[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/jp/ - Otaku Culture

View post   
  [?]In ghost mode, only threads with non-archived posts will be shown
File: 66 KB, 960x793, mynigga.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16663485 No.16663485[DELETED]  [Reply] [Original]

Prepare to have Japan come down on lolicon, idols and onaholes by the 2020 olympics.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cMcWEXcXcvo

>> No.16663492

>>16663485
Based Brits.

>> No.16663503

You already made this thread and it was deleted.
You can stop now.

>> No.16663508

>>16663503
That must have been a different guy. I saw this thread deleted on /a/, which I can understand. But how is this not /jp/ related?

>> No.16663524

>>16663508
Probably because the board is about Otaku Culture itself and not about what some TV station from the UK think of Otaku Culture.

>> No.16663535

i hate being british

>> No.16663547

Perfidious Albion strikes again

>> No.16663712

>>16663535
t. Ahmed

>> No.16663901

>>16663535
Same. I'm at a point where I wish all my countrymen would just stop contaminating the gene pool.

>> No.16663938
File: 165 KB, 1357x640, 7DsRR3B.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16663938

I'll just leave this here...

>> No.16663949
File: 647 KB, 661x782, 1420847737212.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16663949

>>16663485
>lolicon
Naturally, as they prefer real children.

>>16663938
Alternate version.

>> No.16663956
File: 547 KB, 1344x720, sN0hNYC.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16663956

>>16663949
This one is still my favorite.

>> No.16663972

>>16663949
>>16663938
The BBC article in that case was arguably neutral reporting or as close as you can get to it in the West.

>> No.16663979

>>16663972
It's the hypocrisy that we're pointing out.

>> No.16663987

>>16663979
You'll have to explain to me the hypocrisy here.

>> No.16663998

>>16663987
"FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION IS IMPORTANT... and... uh, why aren't these banned yet?"

You can't cherry pick freedom of expression.

>> No.16664027
File: 53 KB, 500x369, GGKLx.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16664027

>>16663998
>why aren't these banned yet?"
The article explained precisely why Japan had not banned such things, even though the average Westerner finds them abhorrent, with great deference to freedom of expression. This was neither hypocritical nor cherry-picking. Did you read the article, or just the headline?

>> No.16664034

>>16664027
I actually listened to the podcast when it aired. And it still had a hint of "So, yeah, why aren't these banned?"

>> No.16664043

>>16664034
>And it still had a hint of
No shit. You're in the West. If you're going to shit on the West's best possible, most sympathetic look at the subject in the same breath as godawful unresearched push reporting, it's no wonder they decided to give up on having standards. It's all the same in one book and gets more clicks in the other.

>> No.16664143

at 15:56 it seems unfair to translate 今日なり as tonight

>> No.16664185

>>16663485
Maybe the UK should be dealing with it's own child exploitation problems instead of finger pointing and pretending it's superior.

>> No.16664194

There have been multiple threads about this that have been deleted. Take the fucking hint.

>> No.16664224

>>16664194
Not OP, but any reason why? What's the problem with having a dicussion about something that actually relates to Japanese culture?

Or is 4chan "not an appropriate forum for serious discussion?"

>> No.16664262

>>16664224
> is 4chan "not an appropriate forum for serious discussion?"

this one

>>
Reply to thread [?]Don't expect anything heroic. Your post will not be uploaded to the original board.
Name
E-mail
Subject
Comment
Action