/jp/ - Otaku Culture

>>17214766
Nice fucking job OP. You get my thread pruned for a shitty image with
>subs

>>17214792
Not to mention you don't know how to link the previous thread.
>>17201742

>>17214798
Fuck

>>17214766
This is the worst OP image ever.

when do we get a thicc boat?

>>17214766
>>17214792
>>17214798
Is there still any doubt that KC3fags are the lowest of scum and KC3 should be banned from these threads?

>>17214806
I mean it's not entirely your fault because last thread's OP didn't do it; but next time leave the thread making to someone who will take the time to make sure everything is in place.

Anyways, delete this thread; shit image.

>>17214819
People haven't been able to delete their own threads for years. Only jannies and mods can do it.

>>17214813
Disgusting.

>>17214822
I know.

Stop

>>17214766
Let us please reserve a moment of silence for the passing of my dear wife, Nagato, who was ruined by the anime some time ago

>>17214962
2 years ago isn't "some time ago".

>>17214963
>It's been two years since the animateining and the scars are still fresh
Auuuuu the horror

>>17214971
Stop typing like a retard or fuck off.

>>17214973
Make me and make me
Now if you don't mind I must return to mourning

>>17214963
It kinda is though.

One more day for opening torp.

>>17215005
If she "does" have opening torpedo then it'll give me all the more reason to ditch Kitakami and Ooi.

But I know she won't. But I'll use her regardless because I'm not a shitty bandwagoner.

>>17215018
There will never be any reason to ditch KTKM/Ooi

The reason ABKM is good is because she isn't a CL, and the more opening torps the better.

But yura wont have opening torp

>>17215030
>The reason ABKM is good is because she isn't a CL
You mean CLT.

>>17215018
You can only use 1 CL in the escort fleet so no, you won't be replacing anyone.

>>17215030
>But yura wont have opening torp

I know she won't. But that won't mean I'll scrap her just because she turns out to be another Kinu.

>>17215040
Oh, really? That's a shame then.

>>17215048
Why did you think people don't use ABKM and Ooyodo as a yasen mule in the escort fleet ever instead of just taking ABKM?

>>17215056
I don't know? I never got far in maps that required combined fleet.

>>17215070
You should read the Combined Fleet page to see what ships are allowed on the main and escort fleet.

It's impressive that they can hold the Daihatsu launcher on their elbow. It looks pretty heavy.

This should've been the thread's image.

Fuck Whora. Where's Natori and Nagara Kai2?

>>17215132
>talking shit about Yura while posting Gabriel
Shit taste.

>>17215143
Found Sataniafag.

>>17215148
Jokes on you, I'm a Tapfag. It's a shame she's learning PHP next, that shit's garbage.

>>17215005
That's just a daihatsu launcher.

>>17215175
I never said it was a midget sub launcher.

I hope you guys are as ready for Yura as I am

>>17215226
I have 2 medals. Suzuya fucked my reserves since I only kept 4 and made the extras into screws. Still need to get Kumano to CVL and the dupe to kai 2 together with Taiyou. Too fucking many blueprints in such a short time.

>>17215226
Of course.

>>17215226
Should've done your EOs instead of idling.

>>17215226
I'm ready for Yura and Sara.

Thread theme:
https://track5.mixtape.moe/ukjklz.mp3

>>17215226
I have 1 bp and 1 medal.
But 2 are reserved for my 2 Littorios.
Must likely, unless Yura gets minisub.

>>17215325
>2 Littorios
You'll get some medals by new quest anyways.

This pleases my OCD.

>>17215226
Maybe next month.

>>17215226
I have 14 medals, I'm ready for her and Sarah.

>>17215005
>no rail
KEK
ABUKAMA reign supreme again

>>17215582
That's the bottom side of the mount you fucking retard. And the rail that ABKM has is the same as the one Kinu has. It's for Daihatsu, not midget subs.

Yura's idle line is nice. Only took an eternity for me to notice.

What is wrong with this panpakapan?

>>17215767
What is this, a gif for ants?

>>17215785
Looks like a cute pose.

Kaga vs Zuikaku

Zuiuns.

>>17215870
Are they fighting over who is more lesbian?

>>17215895
Are amazing.

>>17215933
They're fighting over which one has been fucked by more men.

>>17215870

>>17214962
Go away

>>17215957
I'll be frank, What the fuck even is that face

>>17215982
Bara artist, probably.

>>17215982
It's a Baki reference.

>>17216006
What the hell is she even doing?

>>17216056
Who knows, but the chapter seems to have started with Yura wanting the admiral to buy her a swimsuit.

Is anyone else having problems starting the latest version of EO? I redownloaded it and it still gives me this screen, but the previous version still works for some reason.

>>17216127
No.

>>17214792

Should have been faster making a new one slowpoke.

>>17216132
I was a minute off. Guess my thread autism has to suffer until next time.

>>17215946
>>17215933
That's Zuikaku
>>17215957
Strength =/= powerful

I did it!

>>17215936

Hmm. First time I noticed Zuikaku's side tie panties visible here. I must be blind.

>>17216162
Cute beaver.

>>17215105
I like this artist.

>>17216128
Well that sucks, it just happened for no reason, oh well.

>>17216209
Where's the tail?

???

Cheater

>>17216285
Whip that slut.

>>17216285
>Katori will never be your mom

>>17216305
Quote whom?

>subs
Fuck no please let this retarded thread die. Only retarded people would let it live. The fucker didn't even write the thread full name.

>>17216315
Can't delete it, and janny will cull any new ones.

>>17216325
Make OP delete the pic then. Last thread with the "you may choose only one" faggot was too much already. If not then just sage and let the thread die.

>>17216333
You can only delete an image 3-5 mins after posting. And someone will just come by and bump the thread even if it got to pg10 before the bump limit. The only way to get rid of it is for a janny or mod to delete the thread.

