/jp/ - Otaku Culture

Sentient. How can I have a long, meaningful relationship with an adorable catgirl (only to get dumped in the end) if she's only intelligent enough to eat, sleep, shit and piss? Oh, and fuck. Can't forget that she'd go into heat.

>>12351526
I take it you have little to no understanding of animal intelligence.

>>12351548
None whatsoever.

>>12351526
That makes me wonder - if sentient catgirls were real, would they be able to take time off of work when they're in heat?

>>12351558
Some of them would opt for overtime, because they'd be prostitutes

>>12351526

Yeah, then comes the problem if they are in heat, they'd slut it up with anything they can come across.

Why aren't catgirls real? We eat shit tons of genetically modified food every day and yet nobody bothered to make some catgirls on the side? Is there any good reason for this, /jp/?

>>12351621
Maybe then /jp/ could get laid

>>12351655
We need someone rich and crazy like Elon Musk who shares our fetishes

>>12351655
Because catgirls are something desperate lonely nerds want since it involves dehumanizing a person so it's considered creepy

>>12351665
i wish someone would dehumanize me

>>12351665
>since it involves dehumanizing a person
So I take it you prefer the catgirls as pets thing

>>12351673
Find someone who makes you wear a collar and treats you like shit

>>12351680
i don't have the money to pay for that kind of thing

Janny where are you

So then there would be wolfgirls?

Then bunnygirls?

Then a huge war between the species.

Then evolved to shoot "energy projectiles."

Touhou is born.

If thern were cat girls wouldn't there also have to be cat boys? Otherwise the gene would die off I assume.

>>12351698
Futanari

>>12351665
>Dehumanizing a person
Why don't we just humanize a cat?

>>12351698
catgirls get pregnant from humans. the babies are always female and always catgirls.

humanity dies within three generations.

>>12351719
It's basicly the same, the result would be that catpeople are forever seen inferior to real humans and be eternally discriminated, only good for being used as easy to manipulate partners or sex slaves

>>12351732
>forever seen inferior to real humans

What if cat people have lightning fast reflexes, night vision, great balance, and all the other cat-like advantages? Surely they'd be of some merit in a catgirl-human society.

>>12351727
Assuming the catgirls were loyal and not money grubbing....

We wouldn't even last one generation.

>>12351732
They'll rebel eventually. Give them a couple hundred years and they'll have the same rights as the rest of us. Or if they have cat like abilities like >>12351745 said, they can just get hired into the military or something.

>>12351745
Wouldn't change anything, the arrogance of humans knows no boundaries

>>12351754
Until humans get continually blasted in night raids because the catgirl insurgents can be sneaky as shit and see in the dark

>>12351752

If not more rights, there's also the possibility of them dominating us if they're populating too fast. (If they're like cats and give birth to like 4-10 more catgirls)

>>12351766
Pretty sure humans wouldn't let that happen and just perform a catocaust to "save humanity"

>>12351773

There could be that mad doctor that selectively breeds them to have no ears and tails. (killing the point) but still retaining the cat-like traits.

Then regular humans would be killed off by mistake. Be the next global disaster. Then again, some other mad scientist can create a feline-based disease to kill them all off while humans are immune.

>>12351766
We could genetically engineer them not to breed so fast. Or we could just genetically engineer a virus that only affects catgirls. Or we could just create another species that preys on catgirls. The possiblities are endless and I have no clue why we aren't taking advantage of them yet.

>>12351794
Because we already have enough starving subhumans around the world

>>12351803
I'm kinda getting the vibe that we're pretending this is a hypothetical situation hundreds of years in the future where poverty has been eradicated and we have the scientific prowess to engineer a race of cat people

>>12351803
Goddammit. Why does reality have to be so mean to catgirls? Surely they would find some way to survive in the first world.

>>12351816
What makes you say we don't have the scientific prowess to engineer cat people now, and the law is the only thing standing in our way?

