18178599

>>18178520
>>18178594
>would use
wouldn't

>> No.18178643
File: 183 KB, 344x393, 1501554584469.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18178643

I recently started mining, but my deck retention is only about 60%. Should I turn off new cards until this improves? Is there any other way of fixing this? Or should I just stop worrying about retention and focus on constantly reading?

>> No.18178654

>>18178643
Put more points into INT my man

>> No.18178659

>>18178643
>Or should I just stop worrying about retention and focus on constantly reading?
this

>> No.18178673

>>18177369
>I don't even remember them from imagination.

None of the reading only peons here do.

>> No.18178686

>>18178673
Is that a bad thing?
If I want to impress normies I'll just learn how to write the kanji for "edgy" and leave it at that.

>> No.18178801
File: 9 KB, 250x187, 1474964296522s.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18178801

>>18178673
Unless you're planning to move to Japan, there's literally no reason to learn how to write all that shit.

>> No.18178805

>>18178442
>>18178478
https://youtu.be/AzUf3mMyt7k
You should probably rethink your mindset or stop wasting time on something you'll eventually quit

>>18178643
Don't worry about it too much. Turn down your new cards for a day or a few. One thing I do with new words or words I'm having trouble with is do my anki reviews with a notebook and write down a word each time I press the again button for it. It's not a silver bullet by any means but it does help me.

>> No.18178810

>友達と話した。
Is 友達と私が話しった also correct?

>> No.18178811

>>18178801
Don't you think it's a little half assed? I mean it's fine not to it just seems kind of lame to put in that much effort but not that little bit more to go all the way and properly learn the language.

>> No.18178830

>>18178811
As an idiot who wants to move there, it's not just "a little bit more" effort required.
Memorizing that shit stroke by stroke takes many hours of my life, you know.

>> No.18178833

>>18178811
>"little bit"
What the fuck are you talking about?

>> No.18178836

>>18178830
As a consequence you forget less though and so spend less time going over the same shit you already have.

>> No.18178837

>>18178810
>話しった
Nope. It's also better to just drop the 私, context should be all you need.

>> No.18178842

>>18178643
You have two options.
You either deal with the low retention and keep at it. This is natural because you are not used to Kanji at all, but this is not going to be a problem in the big term.
You will probably find similar looking ones, in which case you need to put further effort into differentiating them.

Or you start with radical or kanji study right now, where you will probably see a effect way faster, but in the end it does not really matter.

The only upside the 2nd path has is that you will have a easier time handwriting anything later on, but you might as well just postpone it until you face a situation where you have to write something per hand and learn it within a couple months at worst.

>> No.18178843

>>18178811
There's nothing "proper" about it. Stop projecting your insecurities and obsessions onto other people.

>> No.18178849

>>18178836
Absolutely not. If memorizing stuff is your goal then just learn to write down the stuff you struggle with.
Memorizing everything is another story bro.

>> No.18178850

>>18178830
as someone who recently dropped it, should be fairly easy once youre experienced and know radicals fairly well and whatnot. going down after youre able to read at a good level and learning to write is downhill rather than while learning, which is uphill

>> No.18178852

>>18178843
You're right, fluent and literate Japanese people have NO idea how to write!

>> No.18178856

>>18178852
There are many Japanese with very good Japanese who have no idea how to write anything but the most basic things.

>> No.18178860

>>18178852
I don't know about you, but my definition of "fluency" doesn't include writing. And literacy literally just means reading, and clearly you can read kanji without knowing how to write them.

>> No.18178870
File: 5 KB, 368x139, 1510152639967.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18178870

>>18178852
>>18178856
>>18178860

>> No.18178872

>>18178870
Literacy includes the ability to create written language, but that does not mean handwriting, typing is fine.

>> No.18178879

>>18178837
yeah I fucked up the past tense, sorry.
友達と私が話した
I know that「私が」is unwanted here, but is this sentence still gramatically correct? I'm still unconfortable with が and は

>> No.18178880

>>18178673
>>18178811
>>18178852

As someone who can write quite a bit, I'll just leave this quote here from a guy who learned Chinese through the military, as I think it describes my experience with writing pretty accurately--you'll forget things at times, no matter what, and to get to a point where you can write effectively requires a ton of effort that is better put into input.

