/jp/ - Otaku Culture

Because they must.

Because cells divide

If you kill a little girl, she remains young forever.

>>11623229
so do families ;_;

>>11623254
honto ni?

>>11623257
Honto honto!

why you pedophile?

Can you do surgery to stop a little girl from growing?

>>11623336
If you don't need her alive (and why would you?):
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rosalia_Lombardo

People on /jp/ never grow up.

Did you know you used to be a child?

>>11623357
Cute. Can you put it in?

>>11623374
Sure, but now the museum charges $10 because they're greedy bastards.

A rose will bloom, It then will fade.
So does a youth. So does the fairest maid.

Because they need to hit the 13–15 sweet spot. I command it.

As punishment for disobeying God and taking a bite out of the forbidden fruit.

Do dog girls get born out of dogs or out of women?

>>11623626
I think it depends on how much dog you want in your dog girl.

>>11623626
It's a fox, you ignorant fool.

>>11623771

I see foxes all the time in my back yard, they don't look like this. They're red and don't have tails this poofy.

Why people have no tails?

>>11623785
it's called a penis

>>11623782
You need to groom their tail and itll become poofy

Why are little girls so lewd? Even without any sort of provocation, they will be lewd towards any male in the area. Why is this?

>>11623782
Foxes has puffiest tails of all canines. Their fur color also may vary.

>>11623802
They aren't being lewd. They're being naive and innocent. You're just interpreting it as lewd because you're a lewd adult.

>>11623802
Because they're physically weak and they need to seduce people to survive.

>>11623812
That seems counterproductive. What if they seduce a serial murder-rapist?

>>11623815
They learn to manipulate him.

>>11623811
That's the main appeal. It's kind of weird that the stereotype pedophile is a sociopath that manipulates children.

>>11623819
But they're the ones who need laws in place to protect them from being manipulated.

>>11623825
Little girls have complete control over pedophiles.
Most lolis manipulate them without being aware of it.

>>11623811
There is no way a little girl who lays on her back with her legs spread showing her panties and looking at you is acting innocently. That's lewd behavior any way you put it.

>>11623843
She probably thinks it's funny. My nephew always asks me if I want to see his penis, is that being lewd? No, he doesn't know what it means to be lewd.

>>11623852
Are you a girl? Please say you are.

>>11623852
That is being lewd, but it really depends on how old he is. The girls I'm talking about are between ages 9 and 11. I don't think a girl that age would ask me if I wanted to see her vagina because she thought it was funny.

>>11623864
A girl asked me that when she was 9 or 10 (I was 11 or 12).

I distinctly remember she said there was "a hole in it". That was the first time I learned that. Until then I assumed girls just "had nothing there" because of what my parents told me.

Do kids just google that stuff now? It blows my mind that I was that stupid.

>>11623864
Well actually I think a little girl would maybe ask if I wanted to see her butt because she'd think it's funny. Butts are funny, after all.

Because boobs are always better than flat chest.

>>11623915
I don't think you're right.

>>11623871
>Do kids just google that stuff now
I'd say probably, but so few people know how to use web searches. They probably just send each other lewd emails from their cellphones and swapnotes, or whip it out on cam.

>>11623256

N-no...

>>11623915
A truotaNEET like me loves both.

Sometimes I want to be a loli so I can wear dresses and go to kindergarten

>>11624161
5 year olds are not lolis and going to school is the worst part of childhood.

>>11624163
why are 5 year olds not lolis?

also i think my childhood would be better if i was a loli

>>11624161
Most of those 12 years were shit anyway. Elementary and Middle School were hell for me and things only got better in High School.

>>11624163
My early school memories are great. I loved that time. And shut up you're not the international loli standards organization.

>>11624191
Well trust me, I know what you mean. I barely had any friends until high school, but i was so stressed in school that I couldn't enjoy having friends.

I just think if I was a loli, my school life would be different, and I would have liked it more.

>>11624171
While a loli is at its base a youthful(seeming) girl, a 5 year old is basically just past a toddler. Furthermore, loli is also a sexually charged term and if you have those feelings for a 5 year old, that's basically toddlercon. Aka turbopedophilia.

5 year olds cannot possess the qualities that make a girl a loli because they barely possess the qualities that make them a sapient human, let alone a lusty one. They just larval humans in a stage between being a baby and potentially a loli.

In summary, they're too young.

>>11624205
Who do you think you are, the loli professor?

>>11624205
I don't think toddlercon is also known as turbopedophilia. You probably just made that up on the spot...

>>11624221
I don't know, but it sounds pretty radical!

>>11624221
The scientific term is actually Nepiophilia

>>11624200
>you're not the international loli standards organization.
I wish I was though. ILSO sounds like a wonderful place, ensuring only quality loli are presented for appreciation.

>>11624205

>They just larval humans in a stage between being a baby and potentially a loli.

What if humans came from eggs? And baby humans were actually grubs?

>>11624221
Shut up, you turbo pedo.

Is this the little girls thread?

>>11624205
i dont agree with you. i could look at pictures of my sister when she was 5, and she is very much like she is now. she acts the same, and looks more like she does now than when she was a toddler.

