/jp/ - Otaku Culture

fuck off back to /a/a fat fuck retard

"Taylor, Quayle and Holland (2001) also argue that regardless of whether the children portrayed in objectionable images are physically abused during the creation of the images, victimisation occurs each time an image of a child is used for a sexual purpose (including sexual fantasy generation, arousal and masturbation). In effect, this activity encourages non-consensual use of individuals as sexual objects."
- "Internet Traders of Child Pornography and other Censorship Offenders in New Zealand" by Angela Carr (Dept. of Internal Affairs, Wellington, New Zealand, April 2004), citing "Typology of Paedophile Picture Collections" by Max Taylor, Ethel Quayle, and Gemma Holland in The Police Journal, vol. 74, no. 2 (2001), pages 97-107

"Child pornography, by itself, represents an act of sexual abuse or exploitation of a child and, by itself, does harm to that child."
- Kenneth V. Lanning in "Child Molesters: A Behavioral Analysis" (National Center for Missing and Exploited Children, 1992)

"Child pornography is not a computer crime. Every image depicts a child being abused. They are crime-scene photographs."
- Michelle Collins, the director of the Exploited Children Unit of the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children, as quoted in Edison/Metuchen Sentinel, The Examiner, and The Independent (New Jersey, August 30, 2006) in an article about a man who sexually assaulted boys and girls aged 2 to 8 and videotaped these acts plus placed hidden cameras in rooms where the children undressed

>>11066163
"It cannot be emphasised enough that behind every horrid piece of child pornography is a tragic case of an abused defenceless child, somewhere in the world."
- Chris Ellison, Australian Senator and Minister for Justice and Customs, as quoted in The Age (Melbourne, Australia, February 23, 2005)

"It's chilling to realize that every photo on every page of every child pornography magazine... is a permanent record of the works of a child molester."
- William V. Roth, U.S. Senator from Delaware and Chairman of the Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations, in Spring 1985, as quoted in The Los Angeles Times (September 16, 1985)

"While little is known about the specific long-term effects of use in child pornography, the immediate trauma and effects of sexual abuse on children is well documented. Because child pornography is a clear record of child sex abuse, its victims would therefore experience the same emotional and physical consequences in addition to any harm resulting from the pornography. ... Child victims of pornography face the possibility of a lifetime of victimization because the pornography can be distributed indefinitely. Physical, psychological, and emotional effects of child sexual abuse are coupled with the possibility of the pornography resurfacing. Being photographed during sexual abuse intensifies the child's shame, humiliation, and powerlessness."
- "Child Pornography: The Criminal-Justice-System Response" by E. Klain, et al. (National Center for Missing and Exploited Children, 2001), http://www.missingkids.com/en_US/publications/NC81.pdf

>>11066166
"It is possible that victims of child pornography suffer as severely if not more severely than other victims of sexual crimes. It is psychologically very devastating, because every time that image is looked at or shared that child is being victimized again and again. The Internet allows these pictures to be shared."
- Kelly Kennedy, a spokesman for the Wisconsin Attorney General's office, as quoted in The Fond Du Lac Reporter (September 7, 2005)

"It does not threaten the First Amendment for the Federal legislature to conclude, for example, that inducing children to engage in sexual activity can physically harm them, and consequently to prohibit the photographing of children who have been induced to do so, and to legislate against the publication and sale of magazines or films in which such photography appears. The publisher and the seller are principals in the abuse."
- "Taking on the Censors" by Robert Sabbag in Oui, January 1978

"The use of children in sexually explicit films is of course criminal exploitation of people who can't defend themselves, and it is cruelty to the children and an offense against the parental feelings of anybody with the slightest amount of sympathetic imagination. I think the makers of such pictures must be tracked down and imprisoned."
- "Dr. Ruth's Guide for Married Lovers" by Dr. Ruth Westheimer (Warner Books, 1986)

>>11066163
>>11066166
>>11066167
but
what if
get this..
it's consensual

>>11066170
children can't consent

>>11066173
says who

I am skeptical of the claim that voluntarily pedophilia harms children. The arguments that it causes harm seem to be based on cases which aren't voluntary, which are then stretched by parents who are horrified by the idea that their little baby is maturing.

The nominee is quoted as saying that if the choice of a sexual partner were protected by the Constitution, "prostitution, adultery, necrophilia, bestiality, possession of child pornography, and even incest and pedophilia" also would be. He is probably mistaken, legally--but that is unfortunate. All of these acts should be legal as long as no one is coerced. They are illegal only because of prejudice and narrowmindedness.