>>12351816
>hypothetical situation hundreds of years in the future where poverty has been eradicated

I feel like that's sooner the world would end.
There are too many rich and powerful people around the world who will keep things shitty for their people and I don't see how they would lose their power

>>12351762
Easily countered by pervasive catgirl strenght catnip and pheromone warfare.

God save those poor fucks on the ground

>>12351816

I'm sure we'll have AI robots that look identical to humans destroy us before we can reach the catgirl phase.

>>12351831
If we have the time to make AI robots that look like people we might as well make them look like catgirls before they wipe us out.

>>12351655
Most of the people who would get genetically modified are probably those weird kids who wore a tail and cat-ears around in high school. It'd ruin the whole thing.

>>12351867
We're talking about yogurt and egg genetic modification here, you can't really genetically modify a grown human being, just pump them full of hormones and hope for the best.

>>12351880
Well then it'd be their children. And I really doubt they can raise a child even half-decent.

Sentient. I want one to hold hands with and pamper like a princess.

>>12352568
Would her p*ssy feel like a cat's or a humans? How does a cat's feel like? Actually, how does a human's feel like?

>>12351655
Gmo =/= mutant weird shit

Cats are better than humans because they don't talk. I'd like to keep it that way.

>>12351766
>implying it's a bad thing

I would prefer if they were sentient, but not sentient enough to question why they were my property.

http://www.change.org/petitions/government-scientists-genetically-engineer-catgirls-for-domestic-ownership

>>12352875

Catgirls can still possibly be the same way, just give them under-developed vocal chords so they can't really communicate with each other.

How cat girl will they get before it turns borderline furry territory? I'd be happy with just the ears and tail. Anything more seems too much.

>>12352997

Just ears and tail is best, but I'd still consider something like >>12352568 acceptable. Probably too much for most though.

>>12352997
>I'd be happy with just the ears and tail.
this + teeth

...and maybe the prickly tongue too

How about childlike intelligence? Or generally human intelligence but the attention span of a cat, so they would still need a legal guardian.

>>12353026
Pretty much adopting the concept as Wanko to Kurasou.

Which I'd be perfectly fine with. I would guess them living as long as humans being problematic, so a 10-15 year life span should suffice.

>>12353011
But your dick would tear apart after a blowjob

>>12351521
Normal humans who say "nyaa" and do some cat-like things from time to time, which usually embarrass them.

>>12353180
Don't judge me

CATGIRLS A SHIT
DOGGIRLS ARE BEST

>>12351521
Sentient
Please teach me, Catgirl-senpai
Or Foxgirl-senpai

>>12353464
>>12353513
um please keep these garbage girls out of a wonderful catgirl thread

thanks

>>12353464
I'd like a dog girl with childlike intelligence, and that she'd be perfectly fine with staying at home all day while I'm in work.
She'd have to learn to use the toilet, and to not lick her pussy if there are visits.

Also /jp/, either for catgirls or doggirls: human speech, or would you prefer them to not be able to talk, relying instead in you knowing what she's feeling by looking at how she's behaving?

>>12353562

>human speech, or would you prefer them to not be able to talk, relying instead in you knowing what she's feeling by looking at how she's behaving?

That's a tough one... I would like to say a very small amount of vocabulary would be fine.

>>12353562
Speech is fine, less hassle.

>>12353597
Broken speech would be adorable. Like Chaika or maybe a little bit more broken.

You think if they were able to talk, they'd have speech patterns?
Like doggirls at times sounding like Scooby-Doo or catgirls saying meowning instead of morning? This would not be intentional, by the way.

>>12353597
"Food", "sex", "sleep" should do just fine.

I just want a doggirl who behaves like a dog in the sense that she is super clingy and loyal.

For that semi-advanced vocabulary is neccesary, while still having a simple mind

>>12351521
Cats are intelligent.

Especially big cats.

Like tigers

>>12353663
Would having a tigergirl put you into danger of being shredded into bits by her if you anger her?

>>12353680
That would entirely depend. Does she have claws? teeth? or anything that she could naturally use as a weapon?

and how strong is she herself? as a regular female?