>>11623212
3D children grow up.

2D are loli forever.

That was fast janny
keep doing god's work

>>11623834
typical victim blaming

>>11624249
seriously what the shit
can't post little girls here? never mind the whole pedo discussion I guess, let's just delete random images

>>11624255
Posting pictures of children without expressed written parental consent is a violation of Us Law. See: COPPA.

Discussion is fine.

>>11624239
Yeah. Post some.

>>11624255
pedophiles such as yourself should seek help for your mental illness

>>11624253
being a victim doesn't automatically free you from blame

>>11624245
then explain strikerS

>>11624255
The old janny would have just deleted this thread.

>>11624262
what if they aren't US citizens?

>>11624259
not my picture

>>11624266
Doesn't matter. This is a US based website and subject to US Law.

>>11624264
How do you guys keep track of when jannies come and go? It's not like they all speak publicly about it afterwards like AoC

>>11624272
>The act, effective April 21, 2000, applies to the online collection of personal information by persons or entities under U.S. jurisdiction from children under 13 years of age.
The child is likely not under U.S. jurisdiction. Go fuck yourself.

>>11624274
Just leave it to the experts

>>11624274
It's just a /jp/ meme. Every time a thread gets deleted or a thread is allowed to stay, it's the "new jannie".

/jp/ has been through 17 new janitors in the past 24 hours.

>>11624261
>then explain strikerS
Wiped from canon once the third movie comes out soon.

>>11624284
This website is under US jurisdiction.

>>11624284
It says "by," not "of." Please work on your reading comprehension before publicly embarrassing yourself.

>>11624284
So make sure you post the little girl's passport with her so that the powers that run this place can be sure she's not a US citizen.

>>11624274

It's jannie when I get banned for something stupid, on-topic posts or threads get deleted, and off-topic posts or threads stay.

It's meido when on-topic posts and threads stay, and off-topic posts or threads go away.

At least that's how I do it.

>>11624295
It's a Japanese TV show.

>>11624288
>>11624292
What a fucking retarded law. Fits the fucking retarded country it applies to.

>>11624272
It's really illegal to post pictures of children without parental consent? What if they're a child model? Am I breaking the law right now? Or do I need written consent for this specific /jp/ thread to post it? What if the child has grown up? Whose permission do I get? Theirs? What about pictures of children taken in public places?

I think your laws have gone too far. What about your freedoms you got from your forefathers? You should stage a coup.

>>11624307
Yes, you can be banned for posting child models or images of sexy children.

>>11624307

Man that hoodie is cool as heck, would /jp/ wear it?

>>11624313
Who decides whether they're sexy? And is >>11624239 considered sexy then? Maybe you should turn yourself in you sick pedofuck

>>11624307
Non-sexualized child models, such as those found in clothing catalogs, are public domain images and not subject to COPPA.

If the child has grown up, then you need to get their permission. It's why reporters require consent to put you on camera for an interview (example).

With children, you must have parental consent. That's why the school sends home that form when it's "picture day" for your parents to sign. Even schools need consent.

>>11624317
4chan staff decides

>>11624317
4chan's staff attorney.

>>11624326
So Janny is a pedo? He deemed that image sexy and left the pedo discussion flow

>>11624332
Discussion is not against the rules. You can type all day long about all kinds of lewd and crazy things, but the instant you post an image depicting what you're talking about ... BAN!

Global Rule 5 does not apply to discussion, only to images.

>>11624336
That image was considered NSFW?

>>11624321
If I had had that as a shota, I'd only take it off in deepest summer.

>>11624340
That image was of a 3D child, posted without written parental consent. COPPA deems that illegal and Global Rule 1 applies.

>>11624342
I'm sure children who appear on TV shows have had their parents agree to it.

>>11624348
The Screen Actors Guild requires that the parent be on set during filming. US Law requires signed consent for a child to appear on film.

>>11624348
The parents agreed to allow the image of their child to appear on that particular program. That doesn't make it legal to repost the image here.

>>11624356
Are you a fucking Jew that you know all this shit?

>>11624363
When you're a pedophile, it's essential you know the laws concerning it so that you don't break them and end up in prison.

To quote Goodfellas, "You know who goes to jail? Nigger stickup men. That's who. And they only get caught because they fall asleep in the getaway car."

>>11624368
Senpai...

>>11624368
There's no way to not break them.

You're breaking the law by just being a pedophile.

God Bless America

>>11624374
Oh, yes there are. You can legally be a pedophile. You can talk about pedophilia, draw it, watch cartoons of it, and enjoy visual depictions of it.

Looking at CP is not illegal.
Owning it? Yes.
Distributing it? Yes.
Producing it? Yes.

Thoughts and words are not a crime.

>>11624376
You can only break the law if you infringe upon another human being's rights. Sexual attraction to a child isn't a crime. Touching the child is a crime.

>>11624382
US citizen? I thought people there got locked up for having CP on their computers all the time.

>>11624386
That's because they fell asleep in the getaway car and actually downloaded it and saved it.

