/jp/ - Otaku Culture

Googling this, looks like someone is really trying to force it.

We need a word like this, though. I've seen "cartoon paedophilia" and "objectum sexuality" used, but both seem too specific.

It's Schediaphilia, you asperger master.

What's wrong with agalmatophilia?

Stop inventing words, Tumblr.

I've already been diagnosed with enough 'conditions'.

Leave me alone already!

>>10555874
http://wiki.answers.com/Q/What_is_schediaphilia

It's the actual term for attraction.

so...

loli thread?

>>10555869

>We need a word like this

I thought it was 'moe'

>>10555886

>>10555890

It's not.

>>10555898

yea

it is

>>10555892
but it seems appropriate, in a thread about attraction to cartoon characters.

What's the -philia for "being attracted to humanoid arrangements of carbon and water?"

>>10555884
Well if Answers.com says so...

Even Wikipedia removed it.

Some non-academic just really wants this to be a word. Which is fine, but I don't get it. What's the etymology? Is "schedio" some German thing?

>>10555901

Ah, ok.

Thats stupid, I really doubt anyone here gets off on all cartoon characters.

Thats like saying someone has a fetish because they get off on 3d porn.

>>10555907

Well, attraction isn't like that.

Pedophilias aren't attracted to all prepubescents.

>>10555898
http://web.archive.org/web/20080815163949/http://matthew.animeblogger.net/archives/2005/07/20/wednesday_notes_akamatsu-sensei_talks_moe.php

>>10555860

Thanks CNN, I would have never known if you never told me. Love the gay rights movement you've been talking about all week long.

>>10555907
It's a paraphilia, not a sexual orientation.

>>10555886

Dem tube bodies.

>>10555886
I don't know anon, based on the topic this thread is probably about to turn into a war I'd rather stay out of.

>>10555886
Dat belly.

>>10555913

Paraphilia is a stupid word so please don't use it. Thanks.

sounds like someone who gets off on compiling schedules

>>10555916
an adorable girl can be an isle of respite in the midst of war.

or something like that.

>>10555908

Well, to be fair, the word is used in several different ways. And since its coinage was basically memetic you can expect its practical meaning to change all the time.

>>10555931
Oh yes calender! All those sweet plans on Wednesday! Ah your Thursday is so beautiful! I'm gonna cum!

>>10555919
Please don't. If you go too far down this route, we'll end up with transethnic otherkin schediaphiles walking down our streets wearing fedoras and protesting against cissexuality, and we won't be able to do anything because that's fine under the Sexual Liberation Act of 2014.

Social norms are a good thing. Paraphilias are a useful idea. You can disagree with the specifics, but please don't be too open. Sexuality may be a spectrum but it's not an omnispectrum(tm). I'm fine with being unusual because I keep it to myself. So should everyone else.

>>10555919
Paraphilia just means that you are attracted to things people aren't normally attracted to. Since /jp/ hates normal people, you think this would be a mark of pride.

Schediophilia, on the other hand, literally means "tendency towards rafting," which makes it sound like you are a Noah wannabe rather than a sexual fetishist.

>>10555971
HECK YES.

>>10555944
just ignore all protesters.

these days they're mostly trolls and they don't even know it.

>>10555971
can we still have our attractive cartoon characters with the rafts?

>>10555971
Fuck mansions, we should build a /jp/ Ark.

>>10555971
They are likely taking the name from the Greek art college, even though it does mean raft.

>>10555975
We should have a /jp/ meetup at some rapids

>>10555975
I better save this picture to my rafting folder so I can have a good fap later. You know what I really like? A nice big orange colored one going down an extremely wavy river with people wearing yellow life jackets! Nothing sexier.

>>10556000
Please post you rafting folder to mediafire.
Please.

>>10556000
You type like a woman

>>10555987
A schediaphilie wouldn't accept anything less.

>>10556018
Because I am a woman :)

>>10556013
I was just being sarcastic but just for laughs someone probably should. I can't even upload anything to mediafire or see my files. Nothing works for some reason, I can only download from mediafire. Don't know if something happened to my account or anything.

>>10556031
You're not me! Get out of here! I'm not a woman.

not exactly a raft, but...

lilos > lolis > rafts

>>10555860

not exactly a raft either, but it floats and a loli can lay on it...

>>10556066
gross

>>10556066
But Lilo is a loli.

>>10556117
#slaythegay

>>10556105
This image would be better if that little girl had a penis.

>>10556117
pls go

>>10556121
Fight me, nerd.

>>10556107
I just know that those noses are there to make them less fappable.