>Writing is important, but no matter what you do, you're going to forget characters... the office that I worked in, there were two PHD's from mainland China that regularly forgot how to write rare-ish characters. Also, I've seen in the last year in a half many dozens of students that could read newspapers with little to no effort, but couldn't write simple things like 想要. So, unless writing itself is your goal, skip RTK.. get a basic grounding in radicals and move on - context and repetition will take care of the rest. If writing is your goal, however, RTK will give you the tools you need
http://rtkwiki.koohii.com/wiki/Zer0range_method

>> No.18178889

People who didn't learn radicals or how to write them:

what do you think of the components of a character as in your head?

>> No.18178896

>>18178879
Sounds rather stiff desu.
Also these 2 have different nuances
友達と私が話した
私が友達と話した

>> No.18178898

>>18178889
I didn't learn how to write the characters, but I did "learn the radicals". By that I mean I did the meme kangxi radicals deck with accurate keywords for a week, then reviewed it once a week for another month and then deleted it.

Every common radical has an identity to me. Not a word, but an identity. I can easily differentiate between them and remind myself that a particular kanji has one as opposed to a particular other one that it doesn't have, even if I don't have the other one that it isn't in front of me. Really complex stuff that isn't a kangxi radical, however, I either identify as whatever full character is, or as a weird mess of strokes.

>> No.18178924

>>18178810
>友達は私と語り合った

くっつきかたはこうじゃないかなあとおもうよ

なおしてもやっぱりちょっとおかしいんだけど

>> No.18178934

What are your thoughts on language exchange groups found on sites like Meetup? Talking to a native Japanese speaker seems interesting and you could maybe learn something or two.

>> No.18178960

自然にすると

>彼/彼女はしばらく私と語り合った

こうじゃないかな

過去にすると、どのくらいの時間かを

いれないとしぜんにならないんじゃないかなあとおもうよ

>> No.18178968

>>18178934
It is a good thing to do

>> No.18179058
File: 15 KB, 289x295, 1479840168155.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18179058

>tfw watched a bunch of videos about people leaving japan because they felt invisible and unhappy as kuso english teachers
When will they learn

>> No.18179087

>>18179058
I don't know why people are surprised that the elevens don't befriend them
if there was a japanese guy I'd assume that he'll eventually leave for his home again, so seriously befriending him would appear like a total waste of time

>> No.18179100

>>18179087
>total waste of time

you know becoming good friends regardless if that someone will move away or not is a life experience and a valuable unforgettable thing to cherish? that's a very sad way to think about it

>> No.18179107

>>18179087
Bro you're not supposed to go to Japan as a gaijin expecting to find friends.

>> No.18179108
File: 543 KB, 600x848, 1513148019932.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18179108

When exactly do you guys select "again" on an Anki card? I most of time just select "Good" for new words and "Easy" for words I already knew. Am I doing it right?

>> No.18179111

>>18179108
What a retarded question anon.

>> No.18179114

どんなにつよいロケットをもっても

こころのつよさはきたえられないのよ

>> No.18179119
File: 115 KB, 224x309, 1484956435968.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18179119

Get your weekly dose of ENGRISH here.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XnhJbf_YJ74

>> No.18179122
File: 69 KB, 1280x720, 1509081338732.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18179122

>>18179111
Sorry, I'm a little bit retard and always believe I'm doing things wrong and will suffer from mistakes in the future.

>> No.18179125

>>18179100
I don't lnow about you, but I feel too old for this kind of shit. as time goes you usually don't see your friends as often as it should be and I sure as hell wouldn't make room for some guy that fucks off anyway

>> No.18179127

>>18179122
Have more confidence in yourself dude.
The answer is exactly what you would imagine - use "again" if you didn't get it at all, "good" if you got it after thinking a little bit and "easy" if you got it right as it popped up.

>> No.18179137

>>18179125
the point is that that persons experiences are from a completely different place than your own, and by sharing them together or spending time together you enrich yourself.

>> No.18179142

>>18179108
why would you press "Good" on a new word if it's your first time seeing it?

>> No.18179161

>>18179142
Because he's an idiot.

>> No.18179167

>>18179142
Because Anki is designed in such a way that you're supposed to do so.

>> No.18179170

>>18179161
you're the idiot here anon

>> No.18179172

>>18179170
Say that to my face fucker not online see what happens.

>> No.18179174

>>18179172
maybe you say it to their face first

>> No.18179178

>>18179174
What's your J-CAT score kid?

>> No.18179183

>>18179178
maxed out

>> No.18179190

>>18179183
Prove it.

>> No.18179196

>>18179167
but that's wrong, you're supposed to press Again the first time you see it.

>> No.18179198

>>18179190
hard drive with the pdf crashed and i'm not about to retake it to prove a point to an idiot on the internet who can't think for their self

>> No.18179203

>>18179198
you don't even know english

>> No.18179205

>>18179198
Well, now that you said that, I believe you! How silly of me.