Some rules might be called for when these acts directly affect other people's interests. For incest, contraception could be mandatory to avoid risk of inbreeding. For prostitution, a license should be required to ensure prostitutes get regular medical check-ups, and they should have training and support in insisting on use of condoms. This will be an advance in public health, compared with the situation today.

For necrophilia, it might be necessary to ask the next of kin for permission if the decedent's will did not authorize it. Necrophilia would be my second choice for what should be done with my corpse, the first being scientific or medical use. Once my dead body is no longer of any use to me, it may as well be of some use to someone. Besides, I often enjoy rhinophytonecrophilia (nasal sex with dead plants).

There is little evidence to justify the widespread assumption that willing participation in pedophilia hurts children .

Granted, children may not dare say no to an older relative, or may not realize they could say no; in that case, even if they do not overtly object, the relationship may still feel imposed to them. That's not willing participation, it's imposed participation, a different issue.

We are asked to believe that the distribution of child pornography — and I mean real child pornography — leads people to commit sexual abuse of children. But evidence suggests it's not so.

There are two arguments for prohibition of "child pornography". One is that "it was made in a real act of sexual abuse". In some cases, that is true. However, in many countries, the "child" may be an adult, or even nonexistent, since the censorship extends even to drawings. Meanwhile, in the US, the "child" may be 17 years old and taking the photos. This argument does not apply to those cases.

The other argument is based on the supposition that looking at these images leads people to commit sexual abuse. The article casts doubt on that supposition.

Making child pornography through real sexual abuse of real children can be prosecuted without censorship. Likewise selling it in a commercial arrangement with those who made it. There is no reason for the censorship which has generated a witch hunt that has ruined the lives of people not even alleged to have harmed anyone.

>>11066181
Children are not known for making good decisions on topics they barely comprehend.

There is a reason why you don't "help" a butterfly break out of its coccoon: You might break their wings.

Loli thread? Loli thread

So imagine a scenario ten years down the road, as you’re taking a stroll in the park. Your glasses (“mobile phone”) are on, as are mostly everybody else’s. You’re broadcasting and recording what you see in public, as is mostly everybody else, in case a friend drops in on your feed and starts chatting about it, or in case you observe something where you need to back up your story later, if you’re so inclined – kind of why people use dashcams in cars and constantly record everything that happens.
So, on your lovely stroll in the park, you turn a corner, and to your shock, see a 12-year-old being brutally raped right in front of you.
WHAM. You are now a criminal, guilty of recording, distributing, and possessing child pornography. You are now guilty of a crime that carries higher penalties than the rape and molestation of a child right taking place right in front of you.
The rapist notices you and laughs, knowing that you can’t do anything. If you were to call the police and offer to be a witness to the rape taking place before you, you would lose your job, children, and house over the worse crime you have just committed. As you struggle in panic to delete any and all imagery that could be used to convict the child rapist, hoping that nobody was able to make a copy, you see another person coming into view of the rapist and reacting just like you did.
And on the ground, a 12-year old who is being raped watches helplessly as witnesses turn away and delete all evidence of the crime being committed against her.

“Nobody would get prosecuted for handing in evidence”: There was a famous case in Sweden where a mother recorded evidence of her children having been abused, by filming them playing, documenting what would have been much too advanced sexual play for that age, handed it to the police, and promptly was arrested for possession of CAI. In the meantime, Social Services gave the father single custody of their children, and banned her from seeing them. She was ultimately acquitted from the criminal charges, but Social Services didn’t change their verdict; she’s still banned from seeing her children ever again. I think that only the most heartless of bureaucrats would call such a fate an “acquittal”.
“Nobody would get prosecuted for handing in evidence”, again: In Spain, prosecution of child molesters grinded to a halt as the local police said outright that people couldn’t legally submit evidence of the crime.
Seeing these cases, would you dare interfere? Would you really risk that your children were separated from their parent over your trying to good? I’d argue that most people wouldn’t, and that the current laws therefore protect child molesters.

>>11066187
That seems more like an argument in order to satisfy your fetish.

Kind of how homosexuals defend bath houses despite them being a health concern due to being a STD spreading hub.

>>11066196
Nice strawman, brah.

>>11066202
>>11066201
>>11066198
Cute

>>11066167
You know it's funny. I'm against cp, but mostly because the production of it requires the victimization of a human being, and the proliferation of such images helps contribute to a system that will result in more victimization to produce more material. The assertion that a person is revictimized every time someone sees an image of them being victimized, however, is utter madness.