>>10556117
There is already a phallic image in it.

>>10556129
It takes more than one phallus to get me hard.

>>10556134
So if she was holding a whole box of popsicles, you would be happy?

>>10556148
Possibly, but I'd still enjoy it more if she had a penis.

>>10556150
here's a loli with a flotation device, and a penis.

>>10556154
That's great, but the penis still isn't attached to her.

>>10556161
It's sort of attached to her hand due to all the stickiness.

>>10556167
But it isn't down in her special place.

>>10556169
Penises don't grow on armpits, silly.

>>10556169
Her belly button? Her feet? Eeeeh?

>>10556169
You give them an inch and they try to take a mile.

>>10556174
How do you know? Have you ever seen a girls penis?

>>10556174
YEAH

THEY GROW IN URANUS!!XD :D

>>10556189

>>10556174
Penises can grow anywhere at any time on anyone, you'll never know where one might grow.

>>10556189
I couldn't and can't stop laugh.

>>10556195
I read that doujin too.

>>10556167
>>10556169
>>10556174
>>10556176
>>10556178
>>10556180
>>10556189
>>10556193
>>10556195
>>10556199

Shut up and post more lolis.

>>10556206
>lolis
Whoa dude, this is a Christian imageboard. Take your child lusting desires elsewhere.

>>10556206
with or without flotation devices?

>>10556205

>>10556213
Why didn't they just do it in the same style as the other DC Animated stuff instead of weeaboo pandering?

>>10556215
[x]with

>>10556213
It's funny because Starfire in the comics is now basically the team whore.

>>10556211
lolis can be Christian, too. see, she's wearing the holy symbol of the Christian faith.

Me on the right.

>>10556226
Too bad she's a shit and the worst girl in her series.

>>10556225
http://www.comicsalliance.com/2011/09/22/starfire-catwoman-sex-superheroine/

lol

>>10556216
>>10556219
so-so

>>10555860
So the jews finally got an umbrella term with which to persecute us. Soon enough we'll be put into mental hospitals to deal with our schediophillic disorders.

>>10556229
Go check your eyesight, that's not Maria.

>>10556239
Easy, just don't talk about it.

>>10556245
>>10556229
You guys are crazy.

>>10556229
yeah, kobato's pretty annoying.

>>10556243
If homos can make out in public then I should be allowed to walk around with my dakimakura

>>10556245

>>10556237
Why does she censor "shit" in an article where she's talking about how it's okay for women to be sexually liberated and so on? That's not very mature. If you're going to swear, swear. If you don't want to, don't.

>>10556250
You're both going to be called faggots though. Just because something is allowed legally doesn't mean it's accepted socially

>>10556245
Why are there so many pictures of lolis with inner tubes?

>>10556227

Me in the blue shirt and cute shorts

http://michelelee.net/2011/09/24/dear-dc-comics/

This makes me sad.

Loli haet Starfire ;_;

>>10556263
I wanna be a loli.

>>10556255

I wanna be inner tubes

>>10556255
actually there aren't. at least not ones that i can post safely on the christian imageboards, and after filtering out the fake lolis.

>>10555944
>Social norms are a good thing

>>10556267
>lolis-at-work

>>10556251
she's cute and adorable, but still annoying.

>>10555944

This is what normies actually think.

>>10555944
>Social norms are a good thing.

??? did you misclick /soc/

>>10556274
>>10556282
>>10556286
I meant the idea of social norms, not the norms as they are now.

But hey, if you want real life to be Tumblr, go right ahead and vote liberal.

>>10556237
>http://www.comicsalliance.com/2011/09/22/starfire-catwoman-sex-superheroine/

>2498 Comments

Nothing like misogyny and slut-shaming to get the internet riled up.

>>10556267
me too.

they're cared for and loved, and they get to play and have lots of fun.

going through school again would suck though, but, can't have everything i guess.

>>10556289
>I meant the idea of social norms
That's still bad retard, social norms are just tools used to punish and oppress those who don't fit into the "power structure" of society.

>>10556293
If you had your way, we would devolve into a psuedo-anarchistic tumblr society, though, which is not actually any better.

>>10556289

>But hey, if you want real life to be Tumblr, go right ahead and vote liberal.

this argument tactic is literally called 'fear & ignorance'

it's a good title

>>10556293
But we have to have a cut-off somewhere, dork. Otherwise you'll have brony otherkin wandering your streets and it'll be considered politically incorrect (and probably illegal) to take fault with them.

