/jp/ - Otaku Culture

Why did they do this? No I'm serious I'm not looking for some us-/jp/sies-XD-lol response I sincerely want to know approximately what was going through the mind of the one who lead this localization.

>>11334832
What, you don't think it's cute?

>>11334832
They changed it to fit the demographic. Young American girls don't like anime.

>>11334847
What about teenage american boys?

>>11334847
If I had a daughter I would keep this shit as far away as possible. Just look at the way they applied their make up, fucking atrocious.

>>11334859
This is how it is in America.

>>11334846
I get the change in font and the need to "multiculturalize" it, but what's the point of the makeup? All I can think of is fucking Toddlers in Tiaras, and the kids on there look like fucking trainwrecks. Hell, it's where they got Honey Boo Boo from.

>>11334892
You're confusing multiculturalism with diversity.

Only reason I think of is that they thought they could make them look more teenagerish than the lolis on the JP cover. Loli fear is probably the main reason for the changes. They even replaced the fucking models in game.

>>11334892
the need to multiculturalize does not infer the need to move out from anime style, you could just edit their background info. there are other cultures but black and white.

>>11334920
oops, just read >they even replaced the fucking models

Nevermind then.

>>11334907
If anything, I think sexualizing children by putting makeup on them is worse. I don't understand the standards at work here. I doubt they actually changed anything beyond the cover art, so why not just draw them older if that's what you're worried about?

>>11334913
The girl in the back is clearly asian, as well.

>>11334913
anime and /jp/ IS multiculturalism at work! We are appreciating the works of another culture with all our stuff from glorious nippon. There was no need to have a multiethnic box art

IIRC there was an anon on /v/ of all places who was attempting to move the English Script over to the Japanese ROM (not that you really need a script for this game). Dunno if he ever finished it though.

>>11334930
Agreed

A reverse case, I suppose.

>>11334946
that's one stupid ass weapon
how do you even use it without cutting yourself

>>11334972
Rather than cutting yourself, it's more the fact that the edge is on the wrong side.
You'd have to do shitty reverse slashes to even use the weapon properly.

>>11334946
I'd play the shit out of the game on the right

>>11334980
>>11334972
He probably just uses to cut ropes and what not when boarding enemy vessels. He's got a pistol, after all.

>>11334992
why is the pistol on his dick

>>11334980
>blade on the wrong side
my thoghts excactly when I saw this sword for the first time. it still is.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kukri

>>11334995
If you were a pirate, wouldn't you put a gun on your dick?

>>11334995
Why is the pistol in a knife sheath?

>>11335003
Maybe it's a gunblade.

>>11335002
That's a loaded question
harr harr harr

>>11334946
Where's the Sudeki comparison? My mind is full of fuck how a weeaboo game screwed up the box art so bad.

>>11335001
but with a kukuri, you at least hold it so you can do a standard slash.
>>11334992
He can't even unsheathe that fucker due to it being on the wrong side, on his crotch and having a blade on the end.
It's like they tried to go JRPG, but disregarded everything.
A guy got paid for this drawing.

>>11334832
Serious awnswer; Appealing to the inhabitants who advocate Multiculturalism in a hijacked media and parents still trying to distance their children from anything Japanese since Pearl Harbor.
>>11334824
Grant it that I liked the show and have absolutely no problem with it, Japan is just as guilty sometimes.

>>11335008
Someone please acknowledge my joke
I worked hard on it

>>11335020
Guess your joke got shot down

>>11335008
>>11335020
Super funny dude, Im pissing my pants.

>>11335020
After you directed me to it I really did luagh

>>11335020
It was a bit of a scurvy joke, to be honest.
It pretty much capsized any hope I had for this board.

>>11335025
nice
>>11335028
>>11335030
Thanks dudes

>>11335008
>>11335025

I lol'd

>>11335025
Now that a joke wwwwwwwwwwwwww

japan is way more kawaii than usa

>>11334913
>the need to multiculturalize does not infer the need to move out from anime style,
The need to multiculturalize isn't able to infer anything because it's not intelligent.
Retard.

>>11335047
Seriously. This stuff should have stopped in the middle of the PS2 era, maybe earlier.

>>11335047
I don't think they actually ended up using that cover.