>>17216349
Fuck. Then please janitor or mod delete this shitty ass pic. I ain't living with retarded KC3 faggot pic ruining the thread.

>>17216360
>implying they'll read your post
The only way you'll get a response is to o to the 4chan irc and pm a mod. Even then they might not delete it.

>>17216360
Well, you can try to make a new thread and hope janny kills this one.

>>17216263
Hey! I got this faggot twice in a row today, well yesterday.

>>17216360
Just get out already.

>>17216360
>>17216315
How is it possible to be this mad?

bump
Fuck anti KC3 faggots

any good ship Composition, I've tired everything on the wiki seems like I can't finish the last dance on 4-5

>>17216431
> last dance
2BB 4CV works even for a newfag with no good ships like me.
>ib4 ">he need BB/CV" ">having trouble clearing 4-5"

>>17216431
2BB 4CV
4BB 2CV (with fighters)

Fubuki is cute.

How accurate are these times?

>>17216430
/jp/ is not a thread for wikiafag sympathizers. Don't feel like you are welcome here for a single moment

>>17216504
The are 100% accurate newfag. What else would they mean? If you get a certain time in construction it will mean it is whatever time it correlates with on the wiki.

>>17216519
I don't like wikiafags at all.
It's just you angry faggots like >>17216528
need to calm down over a fucking mobile game.

>>17216532
>mobile game
If you use kc3 you are a wikiafag by default. If you sympathize with the OP you are a massive fag.

>>17216537
What if someone just doesn't like reading moonrunes all of the fucking time? What if I want to know what quest I'm taking apart of outside of my dailies? What if I want to know which ship is being built instead of playing the waiting game or using an instant construction to find out?

>>17216548
There are other viewers.

>>17216551
So you just don't like one viewer?
What makes KC3 so bad?

>>17216548
No. You are just a lazy fuck that can't learn ship names. Sasuga newfag player.

>>17216553
It has the lowest barrier to entry, thus has a higher than normal amount of derpshits using it.

>>17216556
It's also got a fucking ugly UI. Among other things.

>>17216554
Have you learned enough Japanese to understand everyone's dialogue yet?

>>17216498
Yes.

>>17216554
>>17216556
Literally not an argument.
Can you faggots seriously debate anything without a fucking meme?
>Hurr durr newfag!
>Hurr durr ur a casul
Here's why I use KC3 you fucking retards.
I don't feel like learning a new language to play some fucking mobile game, yes mobile game.
Now in an argument faggots, you're supposed to reply with something that has substance. I.E something that disproves my point.
Try it.

>>17216560
So it's bad because of some subjetive shit?

>>17216574
How do you use KC3 on mobile?

>>17216575
Everything is subjective.

Are you really saying that KC3 is bad because it makes the game easier?
That's exactly why KC3 was created, so it isn't bad.

>>17216574
>people are better than me for not being an idiot and using a better viewer
>hurr durr not an argument
If you just think of this game as "some mobile game" that you want to put no effort or passion into, you shouldn't be here.

>>17216574
idk using EO or KCV or even fucking poi does all the above better and don't get you ragged into the ground

but yea everything is a meme

>>17216585
KC3 does nothing better than the other viewers.

>>17216581
So, I can easily discard your opinion. Thanks.

>>17216593
I know, but it's easier to use and more accessible.

>>17216577
>>17216586
How do you avoid objectifying your autism?
Oh, that's right, miss the point of the original argument and argue semantics.
Again, what makes KC3 so bad, focus on this you fucking brainlets. I know you ESLfaggots can't think outside of memes but if you really try I believe you can come up with something.
>>17216590
At least you can admit this is just bullshit.
>>17216593
So how does it do anything worse?

>>17216601
KC3 misses the point of being a viewer by limiting how much data you can have on screen at a time in favour of being filled with icons. Every other one is much cleaner.

>>17216601
You are the one blinded by your own opinion when plenty has been given to argue against kc3.
>>17216593
>>17216556
>>17216560
How am I memeing? If you getting your feelings hurt is a meme, then everything is at this point.

I'm going to make this clear once. Using a viewer that overlays ANYTHING inside the ACTUAL GAME is trash, period. Meaning subtitles, in game quest translations. kc3 is by wikiashitters, for wikiashitters. If you want to be one, stay there and leave here.

>>17216613
>Using a viewer that overlays ANYTHING inside the ACTUAL GAME is trash, period. Meaning subtitles, in game quest translations
Why? Not everyone knows moonrunes.
Also, you can disable translations.

>>17216601
>/jp/
> brainfuckinglets
Topkek. If we're soooooo brainlet then you wouldn't be here "smart one." Same kind of people attracts each other. So you're bascially just as "brainlet" as us.

But let's be real guys, even though I hate KC3 as much as you guys, having something to hate is not bad honestly. Imagine they all start jumping ships, ruining your favorite viewer. That would be hell on earth.

>>17216623
You can play without translations after less than a month. Shit is training wheels.

>>17216631
>That would be hell on earth.
Maybe for thin-skin shits it would.

>>17216613
From the posts you've quoted literally one (1) could be counted as an argument.
You can turn off translations as well. So there goes your one argument.
>>17216612
Ok, this makes sense.
>A messy UI hinders the information that could be displayed to me.
>>17216631
>Since you're here, you must be dumb. A small group of idiots can't be browse a image board, everyone here is a idiot am I right xD?
Wew, you really shot yourself in the foot with that one.

>>17216623
Literally every viewer that has an English version has quest translations and even ship names on the outside UI. Not knowing moonrunes is moot. You should learn how to read everything important eventually as everyone else in this thread has said. You acting like it's so hard to do that just further puts down any opinion you have into the dirt as it shows you put no effort into this game; just as the stereotype for kc3 users goes.