>>10556298
>>10556300

>>>/pol/
>>>/stormfront/

No one is going to agree with you. You'll find better company in these places so just leave.

and here i thought posting on /jp/ was, in itself, socially abnormal.

>>10556282
Without social norms, everything you do would be considered normal.

>>10556292
I don't think going through school again would be so bad if I'd get to be a loli forever. A few years of your life are nothing if you get to live through the ages as a pretty little girl and wear pretty frilly dresses.

>>10556306

Wow, so things would be how they're supposed to?

That would be really swell, normie.

>>10556298
What exactly do you think "my way" is?
Because it seems like you're just putting words in my mouth.

>>10556299
But it's already happening. A few years ago, gender identity disorder was just another thing that didn't fit into social norms. Some people chose not to see it as a problem, however, and good for them.
Now transsexuals are one of the most annoying subcultures in the world, because there should be no social norms, gender doesn't exist, sexuality is a spectrum, race is a social construct, and all this other bullshit.

Social norms are descriptive. There isn't a shadowy cabal that decides "what's normal", it (mostly) happens organically, with the occasional Zionist/media influence. Liberals are asking us to tear that down and pretend there's no such thing as social norms, that we all find ponyfuckers perfectly normal or you're committing thoughtcrime.

>>10556310
I don't want to be normal.

>>10556315
So you want social norms to go against them?

>>10556314

>Now transsexuals are one of the most annoying subcultures in the world

says who? also, "otaku dorks" are some of the 'most annoying' people in the world to normies, for no clear reason other than "that's different and i therefore dislike it"

you are not going to be able to convince people who've had shit flung at them by social norms for years that social norms are a good thing. they are not, and are categorically the same as racism and homophobia and all that other bullshit that breeds weird superiority complexes

>>10556314
>Now transsexuals are one of the most annoying subcultures in the world, because there should be no social norms, gender doesn't exist, sexuality is a spectrum, race is a social construct, and all this other bullshit.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/XX_male_syndrome

Males can be born with XX and females can be born with XY. Gender is not the same as sex.

Every time something becomes acceptable by the normals it becomes shit.

The less they like the better

>>10556322
How else can I be a social outlaw?

>social norms are bad

/jp/ itself is only barely sustained by its ``social norms." They're everywhere and you can't avoid them, they can't inherently be a bad thing. Now quit being stupid.

>>10556314
All social norms should be torn down though, your still free to not like whatever you want. No one is telling you, you have to accept everyone. I don't care what anyone likes even if I don't like it.

>>10556326

>>10556313
indeed.

though how to sustain one's self throughout the ages? food, clothing, etc.

being provided for by rich gentlemen in exchange for sexual favors, perhaps? since over hundreds of years, even as a loli i think i might have needs other than food and drink and frilly dresses.

1. Pedophilia isn't just a sexual attraction. It's not a paraphilia and should get a new name.

2. The concept of schediophilia is retarded. Everyone can be attracted to drawings except brainwashed/ignorant people (which are sadly the majority).

3. /jp/ is full of pedos in denial that claim to be exclusive schediophiles.

>>10556322
Exactly. Having a dark socially unacceptable secret like being attracted to little girls breathes life into what would normally be a dull existence. If loli was considered normal then life would be dull and boring again.

Pretty sure the dude who's arguing that it's bad for things to be considered acceptable is Tokiko - the same /soc/ exdradite who spends eight hours per day shitting up NEET threads with the 'YOU CAN'T BE truNEET IF YOU RECEIVE WELFARE' shit because he just discovered Ayn Rand.

>>10556333
>/jp/ itself is only barely sustained by its ``social norms."
/jp/ is one of the most anti-normalfag boards on the site, which is why i come here.

this thread was going so well...

>>10556336

>>10556333

>They're everywhere and you can't avoid them, they can't inherently be a bad thing.

wha

this is like

holy heck, what an assertion

>>10556326
That's pretty hipster m8

>>10556313
You'd get bullied by other lolis.

>>10556336
Well I've always assumed if you become an immortal loli you're also a vampire, and vampires come with a complimentary mansion and vault full of cash.

Something being 'accepted' sometimes doesn't really get accepted at all. Take for example, being a 'gamer'. People don't accept the guy who spends most all his free time playing video games. No, they accept the guy who casually plays things like Team Fortress 2 on the weekends for an hour or two. Social norms will never accept those who invest serious time and effort into their hobbies, just the casual elements of it.

>>10556338
Hey you wouldn't have to live in hiding anymore, life wouldn't be so much more dull. I mean life doesn't exactly revolve around your sexual attraction to something.