>>12353680
Maybe, and then she'd sleep the rest of the day.

How would a panther girl be? Black hair and piercing green-ish eyes are a must, but would she be brown?

>>12351526
>>12351558
>>12351621
Catgirls don't go into heat. They're humans with some catlike features. The catgirl reproductive system is human.

>>12351719
Yiff in hell

>>12353782

I read a series that had catgirls who went into heat. They were tough, nasty things used a lot in bodyguard type roles. One dude fucked one who was mid-heat and got torn up real bad. Best sex he ever had though.

>>12353641
>I just want a doggirl who behaves like a dog in the sense that she is super clingy and loyal.
>For that semi-advanced vocabulary is neccesary, while still having a simple mind
I don't think so. Cats and dogs comparable in intellegence, but dogs usually seem to be very loyal to their master, while cats are more indepedent.

>>12353810
My point was that I could only really enjoy her clinginess if she was able to express her feelings via words

>>12353810
Cats are not naturally independent. They form colonies in the wild. Females share leadership and kittencare.

>>12353810
I mean that having "a simple mind" most likely is not necessary. Behavior is quite dependent on upbringing, training and enviroment/society affection.

>>12351521
Although it'd be interesting to see what a non-sentient humanoid animal would be like, excluding brain dead people, I'd like them to be both sentient and sapient, but still not considered human, so pet/slave status is OK. None of that meowing shit either. 2 ears only, with tails, and relatively low IQ. They can wipe their ass, hold a conversation, buy stuff, and cook, but they won't be making any catland paradises. They're good enough to have their own little communities though.

I'd prefer they go into heat too, with the related internal systems instead of nasty human periods. Preferably they can't breed with humans either.

Sentient but without human rights so she couldn't reject me like every other woman in my life.

How would the law treat the issue about loli catgirls?

>>12353827

>>12353896
Why are nekomimis swimming?

Basically intelligent on part with human children but occasionally some instances would have inappropriately high IQ so they would be outcasts. Catgirls would be smarter than doggirls but wolf and foxgirls are even smarter albeit rare. They should also posses undying loyalty to their master.

>>12353912
A 5 year old girl is the same intelligence as her grown up self. Intelligence is a measure of your ability to learn.

>>12353921
Your point?

>>12353923
``Basically intelligent on part with human children'' is nonsensical because a person has the same intelligence whether they are 5 or 25.

>>12353847
Yes, this would be the best.

>>12353926
Yeah well I took that term from language skills apparently, like best what animals could achieve in human language is at best 3-5 year old child. I guess 'intelligence' does not quite fit here.

>>12353896
I'm somehow uneasy that that entire town seems female.

>>12353921
Intelligence is making choices that leave you with the highest amount of future options.

>>12353963
Imagine you're at an apple tree. The tree is filled with dozens of apples. According to you the most intelligent choice is to sit there staring at the apples without ever eating one. You have the maximum number of future options. Then in the future the apples rot and fall to the ground.

>>12351521
You act as if females have much intelligence to begin with. If anything, the human part would benefit from the cat part, as long as the former keeps its rate of maturity. The sooner you mature, the less intelligence you are capable of gaining.

>>12353973
>You act as if females have much intelligence to begin with

Now, let's not act silly just because we are bitter virgins

>>12353973

Would they say something about me keeping loli dog/catgirls as a lone man?
I'd set them free once they grow up, don't want old woman stink in my house.

>>12353972
Not necessarily. If you don't eat one, you might starve and die, losing all of your options, so it's in your best interest to eat some or go find other food, not just stare at apples until they rot.

>>12353902

Well, if you take /tg/ into account, its because they live on a water world (future/alternate Earth) with no significant landmasses. So they adapted to swimming, and have entire professions dedicated to salvaging shit from underwater.

I want a catboy.

>>12354172

>>12354269
>>12354172
Why a boy over a girl?