Why are they focusing on something so utterly dumb when there's a legitimate reason to ban the production and proliferation of child pornography? Do people just not understand that images are not in fact linked to a person's soul? Are we Australian Aborigines suddenly?

This is why cartoon porn is so important. No possibility of victim, no possibility of crime.

>>11066226
>>11066226
>>11066221
>>11066220
>>11066217
>>11066215
>>11066211
>>11066211
>>11066208
>>11066205
>>11066202
>>11066201
>>11066198
I have never been so terrified of opening a spoilered image.

>>11066192
a 16 year old taking nudie pics of herself to send to her 20 year old boyfriend is not comparable with a fucking butterfly breaking out of its coccoon

>>11066230
get that schlong out of your ass jeeze

>>11066230
It's just loli

>>11066233
A 16 yo is well on her way to becoming adult. Still, she should know better.

But we are discussing CP. You know, as in kids. Not stupid teens.

>>11066242
Ah, thank god. I thought we were swimming in FBI bait.

gigapuddiスレ

"Google, the internet giant, is to create a global database of child abuse images - which it will share with its rival companies - in a bid to eradicate child pornography from the web."
"Scott Rubin, Google’s spokesman, said: “We are creating an industry-wide global database of ‘hashed’ images to help all technology companies find these images, wherever they might be. They will then be blocked and reported.”

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/google/10122452/Google-builds-new-system-to-eradicate-child-porn-images-from-the-web.html

>>11066242
>>11066245
>>11066240
>>11066236
>>11066232
post your shit in /b/ you sperglord.
Reported.

>>11066247
it's all the same
the law doesn't give a fuck

>>11066263
>>>/a/

>>11066259
I wonder if these people spending hours manually compiling and tagging images of CP for companies like Google will ever be prosecuted.

>>11066259
I'm cool with that as long as they don't get rid of our cartoon porn.

If I want to fap to porn of this character, it's my god given right to.

>>11066259

So they get to look at seepiss and don't get in trouble? How is that fair?

>>11066273
cartoon porn is already illegal in half of the globe.
moetron looks underage, get fucked pedofilth.

>>11066282
Loli is not illegal anywhere other than maybe UK

>>11066282
it's only illegal in a few countries

>>11066281

um bro are you okay i think your pOnOs is gone

>>11066278
The gubmint and their close friends always get a free pass when it comes to breaking the law in order to enforce it.

tt

>>11066159
I want to like little girls in good ways, I don't want to like little girls in bad ways anymore
Suicide is scary though

wat do

>>11066285
It's illegal in Canada, some European countries, most of Scandinavia, Middle-Eastern fuckholes and even Japan.

>>11066282
It's illegal in a lot of places, but it's at least ambiguous in the USA, depending on state law.

Science says that porn prevents real crimes, so by proliferating cartoon porn of petite midgets, I'm fighting the good fight against pedophilia. My penis is a tool used for the protection of our children's innocence.

>some of the pics ITT
HOLY CRAP

>>11066315
What's wrong? Did some of them scare you?

>>11066211
Nice mother/daughter bonding time!

some of the pics ITT
HOLY CRAP

woah, you can stop spamming

>>11066298
>implying there are countries besides America

this is freaking HOT my boner is so good.

>>11066298
implying there are countries besides America

>>11066263
this. Minus the announcing reports (you for all we know didn't actually make) part.

>>11066268
They can't since they're protected by carrier laws

>>11066373
Where are you when we actually need the loli spam?

>>11066383
Fapping to loli

These images are giving me pedo thoughts.

>>11066383

so Milky Holmes doesn't have a clitoris? Like, she's a mutant or some shit?
So weird.

>>11066422
That's wrong, being a pedo is wrong, lolicon is good.

>>11066429
It's the same shit.

>>11066438
Fuck off crossboarder

>>11066438
Who, in this day and age, doesn't actually know the difference between pedophilia and lolicon?
That's just pathetic, anon. Go hit the books and come back when you're not so uneducated.

>>11066444
You truly made me check if I clicked on /a/ by mistake, don't do that again.

>>11066459
You should go to /a/ now buddy, and never return.

>>11066457
Why isn't she wearing her boots?

>>11066438
Do you really need me to give you the long-ass explanation on how fetishism works in regards to fictional material versus real stuff?