>>11335020
wow congrats man on your joke it was funny XD

why does burger art always incorporate the WORST aspects of 3D instead of distilling them into beautiful 2D creatures like Nippon?

>>11335059
quit nitpicking# it will only make you more frustrated#

>>11335079
because hanbahgahh is the icon of autism

>>11335047
Kinda looks like evil Cerny.

Style Savvy Trendsetters' box art sucked as well in America even the Brits got a better cover

>>11335079
Most American cartoons aren't that ugly.

Someone rep'y and discuss my post further with me or at least post more examples>>11335017

>>11335017
>Doesn't like Spy-dama

許せる！

Sara and Miley are cute.

>>11335209
At least you're understanding and kind, anon.

>>11335209
Actually what I said was
>Grant it that I liked the show and have absolutely no problem with it,
Rather in love with it really.

>>11334946
Those are both awesome covers

>>11335047
lol

I don't like that you have to be some old buff guy in Nier.

>>11335442
I too enjoyed playing as Yuna's brother instead of her dad

>>11334946
Is there any difference between those two aside from cover?

So... How come no one posted THIS yet?

>>11335442
Rather that than some puny faggot.

http://www.nyu-media.com/

>>11336206
>you're actually over 30 years old...

She was probably 7 in the Japanese version.

>>11336206
http://cherrytreehigh.com/translation
>We made a deliberate decision to follow the approach of what is widely perceived as the ‘best in class’ game localizations: the Phoenix Wright / Ace Attorney series.

MY LELS HAVE ENTERED THE Q CONTINUUM!

Princess on Ice sees you jump, spin and pirouette your way to fame as you follow the fortunes of Kelly, Gabrielle, Alyssa and Madison - four young ice dancers. Plucked from obscurity by a mysterious dance trainer our heroines are trained and in turn audition for the Princess on Ice Tournament, the most prestigious ice dancing event of the year. Follow the girls through their journey as they dance their way through the world's premier ice skating stadiums perfecting all the moves and striving to impress the judges.

Do our four dancers have what it takes to be crowned 'Princess on Ice'? The game play is based around rhythm and action using the stylus to follow dance prompts on the lower screen. Tap circles before the time runs out to skate, follow arrows as quickly as you can to spin, touch matching shapes as they meet to jump and tap shapes before they disappear to step. Your skater will react on the upper screen to how well you are doing in the game. Drop too far down the 'heat' meter and she will stumble losing valuable points with the judges.

In addition to all the ice dancing fun you can totally customise your character with fashionable accessories, clothing and headwear. There are hundreds of different combinations across the four characters giving a unique look for each. As you progress through the game you will also be rewarded with a whole host of un-lockable extras including new levels, accessories, special moves and storylines adding yet more life and fun into the game.

>>11336220
that was the reason i didn't ´play the game, those retards blew it.

>>11336220
>Thats why many people didn't play the game. They blatantly said they weren't translating it. They were using it as inspiration for their version.

I know no better way to make your game unsellable.

>>11336277
they did a really bad job there, i could have been the next reccetear.

>>11336292
From what I saw of the game, it looked dull as shit even before all the horrible "localisation".

>>11336212
please find real age.

>>11335843
Is that suppose to be Tomie?

>>11336394
>tomie
it's been a while since I played saya no uta. who is tomie?

>>11336416
Maybe he's referring to the Junji Itou character?

>>11336471
perhaps

>>11336394
It's supposed to be saya no uta. Even me, who can't usually get connected to VNs, played it to all of it's endings. you shouyld give it a try.

here, ill save you the google
http://erogedownload.com/downloads/song-of-saya/

>>11334892
nice popular culture refs, your upvote is in the mail

>>11336416
No what >>11336471 said.
Scary shit man.
>>11336485
Wow thank you. No I never played this one.

>>11334859
>>11334876
Except it's not atrocious. You try to rationalize your existence as a bitter weeaboo nerd by "shaming" normal things when in reality you're still the outcast with the odd opinion.

There's nothing fundamentally wrong with make-up.