>> No.18179209

>>18179203
There are zero English errors in that post.

>> No.18179493
File: 710 KB, 672x1080, 1474290613570.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18179493

>>18179209
やるか

>> No.18179524

>getting an error when I try to add 悪魔 to my deck
Is this that error the guide mentioned if you have similar readings ? I have 魔 as a card as well. How do I fix this shit?

>> No.18179543

>>18179524
SS the error and the result of a 悪魔 search on your decks.

>> No.18179567 [DELETED] 
File: 175 KB, 1920x1541, 1473910001149.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18179567

>>18179543
Please dumb that down for me 先輩

>> No.18179573

>>18179567
screen shot the error you're getting + the result of searching for 悪魔 on all of your decks
then post here

>> No.18179596

>>18179524
You shouldn't have to mine that. It's so ridiculously common in the stories it comes up in that you should basically know it by heart. Same with 魔王.

>> No.18179605

>>18179596
The point is not how common the word is, it's him getting an error that can possibly happen to much rarer words.

>> No.18179607
File: 162 KB, 1920x1080, gayshit.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18179607

>>18179573

>>18179596
I mine what I want bitch.

>> No.18179612

>>18179605
I know that and I hope he gets help with it. Just wanted to give him advice anyway.

>> No.18179618

>>18179119
fucking thank you

>> No.18179626

>>18179607
Is that gibberish after " an embedded page at" common?

Also, did you check all of those results properly? Because it kinds of amazes me that 10k somehow doesn't have 悪魔 in it.

>> No.18179629

can the spaced repetition of anki be disabled and it just show a random card? i just want a deck with all the information on the front of the card, then when next is hit show a different card.

>> No.18179632

>>18179119
くそ悪趣味

>> No.18179637

>>18179626
Yes just tried mining what anon said here>>18179632

and got the same error.

>> No.18179638

>>18179632
ならもっと良いことを

>> No.18179643 [DELETED] 

I don't see why people reported me until my posts get deleted. I posted as much as the people who are on the other side of the argument. Mods shouldn't take side in arguments about language learning.

>> No.18179646
File: 26 KB, 405x544, 1470866492577.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18179646

>>18179637
Restart browser and anki.

>> No.18179659

>>18179643
>mining is a meme
>why did my shitposts get pruned?

>> No.18179666

>>18179638
にんじゃっぽいことする?

>> No.18179674

>>18179666
いやいやいや

>> No.18179683

>>18176347
For the fact that I have no idea what to do with the interval settings. Any suggestions? I have them set to 1 10 60 360

>> No.18179685

>>18179646
Gay shit still isn't working.

>> No.18179695
File: 19 KB, 320x240, 9cecfd9c455be4b8d6654dcf972702c9.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18179695

>>18179674
いや?

しゅりけん

おるから

折り紙2枚ちょうだい

>> No.18179708

>>18179659
Again, people learn languages differently, I don't see why people report different opinions from theirs as if we're supposed to be one big hivemind. Also, I don't see why mods on this board take sides in arguments and delete the side that they disagree with, especially for something as banal as language learning.

>> No.18179724

>>18179708
>Again, people learn languages differently
wrong

>> No.18179726

それから

きんじょのがいじんに

しゅりけんなげて

あそんでもらう

>> No.18179742

>>18179695
だってさ、いやだ
可愛い折り紙けど

>> No.18179765

>>18179708
>people learn languages differently,
No they don't. What changes is how quickly and easily they learn it.
Which brings us to anki and the concept of spaced repetition, one of the most effective methods of memorizing shit if you're a normal person.

>> No.18179775

>>18179742
100きんでかってくるから

えっとなんていうとつうじるんだっけ

I buy origami hopeless shop.

>> No.18179785

>>18178830
>Memorizing that shit stroke by stroke
Kanji are made up of a system of highly repetitive radical elements, meaning no one really learns them stroke by stroke.

>> No.18179799

>>18179785
No shit Sherlock. Now try to memorize which kanji has which radical in what spot and with what readings.

>> No.18179839

>>18179765
>Which brings us to anki and the concept of spaced repetition
Spaced repetition isn't for everyone. Anki isn't for everyone. Therefore all people don't learn languages with the same techniques.

>> No.18179850

>>18179839
Because the most effective technique that works for the majority is a meme right?

>> No.18179851

>>18179839
Nobody has ever learned a language without consuming comprehensible input.