>>11066469
Fuck da police

>>11066429
>>11066444
>>11066452
You can tell /a/ is here when people don't realize that lolicon is just the Japanese word for pedophile.

>>11066475
You need to leave, I bet you're one of those /v/tards who came in here thinking he's a "pro-otaku" or something.
PS: Lolicon is not Japanese for pedo

>>11066471
Pedophilia isn't defined as being an attraction to real children, it's defined as being an attraction to children. Nowhere in medical literature will you find a definition for pedophilia saying it needs to involve a real, living child.

>>11066481
>PS: Lolicon is not Japanese for pedo
Yes it is

>>11066481
>PS: Lolicon is not Japanese for pedo
/a/ needs to leave

>>11066482
>>11066482
>>11066482

>>11066483
No it's not buddy, it means lolita complex, I'm not going to keep replying to /a/tards and /v/tards, fuck off.

>>11066471
Then tell me why people that only claim to like 2D don't use a proper term for it?
People that claim that they are not pedophiles but lolicon, just want to separate themselves from these guys, they're often referred as /a/ crossboarders.

>>11066481
The fact that you're trying to victimize /v/ is only further proof that you're from /a/.

>>11066471
Pedophilia applies to both fiction and reality. You could even have a sexual fetish for school uniforms and that would still be pedophilia because school uniforms are associated with children.

>>11066483
>>11066486
>>11066490
Don't reply, he's just trying to start an argument, he knows this stirs up most of /jp/.

>>11066483

No it doesn't. I could be a 40 year old guy and date a 17 year old girl and she would still be considered loli.

>>11066490
>hurr ur from /a/ i'm not da retarded newbabby crossboarder u are
/jp/ never had anything against loli until you fucktards came in.

>>11066499

In japan that is...lolicon means you are into young girls. Girls far younger than your age.

>>11066499
>I could be a 40 year old guy and date a 17 year old girl and she would still be considered loli.

>>11066499
And the guy would be considered a pedo.

>>11066500
Who said I have anything against loli?

>>11066203
Where's the strawman, exactly?

>>11066483
>>11066486
oh god
just fuck off

>>11066500
Of course /jp/ doesn't have anything against loli. It's just not deluded enough to think that it isn't pedophilia.

>>11066500
Who the fuck said that?
/jp/ never had anything against pedophiles, including you.

>>11066513
assmurdered /a/shit

>>11066503

Maybe in murrica.

>>11066514
I don't care what you faggots think about yourselves, I'm not attracted at all to real life little girls.

http://translate.google.com/#ja/en/%E3%83%AD%E3%83%AA%E3%82%B3%E3%83%B3

>>11066522
Nobody said you are. You're still a pedophile for being attracted to children, real or drawn. This is a fact and you're in denial if you think otherwise.

>>11066527

Is pedophile in Japanese vocabulary?

/jp/ is horny
/jp hates sluts
?????????/

>>11066530
I'm not, buddy.

>noo I'm not a pedophile even though I fit the definition 100%, please don't label me >:(

>>11066482
So that's a yes, then? Alright...

When it comes to an image that has no connection with the real world, every perception of the image is valid. In the case of a photographic depiction of a real life victimization, there is an objective reality to it.

To put it simply, if a person views an image as being a petite midget with a flat chest, and you view the same image as a child, both your interpretations are correct, for you, assuming the image is entirely virtual.

I can go on if you need me to. Lots of examples I can use from various forms of pornographic interests that apply and show how extreme the disparity can be from one viewer of an image to the next.

>>11066522
Are you attracted to little girls? You are a paedophile.

I visit /cm/ and /y/ because I am a homosexual, but I have no interest in real men.

Only paedophiles do this, "I-I only like 2D, so it's different!"
What's so bad about being a paedophile? We're not saying you're a child molester. We're not even saying you like 3D little girls, you might not. But someone with a 10GB "2D Feet/" folder is a foot fetishist, you are a paedophile. Deal with it and stop being upset by normalfag stigma--they'd hate you anyway.

>>11066540
And there is fucking proof that you're an /a/shit or /v/tard, ever since this whole fucking greentexting faggots came in /jp/ started to also think lolicon means pedophile and before this everyone hated abusing the quote functions and there were fucking images everywhere explaining how it's not pedo, where the fuck did you people come from?

>>11066541
You don't have to be attracted to real children to be a pedophile.

Ignore guys. This is like bullying the one gay kid at the playground for wearing a hello kitty backback.

>>11066544
We all know you made that post.