I don't know what should disturb me more: that there are people [x]on /jp/[/x] that haven't played saya or that I'm the only one who found it disturbing enough to comment

yes, sorry for being an ass
but I just... I mean really... argh, I can't even put my feelings into words

>>11336521
I think he meant the application of the makeup was atrocious, not the very existance of it

>>11336529
I don't think so. He was probably using it as a scapegoat to shame "normal" looking girls (in contrast with the anime girls on the left) because he will never have normal girls. The artistic wasn't partially good, so there's no reason to single out the makeup and call it atrocious when the whole picture is unrealistic looking.

>>11334847
Neither do young japanese girls

What is your point?

>>11336524
tough for equality sake, I'll add:
I never finished any of the danmaku touhou games on anything harder than easy. (TD doesn't count)

>>11334907
>They even replaced the fucking models in game.
holy shit
why are they so dead set on doing stupid shit like this? dont they have anything better to do like i dont know...stabalize their economy or replacing fossil fuels?

I swear fucking first world problems can go fuck them selves

>>11336556
>or replacing fossil fuels

Since all video game companies have a side business in the energy industry.

>>11334846
In all honesty what the fuck is wrong with the japanese version?

How does it infer any kind of pedo shit in the slightest?

The american one is worse in my opinion. They actually tried to make them look like real life little girls with slutty make up to look like whores.

god damn it I fucking hate this shit. how can they be so fucking stupid and self righteous like this and think this was honestly a good idea?

>>11336575
I am not talking about the video game industry specifically

I am talking about humanity in general. If we were all focused on more important things

stupid shit like this would not be happening

>>11336578
>They actually tried to make them look like real life little girls with slutty make up to look like whores.

Stop trying to "shame" normal girls to rationalize the fact that you will never have one. Not every girl who wears eye makeup is a whore. The mental gymnastics you have to pull to make those incredibly broad generalizations is likely a sign of how deeply bitter your life is.

>>11336654
>Not every girl who wears eye makeup is a whore.
Where the hell did you come from, normie?

>>11336585
Stupid shit like video games would not be happening.
What I’m trying to convey is here that you are retarded.

>>11336662
When you have no argument it's best not to speak.

>>11336654
I don't know why you keep doing this, nobody is saying wearing makeup automatically makes you look like a whore. It's the way the makeup is applied.

>>11336654
tbqh I really like girls with makeup caked on their face. it adds a special sense of mystique and to them.

>>11336719
That's exactly what he implied. Read his post.

>>11336654
>Stop trying to "shame" normal girls to rationalize the fact that you will never have one
That is some serious projecting there pal.

>>11336666
No, videogames would still be happening but there wont be stupid shit like people having retarded morals and making a game look butt ugly.

>>11336792
This

why is there even a need to do this?

and dont give me any bullshit leik "it promotes people to have sex with kids and it is bad for you and you will go to hell if you think bad things"

>>11336802
Because marketing. They're selling a product, if they think changing the art style will net them more money, they're going to do it.

>>11336788
[citation needed]

>>11336816
You assume I dont have a girlfriend, that was already your first mistake. Not only that but she does not wear slutty makeup like in the op

>>11336828
"Because I said so on the internet" isn't credible proof of anything. Furthermore, what does any of that have to do with your fallacy?

>>11336831
> Furthermore, what does any of that have to do with your fallacy?
You made an assumption and you are wrong about it.

>>11336839
>"Because I said so on the internet" isn't credible proof of anything.

Furthermore, it has nothing to do with your fallacy of broadly generalizing an entire group of people.

>>11336842
>an entire group of people
Who, the sluts who wear shitty makeup?

>>11336849
Begging the question.
Using a fallacy to support a fallacy is only cementing your loss in this.

>>11336550
>i have never seen the massive money vault that the proceeds from precure are stored in
protip its called the moon

>>11336856
What was the first "fallacy" I made? I am too lazy to look back up. I thought "Who, the sluts who wear shitty makeup?" was the first one how is this another one now?

>>11336863
Not every girl who wears eye makeup is a whore. The mental gymnastics you have to pull to make those incredibly broad generalizations are not easy.

>>11336865
surly you can't honestly be serious that the majority of those viewers are from girls...

>>11336873
Oh that...

No, yeah, that it pretty much the case. There is no reason to but make up on other than to look like a slut and do slutty things. Society as imposed that on women and make them feel it is necessary to wear it when they are just as good looking with out it.

