/jp/ - Otaku Culture

Hey Komandos, quiz time. Which one is India, which one is Paki?
just save this picture as 631.bat and you'll see.

>>1746814
Wow that's almost CP.

>>1746802
They look like mexicans

>>1746817
...

I bet you were born in the 90s

In b5 "LOL I BORN IN 1965"

>>1746826
Excuse me? I'm just stating that the female in question appears to be under the age of 18, and that you can just about see her nipple. That would make the image CP.

>>1746834
JB≠CP

Learn the difference, it may net you a shorter sentence.

>>1746847
Nude & under 18 = CP, learn the law or you're fucked.

"But Your Honor, she has pubic hair! It's obviously jailbait and not child pornography."

>>1746847
You're an idiot. Anything under 18 where you can see the nipples, vagina, and sometimes anus, is CP.

>>1746859
>sometimes anus
ಠ _ಠ

>>1746859
>>1746851
How about both of you shut up because no one cares about the differences between JB and CP. All we care about is Berryz.

>>1746851
Nudity != CP
It must be of a sexual nature, as nudity alone can fall under artistic expression.

>>1746851
Pedophilia is the attraction to prepubescent children. Ephebophilia is attraction to pubescent young adults.

The law is colorblind on it, but the technicality exists. Also, the idea that people aged 14+ are still "children" is a very recent idea, not applicable to anything before 60-70 years ago, and only coming into vogue in recent times.

Also, a part of the result of paternalism on the part of most world countries and the reduction of citizens to the status of "children" in regard to the responsibility for their own actions.

>>1746885
CP > Berryz

>>1746851
This should be changed since there's obviously a large difference between a 17 year old taking pictures of herself and a 5 year old having an adult....
oh right. Our legal system isn't logical, and anyone who attempted to make such a change would be accused of trying to let "pedophiles" off easy, and likely accused of being one himself.

>>1746898
Hence why it's still possible to find a certain notorious bit of album cover art...

>>1746904
And before someone whines about what I said, let me relate that I've seen college students refer to themselves as "still kids" when describing their life responsibilities.

These are the same ones that never grow up.

>>1746898
Not anymore. Since you haven't noticed, the anti-pedophile rage has gotten to the point that ANY nudity is CP. Look at all the parents that took pictures of their kids changing/bathing and got arrested for it.

>>1746911
20 year old boy here

fuck growing up

that must have been discussed thousands of times on 4chan already

>All we care about is Berryz
and sometimes even C-ute

>>1746904
I never said I agree with the facts I offered, I was just telling him what the law's like.

>>1746927
oh wow sauce

Oh hi, I took the liberty to
>>1747021
I hope you don't mind
And let this one sage into oblivion

>>1746927
Gonna need proof; I've never heard of it.

I regret posting that picture so much. It made this into shit. Anyway, it's kind of weird that it got deleted, there's no actual nudity and it's not even a very questionable picture. It floats around Hello! Project circles all the time.