American child pornography federal law:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/1466A

> including a drawing, cartoon, sculpture, or painting
> Nonrequired Element of Offense.— It is not a required element of any offense under this section that the minor depicted actually exist.

>>11066541
Is that supposed to be "long-ass"?
Go back to /a/ to justify your pedophilia.

>>11066545
You're going to need to reread that.

The point is that what's being viewed isn't necessarily a child. The reality of an entirely virtual image is subjective.

>>11066555
That's for realistically drawn children, not for "anime style" drawn children. Not saying that they won't conveniently expand that law.

Wow, left /jp/ for over a year and came back to this fucking mess of mentally challenged retards, greentexters and crossboarders.
God damn it /jp/, I bet the VN threads aren't even dedicated to just untranslated VNs too.

>>11066543
>I'm gay but not attracted to real men
What the fuck, you people are more insane than in old /jp/

4chan/jp/ - No Rules Spamming Culture (Worksafe!)

>>11066561
>>11066543

>>11066545
Yes, yes you do. According to the legal definition, and even any dictionary one, unless you conflate pictures of children with children.

http://www.animeultima.tv/forums/f82/lolicons-potential-pedos-33769/

I had poured all my autism in this tread with these normals. Read a few pages if you're bored.

>>11066570
Definition of PEDOPHILIA
: sexual perversion in which children are the preferred sexual object

http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/pedophilia

American child pornography federal law:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/1466A

"including a drawing, cartoon, sculpture, or painting"
"Nonrequired Element of Offense.— It is not a required element of any offense under this section that the minor depicted actually exist."

>>11066578
Yeah well 2D girls aren't children, they're a magical being made of pixels, radiation and pure love.

>>11066584
I can't tell anymore whether this is sarcasm or maximum delusion.

Is it bad I want to have sex with a loli?

I'M THE FBI EVERYONE GET ON THE GROUND!

>>11066562
http://www.monett-times.com/story/1904776.html
http://www.wired.com/images_blogs/threatlevel/2010/02/sentencingmanga.pdf

>>11066588

no

>>11066564
Nice try but nobody used "crossboarder" over a year ago.

>>11066543
What the fuck, you people are more insane than in old /jp/

>>11066541
2D loli porn has other things associated with children, though, like teddy bears and those innertubes. It's obviously pedophilia.

>>11066587
So if I draw a banana and say this is a girl it's suddenly a girl? I'm masturbating to the beautiful lines and delicious shading and coloring and the amazing radiation emitted from this wonderful creature.

http://www.afp.com/en/news/topstories/virtual-child-pornography-call-stirs-dutch-debate/

> "The proposal isn't really pertinent and for some people it will certainly increase the likelihood of going through with it (sexual abuse)," warned psychotherapist Jules Mulder of the De Waag clinic.

> Mulder, who specialises in treating paedophiles, noted that it would be very difficult to cover all "tastes".

> "Some want photos of naked children, others want children having sex while someone else wants an eight-year-old boy with dark hair and a certain look in his eyes," he said.

> "It's not possible to satisfy these different desires with a bit of virtual child pornography."

>>11066590
Serves him right for having a wife.

>>11066584
Photographs of a girl being raped are just an arrangement of pixels stored in JPEG blocks.

I only like 2D women, what does that make me?
By /a/'s logic I'm not heterosexual.

Okay, you know what, fuck you /jp/. This isn't a place where you could escape from the shitty real world anymore, it's a place of autistic retards and normals who can't even take it easy anymore.

>>11066611
Asexual

http://www.afp.com/en/news/topstories/virtual-child-pornography-call-stirs-dutch-debate/

"The proposal isn't really pertinent and for some people it will certainly increase the likelihood of going through with it (sexual abuse)," warned psychotherapist Jules Mulder of the De Waag clinic.

Mulder, who specialises in treating paedophiles, noted that it would be very difficult to cover all "tastes".

"Some want photos of naked children, others want children having sex while someone else wants an eight-year-old boy with dark hair and a certain look in his eyes," he said.

"It's not possible to satisfy these different desires with a bit of virtual child pornography."

>>11066598
Are you going to tell us the doujin?

>>11066601
Just because you are a horrible artist doesn't make it not a girl.

Horny virgins. What else are you expecting?

>>11066615
Photos of a girl aren't made of pure love and magic.

I wish I had enough images to spam this thread to the bump limit before the normals got in and started spamming their own shit.

>>11066611
what the fuck were you doing on /a/
oh, right...