>>11336876
you probably think the same thing about clothes, though

>>11336877
Oh yeah, if we could go back to being naked that would be nice. We have made things too complicated and unnecessary for ourselves.

>>11336876
>No, yeah, that it pretty much the case. There is no reason to but make up on other than to look like a slut and do slutty things.

False. In high-school I personally wished I had makeup to cover up blemishes. This is a reasoning fallacy, and you're going to have to except it sooner or later.

>>11336933
And for context I'm a man, so I wouldn't. I was just pointing out one of the many reasons that your reasoning is wrong.

>>11336877
Not that anon, but I feel like I should interject here.
Outside of protection from weather and other hazards (animals, etc.,) clothing does little more then show status and cover your body (and only then if you have a cultural background of shaming nudity.)
Makeup is used in just about the same way, it's purpose is to attract attention (not any specific kinda either) but without any actual application outside of that, discounting any sort of medicated stuff.

It's easy to assume in todays' social environment that most of the time makeup is used in an over abundance it is slutty, since most imagery of makeup used in the fashion on the cover tends to be for lack of a better word slutty in nature(aside for makeup used for lighting during photo/movie shoots, it helps keep the strong stage lights from washing out your natural color).

Nothing wrong with makeup if applied to accentuated but when it's heavily relied upon...awful.

Tl;dr : Clothing is actually helpful, makeup just covers up skin issues.

>>11336535

Dude, whores apply their make up like that thus it is whorish thus atrocious. Except if you like whores.

>>11336948
Ah, That should be "accentuate"

>>11336957
Your sentence is incoherent and doesn't make sense. Repeatedly his fallacy isn't actually making a point.

You're objectively wrong. See prior posts as to why.

>>11336948
>Tl;dr : Clothing is actually helpful
Nobody besides working class adult males wears clothing without giving any shits about how it looks.

>>11336975
Oh, and people who stay in their rooms all day, but they don't count because half the time they just lounge around naked.

>>11336964

>Heavy use of makeup on a typically "sexually aware" pattern.
>On little girls.
>Nothing is wrong at all.

Casting aside my love for preteen whores there indeed is a problem, sir.

>>11336535
>>11336964
What's with the shitty armchair psychology? We get it, you jumped to conclusions immediately upon reading his post and refuse to drop your assumption no matter what anyone else says.

>>11336986
The fact that you associate eyeshadow exclusively with whores is your problem.

>>11336975
See,

>"Outside of protection from weather and other hazards (animals, etc.,) clothing does little more then show status and cover your body (and only then if you have a cultural background of shaming nudity.)"

Because I feel like I may have said that people have a use for clothing, not about who wears it for what reason, that is neither hear nor there.

>>11336986
>>11336994
He essentially said that whores wear makeup (which is always true as there are whores who don't), therefore "makeup = whores". It's a blatant fallacy that unfairly generalizes a lot of people. This has used as a scapegoat to attack "normal girls" like ones on the cover of Princess on Ice, and it all reeked of nerdy bitterness.

I didn't jump to a conclusion. There's simply 1 or 2 people unwillingly to admit they were wrong and had faulty reasoning.

>>11336986
>>11336994
He essentially said that whores wear makeup (which isn't always true as there are whores who don't), therefore "makeup = whores". It's a blatant fallacy that unfairly generalizes a lot of people. This has used as a scapegoat to attack "normal girls" like ones on the cover of Princess on Ice, and it all reeked of nerdy bitterness.

I didn't jump to a conclusion. There's simply 1 or 2 people unwillingly to admit they were wrong and had faulty reasoning.

>>11336997

When it looks like that (on little girls) it IS whorish, sir.

>>11337006
It's supposed to make you look pretty and draw attention your eyes. Sometimes it's supposed to convey elegance, such as in ballet or opera. The fact that you happen to live in a place where all the girls wear makeup and are whores is your own problem.

Make up for that sport also use to be heavy so that it can be seen by the jury (that and the extravagant ouftits) so it being whorish isn't even to take into consideration here, it would be like asking why toreadors wear such a gay costume.

>>11337018

>It's supposed to make you look pretty and draw attention your waist. Sometimes it's supposed to convey elegance, such as in ballet or opera. The fact that you happen to live in a place where all the girls wear waist chain and are whores is your own problem.

Something slutty is slutty dude. Deal with it.