>> No.18179858

Remember: do not argue with the Canadian

>> No.18179925

>>18179785
if you know the radical stroke order it is technically stroke by stroke

>> No.18179928

>>18179799
It's not hard nor does it take nearly as much time as many would like to insinuate.

>> No.18179940
File: 17 KB, 285x279, 1349638205054.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18179940

>>18179928
You should try it then. It's not like even adult japs struggle with it.

>> No.18179949

My mature count is slowly increasing, but my retention is slowly dropping.

>> No.18179987

>>18179940
>You should try it then
I'm speaking from experience.
>It's not like even adult japs struggle with it
Not educated ones. If you want to hold onto those beliefs as justification for your own actions, fine, but please don't act smug about it. Just admit that it isn't in your own personal interests and leave it at that. No one is condemning you for not wanting to invest time into learning element X or Y of the language.

>> No.18180012
File: 1.18 MB, 400x253, 1448553630436.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18180012

>>18179987
>it's another "I know better than natives" episode
Get over yourself holy shit.
Unless you're like that autistic american who passed the 1級 you should really seek help with your Dunning–Kruger crap. And guess what, even he studies kanji for about 2-3 hours daily.

Now fuck off.

>> No.18180052

http://www.strawpoll.me/14790513
Poll since this question has actually never been resolved in DJT's history, as we saw a few posts ago.

>> No.18180055

>>18179987
Level 3
Pass rate for this level: 47.5% (in 2010)

Level Pre-2
Pass rate for this level: 36.6% (in 2010)

Level 2
Pass rate for this level: 23.9% (in 2010)

>> No.18180060

>>18179858
How do we know it's him? The only way to prevent it is to not argue anyone, but you know damn well this place cannot survive without constant autistic screeching.

>> No.18180070

>>18180052
Isn't the point of the true retention add-on exactly to compensate for the fact that you're supposed to press again on new cards, so that it doesn't count those again presses as mistakes?

>> No.18180075

>>18180052
who gives a shit

>> No.18180082

>>18180075
This guy >>18179142 This guy >>18179161 This guy >>18179167 This guy >>18179170 This guy >>18179172 This guy >>18179174 This guy >>18179178 This guy >>18179183

>> No.18180086
File: 22 KB, 1730x198, well fuck you too.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18180086

>>18180082

>> No.18180089

>>18180082
Pressing Good makes no fucking sense. You didn't get the answer right, you didn't remember anything. How could that possibly be "Good"? Would someone press "Good" if they forgot the answer? It just makes no fucking sense.

>> No.18180097

>>18180089
I've actually seen most people argue on here the past few years that you should press good, because you actually had no was of knowing it in the first place, and Anki is designed for you to advance the card to the next step after seeing it for the first time.

>> No.18180105

>>18180097
Risking seeing a card that tiniest fraction more often (seriously in the grand scale you'll end up seeing it a couple of days early maybe) is much more productive than risking seeing it too infrequently and having problems with it.

>> No.18180111

If you don't change the steps for new cards to something retarded like 10 30 60 600, pressing Again on the first step doesn't do anything but fuck up vanilla stats and force you to see the card again very soon. And changing the steps away from the default is a placebo that causes you to see cards in the wrong order more often unless you have infinite reps.
>>18180105
If you graduate the card then you did not see it too infrequently. No buts.

>> No.18180119

>>18180105
I do understand that, and I'm on the ''again'' side, but based on the poll for now http://www.strawpoll.me/14790513/r , it's 5 against 2, so at least two people are feeling justified in pressing good. They should post their arguments here, because I don't quite get it either.

>> No.18180121

なんかすごいさむいんだけど

だれかにほんに

ふゆしょうぐんよんだ?

>> No.18180125

>>18180119
I posted mine here. >>18180111

>> No.18180129

>>18180111
>causes you to see cards in the wrong order
Isn't that a good thing, since you're not ''artificially'' memorizing the order and not the individual words?

>> No.18180133

>>18180119
I just like to.

>> No.18180138

what part of seeing a card you dont know for the first time is "good"? you didnt guess what you don't know (unless you guessed context clues right via kanji)?

good is for passing it, and new cards are not passing.

furthermore, it probably doesnt even matter. your stats are irrelevant and having cards come in 5 cards earlier than it usually would will have nearly any effect on your SRS because its so new that the spacing is nearly irrelevant within the span of a single day in the long term

>> No.18180142

>>18180133
Don't you ever mistake an old card for a new card (because you forgot you had seen it before) and press ''good'' on it, accidently moving it forward even though you didn't remember the card?