>>12354172

>>12354275
BOTH!
forgot to attach my image in >>12354269

>>12351732
>catpeople
>discriminated
only because they are mistaken for anime-con-goers.

>>12354286
Do you really think humans will miss an opputurnity to discriminate a whole different sentient race?

>>12354299
Depends on who will profit from it.

>>12354308
Monsanto, designing your made-to-order catgirls of course.

>>12354326
Well, if demand will be high catgirls won't stand a chance, yeah.

>>12351521
Sentient, in an imouto/daughteru way.

DOGGIRLS AND FOXGIRLS!!!

catmen

>>12354333
You wouldn't fuck your daughteru, would you?

monkeymen

>>12354367
Maybe.

>>12353973

I have a double-major in computer science and mathematics. I write software for a small (<20 people) financial company. I probably make at least twice as much as you do. It's not because of my looks - I'm almost 200 pounds and have been rated a 5/10 (at best). Nor is it for "diversity" - small companies are not obligated to hire minorities or females for diversity, nor can they afford to hire a token. What have YOU done with your miserable life? Fucking virgin.

+1 for non-sentient catboys. I'd put glasses and a dress shirt on mine

>>12354449
Fuck off homo.

>>12354454

make me

How many loli catgirls per household?
I'd dress them up in adorable denim shorts and wifebeaters.
And hoodies and tights in winter.

>>12351521
Fully sentient. Whether or not they have any rights depends on which society they're currently living in. Aside from the obvious physical characteristics their mental faculties are almost completely indistinguishable from those of "full" humans aside from a few cat-like quirks that can be managed through training.

>>12354636
Not all cats are equal.

A kitten like Chen would be the equal of an adult like Shou.

Catgirls should be fully intelligent.

Nekomimi should be fully capable of being mothers ;)

>>12354449
>lots of rant about so-called life achievements
>homo
Why am I not surprised

>>12354910
Don't be a bully in /jp/

This isn't rebbit.

>>12353005

Katt is always acceptable, dude.

>>12355015

Seems this thread is attracting some furries now.

>>12356216

A catgirl thread attracting furries (or whatever people consider to be furries, line is so fucking blurred at this point)? You don't say.

Please don't backpedal with the "no, no, those aren't furries. THAT is furry! My definition of furry is the right one!" because then you'll just be at the same level as the average /v/irgin. Please stop before you even start. It's boring and tired.

>>12353663
Cats are not smart. They are cunning, but not smart.

>>12356216
Katt is 1.5, I believe.

>>12356419

But if they retained human intelligence on top of being cunning. Sounds dangerous.

Dumb like a cat, because I want to be able to abuse mine without it snitching.
They also need loli bodies but with some really lewd features like big tits.

>>12356403
Furry vs non fussy is simple. Does it have animal facial characteristics while being humanoid?

>>12351521
why not both?

I bet they smell bad

>>12353075
Would them dying be sort of a FoxDie thing? Or would they get wrinkly and old. I'd much prefer the former.

Sentient ≠ Sapient

Rats are sentient. Humans are sapient.

>>12356743
When you smell a cat, does it smell bad? I think not. They'll be well versed in grooming themselves.

The only problem is getting rid of the jealous feminist cunts that'll cry that we're not caring about them no more. Then they'll team up with PETA and come up with more stupid excuses about equality and crap.

>>12357932
I remember some feminists getting really riled up about the possibility that guys may end up preferring fembots over actual women. They claimed it was oppressive to women and selfish.

>>12351552
Then that makes your thread very stupid.

>>12358106

They always gotta cry about something.

I don't care as long as I can fuck them.

>>12358106
To be honest, the desire to have a living being as your personal property who can't object you is pretty selfish.

The concept of pets is kind of selfish too, but at least people don't fuck them

>>12354870
implying instinct doesnt do just that

>>12359257
Are you a PETA member or something?

There's nothing wrong with owning and taking care of a cat.

>>12359275
I didn't say there is something wrong with it, it's just kind of selfish most of the time since most people use pets for companionship and to fight their own loneliness rather than out of the desire to selflessly take care of an animal.