>>11337035
You think everything girls do is slutty. Nobody cares what you think.

>>11337045
Why are you even protecting slutty whore women?

>>11337004
The original poster only said that the make-up on the girls was poorly applied and atrocious. You took it as meaning that make-up in general is atrocious, and then came up with a pointless "explanation" as to why said poster would feel that way about make-up and why it makes him a bad person. When people pointed out that you had misinterpreted what he said you then start insisting that they were the ones that were wrong when there was really nothing to suggest that what you said was even true. You're acting like a huge tool and talking about subjects you know nothing about as if you're some kind of expert. It's stupid.

>>11337048
It's perfectly normal for girls who are in performing arts to wear eyeshadow. What makes you a whore is sleeping around, not wearing eyeshadow. That's a retarded assumption and a disservice to perfectly chaste young girls everywhere.

>>11337045
Nobody care what *you* think, slut apologist. There are many ways to apply make-up, and those in >>11337006 or OP's US image are bad and widely considered "slutty".

>/lgbt/
>/r/feminism

>>11337045

When something is commonly accepted by society as slutty (like the heavy make in >>11337006 ) it is slutty, as sluttiness is defined by society's standards.

D.E.A.L W.I.T.H I.T.

>>11337061
/jp/'s opinions are not commonly shared by society.

>>11337059

It doesn't make you a slut but make you look like one, which is why we are having a discussion about op's pic in the first time.

>>11337045
Stop derailing the thread, retard. He said the way make-up is applied on the American cover is slutty, then you went on an autistic rampage to disprove a claim nobody did.

>>11337049
>aie haev no rebuttael so I ataek u

>>11337070
It is as idiotic as claiming a girl doing gymnastics in a leotard is a slut because she is wearing revealing clothing. It comes with the territory.

>>11337069

"I don't look slutty at all teehee ! " - Your mom

>>11337078
Rebuttal to what? He's arguing against something no one ever said. What do you expect me to say to him?

>>11337073
It's not slutty. It's performing arts standard.

>>11337080
My mother doesn't use eyeshadow. Does yours?

>>11337060
Look at this big hardcore tough man. You do know that him pointing out that you incorrectly label everything as slutty has nothing to do with feminism right?

Stop trying to overcompensate for your flaws.

>>11337078
Go back to SomethingAwful, moron.

>>11337079

That's why I posted >>11337022 . But outside of that context it would be considered slutty. That's why people go full rage/pedo mode when they see little miss fashion and the like.

>>11337089
The girls in the OP picture are presumably putting on an ice skating performance.

>>11337084

>My mother doesn't use eyeshadow. Does yours?

No. And i'll probably never fuck her. Feels bad man.

>>11337095

That's why I posted >>11337022 I said !

>>11337109
I confused you with someone else, my bad.

>You try to rationalize your existence as a bitter weeaboo nerd by "shaming" normal things
>He was probably using it as a scapegoat to shame "normal" looking girls
>Stop trying to "shame" normal girls to rationalize the fact that you will never have one
>This has used as a scapegoat to attack "normal girls" like ones on the cover of Princess on Ice, and it all reeked of nerdy bitterness.
>Stop trying to overcompensate for your flaws.

.... I leave /jp/ for a while and come back to you guys arguing over retarded shit still.
Why don't you turn the argument around and talk about why the original Japanese image is "bad" enough to be replaced.

What is wrong with it?

>>11337117
It's not bad. It was replaced for marketing reasons.

>>11337117
Nothing is wrong with it, it's just the usual American neurosis.

>>11337116
They are sorry, they didn't realise they weren't on facebook and had to put up a façade to stand up for women and their rights.

Its alright guys! your mom and feminist sister doesn't browse /jp/! you don't need to keep the façade up.

>>11337117
Either they didn't think it would sell well, or it did not fit with the image they were trying to market.

>>11337128
>>11337125
>>11337122
Americans like creepy looking girls? That smile scares me.

>inb4 why does smiling have to be creepy, you are just trying to shame normal smiling girls.

>>11337117
I like it, well other then green looking like she's on something crazy. It just has that foreign feel to so it was changed to make it more appealing to the natives.