>>11066622
It's chapter 3 of Sweet Parfait by Arekusa Mahone, page 66.

>>11066631
What is normalfag loli?

>>11066569
Odd. You seem to be ignoring the point. See, the thing is that, in fetishism, the use of elements that aren't sexual for their attractive connotations (attractive in the non-sexual sense) is common for the enhancement of any particular piece. For instance, a leather jacket or angel wings might be utilized to give a piece certain implications. The leather jacket itself is not sexual, but merely implies the character is tough, while the wings create a feel of purity.

You can say "it is what it is" all you want, but you're underestimating the degree of divergence one mind can have from another in regards to pornography.

Feel free to argue that sexual attraction to children is not a requirement to be considered a pedophile, though.

Nobody gives a shit if it's illegal or not

>>11066634
>glasses
disgusting

Why does >>11066581 use quotation marks for quoted text, but >>11066621 doesn't?

Be consistent with your gimmick. In written English, you alternate between double and single quotation marks for quotes within quotes (starting with single quotation marks in British English, or starting with double quotation marks in American English).

>>11066615

sex =/= rape

fucking bizarre, I know.

>>11066163
>>11066166
>>11066167

You must also outlaw graphically violent images then. They are also images of crime scenes. This idea that simple possession is going to exploit and morally hurt the children is absurd, what about the guy in the Boston bombings who lost his legs and probably had to see that footage dozens of times in the weeks that followed?

>>11066646
Normalfag loli are 3D girls and people yelling "UR A PEDO STOP ENJOYING THINGS AND HATE YOURSELF"

>>11066641
are you mentally incapacitated?

>>11066652
>"UR A PEDO STOP ENJOYING THINGS AND HATE YOURSELF"
You see, nobody is doing that but you think that way because your normalshit buddies over on /a/ told you that pedophiles are a) always attracted to real children and b) molesters about to strike

There are no pictures of real girls posted. Please just stfu.

>>11066652
Why don't you enjoy being a pedo? Then everyone would be happy.

>>11066644
You have genocided over eighty million Jews by viewing Holocaust pictures, goy.

Right now you're committing a napalm attack. And possibly possession of child pornography, depending on local obscenity laws (perhaps even production, you are caching it after all).

>>11066652
You see, nobody is doing that but you think that way because your normalshit buddies over on /a/ told you that pedophiles are a) always attracted to real children and b) molesters about to strike

>>11066621
>"Some want photos of naked children, others want children having sex while someone else wants an eight-year-old boy with dark hair and a certain look in his eyes," he said.
>"It's not possible to satisfy these different desires with a bit of virtual child pornography."

Oh god, the guy has no idea how fucked up the internet is, does he?

>>11066660
And?

>>11066621
"Some want photos of naked children, others want children having sex while someone else wants an eight-year-old boy with dark hair and a certain look in his eyes," he said.
"It's not possible to satisfy these different desires with a bit of virtual child pornography."

Oh god, the guy has no idea how fucked up the internet is, does he?

>>11066664
>>11066658
>>11066662
Because I don't want to be called a pedo and lolicon makes me feel better than labeling myself a fucking pedophile, also stop projecting your crossboarding faggotry on me.

>>11066634
Thank you~`

>>11066667

I'm not arguing with you shitbag troll. This discussion always turns out the same way on every single website.

>>11066673
They're different anyway. Stop listening to the uneducated.

>>11066615
Such photographs are produced as a result of a real life victimization and thus bear an underlying reality to them. The proliferation of such images also feeds into a culture which produces demand for more and can result in further victimization.

>>11066673
Well, you certainly embody the repression part of the Lolita complex.

>>11066679
The discussion here is actually very different. Nobody is telling you to stop masturbating to it or to stop enjoying it, many people who are arguing against you are doing it themselves. People are telling you to drop that retarded definition /a/ and the rest of the retarded internet is using to make themselves feel better about it.

>>11066694
You better tell the Japanese to stop differentiating between them then.

>>11066680
Are you really so fucking stupid that you didn't catch on the blatant sarcasm of that post?

According to you retards pic related isn't a loli because she's not a little girl and is an adult teacher, am I still a pedophile for liking LOLIS and not little girls? Why the sudden change of mind /jp/? You always said loli = body type and not age.

>>11066679
K

>>11066699
I didn't put any sarcasm in my post you tard, I meant all that.

>>11066694
Maybe if you'd actually accepted the subjective nature of virtual pornography, you'd not have to put you hat in the ring with people that rape children.