>>10556338

You should really not be here if you think what we do is a 'dull existence' or 'boring.' Head back to whatever quagmire of shit extruded you.

>>10556333
>``
>"

It's `` and '', not `` and ". If you think this is just a meme and you don't understand the reason behind it, at least lurk more before using it.

>>10556343

maybe it was poorly worded. But society can't exist without "norms" and it's foolish to claim otherwise.

>>10556337
That's another thing, if it was accepted we wouldn't have so many people living in denial either.

>>10556338
Except being able to spend time with little girls without anyone wanting to kill you would be the opposite of boring.

>>10556347
not always. eva mcdowell didn't start off in a mansion, iirc

>>10556344
But it's true. Look at all the things normalfags have destroyed. Every time they get their hands on something they corrupt it.

>>10556353

The reason is that two-kike has been forcing it for over a year now.

>>10556353

make `me’　’

>>10556360
You're crushing my dreams, Anonymous.

>>10556352
The only reason it's so exciting is because you aren't supposed to do it.

>>10556360

>>10556349
>life doesn't exactly revolve around your sexual attraction
Normals think otherwise. A stereotypical fat pedophile thinks about sex 24/7.

>>10556355

yes i agree!! also man's blood will boil if they exceed 80 mph

>>10556362
They don't corrupt. They give it an ever-growing tumor.

It's still the same as it was, just there is a huge wad of cancer growing on it. Rarely will it ever completely engulf it before the topic dies or the tumor dies.

>>10556367

Thanks for telling me my thoughts for me, normie.

You can scuttle back to /soc/ any time you feel like it.

>>10556362
It's a lose/lose situation but the grass is greener on side because like someone said there wouldn't be as much hostility if it was acceptable to normals even if they will never really understand it and still hold up their really weird stereotypes that may change but still be as equally wrong.

>>10556368
My heart is as pure as the sun is hot.

slay the normalscum

>>10556353
>If you think this is just a meme

I think you should go back to /g/ where you can talk with other turbonerds why people should call it Gnu/Linux instead of Linux.

>>10556339
If you're talking about me, I'm not saying it's bad for things to be considered acceptable (and I'm not Tokiko).
I'm arguing for social norms. They're useful. You go to a wedding, you wear a black suit and tie. You don't turn up in a zoot suit and moon boots. Standards are a good thing.
Similar deal applies to sexuality, gender, race, etiquette, whatever. You can't just pretend these things don't matter in the name of "X is a spectrum" because that's not true in the world we live in. There's a reason so many cultures settle on similar ideas independently of each other.
The average human male will always be heterosexual, identify as male, and not want to fuck kids/trees/cartoons. The average human female will always be heterosexual, identify as female, and not want to fuck kids/trees/cartoons. Males will always be into more masculine things, females will always be into more feminine things. This is sexual dimorphism, not a social construct.

>>10556366
there, there, i'm sorry, i didn't mean to crush dreams...

here, have a loli butt. just imagine touching it and squeezing it and running your fingers beneath her panties...a nice dream of another kind.

>>10556374
Now you are just trolling.

>>10556353
>M-MUH MEMES

>>10556362
Normalfags don't destroy anything. The problem is that there are a shitload of normals everywhere and that gives them a lot of power.

Videogames have become shit because the greedy videogame companies are trying to appeal to the retarded normals.

They are still at fault for being so fucking retarded, though.

>>10556386

you are arguing that everything should stay the same because the status quo makes you feel comfortable and safe

it's the same thought process that religious people use

>>10556387
I would never do lewd things like that! Lolis are for cuddling and dressing up.

>>10556386
I don't give a shit about the norms that dictate what people wear or how they carry themselves.

But I have a closed door policy on sex. You like fucking dudes? I don't care and don't want to hear about it. You fap to pictures of rotting corpses? Hey thats great, but I don't want to hear about it.

I thought this word was seemingly too much like pedophilia and then I click on the thread and pedos are spamming it.

No thank you! This the wide tent approach. If you start calling everybody the term it gets deluded. I don't want to be grouped with pedophiles just because I like 2d.

>>10556387
What does her ass sweat **** like?

>>10556347
Why stop at a mansion? You could be a loli Dracula if you wanted.

>>10556363
He did ``this" thing first. I kept correcting him, he kept doing it. He probably didn't want to admit to being wrong, so he pretended it was ironic or whatever. Childish, but fair enough. Since then, other people have started doing it.
As for actual ``faggot quotes'', they go back years on /jp/ because they go back decades on the internet.

>>10556383
I don't think that and I don't see how these two things are that related.