Now what viewer do you want, one that requires chrome, garbage looking cramped UI? Or a customizable one that looks good, runs in a seperate process? The answer is pretty obvious

>>17216613
I only translate the quest page. There is nothing extra in this game that needs translation.

>>17216634
I said on earh, not in /jp/ didn't I? Kek.
>>17216635
>A small group of idiots
Pretty sure there're a lot of other "idiot groups" out there too. Why are you here newfag? Why are you not there with them if we're the idiots? Nice "cognitive dissonance" you have right there kek.

>>17216642
And any other viewer with an English ver. has that. For the 3rd time.

>>17216636
Requiring Chrome instead of Intermet Explorer is at most a comment. It's definitely not a criticism.

>>17216648
Right, because I love leaving a memory eating botnet up 24/7.

>>17216645
> "idiot groups"
I meant "smart groups," oops.

>>17216649
I didn't know that people on 4chan with IE as their primary browser even existed.

>>17216548
Just ignore them. If you've been here long enough, you should know haters refuse to listen to any viewpoint that isn't their own.

>>17216636
>Literally every viewer that has an English version has quest translations and even ship names on the outside UI
So, it doesn't matter if I use KC3 or not then.
>one that requires chrome, garbage looking cramped UI?
UI being ugly is a fair subjective point.
I don't find it ugly at all.
>Or a customizable one that looks good, runs in a seperate process? The answer is pretty obvious
I use Chrome to run KC and browse 4chan at the same time, your idea would be for me to run Chrome and another viewer at the same time which would be two count it (2) processes. If it's apparently that big of an issue to run a program wouldn't it be easier to use just one (1).
>>17216645
Dumb fuck, you're one of the 3 idiots in that small group, keyword small. Google small and learn it's definition. Everyone else is not a idiot, it's just you fuckers. Also,
>hurr durr lemme use a big word to prove my intelligence that will show him xD
>>17216658
It's pointless. Logic and reasoning just seems to escape these people.

>>17216658
mhm, because everything he listed there any other viewer does plus better. Poor guy, let him victimize himself for his stupidity.
>>17216657
Firefox, how old are you? Plus chrome has the tendency to refresh your game if you leave it unattended
>>17216662
It matters because every viewer does what kc3 does better, and you're too ignorant to even realize this. Yeah, you're the one with logic and reasoning when you're so stuck up on only using the shittiest viewer and casually playing the game. Ignorance is bliss, my dude.

Who else isn't bothering with Yura until we know what she's capable of?

>>17216662
> you're one of the 3 idiots in that small group
Ah you mean the silent majority in /jp/ didn't really say anything about your retarded shit? Oh yea right not everyone can ignore your retarded shit you know.
>hurr durr being ignorant is smart guys xD

>>17216674
>Doesn't have all the k2s
>Doesn't level ships with planned k2s beforehand.
It's called KanColle for a reason

>>17216636
Acutally I want the Chrome one, because I can't use the other one at work.
Also, nearly everyone use Chrome by now.
About the interface, it's just a biased opinion.
It's undoubtable that KC3 makes the game easier for newfags. Translating things in the most obvious way, easier interface, easier customization options... it just makes the game easier, you don't need to learn anything. Other viewers requires some skill where KC3 requires none.
Most of you probably don't like it because of that, because things need to be complex, so you can say "fuck off" to new people playing "your" special weeb game.

>>17216673
You've said everything and nothing at the same time.
Fuck off.
Just say it's ugly faggot, that's your only subjective argument.
>>17216677
hurr durr ur ignorant
>I'm such a fucking crybaby because he called a spade a spade
You're an idiot.

>>17216673
>Firefox, how old are you?
Twenty-six. Switched off Firefox because Firefox 2.0 was a leaky piece of shit. What viewer is driven by Firefox?

>>17216677
>the silent majority in /jp/ didn't really say anything about your retarded shit?

Both sides are being retarded so I'm just waiting for janny to clean this mess up.

>>17216679
CL Kai Nis are always disappointing, because no matter what it will never be as good as Abukuma.

>>17216682
How is that my only argument? I'm not going to spell it out for you again. Quit trying to act like you have a high ground on me, dumbass.
>>17216680
You should learn things; thats part of playing the game. Where's the fun if everything is just made easy for you? Where is the learning? But you're right; we do want things to be complex. And we do want casuals like you to fuck off, this is a board for serious players.
>>17216686
Nice strawman dude. Are you really that stupid that you can't connect the dots? You don't need your viewer to use the same browser as your main browser. And not everyone constantly has their main browser up. And like I said;

chrome has the tendency to refresh the game if you leave it be for too long/ go do other things that require memory.

which is a big deal when it comes to getting expeditions, clearing quests right when they reset, amongst other things.
>>17216694
This whole thread needs to be deleted, OP made it shit to begin with.

>>17216682
>You're an idiot.
Topkek. I can show how "big" my brain was through my ingame achievements and be totally ignorant about your shit. The fact you don't understand why newfags can't be put together with oldfags has already proven how dumb you are. Fortunately KC3 is the scapegoat for that problem. I don't really care about bad shit in KC3 like "using chrome" or "retarded layout", but "play stupid game wins stupid prize", and you're the stupid one for being stuck with it.
>>17216694
Well I'm adding fuel into fire so they can delete everything, even this whole thread lol.

>>17216695
Unless you have other ships in need of K2s then I don't see the reason not to grab every new K2; bad or not.

>>17216697
Ok, spell it out for me bro, what makes KC3 such a bad viewer outside of all the "arguments" I have already debunked, you fucking jack ass.
>This whole thread needs to be deleted, OP made it shit to begin with.
Seems perfectly fine to me, stay mad faggot.

>>17216697
>You don't need your viewer to use the same browser as your main browser. And not everyone constantly has their main browser up.
I have had my browser open this entire year. I still don't see how IE is an advantage. I would have to run it in a virtual machine on my computer.