>>11066697
They don't.

>>11066703
I want to have sex with Tomoe sensei

>>11066694
>>11066703

It was never about body type, just away for retarded taggers to keep tagging pictures just because the fucking girl has a flat chest.

>>11066715
It is about body type, what would tomoe be then? A pseudo-loli?

>>11066712
WELL YEAH YOU'RE A PEDOPHILE SHE LOOKS YOUNG GO TO JAIL AND HATE EVERYTHING EVER

>>11066707
Then you're literally embodying the /a/ delusion and angst of the social stigma attached to being labelled a pedophile.

>>11066718
I am a pedophile though.

>>11066709
>>11066718
Who the fuck is saying pedophiles are all child molesters? You people are fucking paranoid.

>>11066621
>>11066665
I'm seriously thinking about emailing him about this, but all I can find are his LinkedIn and his Facebook.

Would it be rude to sign up for an account just to private message him and say, "Hey! Pixiv exists!"?

>>11066694

I agree with that though.

God /a/, please leave, nobody wants you here.

>>11066697

>>11066725
Then kill yourself.

>>11066719
I'm not autistic and can't sit home on my ass all day argue about pedophilia, I have a life and I don't want to be called a pedophile.

>>11066731
I don't like 3D little girls though.

>>11066734
Are you worried about losing your job?

>>11066736
Then you're a lolicon not a pedophile.

>>11066724
She's a loli

>In Japan, the term describes an attraction to underage girls (whether prepubescent, pubescent, or post-pubescent) or an individual with such an attraction.

>>11066734
I know that post isn't serious but you people are fine with being called a lolicon then? Assuming people understood what that word means.

>>11066729
Why can't you post normally instead of just covering your ears and pretending everyone who disagrees with you is a heinous /a/ shitposter?

>>11066736
Pedophilia has as little to do with dimensions as lolicon.

>>11066745
Probably because nobody on /jp/ is deluded enough to differentiate between two things that mean the same just to feel better about yourself.

>>11066738
No, I'm a pedophile.

>>11066739
And there you go, she's not underage and she looks young, so what is she then?

>>11066749
You're mistaken

>>11066751
>or an individual with such an attraction.

>>11066750
I am literally recording all of this thread and I'm so glad you're just admitting you're a pedophile.

>>11066736
Right, but you're sexually attracted to features associated with 3d girls. Have you considered instead just viewing it as a divergent body type with connotations of innocence? If you're not sexualizing the childlike traits, but instead using them as an additive bonus, you don't have to be sexually attracted to children.

Failing that, kill yourself. Probably going to be safer.

>>11066754
So if I like small feminine women with small tits I'm also a pedophile?

>>11066758
Australia says yes.

>>11066758

Yes.

>>11066755
Who are you?

>>11066762

A faggot.

>>11066761
>>11066760
What the fuck? Why? Why am I not allowed to like certain characteristics without being called a pedophile?

>>11066758
If the reason you are attracted to them is because they resemble children. So probably.

>>11066755
Being a pedophile isn't illegal though.

>>11066762
ur mom, go to bed son the fbi will be here soon.

>>11066770
But my bros will hate me for it :(

>>11066767
Why are you in denial of what you are?
What's wrong with being a pedophile?

>>11066767
Pedophilia is sexual attraction to childhood. If you like features associated with childhood, guess what that makes you.

>>11066770
In what country isn't it illegal?

>>11066767
Hey, I'm not saying Australia is right, I'm just saying they banned flat chested women because they think anyone who is attracted to them is a child raper.

>>11066755
Good thing being a pedophile isn't illegal.

>>11066767
Because that's what you are. You're like these nerds:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Men_who_have_sex_with_men

"I like dicks in my butt! B-But I'm not gay!"

You like little girls, you are a pedophile, that's fine. There's nothing wrong with that as long as you don't harm anybody.

>>11066758
Yes. Some countries (cough, Australia) even tried to outlaw porn featuring women with small breasts. Not sure if they actually succeeded.

>>11066776
I don't like features associated with childhood holy fuck, I just like feminine traits which is pretty normal as far as I know.

Debating terminology is always dumb.
Some like real little girls, some like 2D loli.
That's all there is to it.

>>11066792

But its wrong and you should kill yourself >:(!!1! Like this post if you hate pedos!

>>11066739
>prepubescent
Pedo
>pubescent, or post-pubescent
Not pedo

By stigmatizing pedophiles who can't help their feelings, normalfags are making it harder for those who want support to get it, which would prevent a lot of child abuse.