>> No.18180143

>>18180121
温度は?

>> No.18180157

>>18180142
No, because I do my reviews and new cards separately. I've tried Anki in pretty much every way:
>new and review mixed, hit "again" on new cards
>new and review mixed, hit "good" on new cards
>new and review separate, hit "again" on new cards
>new and review separate, hit "good" on new cards
The last one is the one that works best for me, just as a personal preference. I didn't notice a significant increase or decrease in retention. The only thing that's changed my retention is how many new cards I add per day: at 10 per day, I can maintain 90+%, and 15, it quickly drops to 80-85%, and I'm currently barely squeaking by with 75% retention at 20 cards per day. But I'm willing to go with slightly lower retention and slightly longer spent on Anki if it means I can get through learning vocabulary twice as fast.

>> No.18180164
File: 73 KB, 594x446, 586749.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18180164

>>18180143
8どくらい

あのんは

>> No.18180180

>>18180129
Other way around. With large "Good" steps like 30 minutes (in 10 30 60, the first number is the failure step, the second number is the first step after pressing good on it the first time, the third is after pressing good twice), you're more likely to see failed new cards for the second time in the order in which they were introduced. If it's low like 10 minutes, you're less likely to build up many new cards on the 10 minute step at once, and whenever you fail one it gets shuffled out of the order it was originally introduced in.

If your first "Good" step was 10000 minutes and you had a review ahead limit of 10000, then you would see them in random order after doing all your reps, but it's bad for your short term retention to graduate cards when they're not interspersed with reviews.

>> No.18180189

>>18180180
By the way if what I'm saying is hard to understand just imagine a cramped highway and a highway where all the cars are spaced far apart. In the spaced out highway cars take a longer time to change relative positions. That's what it's like with long steps.

>> No.18180191
File: 15 KB, 480x243, 1478997831854.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18180191

>>18180164
いいな~羨ましい~
ここには16度くらい

>> No.18180192 [DELETED] 

>>18180142
not him but i split new cards and review so I can keep track of what i'm learning new.

>> No.18180204

>>18180180
Makes sense. Do you actually use 10 30 60? If not, what are your steps?

>> No.18180207

>>18180204
I use like 5 10 or something.

>> No.18180243

>>18180191
にほんはいまランチのあとなのに

8どだよ

あしたのあさ

もしかしたら凍るかもしれない

わくわくしてきた

>> No.18180264
File: 77 KB, 1280x720, 1484960917915.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18180264

>>18180243
いいな~

>> No.18180351

>>18180012
What about his post insinuated anything like that? There are plenty of ESLs with broken grammar who can spell better than the average native, because the average is brought down by idiot natives who can't spell. The average in Japan is brought down by idiots as well as every other civilized country. You don't have to study 6000 kanji to do better than some natives. Kanken tests more than what was described, by the way, and kanken guy is aiming for perfection, so your comparison is shit.

>> No.18180367

Any VNs featuring characters who use 北海道弁?

>> No.18180390

>>18180351
>What about his post insinuated anything like that?
The part where he pulls up his own experience as an argument while assuming "educated" japs don't struggle with kanji.
Nevermind that the average in Japan is literally above most westerners and nevermind that said average still fails to pass the many levels of 漢字検定.

>> No.18180394

>>18180390
You really are autistic.

>> No.18180395

>>18180367
ほっかいどうことばは

さっぽろことばだけならわかるけど

あそこはひろいから

かんたんなロシアのたんごも

はいってたりするんじゃないかな

むずかしいよ

>> No.18180403

>>18180394
Argument 404. Now fuck off.

>> No.18180423

https://irorio.jp/kaseisana/20180108/431913/

あのんが

あたしとあたしのかーちゃんのしゃしんかざってたら

ちょっとひく

>> No.18180451

>>18180012
>it's another "I know better than natives" episode
This wasn't something I claimed. All I said initially was that people don't approach kanji as a mess of random strokes and then that educated Japanese don't struggle with writing kanji.

>1級
This is a strange red herring.

>Now fuck off.
You're not even arguing with what I posted. I honestly have no idea why you are so upset over this but it sounds more like you are arguing with your own personal demons and projecting them onto what you think I said or meant. You're free to continue arguing with yourself but this is the point I exit the discussion.

>> No.18180465

>>18180451
>it's not hard nor that time consuming
>those japs are just duuuumb, those who fit inside my definition of educated have no problem duh
Go to sleep you prick.