I also have never had a refresh issue except on my Chromebook.

>>17216697
>>17216701
Literally everything you faggots have said this whole time has meant nothing.
You just want to feel superior for using something that is objectively (yes objectively, google it) the same fucking thing as the others.

>>17216703
You haven't debunked anything. All you have said is "my opinion is subjective so that means you are all wrong techincally haha xd"
1. Uses chrome instead of a native application, I have already explained why this is bad.
2. Made by wikia
3. Used by and associated with idiots like you
4. Crammed/ ugly UI
5. Encourages use of things like overlayed subs/ quest TLs
6. does NOTHING better than any of the other viewers
7. other viewers have more/ better features over KC3
>>17216709
>objectively the same

>>17216709
And you're called out for being the dumb one, like scapegoats. Grats, you played your stupid game and our posts are your stupid prizes.

Best part is I can GUARANTEE both of you KC3 shills haven't touched another viewer, let alone see what they do. You have no grounds to base your opinions on because you haven't tried any alternatives.

>>17216717
>I have already explained why this is bad.
No, you haven't. All you did is whine about botnets when your entire operating system is a botnet.

>>17216723
TL; proud Google+ user under constant data mining.

>>17216680
>Also, nearly everyone use Chrome by now.

>not using palemoon

>>17216722
I used Grabacr07's viewer when I had a Windows machine. You are being a projecting faggot.

>>17216717
I have already explained why this doesn't matter.
But here we go.
>1. Uses chrome instead of a native application, I have already explained why this is bad.
I use 4chan and KC at the same time. What fucking difference does it make? You're being spied on right now, you idiot. Once you connected to the internet, you're always at risk.
>2. Made by wikia
Ok. Who cares?
>3. Used by and associated with idiots like you
Not an argument.
>4. Crammed/ ugly UI
Subjective. No matter how much you scream and cry, it works.
>5. Encourages use of things like overlayed subs/ quest TLs
You can turn this off
>6. does NOTHING better than any of the other viewers
Not an argument. If it does nothing better, what's the problem with using it?
>7. other viewers have more/ better features over KC3
What features?
>>17216722
I have used Poi.
I didn't care for it.
I don't feel the need to have an autism spasm over something so small and insignificant.
>>17216734
Cute.

>>17216723
>Ignores the 7 points I put in numerical order that any autistic person could follow

instead tries to call me out for whining when that's all you've been doing this whole time.
>>17216731
I'm not being a projecting faggot. >>17216430
Is the post that started this recent shitshow. Letting garbage like this be accepted in addition to the shoddy job OP did on making this thread, really shows how poor board health is right now.

>>17216742
There are people who think that board health is incompatible with any form of general thread. If you don't want to "accept" the thread, don't use it.

>>17216742
Make the OP next time then. Want something done right,do it yourself.

>>17216747
Right, because when a community is good but then gets flooded with people that negatively affect it, you should just leave the board.

If people are posting stupid things it's the duty of the community to remind them that their retardation is not welcome.
>>17216753
I did make the OP, but it was 1 minute later than this one and pruned as a result. The one that was posted first stayed despite being poorly made and rushed, whereas I took time into making it decent; but I guess that is my downfall.

>>17216697
>You should learn things; thats part of playing the game. Where's the fun if everything is just made easy for you? Where is the learning?
I already need to learn the game, viewers are not the game.
We're not serious. You think you are, but you're not. Games aren't serious, they're just games. KC it's even less serious than the majority of games.

>>17216755
Prep it in a notepad file or something.

>>17216755
So you're just butthurt.

>>17216756
>We
All of you, go back. Anon, remember to insert the "fuck off" part next to the "new to the game" part in the OP next time.

>>17216756
>We

>>17216764
>>17216767
>You think you are, but you're not.

>>17216756
Ah yes, the classic "its just a video game, so you can't take it seriously."

Why are you even on this board if you don't care about the game?
>>17216759
It honestly doesn't take long to do, but as I was posting my thread the other just came up. They really should have checked to see which one was clearly more quality but I doubt the /jp/ jannies care about this general all that much. But yeah, I am butthurt about that, so what? This thread means stuff to me and it annoys me if it gets shitty.
>>17216764
I will gladly add this and I will try to make sure I make the next OP.

>>17216773
>Why are you even on this board if you don't care about the game?
This game has many casual fans, or fans who are in it for the characters, or fans who are in it for the secondary material. Not everybody ranks.

>>17216755
>Right, because when a community is good but then gets flooded with people that negatively affect it, you should just leave the board.
You are one of those people. The old guard are all gone for a reason.

>>17216773
I obviously care about the game.
I take it seriously, playing it every damn day since about 2 years, paying and everything else.
But being serious about this game just make me pathetic like everyone else here.

You're not less pathetic if you make your life more complex using a uselessly difficult interface.

>>17216772
And because you said that it's true?

>>17216764
Newfags are fine but there's been some really obnoxious ones lately.

>>17216773
>[New to the Game? Read first, ask later]
Well, on second thought adding insulting things to the OP wouldn't be helpful. But I really think people should think about this before posting. This doesn't just apply to game questions, but also what you might post. If you are new to the board you should take the time to get a feel for what kind of stuff causes shitshows; stuff that you post that you will get heavy negative backlash for.
>>17216777
The old guard are gone because too many newfriends/wikia has flooded the board and the majority that would normally call these people out for poor posting are now a minority. This is ever clear right now when not many people are on; especially because of the poor OP. 43 unique posters? Pretty bad.

This board was good in between events; but I've noticed a quality decrease since coming into spring event this year. Obviously the board is worse during events, but seeing this kind of behavior during idle times is discouraging.
>>17216778
I just don't see the other viewers as being "harder to use" or "more complex" than KC3, and they have more features/customization to boot. I'd think someone with 2 years of experience would understand this.