>>10556390
Damn straight.

>>10556399
caramel

>>10556396

you have a closed door policy on sex that's different from how you do it

no one ever complain when some mouthbreaking tard makes inane comments about how much they love breasts, but you sure hate when them fags act gay around you!!

>>10556399
Heaven, or your respective religion's positive afterlife.

>>10556397
Oh stop denying yourself. You only like 2D my ass.

>>10556394
oh, woops. didn't know you stayed on the pure side of your loli love. images like this must be tough, then. a moment like this ought to be pure and innocent.

yes, pure and innocent.

>>10556391
As long as they're making money, they don't give two shits about their player base.

>>10556406
Elysium.

>>10556394
They are so cute, innocent and lovable that you eventually want to do lewd things with them. That's how pedophilia works, don't try to deny it.

By innocent I mean childish. Innocence can make you do cute things AND evil things (bullying, for example).

>>10556393
Nope, I'm basically arguing the same as >>10556396.

You can do whatever you want as long as it doesn't cause serious harm. Like men? Great. Have gender identity disorder? Fine. Want to have sex with cartoon ponies? Whatever.
All I ask is that you don't pretend these things are normal, and you don't be an obnoxious fucktard about it. It's not acceptable to take a shit in the middle of the street, it's not acceptable to be a flamboyant, attention seeking asshole.
If you're abnormal (and social norms will always exist), keep it to yourself. It's the difference between anime fans and KAWAII UGUU~ teenagers who wonder why they keep getting picked on.

>>10556405
Don't project on me nerd

I get just as grossed out when I see a man and woman making out in public. If you like sucking cocks thats great but don't get mad when people ask you to do it in private and not in the middle of a playground.

>>10556410
If anything, normalfags are incredibly easy to gauge. They're satisfied with the same rehashed crap every year (Call of Duty) despite the fact that there is literally nothing to it.

>>10556399
what does her ass sweat dick like?

what does her ass sweat shit like?

i dunno, your question doesn't make sense to me.

>>10556397
Lolicons are paedophiles you cuntlord.

>>10556396
That's fine, no matter what is and what isn't acceptable to normals I never just go around telling everyone in depth about all my sexual desires. But see what isn't acceptable you can hardly discuss anywhere at all.

>>10556397
You aren't a 2D pedophile? I am.

Still don't get why everyone hates that word. It's not like I'm a child molester.

>>10556413

how about this: i do what i want and you suck my dick

you are subscribing to a dying mentality and i'm not, so that's pretty good for me

>>10556417

ok? who cares

>>10556414

i'll do what i want, thx

>>10556415

>rehashed crap
>/jp/ - Otaku Culture

I think you must be lost

There should be no taboos.

I should be free to make out with my otherkin b/w wolf bf wherever I want and whatever I want.

>>10556421
Awesome mentality

So if someone decides to cum all over your door handle and kill your dog thats ok because "they're just bein themselfs!"

>>10556347
Claudia didn't have a mansion.

>>10556412
I'd like to think that I can resist the temptation.

Turn a normal thread into a paedophile haven, never change 4queers.

>>10556417
>>10556417

This.

Though the real problem rises when paedophiles are grouped up with active child molesters.

>>10556410
Why is the player base so goddamn retarded? Only a few of them notice the problem and the others just call them trolls or haters.

Nintendo fans are the worst.

>>10556430
i'm sure you can. but you won't have fun doing it.

>>10556426
Tom Cruise was hot in that movie.

>>10556429

sure, that's exactly what i said

>>10556428
omg are you a transethnic genderqueen polyamorous gluidsexual otherkin too?

>>10556434
EasyGameStation is Nintendo?

>>10556436
Too bad the sequel blew so hard.

>>10556430
I'm not saying that you can't.

In fact, spending so many years resisting it makes you way less "dangerous" than the average man. You have mastered the art of restraint.

>>10556417
Having difficulty telling reality and fiction apart, bitchface?

>>10556428
To be fair, the only reason sexual taboos exist is because of children.

I think we just need to get over the idea that we have to protect children from sex. Kids won't be traumatized if they're educated properly, they just won't give a shit.

I mean, why can't I have sex in public? Besides getting in the way of people, what's so wrong with it besides "people just have a problem with it"?

>>10556436
I wouldn't know, I never watched the adaptation, plus I would be more interested in Claudia's actress, whoever that was.

>>10556444
Fictional children are still children you queernozzle.

>>10556444
Pedophilia is attraction towards children, depictions of children, or things that are generally associated with children. It's one of the most general terms out there.