In short: The way Satori handles her petgirls is nice, the way /jp wants to handle their petgirls is selfish

>>12359283
It's just going to depend on the person really.
If catgirls were a thing I wouldn't hesistate to adopt one and raise it as a father.

>>12359275
holy sweet jesus do I wanna fuck Orin

Assuming they gain incredibly high sentience and intelligence, what would a catgirl scientist invent?

>>12359336
Synthetic fish

I feel like if they gain sentience, specific cultures would treat them differently. 'Murrika and most of the Anglosphere would do their best to keep them down because of their closeted hate over things that are cute and thinly veiled butthurt superiority complex. Asian cultures may be more receptive of them and treat them like how the Indians do with cows or like Egyptians back then with their own feline gods.

>>12359354
Would depend on how akin to humans they are. If it's just human + ears and tails it would be difficult to make a legal argument excluding them.

I am allergic to cats. Could that make me allergic to cat girls?
I can just imagine, the only girls I get along with I am allergic to, and make me sick.

>>12359480
In the worst case scenario you would be allergic to the tail and ears. So It probably wouldn't be that bad.

>>12359491
Wrapping their ears and tails in saran wrap or something kinda kills the deal though.

>>12359519
You will have to find yourself a cat waifu that lacks the specific underhair type which people are allergic for then.

>>12357932
I think they tried to ban sexbots or something in Canada. I can't remember exactly what. I've read about it while Oculus Rift was a big thing before Facebook bought it up.

>>12359519
just wear a facemask then.

>>12359550
Facemasks covering the ears and outlining them sounds totally hot.

>>12359519
drawfags plz
>4koma
draw Allergy Anon with his catgirl waifu in saranwraped ears.

She cant hear his cries for help as a spider lands on his nose

>>12359526
or just get a hairless breed of catgirl

>>12360612
In reality the cause of allergy are proteins present in the saliva and sebaceous fluid of the cat, not from the hair itself.

So if by genetic engineering you remove those proteins the cat will no longer give problems!

>>12360612
Shave that pussy bruh

>>12360720

Or genetically modify yourself to remove those allergies. Tell those anti-histimines to gtfo.

>>12353797
Did the main character have blue hair?

>>12362694

It was a western fantasy novel series, so I don't think so. The MC was a demigod of some kind, if memory serves.

>>12359480
get a sphynx catgirl?

>>12362772
ah, I just remember some really shitty western comic about a blue haired knight that went around banging catgirls and trying to liberate them from the oppressive paladin society or whatever. It was pretty terrible, but the guy kept drawing it for like four years.

The real problem with genetically engineering catgirls or, for that matter, any other form on sentient human-like creatures are going to be moralfags.

Creating "synthetic life" is already possible. In fact. JC Venter and his researchers have already done so in 2010 and they are continuing research on that field.
Sure, they've only succeeded in creating a synthetic prokaryote, but give it a few decades and some more research into human evolutionary biology an we'll get there.

But engineering anything with a human likeness, especially if it's somewhat intelligent, is going to be forbidden as soon as it becomes possible. Moralfags will immediately give those creatures human right, making further engineering impossible.

>>12363431
>I have PERSONAL FEELINGS about the advancement of the human race, LISTEN TO ME!
Fuck these people.
They're already trying to get inanimate lifeless objects banned, just because I want to put my penis in it.

I'll settle for cat-girl-robots.

>>12363431
Morals are maleable. Give it enough time, and nobody will bat an eye to homosexuality, paedophilia and really hard drugs. When that happens, nobody will care for a few sins-against-god.

>>12363769
>that photo
>totally worth it.jpeg

>>12363769

Who wants to bet if it had been a dude doing the fucking it'd a 50 year type sentence?

>>12363827
Of course. And he wouldn't be making that face

>>12363769
>Morals are maleable

Which is why it is so disgusting that there are some people who would stand in the way of progress because of something so intrinsically transient as morals.