>>17216795
>The old guard are gone because too many newfriends/wikia has flooded the board
The old guard MADE the Wikia. Nobody called these people out on their posting. People were free to play as optimally or suboptimally as their heart desired.

>>17216800
The old guard that MADE the wiki are no longer a part of the wiki. It has been that way much longer than the old guard of this board has been a minority here.

>>17216806
The old guard also played suboptimally, blogged about completing their Sendai and Kongou sets, posted copious amounts of fanart, organized translations, collected and posted scale models, and spent their time welcoming new players instead of trying to identify them so they could be shamed out of existence.

>>17216795
>wouldn't be helpful
How about this:
"New to the game? Fuck off! Just kidding but you need to read first before asking questions. DO NOT ASK SOMETHING THAT WIKIS CAN ANSWER."

I'm convinced the game is trolling me now. I switched my flaghip to harukaze thinking I needed to use a ship with the same voice to make her appear, so of course this ends up happening. I've gotten every possible ship now at least twice except for taiho, shoho, and zuiho. is there some kind of phoenix summoning dance I need to be doing?

>>17216815
Yeah you need to remodel all your Shibafu ships and then use Kaga as secretary.

>>17216810
And that was when the game was much more niche in the English community. As a result, people coming into the game already had an underlying passion and drive for this kind of stuff.

Nowadays with the anime adapt and fanart being collected by copious amounts of secondaries, many new players to the game; new players who are associated under "wikia" are not compatible with vets due to obvious reasons.

>>17216792
And it'll probably get a bit worse when the dub for the anime gets released.

>>17216823
Not even to mention wikia "historians", those people are the worst.

>>17216788
Not because I said it, but becase it is.
You think you're a serious person playing a serious game.
But, as the matter of fact, you're a just a pathetic person playing a bad japanese game based on RNG.
Just as me.
But I'm less pathetic than you because I don't make false images of myself being all serious about a falsely serious game.

>>17216860
Sounds like you are projecting your issues and frustrations with the game onto other people and blaming them for liking, enjoying, and taking something seriously a game you can no longer.

>>17216810
Different times. I don't even see anything wrong with doing those things today either except fanart when it's the same images that were posted the last 20 threads or blogging about everything.
>instead of trying to identify them so they could be shamed out of existence.
I only see that happening when they're being really annoying.

My wife Hamakaze is so cute.

>>17216880
I'm not projecting anything, I don't blame anyone for liking and enjoing KC. There's nothing bad in enjoying something bad, I like a bad game too, and I take this bad game seriously just as you.
I'm just realistic unlike most of you.
Your useless seriouness and closeness will hurt newfags. Why would you hurt a newfag? Can't you just be nice to someone pathetic as you?

>>17216880
Wtf I feel bad for him now. I mean I would most likely type the same shit if I got bfto'd by RNG-sama. But then again I wouldn't be here at that point though.
>>17216906
It's okay anon I understand your pain now.

>>17216906
>I take this bad game seriously just as you
Do you rank and have 10 medals?

>>17216906
Nobody is hurting newfags for no good reasons. And it's not even limited to newfags. When people post things that are obnoxious/annoying then they are going to get called out for it. Whether it be asking for spoonfeeding when the answers are clearly on the wiki, bitching about rng, or posting stupid images.

>>17216920
The discussion was born from the viewers argument. When someone is clearly an idiot there's nothing bad in insulting him.
When someone just have a different opinion or asks something, it's not.

>>17216917
5 medals, I don't rank because I've a job.

>>17216565
I would bend her over the table and fuck her brain out.

>>17216934
What makes you feel that way? She's bland as fuck.

>>17216939
Fubuki is bland but sexual.

>>17216532
If this were a mobile game it would never have gotten big.

>>17216810
>The old guard also played suboptimally
So do the new guys. In fact the old guard stopped doing things suboptimally when the mechanics became more known.

>>17216730
muh nigga

Shitty KC3 newfags got really bold lately. Play at least 2.5 years before even thinking about arguing with people here. Learn your place.

>>17217033
This is not your special club you shithead.

>>17216986
Only the ones who took the game very seriously. A lot of old players were there for lazy countdown simulator.

>>17217043
Yeah, it kind of is.

>>17216532
>>17216574
>>17216929
Most /jp/ers don't know the difference between a mobile game and a browser game (other than the platform, but that alone results in fundamental differences). I don't expect casuals to, either. This is why comparing KanColle to shit like F/GO and Granblue is like comparing apples to oranges. You might as well be comparing games/fruits as a whole.

Mobile games are designed to be time wasters, since they are designed to be played on the go, in short, frequent sessions. This same design also means that to retain the playerbase, to keep them hooked, the game needs to be fast-paced, and be conducive to short term investment. Browser games don't get this. In particular, KanColle is a long term investment game (especially due to being so slow paced), which runs completely counter to the point of a mobile game.

The reason you don't take KanColle seriously is because you treat it like one. Were it really one, you would be right, because simply put, it's terrible game design for a mobile game. But then had it been one, it would have died out early. The reason why it didn't is because it was instead a browser game. Other people here treat it like the browser game it really is, which is why they take it more seriously than you do.

And even cross-platforming cannot iron out the differences. The Android app is terrible to use for anything other than expeditions. And that's not taking into account that unlike playing on a browser, on Android the slightest dip in connection results in an instant errorcat, which means you have to refresh. If you were in mid-sortie, you have to start all over again. An actual mobile game doesn't suffer from these problems. Were it a mobile game, you would be able to continue your sortie from where you left off, or better still, never get a cat to begin with, but simply have to click the continue button again. But this clearly isn't the case.

So there, I've explained the reason for the difference in opinions between you and the rest of the people here. It's not merely KC3; for the record, I don't care about KC3 or its users, since #notallKC3fags and stuff.

>>17217071
That stopped being the case post-IBS.