>i fap to promiscuous girls considering the entire concept of the doujinshi industry involves around promiscuous girls basically
>I see a 2D depiction of a female with makeup and need to shit post despite the above
>i maek generalization fallacy
>i lose argument
>i call naems

>>11337133
Who are you quoting, Y Kant Ozma?

>>11337116
>>11337133
I'm not sure what you're trying to achieve, but I'm pretty sure it's not helping.

>>11337142
I'm both of those and still don't understand.

>>11337139
He's bored and wished he was born a female.

>>11337133
I was going to ignore this post I usually don't reply to retarded goons, but

>the entire concept of the doujinshi industry involves around promiscuous girls basically

You can't be this stupid. Please go back to the shithole you crawled out from.

>>11337145
You are bored and female.
How is the possible? Don't you have evil female things to do?
Also why did you announce your gender, attentionwhore.

>>11337142
Personally I dislike women, however I dislike stupidity even more.

I pointed out his fallacy, his "babbys first misogynism", and behavior contradiction. The real misogynists out there don't need retards shit-posting and wasting thread space because of some splurg reaction over one image.

>>11337133
>>i maek generalization fallacy
If you're who I think you are, that's exactly how you started your side of the argument.

>>11337147
>I was going to ignore this post I usually don't reply to retarded goons
Great!

>but
WHY

>>11337153
>bored
>wished he was born a female.
You fucking suck at English.

>>11337157
>I dislike stupidity even more.
Why are you all cringeworthy retards, can't you all just ignore this shit
>I'mma preach shit to you obvious trolls

... holy shit I'm not on /a/, I'm on /jp/ a shitposting holyground.

My bad, continue.

>>11337147
Just about every doujinshi is out there is based on the premise of females being more promiscuous than normal. Even the rape genre has an insanely high ahego rate.

You are that stupid. Put your head deeper into the shithole you never crawled out from.

>>11337174
>I'm on /jp/ a shitposting holyground.
Shitposting deities lurk here.

I really want to send this thread to whoever designed that cover.

Also, what does the Japanese version of the sequel look like?

le biannual shitfest

>>11337178
There's some humor to be found in hearing /jp/'s rape enthusiasts complain because the girls start liking it halfway through in 90% of it.

every girl in the world is a slut because every girl wears make up i hate girls but i want to be a girl lol

>>11337186

>>11337187
Sums up the insecure contradiction-filled shit-posters complaining about the cover image pretty well.

>>11337192
+1 posts only ever make it sound like you're replying to yourself.

Every fucking comiket, the goons come out to leech off of us and shitpost all over the place.

>>11337187
If I was a girl, I wouldn't wear make-up. I'd look after my skin, just like I do as a man. Skin goes all claggy after repeated application of make-up, which is why women become dependent on it (my uncle is a dermatologist, so I know what I'm talking about).

>>11337187
Do you honestly believe that you're going to change anybody's mind by shitposting like this? Just go back to SA already, you're not even funny, you're boring.

>>11337178
>I will make generalisations about things because I'm irrational as fuck

Doujinshi does not mean porn books, If you want to refer to specifically porn doujinshi please refer to it as H-Doujinshi, Thank you.

The idea of porn being made for the purpose of sexually pleasing people by delivering unreal levels of promiscuity is common in all porn in all nations - it is in fact a staple of US porn videos involving college girls and nurses etc, all acting desperate for cock.

I don't understand how you can just generalise to one particular nation and one particular for of porn just for dramatic effect and call someone else an idiot.

>>11337202
That's not how you quote. Take your meme arrows to >>>/v/ and stop derailing.

I don't even know what's going on anymore.

>>11337187
I don't understand your point. Nobody here implied that, you're just attacking straw men and derailing the thread.

>>11337197
wow great fuck you

>>11337205
>derailing
>not looking at all the post prior to that one.

>meme arrows
You belong on /v/

>>11337209
I like how he showcases his barbaric /v/ behavior even more when he gets called out about it. A true cross-boarder.

>>11337207
Did you even read the fucking thread?
everyone said the same exact thing with a few different words

>>11337202
Like, half of it is porn. Which happens the to be the half that most people here care about, except a few of the Touhou fans.

You can emphasize anything you like for dramatic effect. This thing was particularly relevant because lots of people here are fans of it, whereas most of us probably aren't jerking it to mainstream American porn. Not the person you were replying to.