>>12363832
No no. You don't understand. Once morals plummet, people will cry out for salvation from any source, be it religion or a leader/savior/messiah, because freedom is fucking scary. When that happens, all those things we now consider vices will be reviled and shunned, ending with their total ban, which may last millenia. This has happened before, and it will happen again.

If you want bio engineered catgirls, you must first show that it is safe and in no way amoral. It is the only way.

>>12363856
>you must first show that it is safe and in no way amoral.

People these days don't want bio-engineered food because "oh nuu gawd, it has GENES!", you're not going to convince them to allow human-like synthetic organisms.

>>12363886
The best way to do it is probably just to do it without consent. Not much you can do when there's a thousand live sentient catgirls already.

>>12363886
This is a misconception spread by the media and their fear mongering. Remember, they need drama in order to sell.

The best, easiest way would be to create plants that could end world hunger or have animals that could be used to end most modern day diseases.

>>12363918
>easiest way would be to create plants that could end world hunger
That problem is not solvable with any single plant.

>>12362872
Got any more?

>>12363975
>implying

>>12363989
No. I just had that lying around.

>>12363975
Plants then. There has to be a way.

>>12364071
Two of the most promising developments, perennial rice and and C4 rice are being pursued with traditional gene manipulation, i.e. simple breeding.

There certainly is room for genetic manipulation, but what we can do with it right now is quite limited. Interesting features like the above-mentioned ones require complex genetic networks which are much harder to transfer than a few individual genes.

>>12363856
>If you want bio engineered catgirls, you must first show that it is safe and in no way amoral. It is the only way.

Like the Emperor-approved catgirls of Warhammer?

Woah, what the fuck is this thread and who the fuck are you people.

>>12362872

Does this talk about fucking them or is it just masturbating them? That's all I can find.

>>12363886

And the human ignorance has no bounds. Look at what NDT says, people are just that stupid.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1ecT2CaL7NA

>>12363769
A one year sentence for diddling a prepubescent boy for 5 years? Fuck, you get more time looking at CP.

>>12353075

>>12365140
I believe a factor was the atomic bomb. People started to fear change more because they thought that science went too far. And maybe it did, but this has painted the perception for all other fields.

>>12364971
Exactly. Now you understand.

>>12365306

Has nothing to do with the dropping of the bomb. People have always hated and feared scientific progress for a wide variety of reasons, all of which are stupid.

"It's dangerous, you might harm someone! You're blaspheming against God, you're going to Hell! You'll make X industry redundant, people will lose their jobs!" etc etc

>>12365664
Maybe science will advance fast enough where natural selection will return full strength again. So much crossbreeding with catgirls and everyone will have the gene after a few generations. It's genius!

Maybe have a secret war where we can use some catgirls to kill the virus of tumblrfags.

>>12365246

i-i don't remember that scene

This entire thread is creepy and pedophilic

You all just want a passive self cleaning fuck toy

Please set yourself on fire now

>>12366044

>You all just want a passive self cleaning fuck toy

I fail to see the problem

>>12366083
a dildo and tenga costs much less with no hassle

>>12366086
Dildos and onaholes can't love you though.

>>12365246
okay, no I want to play a new game. Hmmm

>>12366089
catgirls can't love you either and even if so it's all fake just like having a waifu

>>12366097
>catgirls can't love you either
Catgirls are more capable of love than real girls.

>>12366103
I want >>>/r9k/ to leave.

>>12364971
hahaha what the fuck

i call a shoop

>>12359257
>concept of pets is kind of selfish too, but at least people don't fuck them
you're so cute and innocent

>>12351521
if you just want a cute girl with cat ears to be affectionate towards you just buy your girlfriend nekomimi and some mood changing pills.
you might have to slip them into her drink or something

>>12366142
>some mood changing pills
Tell me more about this /jp/

>>12366142
You'll never replicate a natural wagging tail

>>12366146

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qvHcBq7UaY0

>>12366143
I just assumed that something like that exists. I guess you could ask Wikipedia or 420chan about this.
My point was mainly that there are people that might under the right circumstances give you a similar experience to a catgirl.