>>17217104
>#notallKC3fags
Fuck off I bet you're into viewermixing too you degenerate kek.

>>17217104
You're the first person actually contributing in a serious way to this discussion.
There's no need to explain what is a browser game and what's a mobile game. I already know that.
I don't use KC on Android beside when I can't use a PC because I'm off my city/country.
I already said I take it seriously but I don't think it's a serious game, for many reasons.
I think also that KC3 is a better interface for newfags, that lowers drastically the learning curve for the game and doesn't require any skill or learning to be used.
Other inferfaces, even giving more infos on screen (I'm not denying that) are more complex and less comprehensible (no icons, no colors, no clear panels, no accessible and updated translations) and, therefore, better, especially for newfags.

>>17217168
>There's no need to explain what is a browser game and what's a mobile game. I already know that.
Ï didn't think so considering you kept calling it a "mobile game".

>serious game
Then what's a serious game to you? One with muh complex gameplay and story? Would you call, say, chess, a "serious game"?

To me, any game is as serious as one makes it to be. That's all.

Finally, about the newfags bit. /jp/ likes newfags who can think for themselves. To read the wiki thoroughly, to come up with optimal fleets on their own, to know how to prepare for events and which ships to level, etc. And before the advent of KC3, many did.

You said it yourself, KC3 lowers the learning curve. But then that means it has led many newfags who can't think for themselves to play this game, and come here to discuss it. Because of this, /jp/ associates KC3 users with people who can't think for themselves. And /jp/ doesn't like people who can't think for themselves.

>>17217195
>Ï
Oops. Stupid keyboard.

>>17217195
>What's a serious game?
A game that is difficult, competitive, complex in gameplay, or else is "serious" as a piece of storytelling media.

>optimal fleets on their own
Nobody new does this unless they are a masochist. They watch the trailblazers and copy them.

Do any of you even have fun playing this or is it just done out of some sense of obligation to nonexistent women?

>>17217229

A little bit of both. But I mostly do it just to get a good feel of the girls before I fap to doujins of them.

>>17217229
I have fun with spreadsheets. I like using Excel.

>>17217229
I do it for my fleet, it's my work.

Am I the only one here who unironically enjoys playing this? It's like I enjoy looking at other people's ships and equipment and thinking of how to bring the best out of those, no matter how good or shitty they may be.

>>17217229
I can't play games I don't have fun with

>>17217229
Mostly the second one but I can get some joy out of it every now and then.

>>17217293
>Am I the only one here
>Asking this shit in this thread of all places
What do you think faggot?

>>17217309
If no one else here enjoys it like I do, I can't imagine any other English community doing likewise.

>>17217293
Everyone left in this thread only gains pleasure from shitting on less accomplished players. Medals, for example, are primarily good for giving you to shit on people without medals and not much more.

>>17217293
Everyone left in this thread only gains pleasure from shitting on less accomplished players. Medals, for example, are primarily good for giving you the right shit on people without medals and not much more.

>>17217229
For me it's pretty much a bad addiction I can't quit.

>>17217293
Everyone left in this thread only gains pleasure from shitting on less accomplished players. Medals, for example, are primarily good for giving you the right to shit on people without medals and not much more.

I should sleep.

>>17215963
Make me
Also you're late

Why were they arguing?

>>17217549
We've recently got an obnoxious newbie who likes chinkcolle, thinks that he is entitled to get every ranking rewards without ranking (and also blueprints).

>>17216817
Kaga sure is talented, is there anything she can't do?

>>17217643
Be a good girl

>>17217229
Waifu comes first even if I'm not having too much fun.

>>17217643
Stop being gay and a bully.

>>17217671
>Implying

>>17217643
Being not shit.

Please stop bullying Kaga-san already

>>17217771
I agree.

Surely I'm not the only one who's passively Kai'd destroyers just by doing Expeditions, right?

>>17217851
Nah, I also do it.

>>17216574
To be frank most /jp/ actually uses insults and ego rather than actual opinion. Case in point would probably by the Chinese games, where only rarely do they respond with arguments rather than using the term "chinkshit" then calling it a day. Most would laugh at you for playing a chinese game rather than figuring out "Why people play it" and just flag people as :"Chinks" or "KanColle dropouts" without wondering "why did they drop out? After spending loads of time and money in this game?" Just replying with a big fat "They couldn't handle it" using blanket statements is Kinda this thread's thing. Oh, and replying to this post with "Autism" or "Fuck off" would probably only prove my point even further.

>>17217838
Congrats anon, I'm sure you'll be happy with Kagawife

>>17217866
Kill yourself.

>>17217937
For once it's more original than what most /jp/ cycles through. But just telling someone to kill themselves is not disproving my point. Granted there are some times when /jp/ cares to explain rather than just eject an insult out their assholes. mostly it's just nothing but the same old shit. but "Old is gold" as they say.

>>17217937
Just ignore him would be the better way.

What can Yura's special gimmick be?
It should be something new right?

>>17217994
She's carrying a catapult in her hand so probably seaplane fighters and bombers. So literally fucking nothing.

>>17217866
Maybe because people are sick of seeing that off-topic shit mentioned here all the time? You're posting about a literal chinese copy of the game the thread is actually about, no shit people will just tell you to fuck off instead of arguing seriously.

>>17217229
I do it for both This is the only way I can have a harem

>>17217229
I like the game, but I also really like keeping track of all of my stuff. Spreadsheet-friendly games are a lot of fun.

>>17217997
Would that make her able to equip Zuin's?

>>17218168
Do you not know what Zuiun is?

>>17218172
Its a seaplane bomber, right?

>>17216504
Come on, I wanted an answer. Not drama for being a wikiashitter or not.

>>17218194
>The are 100% accurate newfag

How is this not an answer?

>>17218194
You did get an answer you fucking retard.

>>17218194
And this is why we make fun of retarded newfags.