>>10556445

nothing but it probably won't change for a while

>>10556445

>the only reason sexual taboos exist is because of children.

sexual taboos exist because of the family unit.

>>10556444
I'm a heterosexual.

Pic related: it's the female I'm most attracted to.

>>10556450

The nerve of these fuckin' pedophiles... don't they understand that sex is traumatizing to pixels arranged so they resemble a fictional child?

>>10556435
Dressing them up is more fun than doing lewd things to them. Plus there are always slightly older girls for the nastier things.

>>10556431
yep. it's a pastime.

>>10556413
Even gays can tell their parents about their abnormality. Why do my parents have to be brainwashed?

Not being able to talk about it with anybody is stressful.

>>10556445
Because you're infringing on other peoples right to not vomit after seeing a gay neckbeard orgy in front of a walmart.

>>10556445
I pray you're being ironic but in case you're not, it's not so much about the taboo but the fact that children can't consent to sex and aren't physically built for sex.

>>10556445
I honestly don't care, people can make out in public all they and even have sex but just don't get in my way. There really is nothing wrong it, it's that people attach this weird sort of meaning to sex like it's sacred.

>>10556417
>>10556420
>>10556407
Don't group me with you. Like I said, this is the wide tent approach. Lolicon or pedophile is too specific so now you're trying to include everyone else with you.

I definitely do not identity as a lolicon or want to be grouped with people who do. I don't mind people who jerk to underage material, but any self-identified lolicon is gross. All obsessive about underage and shit. kimoi.

>>10556461
Go back to /a/ with that shit, please.

>>10556459
Why do you have to talk about everything? Why do you want everyone in on your business? Are you an attentionwhore?

I get off on the thought of eating people but I don't fucking hand out fliers letting everyone know.

running short of lolis with flotation devices, so have a fake loli with a flotation device.

>>10556457
that's not what i mean. the resisting is what won't be fun. dressing them up though -- yes, always fun.

>>10556459
Go back to /spc/ if you want to talk about feelings you queer.

>>10556464
I knew I probably shouldn't have used the phrase "protect children from sex.".

I mean from knowledge or depictions of sex. There could still be an age limit, or kids could be taught the truth: sex will hurt until they're older, so it's probably better to wait.

>>10556467

Go back to /soc/ with your shit. Thanks.

>>10556476
Only /a/ is retarded to pull the fictional children argument.

>>10556469

>Why do you have to talk about everything? Why do you want everyone in on your business? Are you an attentionwhore?

uh, not everyone is you, you gigantic child

some people are bothered by the entire world hating them irrationally for something which is objectively harmless

>>10556480
No one cares, crybaby. Real /jp/sies embrace their socially ostracized behavior, stop whining and accept that you don't and will never fit into social norms.

>>10556465
I attach that weird meaning to sex. Not for religious or metaphysical reasons, but because it is an emotional act for me. It's like kissing. I wouldn't kiss a stranger, it has to be someone I have feelings for. But if other people want to, they can go ahead. If you want to be a prostitute, a porn star, a player, a slut, whatever, go for it. Have sex in public and treat it like it's nothing. As long as I still have the right to see sex my way, you can have sex your way.

>>10556473

>>>/pol/

How's living in the past? Pretty shitty, right?

why so many clothes in the water, fate-chan?

>>10556466
yay! i'm gross!

>>10556464
>aren't physically built for sex
Sex isn't penetration, you fucking retard. You can just lick her pussy.

>>10556479

Only /soc/ is retarded enough to think drawings have feelings.

>>10556483

Woah, high-level troll here. You've megarustled some fuggin jimmies, bro.

>>10556494
Holy shit you're obnoxious, please stop posting.

>>10556492
Nothing but penetration counts as sex faglord.

i'm getting hungry. maybe i should break for lunch.

>>10556464

>children can't consent to sex

Why?

>>10556497
I'll miss you.

>>10556492
Does this feel good for little girls?

If so, I don't get why pedophiliac sex is so taboo. A lot of adults have an "if it feels good, do it" approach to sex. I don't agree, but they're within their rights to think that. It's a double standard that this can't apply to kids. Children like feeling good too!

>>10556484
That's ok, I know what you mean and I believe you there. Should've worded that differently.

>>10556498
Because they don't understand what sex and feelings of attraction are. Keep in mind when I say children I'm including the 11 and under range.

I never thought some people on /jp/ would yearn to be "socially accepted" so badly

>>10556483
I'm not comfortable around my family if I have to lie to them. Especially if need to lie in order to protect my whole life.

>>10556498
Social and legal brainwashing.