>> No.18180505

>>18180465
to be fair most of the people in this thread have no problem calling people who cant manage 9000 words per day dumb too, so i find no ones metrics of whats 'right' worthwhile

>> No.18180513
File: 125 KB, 1200x799, DBnWcuwVoAAHN_d.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18180513

はしもとかんな
かわいい

>> No.18180518

>>18180505
But >>18179765 said that language learning is one size fits all. You're shattering my whole worldview maaaaaan.

>> No.18180523

>>18180513
くろかみなのに?

きんぱつじゃなくって?

>> No.18180555
File: 163 KB, 781x549, serveimage.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18180555

ITT

>> No.18180573

>>18180555
Actually DJT is like only 3-4 people constantly replying to each other with different IPs, which gives the illusion that it's a huge community.

>> No.18180704

>>18180390
Sorry, I didn't realize that you know literally nothing about kanji if you haven't passed level 1. I guess illiteracy is unavoidable and I should just give up. Interesting how you ignored everything after the first line in your blind rage against the anon who slighted you, though.

>> No.18180717

>>18180573
Pretty sure it's just one guy.

>> No.18180727
File: 332 KB, 1251x957, 1514809172895.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18180727

>>18164209
Requesting pic related be used in the next op, thread-maker-senpai.

>> No.18180732

>>18180727
Cute.

>> No.18180737

>>18180727


はねないよ

そのフォントおかしい

>> No.18180742

>>18180727
>>18180737
スもおかしいよ

スのいっかくめは

はらう

>> No.18180914

>>18180727
We can't have a pornographic OP image on a blue board.

>> No.18181243

>>18179058
I'm curious, can you go to Japan as a "real" English teacher?
I mean do actually qualified people get the actual jobs and not these low wage loser jobs?

>> No.18181282

>>18179058
ugly fat weeb autists detected
any halfway decent man would be drowning in sideways pussy

>> No.18181329

>>18180555
there should be a gate in the background

>> No.18181419

>>18179058
My Japanese teacher also left Japan because she felt stifled by the overly rigid collectivist society.

>> No.18181560

>>18164460
Personally I'm learning it because it's handy when it comes to vidya since there's a lot of import-only games. Also, it's a hobby.

I'm also sure that if I ever want to learn to read Chinese that it'd be somewhat easier since a lot of the kanji overlaps. I probably wouldn't learn to speak it though, I'm not particularly fond of talking to Chinese people.

>>18164528
The average Pajeet barely speaks English. Just because they get it in school doesn't mean they can actually speak it. I learned Dutch, English, French and German in school but I wouldn't be able to speak French or German to save my life (even though I've had French classes for 8 years, with like six hours of it every week).

Learning Japanese now is making it extremely obvious to me how absolutely inefficient high school studying methods are. So much time you're forced to waste.

>> No.18181579

>>18179683
1 10 10, 1 10 20...
Anything more than one hour is proably going to fuck you up in the end

>> No.18181625

>>18175740
I gotta say, core2k/6k was very easy to me at first. I could also easily do 50-100 words per day.

Once I hit 1000-1500ish words, though, everything slowed down substantially, since a lot of simlar words start to show up, many of which are related to politics and business, and many of which are kind of difficult to tell apart, like 産業 (industry) and 商業 (commerce). Thankfully the deck seems to alternate regularly between these types of things and katakana words which are usally very easy, which makes it doable to add at least 20 words a day.

If you can keep doing 50-100 words a day all throughout the 10k deck you've probably got very good retention skills or have a lot of free time. I think I'm relatively average in that regard.

>> No.18181704

>>18181625
>I could also easily do 50-100 words per day.
How?
The vast majority of early words are composed of "brand new" characters (i.e. kanji you've never seen before), how can you efficiently learn 50 or even 100 of those in a day? What was your retention?

>> No.18181773

>>18181704
Not him.
But considering you barely have any reviews at this point what does it matter if you learn/review 50-80 words or 100-160?
>how can you efficiently learn 50 or even 100 of those in a day?
I'm pretty sure it's less effective.

The hard part is keeping up with the pace in the long run.

>> No.18181779

>>18181704
I did have a bit of prior exposure though, since I have watched a lot of anime and stuff when I was younger. But the first few hundred words really are pretty logical, and often the kanji are simple and easy to remember. There's the numbers, which shouldn't take long to learn. There's the days of the week, which all have the same ending and feature a few common kanji like 火,金,木,月. And there's quite some overlap: if you know 一,二, 三 you'll remember 一つ、二つ、三つ pretty quickly, too. That kind of stuff. They're often pretty concrete and fairly broad concepts, which is less the case when you get farther in the deck, when more abstract concepts as well as specific varieties of certain things start to appear.