>>11337216
No, they didn't. Nobody talked about make-up itself being inherently slutty but you.

>>11337214
please stop bully plz, I will tell Mama Ran.

>>11337223
You're bad at reading, go back to school you NEET

>>11337217
>half of it is.
You have no idea.
Just because you can only see the porn on the internet and only know a little non-H doujin.

Why don't you actually see how much non-H doujinshi there is, it most certainly is more than half, but you probably only believe comiket is the only place you can doujinshi and only what gets uploaded is all there is!

>>11337228
Please specify which posts implied that makeup itself is inherently slutty, which is the claim you were trying to disprove.

>>11337230
Touhou's 20% is an exceptionally low percentage.

>Why don't you actually see how much non-H doujinshi there is, it most certainly is more than half, but you probably only believe comiket is the only place you can doujinshi and only what gets uploaded is all there is!
If most of us were expected to be Japanese and visit Japanese doujin conventions all across Japan in person, then you might have a point, but in /jp/ the doujinshi that aren't may as well not exist unless some passionate person orders it through a proxy service. Which nobody does, because nobody cares. Well, maybe two people do.

>>11337233
Please read the thread, post by post. You'll see what I'm talking about, you nerd

What are the criteria for deletion, ITT?
Greentext, weak arguments, short posts? Plenty of people are falsequoting (like >>11337202), but is it because they have longer posts and sounder arguments?

>>11337241
>Please read the thread

Who the fuc* would want to read this thread?

>>11337247
Probably if you put a lot of false quotes in and attach a dumb picture reaches a critical threshold of shit.

>>11337249
I forgot to mention. That's my face when somebody expects anyone to read this thread.

This is my face when mom offers me aisu kureamu.

If things and places were different I'd really think we were raided by goons.

>>11337186
Wait, are these all localizations of Japanese games? Or did they just find some vaguely related games and shoehorn them into the same brand?

(2/3)

>>11337262
(3/3)

>>11337258
If things and places were different I could fly on wings and be master of all I surveyed.

>>11337266
But your power would blind you, then you would be master of nothing.

>>11337268
I flew too high, and fell too far. Truly, fate is unkind.

>>11337276
>Truly,
I hate when people write this!

>>11337276
But in the end nothing really mattered, did it?

>>11337285
We're pretending to be profound. Please let us have our special moment.

>>11337285
Ostensibly.

>>11337279
You mattered anon.

Holy shit, did I step into /b/ by accident or something? What the fuck.

>>11337327
welcome to le new /jp/ xDDDDDDDDD!!!

>>11337332
MEEEEEEIIIIIIIDOOOOOOOOOO

>>11337327
If you view 4chan as a "comedy website", then this thread is one of the best in months.

>>11337345
I think you should get your humerus checked out.

>>11336997
I think the real problem here is the cock that you have lodged inside of your rancid rectum..

I kind of wish I hadn't gone to sleep so I could have watched this shit happen in real time. Sorry for your loss, OP.

>>11337375
I have it on good authority that my rectum actually smells like wildflowers in spring.

>>11337375
Sick argument. You didn't get owned at all.

Princess on Ice was fixed a while ago if anyone is interested:
http://mfi.re/?05plo3ve5k33q2x

>>11337357
I'd like to check out her humerus.

>>11337375
Alliteration !
x2 COMBO

Nice !!

Makeup is for sluts.

>>11337426
No, it's not. I'm a virgin and I wear make-up to work. It helps to make me feel a little bit more pretty and increases my self-confidence!

>>11337426
xDDDDDD

>>11337433
Makeup is for sluts.

Why are there so many worthless pieces of garbage in
this thread? Don't these imbeciles realize that they are
doing a disservice to the universe itself simply by
existing? These disgusting things aren't even worthy of
praising the ground upon which I walk, let alone posting
in the same thread as myself.

>>11337437
Why would you want to feel pretty?

If you weren't a slut, you'd want to cover up.

There are millions of Muslim women who wear burqas and niqabs by choice. If you're not one of them, then you're a slut or a slut-to-be.

>>11337437
Would you let me beat you up if I paid you? I wouldn't rough you up too bad, I was a prison warden at one point and an amateur boxer before that so I'm experienced enough to hurt you without causing any real damage.