>>12366146
point taken

Please stop trying to make vn's/eromanga scenarios real it's scaring me.

I can only imagine how much shit a catgirl would knock over if she acted like our cat.

>>12366044

Someone sound the oppression sirens. Also, catgirls are pedo territory now?

Feminists are the worst.

>>12365953
It looks like it's in blond loli's room, so perhaps if you follow blond loli or K name's route you'll find it.

>>12366121
They're mentioned in the last two rulebooks. There's even a catgirl homeworld (Carlos Mcconnell)

>>12365953
She runs into the male dog wanking it to his master's panties, and then has sex with him.

>>12353204

This, with more cat words besides nyaa.

>>12359257
>To be honest, the desire to have a living being as your personal property who can't object you is pretty selfish.
>living being
>robot
>a walking toaster with windows installed in it is a living, sentient being now
full on retard

>>12366614
Lurking tumblrfag decided to post and looks stupid as hell. Nothing new really.

Women find the fantasy of having a sex robot creepy not because they think you'll replace them (feasible only in the minds of certain autists) but because they think you'll want them to be like the robot.
>>12366614
In almost all porn with sex robots, the robots are almost always sentient and pretty much human. Actual robots are creepy as fuck, which is why only a select few go beyond the fantasy.

>>12365196
Is beacause she's a woman

>>12359283
By your definition of "selfish", anything you can do would be selfish.

- You donate to charity because it makes you feel better.
- You help that lady across the street because it makes you feel better.
- You do good things because they make you feel better or improve your situation somehow.

>>12351521
>not wanting superior fish girl

Human-like. But this might pose an issue if we don't get along

>>12353797
The thing about that is, if Catgirls went into heat, the probably would have to be DFC. Human breasts wouldn't work on something that only goes into heat every once in a while.

I'm fine with everything as long as she can aim and hold a gun.

Pets are cool but home defense pets are cooler.

>>12369336
Make them yandere and you got a really solid premise that would make a billion dollars.

>>12369379
Pets with yandere tendency would be outlawed pretty quick, and they would become assassins used by cartels and the gubmint I think.

>>12366614
Actually I was talking about petgirls, and not about robots since that was the topic of this thread, but considering the post I've quoten you probably have misunderstood my post which is my fault, sorry.

Also, who are you quoting?

>>12369408
To be absolutely fair, robots would make better petgirls than actual petgirls, mainly because they are more durable, requires electricity instead of an actual diet and they are completely loyal and programmable/customizable.

The future would be a bright one if I can have a robot girl as a home defense "pet".

>>12369428
Though this customizable feature also has drawback, such as when perp hacks your girl and turns her against you, which would be a pretty bad situation.

Organic petgirls are probably better in this respect.

>>12369194
How would you cuddle with her? Doesn't she need to be in water?

>>12369428

I don't want a robot. Just a catgirl.

>>12369408
while replying to a guy talking about a sex robot.

>>12369428
It worked so well with the cylons.

>>12369201
>every once in a while
All the fucking time? Fucking cats, both literally and figuratively.

>>12370584
Never watch that shit so I can't comment.

>>12369693
What if it's a robot catgirl?

>>12370709

I just want a catgirl. No robots. I'm a simple man with simple wants.

>>12372046
>>12370709

Robot catgirl or real catgirl, I'm fine with either one.

>>12369146
>Women find the fantasy of having a sex robot creepy not because they think you'll replace them (feasible only in the minds of certain autists) but because they think you'll want them to be like the robot.

If I had a catgirl sexbot, why would I even want a biological female? Their behavior would be irrelevant, I no longer "want" them to be anything.

If anything, wouldn't that be an example of the ultimate liberation? "Go do whatever you like, be whatever you like. No need to be concerned about me, I'm not any part of it."

>>12377573
Shh. Feminists are hypocrites, especially when they start pissing all over other females for one reason or another