If I equip a DD with only torpedos and go into night battle vs a fleet with both surface ships and submarines, will the Destroyer focus the SS or the surface ships?

>>17218293
They will always focus subs.

>>17218293
If a ship can attack a sub, they will, the only exception being the two offensive light carriers (kumano and Suzuya).

I hope level 64 is enough for Yura.

>>17218392
Are you stupid?

Are you foolish enough to think the new Mutsuki Kai Ni doesn't need a blueprint?

>>17218400
None of the Mutsukis require blueprints, and neither will the next one. At worst she'll need level 75 like Shitsuki.

>>17218403
Nor does Asashio and Kasumi yet Ooshio got one as so did Arashio who was the last DD to require a blueprint.

>>17218410
They got away with BP because of lower level requirement and Daihatsu. They don't have to do that for a Mutsuki because both Mutsuki and Kisaragi already get their Kai 2 at a lower level (65) than Shitsuki (75) without a BP. All they have to do is not give her Daihatsu.

>>17217293
No, I still enjoy the game for what it is.
I wish there was more to do though, but it seems to be moving that way so I'm not worried.

>>17218414
>All they have to do is not give her Daihatsu.

She'll get one because that's what Tanaka likes.

I wish the Abyssals also has a other seasonal art.
Only Hoppo has seasonal art.

>>17218477
Frankly, few people in the playerbase at large give a fuck about abyssals that aren't Hoppou and Kouwan. Disgusting, I know.

14 and a half hours left.

>>17218560
I don't like her. I hope her K2 is boring and her perk is useless

Is this still how you do 5-5 or has something changed?

I want world 7 and a bunch of new, low-rarity girls to fill it out.

>>17218609
>Akagi
Yes, you use Sara.

>>17218615
I hope they add 7-1 tonight and make the quests that have medals as an option be there.

>>17218560
Man, I don't get what people have been yelling about the patrol boats for. I think they look great.

>>17218623
It happens every event. The new girls are revealed, people complain, the event ends, everybody likes them.

>>17218616
>Sara

I forget about her way too often, thanks.

>>17218609
Well I personally ended up swapping Kaga for Saratoga, but otherwise that's my setup exactly.

>>17218627
Etorofu is still ugly

>>17218620
>the quests that have medals as an option be there.
Yes, everything I could dream of. They already added quarterly quest with medal reward, 7-1 seems possible now. And that'll be a very good incentive to actually clear 6-4.

>>17218609
Try this one

>>17218638
Leave.

Etorofu is cute.

>>17218659
She's a derpy midget just like Arare and Ooshio

>>17218638
Erotofu was, and still is, the cutest DE from the start, from the moment she was revealed. Check you taste in cute little girls, friend.

>>17218659
>>17218688
I like sex kaiboukan.

>>17217994
AoE opening torpedo.

>>17218688
Kunashiri is the cutest.

>>17218679
Life must be difficult for you being wrong literally 100% of the time.

>>17218688
Shimushu is the cutest, Kunashiri and Erotofu are the best for lewd.

>>17218719
I find her verbal tick really annoying.

>>17218725
But that's the best, she's like a prinny turned shipgirl.

>>17218735
I never thought of it that way before.
How terrifying.

>>17218679
>derpy midget
Just imagine these things peeking over your desk every day. Tell me that's not adorable.

>>17218744
I like this, she would need a little stepladder to hand me papers properly.

Please, stop sexuallizing Etorofu.

>>17218783
Then who should we sexualize?

>>17218783
There's nothing sexual about this hobbit

>>17218783
Please, go back to plebbit you prude normalfag.

>>17218744
Adorable.

>>17218679
Ugly midget is more like it.

>>17218807

Hey-ho, maintenance coming up in 5h10m!

>>17218913
Jonny 2x4 is missing you, plank.

>>17216548
>What if I want to know which ship is being built instead of playing the waiting game or using an instant construction to find out?
KC3 is so shit, it doesn't have something as basic as this?

>>17218929
He was talking about not using any viewer, mastermind.

>>17218929
> it doesn't have something as basic as this?
Of course it does.

So Yurafags will get disappointed with her remodel right? I expect OASW and daihatsu/tank carrier.

>>17218942
Is anybody expecting the opening torpedo at this point? I don't think people have high expectations after Kinu when it comes to CLs, so anything decent will please.

I can't wait to see everyone marry Yura and claim they always liked her if she turns out good.

>>17218973
You don't like Yura?

>>17218954
>Is anybody expecting the opening torpedo at this point?
Yurafags. Hopefully she will at least bring some daihatsu or the new tank from spring.

>>17218980
>Yurafags.
Not even Yurafags are expecting it to happen. Hoping != expecting.

>>17218980
They want it, but they don't expect it.

>>17218973
This is what every statfag is like, dipshit.

>>17218984
>>17218987
I stand corrected.

>>17218973
I like her but I wont marry her.

>>17218973
Pretty sure most think she will be another Kinu.

>>17218973
I always liked Yura for building me Abucute at least and will marry her when her time comes, but her remodel with definitely be good. It just won't be great like Abubear's.

>>17218929
It does. Kashima a best.

>>17218627
I don't think that many people like Gangut and I think many have forgotten the DEs.

>>17219021
Kashitma a shit.

>>17218973
My only reason on why I might not choose to marry her is because I feel nothing for my ship-girls.

>>17218989
Only the ones in denial who want to pretend they're not just doing it for stats. A real statfag wouldn't care.

>>17219041
They would if it meant Yura could equip a mini sub.

>>17219021
Those juicy thighs, holy fuck.

>>17219026
I think spring event brought a bunch new popular girls in comparison to winter. 2 nearly identical looking subs, a boku DD, and a gumo. In comparison to Russian BB, 3 escorts which will probably get more love in future events, taiyou which is shibafu's saving grace and a unique CVL. Feels a lot more impactful to me.