>>11337436
Quality!

>>11337462
Makeup is for sluts.

Alright, so who's behind this raid? It's obvious there are normalfaggots all over the place in here, so where are they from?

>>11337477
It's not just the normals defending shitty localizations that are the problem. Even if I agree with some of the things they said, this thread is clearly full of crossies. Reading this thread made me feel like I'm on /a/b/v/.

>>11337451
I told you why. To help with my self-confidence. My self-esteem is pretty low, but looking nice makes me feel good.

>>11337489
"crossboarder" is an /a/ meme

>>11337489
Hurry, somebody start up a traditional /jp/ shitposting party so this guy can feel at home.

>>11337493
"___is an /a/ meme" is an /a/ meme

>>11337496
Except shit posting is not what was traditional about jp

it was about quality unironic posts that promoted good intellectual topics and conversation

>>11337498
I thought /a/ liked to pretend that it didn't have memes.

>>11337493
No it's not. I've seen you claim many terms that originated on /jp/ come from /a/. It's more of a convenient term than a meme. It represents the improvement to be had from completely cutting the board off from the rest of 4chan.

>>11337500
So if somebody says something fucking stupid, call him out on it. Don't just watch the stupidity unfold and casually mention that the thread was full of crossboarders after it's all over.

>>11337500
3/10 if serious

8/10 if trolling

>>11337503
Boards that are actually cut off of 4chan all fucking suck.

>>11337521
Makeup is for sluts.

>>11337471
Logical!

>>11337503
I was wrong. It's not from /a/, it's just a shitty 2012 /jp/ meme that popularized by /jp/'s shittiest posters, long after everybody had stopped pretending that /jp/ was a ogod board.

>>11337527
It used to be that people would specify which boards contained undesirables, but 4chan has become so packed with normals and mememasters that it's gotten to the point where it's just a lot easier to consider every board to be full of undesirables, and sum it up with "crossboarders are not welcome".

>>11337540
>4chan has become so packed with normals and mememasters
Which boards went from "okay" to "shit and intolerable" between 2010 and 2012 that caused this change?

>>11337549
All of them, but most of them weren't okay even in 2010.

>>11337549
>Which boards went from "okay" to "shit and intolerable" between 2010 and 2012 that caused this change?
/jp/

>>11337549
Most boards went from "shit" to "intolerable shit" between 2008 and 2012. It's a slippery slope of shit that continues to go on. The way I see it, by discouraging people on /jp/ from using other boards, and by discouraging people from other boards from posting on /jp/, it's cutting off the infection to slow down its spread.

>>11337564
/jp/ is already full of retards, dude. Surgery doesn't work after metastasis.

>>11336485
>Even me, who can't usually get connected to VNs, played it to all of it's endings.
well, not to shoot you down or anything, but that game had very few branches. not hard at all to play all the endings.

>>11337573
I actually prefer complete retards over normals.

>>11337579
Sparky has a board I think you'll like.

>>11337588
I said I prefer complete retards over normals, that doesn't necessarily mean I like them. Besides, the posts need to at least be comprehensible.

PAL cover also Japanese one.
What was wrong with this one, why change it? Does seeing little boy with horns holding a piece of wood make you want to buy the game, instead of the nice artistic cover?

Was this the Japanese box art too?

I want to bomb american for doing this shit.

it is literally pointless.

of all the shit that one could be doing

but nope you gotta change those box covers to make them more pc right?

god how I wish i grew up in a japanese child hood. the games they got to experience and play. american dint even get a third of what japan has.

I like how the PAL release of Mario & Sonic at the London 2012 Olympic Games had more British icons (buses and shit) on the front cover than the other releases.

For some reason it's hard to track those down. The game isn't even listed on MobyGames.

>>11337671
le politically correct face

>>11337671

>>11337186

>>11337678
This?

>>11337677
wot a fuking weeb lmao

>>11337677
You’re fucking retarded.

>>11337692
>>11337694

>>11337070
This picture gives me hope because if a plain looking asian can pull that look off then so can I someday♛

>>11337698
Yeah, melonpantsu on head retarded,

>>11337686
Yep. Notice this here American version has more sports and characters instead.

>>11337709
He's calling you a melonhead, dork.