>>10556499
gee, thanks.

i'll miss you too.

>>10556500
Children's sex organs aren't developed enough, orgasm would be near impossible to achieve.

>>10556510
Why do you need to lie? Sexual shit should be private anyway, you're never going to be able to have a healthy relationship with a child anyway so you might as well give up and live in secret forever.

>>10556502

Uh, that's a really retarded generalization. How do you know what all 10-year-olds on the planet understand?

>>10556504
I don't. I just want to be left alone man. Mission accomplished!

>>10556492
That could cause untold psychological trauma due to doing something like that at such a tender age.

>>10556508

Got a source?

>>10556479
Wait, they aren't real children, so no one is getting hurt so it shouldn't count as child molestation. Unless someone used the fictional excuse as a way of saying they're not a paedophile, then that's just denial.

>>10556502
I know sexual consent has a specific meaning which is why children can't consent (even though they can obviously say the words "I give you permission to have sex with me"), but
>Because they don't understand what sex and feelings of attraction are.
how is this a reason?

Again, I know it's a different kind of consent, but I can give my consent to a scam. I got signed up for some movie website by street peddlers even though I had no idea what it was.

Can't you just educate kids? It's not like you "learn" anything new simply by going through puberty. A child might not explain why sex feels good or whatever, but I'm sure you could explain it to them.

>>10556484
Why can't I have feelings for children? Why does everyone assume and I just want to use them as objects and WILL do it?

>>10556507

>>10556485
Liberalism is not the future, it is a childlike regression when confronted by reality.

Can we be /jp/ - Little girl Culture, yet?

>>10556512
It's a really creepy generalization to suggest that 10 year olds fully understand and pursue sex.

>>10556508
>orgasm would be near impossible to achieve

Oh we'll just see about that.

>>10556522
Yeah.

>>10556515

Why?

>>10556500
It can, everyone likes different things. Like someone said sex isn't just penetration. I'm actually not into penetration at all.

>>10556519
Because social norms say it's creepy and it's unlikely to ever change.

>>10556519
Because overlooking red flags is what causes rape cases to occur. If everyone is suspicious of you all the time, you are less likely to commit crimes. Encouraging people to stay in their rooms is always a good thing, right?

>>10556239
This is why psychology is bullshit. They make everything a "disorder" even if it's perfectly normal, while ignoring actual disorders like sexism and homophobia.

>>10556508
How can you seriously believe that? I hope you are trolling.

>>10556524
Why would you want all this anyway? Children aren't going to be able to healthily conceive a child, laws are never going to change because one sub-group of people want to have sex with children with out valid reasons to violate social norms.

>>10556531
>orgasm

>>10556538
Sexual organ development doesn't start until puberty, you are really fucking creepy and I hope one day you remove yourself from this world prematurely.

>>10556526
Introducing a child to sex will cause them to go out and seek sex on their own. Then the child will get pregnant at as a teenager and get all sorts of STDs.

>>10556519
You can.

Homosexual romances used to be taboo and stigmatized in a similar way. I guess we can just hope for a Lolita 2.0 with some slightly more narrow themes. e.g. some European film about a man who falls in love with a little girl and it's fine. Then everyone gets upset, but it receives critical acclaim and twenty years from now we'll look back on it as one of the key things that started the pedosexuality acceptance movement.

>>10556525

It was smart of you to duck the question and submit a strawman to represent me, because there's no way to answer it without destroying your own argument. Good call, dude.

Here's the facts: no one said that all 10-year-olds understand sex, but that all mentally healthy 10-year-olds are capable of understanding sex, and thus capable of giving consent. Most 10-year-olds don't currently know what sex is because they're not allowed to. All of an age-group doesn't need to understand sex to be able to morally consent, either: 18-year-olds the world over can consent to sex, yet there are certainly very sheltered 18-year-olds who don't even know what sex is. We tailor our morals to the masses and not the exceptions.

>>10556522
/jp/ is so many things that it just can't be defined anymore. The userbase defines it so little girl threads are part of it. We even have food threads here now. The topics are all over the place.

>>10556516
I feel angry everytime I have to pretend that I find some adult model attractive. WHY do I have to lie about it? What is the point? It's irrational, nonsensical and makes me want to punch someone.

>>10556548
This will never happen because homosexual relationships cause no harm mentally or physically.

>>10556551
You're forgetting the part where 18 year olds can give child birth without dying or permanently damaging their bodies.

>>10556546

It's pretty funny how normies get frustrated and just start hurling insults when you back them into a corner with their shitty arguments.