Normalfags are the ones ruining children's lives.

>>11066779
Holy crap then what do flat chested women do in Australia? We must save these maidens from that hell, /jp/

>>11066796
3DPD

>>11066793
They sneaked hebephilia into "pedophilic disorder" in the latest DSM. Previously they even said it was fine to fuck a 13-year-old if you were in your late teens.

>>11066801
Your defense mechanisms are still top notch. Not a single person in this thread has taken that stance yet.

>>11066792
What if I like both?

>>11066813
No it's not, where in europe is that legal?

>>11066796
I wonder what happens when a flat-chested, adult women takes nude pictures of herself in Australia. Is that child pornography? Does she go to jail?

>>11066805
Luckily in most of Europe fucking 13 and 14 year olds is perfectly legal.

Can we just stop saying pedophile and say Child Raper? Anyone who sexualizes children is a monster.

The only possible escape from that is to view any attraction you have to childlike features as being nonsexual elements applied to a sexual form. This pic for example has several elements that make the character "sexier" without being sexualized themselves.

>>11066811
She's not even allowed to look at herself naked unless she's under 18.

>>11066817
I fucked your mother before you was born, son.

>>11066813
If by Europe, you mean eastern Europe, i.e. brown niggers, i.e. the origin of 90% of all internet child pornography, then yes, it's perfectly legal.

>>11066819
Spain.

>>11066822
Okay.

>>11066819
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/4/4e/Age_of_Consent_-_Global.svg/2000px-Age_of_Consent_-_Global.svg.png

The brightest is Spain with 13 followed by Portugal, Germany and others with 14.

>>11066809

Nothing wrong with that. Just don't molest the 3D girl.

>>11066817
It's rapist you stupid /a/ faggot

>>11066824
>90% of all internet child pornography
That would be webcams.

>>11066824
The age of consent in Russia is actually fairly high but thanks for admitting you have no clue what you're talking about.

Okay guys can we just end this thread with what we learned and got from this harsh battle?

>>11066819
The former Prime Minister of Italy is basically a pedophile.

>>11066833
Okay, right, that applies to current times. I was more talking about the past here, where webcams weren't as prevalent.

>>11066849
I'm not a child rapper you god damn stupid

>>11066842
Pedophiles are people who like small tits

>>11066832
No, YOU'RE stupid /a/ faggot

>>11066849
Damn dude you got so frustrated about me calling you what you are that you forgot an "a" in your sentence.

go damn, there are no loli pics in this thread?

>fuck this shit, im out

>>11066842
There's a lot of newfags on /jp/ that pretend they're oldfags and like to mix in some of their epic morals into the discussion while still trying really hard to save face and appear like cool /jp/ deviants.

>>11066850

You rap for kids? Yo dawg thats so cool!

>>11066832
Nah, that makes it sound like the child is the rapist. If you say child rapist, I mean.

And just saying rapist is incorrect because raping a woman over the age of 18 isn't really that big of a deal compared to raping a child in terms of evil levels.

>>11066857
No I rape kids not rap for kids, get it right.

>>11066856
Says the /a/shit who is afraid of labels

I hope we can have another loli thread soon enough that turns into an intense political argument.

>>11066865
>evil levels

>>11066865
>And just saying rapist is incorrect because raping a woman over the age of 18 isn't really that big of a deal compared to raping a child in terms of evil levels.

EPIC XD

>>11066859

You don't have to deny it dawg, I rap for little girls to.

>>11066866
No, loli threads should be about fantasizing about lolis or talking about experiences with them.

>>11066873
But being called a lolirapcon is wrong

>>11066878
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YGjsHcnKrlk

>>11066852
I did it ironically you dumbass.

>>11066881
reported for trying to rape my ears

>>11066870
>>11066871
You laugh, but don't come running to me when you file your Karma wrong.

>>11066890
http://www.youtube.com/watch?list=PLA369F0DBEB292D9F&NR=1&v=Ab_W5Tj4Qrk&feature=endscreen

>>11066832
>>He hasn't played Battle Raper

GUYS I'M GOING IN THE BATH WITH MY LOLI SISTER WHAT DO?

>>11066915
Stick soap up her butt

I think we need to call ourselves wizards instead, just to emphasize how much this is like the old witch hunts.

That way we can all enjoy these discussions more when they yell to burn all the wizards. Meanwhile the wizards can magically create children out of paper.

>>11067027
Get your head checked