/jp/ - Otaku Culture

there is no 2D realm you dweeblord

>>11259863
That's not true. Haven't you ever heard of the Everett-Wheeler model, or watched Digimon?

maybe

>>11259863
You.. really are dense person, aren't you?

>>11259884
>..

Get a load of this fucking retard. Why don't you go back to retard school, retard.

Lower dimensions are unable to see higher dimensions.

The better question is do they find 1D better?

>>11259889
Why are you so mean and edgy? Did you have a bad day? Did your girlfriend made fun of you? Please, feel free to talk to me.

There is no 2D realm, faggot.

>>11259898
Please learn proper English.

>>11259898
Choosing to ignore the issue of you being a retard rather than address it head on, I guess I shouldn't expect much more out of a literal retard.

>>11259894
Wait a moment here. Does it mean that a 4D realm truly exists?

>>11259903
>faggot
>>11259889
>retard
>retard
>retard
>>11259863
>dweeblord
>>11259910
>retard

>>11259897
Probably. In Flatland, line segments were the women.

>>11259912
Isn't there some physics theory that there are 11 spatial dimensions?

Or is that pop science nonsense, like superfoods and psychology?

>>11259918
You mean the one related to the string theory? Truly an interesting one, I admit.

>>11259863
I use believe thete was...it was called the toon world and I was like a god there.

>>11259918
>psychology
>pop science nonsense

>>11259950
I was joking. Obviously psychology is applied statistics. A shame all it does is back common sense and re-establish what philosophers realized centuries ago.

Stockings and leggings are never drawn properly in 2D-only drawings.

OP's picture looks nice, though.

>>11259962
I like stockings/leggings when their leg is pushing out over the top

>>11259928
Pegasus please.

>>11259915
Who are you quoting?

>>11259860
No. It is impossible.
On /sci/, this was used to explain projections of a hypercube (so called 4 dimensional object).
Think of it this way, we in the 3 dimensional world cannot begin to perceive what a 4 dimensional object looks like, simply because we exist in a lower dimension. We can perceive 2D and 1D easily though.
As such, for any existence living a 2D existence, they cannot perceive what a 3 dimensional object looks like. They can only make a projection as to what it might look like. They have no sense of depth, and any "3DCG artist" might as well be a mathematician bent on mental masturbation.

>>11259985
But the 2D realm has shading. It's not one of your flat, moe 2D realms, it's the three/four-tone 2D realm that's been around since the 80s.

So they have some sense of depth. Maybe the word isn't truly 2D to them. They can still walk around in three dimensions, but everything would appear "2D" from our point of view. To them it's normal. And it makes sense that, in their world, some artist would expand on the natural shading in reality, and create what we would perceive as realistic-looking 3D models.

>>11260000
To assume a 2D existence has any 3 dimensional senses is just wishful thinking on the part of a 3D existence. A hand waving away on the part of the artists.

>>11259972
No Im not him, but I am a tripfag.

>>11260022
Well I say this because in our cartoons and games, characters are aware of depth. They walk towards the camera. Streets run off into the distance. They're not stuck in a platform game where all they can see are a series of line segments.

That's the world we're talking about. Not the boring Flatlander shit where pentagons bump into squares.

>>11260062
Well the boring flatlander shit is reality. Have you ever ran a program called "The Game of Life"?
2D existence to a T.

This thread sucks, let's just make this an oblivion mod thread

When a 2D character looks at a manga, does it look photorealistic or stylized?

>>11260108
They just see a 1D line leading into the abyss.

>>11260081
But how do the cells (or whatever they're called) perceive each other? Do they even know how many are around them?

It must be boring as HELL.

>>11259863
>>11259903
2d wordl is real u just hav eto beleve

I'ld say no judging on how illusion's game sales are lackluster and TeaTime just kicked the bucket.

>>11259860
That would be perfect, no? A 2D waifu insistent on the superiority of what you are. Not only is your waifu your fetisch, you're hers. It's ideal. It's perfect.

It's never happening.

How come they can make perfectly moe 3D looking characters, but no one has been able to make decent 3D sex?

>>11261371
I guess it's tricky getting the animations just right. Uncanny valley and such.

>>11261371
>perfectly moe 3D looking characters

They have?

>>11261408
You don't think Elins are moe?

http://www.nicovideo.jp/watch/sm17985146