LOOKING is not a crime.
OWNING is a crime.

Do children make the best soldiers?

What if I take a picture of a crowd and there's a child in it?

>>11624386
sounds like owning it to me.

>>11624393
Oh yeah, sorry.

>>11624389
Does caching not fall under owning?

>>11624392
Blur the child's face if you post the pic.

>>11624397
No. Caching is considered "unwilling ownership". A byproduct of how computers and the internet works.

If a man steals a car and leaves it in your driveway, you do not get arrested for car theft.

Discussing committing criminal acts is definitely a violation of the ToS. Please stop.

>>11624403
Isn't it more like you stealing the car, parking it in your driveway and then pretending like it wasn't you that stole it? Full images don't cache unless you click on them.

>>11624409
Not exactly the same. It's really a terrible analogy, but it was the first thing that sprang to mind.

However, caching is not considered ownership. For example, on 4chan. On a long enough timeline, 3D CP will be posted and you will see it.

What if you have an addon that automatically expands all images? Not exactly your fault that some other jackass posted illegal content.

Not Guilty
Case dismissed.

>>11624416
>On a long enough timeline, 3D CP will be posted
You mean every night. Hey guys, etc.

>>11624409
I wonder if that's why they spoiler it, to trick someone into clicking on it.

>>11624416
I certainly wouldn't take things like this from granted if you live in a 3rd world country like the US. All your rights and the law goes out the window when you're pedo.

>>11624423
Then you know nothing about the United States.

Nobody has ever been imprisoned in the US for being a pedophile. To break the law you must commit an action.

>>11624430
Keep telling yourself that when you're in court explaining why you had HC CP cached and the judge is looking at you sideways. BAZINGA!

>>11624416
But someone might be actively searching for CP and not come into possession of it. That should be illegal.

Who gives a shit about ugly, smelly 3d kids?

>>11624460
Most of the people in this thread fantasize exclusively about 3D loli. They never want to talk about shit like LO or Naisho or My Little Sister's Sexual Education, just how great it would be to meet a loli and have her bounce up and down on your cock.

>>11624460
>>11624467
Gross!

>>11624467
>would be to meet a loli and have her bounce up and down on your cock

you know thats not physically possible, right? Unless you have a micropenis.

>>11624476
is this a nanololi?

>>11624467
I've only heard about LO! I will investigate the other two so I can discuss them.

>>11624467
>Never LO
u wut m8?

>>11624467
>Never LO
u wut m8?

>>11624476
>you know thats not physically possible
No, it's possible.

>>11624476
I don't really see a reason an actual loli(that is, the 10-14 type) couldn't fit it. It's not like their vaginas aren't stretchy until they're 21. They've achieved most of their height by then too. It'd be like a tiny adult asian girl. (also they bang people and get pregnant 'all the time')

I mean hell, midgets have sex and they're like fucking 3 feet tall.


>>11624481
No, this is. (Note, Nanoha is from a VN so she's /jp/ related.)

>>11624467
Everyone who talking about only manga always likes shitty artists anyway.

Speaking of shitty artists, has that what's his name, the cannon to-something-shi sensei guy, made anything new lately?

>>11624456
>That should be illegal.
The Law does not deal in "should be"s.

>>11624532
Not until someone proposes such a law and it passes you mean.

>>11624534
Someone has to propose it and the bill has to pass Congress and be signed by the President before it becomes Law.

Even if someone proposes it, it's still not Law. There's a process. See: School House Rock "I'm Just a Bill".

And until that bill is enacted, whatever is contained therein is 100% legal.

>>11624542
That's why the guy expressed his opinion on the matter with "should be".

>>11624547
The phrase "X should be illegal" should be illegal.

>>11624522
Don't be tricked, Janny! Nanoha is an anime girl.

>>11624560
Quit trolling. Nanoha is from a couple of VNs by the guys who made Wanko to Kurasou

http://vndb.org/v2500
http://vndb.org/v1122

>>11624522
Even discounting manga, there's a hundred VNs where you get to fuck your loli sister, which people never seem to talk about in these threads.

Why is freenet so fucking slow?

>>11625186
what's the story behind this pairing?

>>11624099

>>11625188
No idea, didn't really like love live so much. Just like the artist.

Because of the demiurge.

Warning from a government /jp/sie, this board IS monitored heavily by us. Be careful what information you post.

>>11625279
did you arrest anyone?

>>11625282
This guy >>11625186 is dangerously close to getting a visit.

>>11625284
I just use freenet as a secure way to talk to others, government man.

any /jp/sies want to be my friend on freenet or have a very secure node network I could have in on?
I want to tick my tock to tots

>>11625294

What's freenet?

>>11625294

>I want to tick my tock to tots

This is probably the cutest and least offensive euphemism for jacking off to cp I've ever heard

>>11625324
cp sharing anonymous p2p network

Because only then can she leave the vile, filthy curse of adolescence and mature into a ripe beauty

>>11625279
Is it 2009 again?

fuck off troll

dubs get

>>11625279
Confirmed.

-Bill from the CIA