>>17219082
And of course everyone's favorite Hokkaido seal clubbing fleet oiler.

>>17219090
The best new meme.

>>17219100
Where the fuck does she pull it out from?

>>17219090
Ah seal clubbing, Japan's pastime.

>>17219112
Her ass.

>>17219100
Shouldn't that thing be bigger? It carried 2 45cm torps but the whole hull looks as big as a normal 61cm torp that KTKM carriers.

Kaga is just too cute!

>>17219223
Why would anyone use Kaga when we have Sara now? It just doesn't make sense.

>>17219122
Canadians and Alaskans do it to as shooting seals decreases the value of their pelt.

>>17219134
But that's exactly where Tanaka pulls his remodels out from

>>17219031
Then why are you here?

>>17219227
It really is a mystery.

>>17219227
Because you're a retard

>>17219257
That's funny coming from the Kagashitter who doesn't understand how slots work.

>>17219251
Because I enjoy playing the game?

I'm not going to waste a ring on a girl who I might not even like.

Some nips think Saratoga K2 will come on the same day as Test Baker. What do you think?

>>17219270
Considering Ashigara got it on her launch date it's possible.

>>17219270
That would be cool as fuck.

>>17219270
July 24 is a whole month away so it'd be a good time to do it. I'm with them.

>>17219297
>not giving it on 4th of July
Not American enough.
But whatever.

>>17219335
That's reserved for the surprise Iowa Mk2

>>17219335
Both work honestly

>>17219335
I think a ship's history matters more in this case anon.

>>17219362
It would be Mod 2.

>>17219335
Actually july 4th this years falls on a not so unusual maintenance day, you might be onto something.

Do I need rank 6 if I'm to get type 4 passive sonar?

>>17219556
>rank 6
What?

>>17219562
I'm looking at the wikia page for type 4 passive sonar and all I'm seeing is rank 6.

>>17219556
Akashi doesn't sell stuff, she sells services.

>>17219572
I know this, anon.

I just want to know why its not letting me craft for Type 4 passive sonar despite believing I have the resources.

>>17219576
You either don't have a type 4 sonar or it's equipped to someone.

>>17219556
No, you upgrade 93 to MAX first, then another upgrade to make T4.
Or just do quest for them.

>>17219570
You're fucking blind then.

>>17219576
You don't craft shit, you upgrade them.

>>17219570
I don't know what you're talking about. To get a Type 4 from Akashi you have to upgrade a Type 93 to +max and then upgrade it.

本日【11:00】より、「艦これ」稼働全サーバ群はメンテナンス&アップデートを実施致します。本日の作業完了は【19:00】を予定しています。提督の皆さん、お手数をお掛けします、メンテ開始前に「艦これ」を一旦終了して頂けますと幸いです。ご協力どうぞよろしくお願い致します！

>>17219582
Ah, so that's what I do.

Thanks for the answer.

>>17219592
Next time actually read the wiki.

>>17219606
I had the actual page opened up before I made my reply, anon. I forgot that you needed to upgrade 2 type 93 passive sonar's to max which is why I didn't understand it.

>>17219614
>upgrade 2 type 93 passive sonar's
No you don't, you only need to upgrade 1.

What's your weird obsession?

For me it's transport fleets, landing craft and seaplane fighters. I couldn't give a shit about strong ships or strong equipment.

AVs > CVs

>>17219620
AVs are shit except Akitsushima.

>>17219614
>2 type 93 passive sonar's to max
You need only one and have two in stock to transform.

>>17219614
Apparently you still don't understand it.

>>17219628
I guess you're right because I apparently thought I needed 2 ranked to max if I wanted a type 4 passive sonar.

2 hours ~15 mins until maintenance. I hope you faggots got her to 75.

>>17219672
I got her at 1.
And she's about to get scrapped for the millionth time.

>>17219672
I got her to 97.

>>17219672
Got her to 98 just from ranking last month, fuck this month though.

Is Taihou a good investment?
Everyone keeps saying I should only try to get Akitsus and Maruyus from LSC and everything else is useless.

>>17219773
Yes.

Anyone having problems with the android app when sortieing? Since yesterday evening I'm always stuck on this screen.

>>17219808
It also happens on the browser if your connection is so bad it can't even download the enemy images in a timely fashion.

>>17218697
>>17218807

calling the military police.jpg

>>17219773
Taiyou will be a great addition during SS Hime maps.

>>17219672
If this wide eyed bitch turns out to be not useful, she's going straight to the scrapyard.

>>17220090
>not remodeling everyone

本日この後【11:00】より、「艦これ」稼働全サーバ群はメンテナンス&アップデートに突入致します。提督の皆さん、お手数をお掛けして恐縮です、メンテ開始前にブラウザを閉じ、「艦これ」を一旦終了して頂けますと幸いです。ご協力、どうぞよろしくお願い致します！

>>17219362
Iowa Mk2 is already out.

The wait begins.

>>17220137
I love this meme

>>17220149
It's not a meme. Kai = Mk2 we're been over this shit countless times.

>>17220149
>>17220137
It would be mod 2.
>>17220139
Yura is actually going to the scrap yard.

>>17220155
Kai = Mod 1. K2 = Mod 2.

>>17220167
Mod != Mk.

Maintenance when?

It begins.

>>17220158
It's just going to be "two".

>>17220158
>the scrap yard.
That's not what the sign says.

>>17220168
Mark implies it's a new production model. Mod is for modification. Last time I checked Saratoga isn't a completely new ship.

>>17220155
Kai is fucking Kai, not Mk.2.

>>17220174
Well I have a feeling that will be the case too. Seems like nips and overseas who care think Mk, Mod, Rev or whatever would be cool.

>>17220185
I like the idea someone had of iowa double bacon

>>17220173
Fug I forgot.

>>17220187
I remember some nips said Sara K2 should be called Super Saratoga.