It's not like the core2k deck tends to make you learn enormous amounts of kanji at once. Learning 20 new words does not mean learning 20 new kanji.

>> No.18181858
File: 108 KB, 747x440, 1499488554504.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18181858

>>18181779
Well let me prove you wrong. Here's what 20 (actually 21, but same shit) new cards can look like 200 words in. 19 new kanji.
Sure all of these words are really important and "basic" but learning 50-100 of those a day of those is pure suicide at least for me.

>>18181773
You're right it doesn't really matter, but I found that spending more time on learning saves me a lot of hassle later on

>> No.18181924

>>18181858
>200 words in. 19 new kanji.
By the time my vocab deck reached ten thousand reviewed words, it was covering 2667 kanji.
The Core decks are pretty kind in this regard.

>> No.18181980

How did you anons learn to differentiate between two incredibly similar kanji when you were learning them?
Like two that look very similar at a glance, but the slight difference changes the meaning completely. I always get them mixed up, like I did with some of the hiragana but this is way worse.

>> No.18181981

>>18181924
I'm not mad over learning Kanji, I'll gladly learn these nasty cards.
My point is learning 50 (let alone 100) of those a day doesn't seem feasible in the "long run".

Also, your deck is actually less dense than core6k when it comes to kanji coverage.
I just checked, core6k covers 1608 unique kanji. This means it has one kanji for each 5999/1608 = 3.73 words while you deck has one kanji for 10000/2667 = 3.75 words.

>> No.18182002

>>18181981
>My point is learning 50 (let alone 100) of those a day doesn't seem feasible in the "long run".
Doesn't really matter because the amount of new words can be changed from day to day if the person wants. Anki is flexible, unlike many anons here who are like sticks in the mud.

>Also, your deck is actually less dense than core6k when it comes to kanji coverage.
There were around 2k kanji by the time it was around 6k words. It slowed down due to finding less words with unknown kanji to mine.

>> No.18182079

>>18181980
I fuck up 遠い, 遅い, 速い regularly even though they hardly look the same. My biggest issue was when the deck introduced 階段 and 段階 really close together.

>> No.18182106

>>18182079
>>18181980
>still can't into katakana shi vs tsu and so vs n
>tfw kanji will rip me a new anus

>> No.18182118

>>18182002
I am glad my deck with less than 4000 words has shit like 内閣支持率 to boost the Kanji rate.

>> No.18182120

>>18181980
I got familiar with radicals, not learning them but just briefly looking over them a few days in a row.
It helps massively if you notice that one of the similar looking kanji has the radical for water in it and the other one doesn't for example.

Even better if the radical gives you a hint about the meaning of the word, not always the case though.

>> No.18182127

>>18182106
I literally have known katakana for, fuck, 13 years now? Taught it to myself as a kid and didn't take my studies any further because it was enough to brute force RPGs. Anyway, my point is that I still fuck those up but it's not a big deal. Katakana words are rare enough and since they're loan words you can figure which is which easily enough. Kanji isn't that bad either, don't psyche yourself out.

>> No.18182234

>>18181858
I mean, I didn't say that this is *always* the case. You'll have some days which are tougher than others.

This is an example of how it might be useful to either learn radicals or try to identify common structures in kanji though, and find a sort of logic in the things you're memorizing. Like, 冬 (winter) and 寒い (cold) both have those little lines at the bottom which I always associated with snow. And for some of the others like 古い (old) I always found that it looked like a gravestone, and for 秋 the 'fire' kanji on the right always made me think of the colour of falling leaves. Or 店 kind of looks like a market stall seen from the side.

But later on you get these really complicated kanji compounds like 製造 which really don't look like anything to me, and getting several of those in a row is really demotivating. Sometimes it helps to look up the individual kanji that make up a word but sometimes it doesn't so much.

>>18182079
Doesn't help that they've all got to do with distance or speed. With verbs it usally helps for me to remember the general sound of a word, and usually kanji A will have verbs with different endings than kanji B, but with adjectives you can't do that shit.

With 段階 I was kinda lucky since it's a common word in video games (like, X's defense went up one stage!).

>>18182106
You'll be fine anon. Best thing is to just start asap once you've got the hiragana down. You'll get the hang of katakana as you go through the deck, since that's why there are so many katakana words in there. Also usally a katakana word will make no sense if you try to pronounce
it with the wrong kana, so just try to pronounce them and you'll know pretty quickly if you make a mistake. Once you get proficient at it you won't be dissecting words into their individual kana anyways, you'll just sort of recognize them on sight, like you do in English.

>> No.18182306

あのん

デイリーってどういういみなの

おなかすいた

>> No.18182307

>>18182106
The shinkansen goes fast, so anything dangling along it is dragged and thus more horizontal. シンカンセン has no ソ or ツ. So when you see one consider the direction of those lines and you can figure out which

>> No.18182326

>>18182307
チョオオオオオオオオオオオオオオオオオオオオオオオオオオオオオオオオオオオオオオオオオオオオオ

>> No.18182375

>>18182306
daily まいにちの

>> No.18182388

>>18182234
>But later on you get these really complicated kanji compounds like 製造 which really don't look like anything to me, and getting several of those in a row is really demotivating.
I never studied kanji myself, but it isn't hard to recognize words like 製造 immediately simply due to association. I see 製 in a LOT of words, so any word that starts with it I already have an idea of its basic meaning and probably pronunciation too. As you learn more these kinds of connections just come together more and more. Learning new words that are slightly different reinforces what you already know and makes you eventually able to pick up on small differences. It's like playing a game that's linear at first but then you discover a bunch of cool shortcuts later on.

>> No.18182393

has anyone here ever had sex with a japanese girl before question mark thanks siri

>> No.18182400

>>18182375
むいかにいちにちたすとここのか?

>> No.18182414

>>18182388
Yeah, I know. It's just that these kanji are very tough early on, since you can't really break them up into logical pieces.

>> No.18182422

>>18182400
なのか

1.ついたち 2.ふつか 3.みっか 4.よっか 5.いつか 6.むいか 7.なのか 8.ようか 9.ここのか 10.とおか

>> No.18182445

>>18182422
デイリーはいちにちのいみいがいに

にさんにちのこともあるの

>> No.18182447

>>18182393
*raises paw*

>> No.18182467

>>18182447
how ookii were her oppai

>> No.18182472

>>18182467
on a scale from ichi to juu

>> No.18182484

>>18182472
>japan
>1-10
lol keep learning kid

>> No.18182488

>>18182484
sorry man i guess i'm still thinking in americano
please correct me so i can learn how to rate big tits in japanese

>> No.18182499

>>18182467
とても大きかった

>> No.18182520

>>18182445
ないよ
いちにちっていみでもないかな
"いちにちごとの"っていみならある

デイリーはdailyをかたかなにしただけでえいごだよ

>> No.18182536

>>18182499
Disgusting. Flat is justice.

ぺったん、ぺったん、つるぺったん

>> No.18182570

>>18182488
the common way to rate is out of 100

people will just say 80点 or something randomly and it's always out of 100

>> No.18182607

>>18182488
big

bakunyu
kyonyu
binyu
hin-nyu or chippai
manaita

small

>> No.18182644
File: 409 KB, 150x151, 1493793941267.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18182644

>>18182607
I laughed more than I should have

>> No.18182651

I just tried to cook a stir fry and it set the fire alarm off.
Fuck you japan

>> No.18182712

How do I get numbers down when reading? I'm afraid that I'm picking up bad habits from the "production" of assuming how a number (and counter) is read, given all of the exceptions. I'd rather not refer to TK or wiki every time I see a number, if possible. Is there good listening practice for more exposure to this?

>> No.18182731
File: 76 KB, 848x480, 1492946718229.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18182731

>> No.18182749
File: 87 KB, 886x1024, DJxRJQ0VwAIn5C5.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18182749

今度はテニス部から
ボコボコにされたとこを
助けてくれたんだってねえ
何でも
裸みたいな格好になってまで

>Mako said you just saved her from a pummeling by the Tennis Club, becoming all but naked in the process.

what is the とこ from?
ところで?

>> No.18182763

庭化

>> No.18182808

>>18182749
ところを indicates the time/situation.

Even though を is used, it might be better not to think of it as a verb acting on an object. You can just treat it as something similar to 時に and you wouldn't be far off.

>> No.18182817

>>18182749
ボコボコにされたとこを is gone in english.

>> No.18182821

>>18182808
>ところを
This and all the other variations can go suck a fucking dick

>> No.18182837

sorry found it

>> No.18182975

>>18182817
????

isnt this the "pummeling" part?
>4. viciously beating; hitting and kicking repeatedly​Colloquialism, Only applies to ボコボコ, Only applies to ぼこぼこ

>> No.18183054

成敗してくれるわ

>>
Name
E-mail
Subject
Comment
Action