>>10556548
Did you forget Lolita was a tragedy?

>>10556535
It's not normal socially. "Normal" is used in the statistical sense of the word, not in the "not weird" sense of the word (though there's obviously some overlap depending on how much of a jerk you are).

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_norms

Think about the etymology of the word "disorder". Dis-order. It's like "abnormal", which unfortunately has also come to mean "weird".

>>10556556

Neither does sex with children, as long as the social stigma is removed. The whole world telling someone they've been abused makes them feel abused even if no harm underwent them.

>>10556556
It harms me when queers get their germs on me.

>>10556555
You could just say she isn't your type. It would be true and not reveal yourself as a pedophile.

>>10556568

See >>10556569

>>10556564
No you retard, children's bodies aren't built to have sex with adult males. You will cause horrible damage to their reproductive organs and likely psychologically damage them for life.

>>10556562

This is the future, sweetie. We can have sex without having children, or even penetrating at all.

>>10556556
Assuming you mean among men, they have a higher chance of spreading sexual disease. Lesbianism actually has less of a chance, but they still can't get pregnant.

>>10556573
How is this a counter point? You're not covering the psychological damage at all.

>>10556535
I hate homophobia (those faggot traitors deserve it, though), but I don't think it's a disorder. It's just a opinion based on prejudices.

The same with pedophobia.

>>10556578

See >>10556564

>>10556555
I just pretend I'm not attracted to anything and save myself the pain of hating myself so much for lying like that but I think it's also a miracle in a way that I also happen to like some guys around my age.

>>10556556
Plenty do, I've seen it happen. Similarly, I don't think a harmless, loving pedophile relationship is impossible, though I'll admit it's less likely than among consenting adults.

>>10556561
That's what I meant by narrower themes. Maybe I'm wrong, but the novel never really struck me as pro-pedo or anything. Everyone went full normalfag in the end.
I mean something more happy, or at least a straightforward romantic tragedy. Like gay romance movies or Titanic.

>>10556569
Like [holding hands]spoiler[/holding hands]?

>>10556587
So never?

/jp/ has better pedophilia discussions when it's not full of a bunch of dogmatic retards on both sides

>>10556579
A fictional proposition for the future doesn't mean anything. That is never going to happen because social norms have demonized paedophilia for time immemorial and it's not going to change in any of our lifetimes.

>>10556587
How is it a discussion if it's just creepy neckbeards talking about how smooth X fictional character's legs are?

>>10556547
"Introducing a child to violent videogames will cause them to become murderers".

>>10556587

Why would you ever argue any other way except from dogma? It just makes your argument sound weak, like you only half-believe in it, and nobody takes you seriously.

>>10556583
Now now, let's not get carried away.

>>10556591
>>10556592

>>10556592

Why are you still here instead of back on SomethingAwful if you hate it so much? I mean, nobody's gonna make you stay, d00d.

>>10556594
If I had super powers, I would probably become Big Boss. That's about as close as that gets, though.

Would you lick Cirno's legs?

>>10556548
>Lolita 2.0
The protagonist was an obsessive sick fuck. Why didn't the author create a normal pedophile instead of him? I guess the author was another brainwashed moralfag.

>>10556587
The thread got really lucky today.

>>10556587
Some discussion. Kiddie fiddlers who wank to pictures drawn by Japanese men are on high horses insulting homosexuals. In prison pedophiles get beat and raped by other men. At least homosexuals aren't bottom of the rung.

>>10556602
Yeah just pull the goon card whenever someone insults your precious little paedo pride.

>>10556546
>girls don't have vaginas and boys don't have penises until they're a certain age

wut

I think pedos are weird, but this is just stupid.

>>10556605
Would my tongue get stuck like in A Christmas Story?

>>10556581
Even if it had Nabokov's writing (which is hard enough to get since he's a literary giant), having a happy end where HH and Dolly enter into a loving relationship while she was still a child would have made Lolita much less successful.

>>10556610

+1 upvote, I will be personally contacting lowtax and asking him to goldmine this post

>>10556535
>>10556585
There are disorders that can account for these things, though.

http://youtu.be/FqK2ILCq-do?t=1h14m10s
Here's a racist woman who clearly has problems. She doesn't hate blacks because of some scientific reason, she's delusional and a little paranoid.

>>10556611
Development doesn't refer to its existence.

>>10556615

I don't think he cares about its financial success. Please remember that not everyone here is a Jew.

>>10556594
Introducing a child to violence does make them violent. I mean actual violence, like beating them up. Much like the argument was actually having sex with the child.

>>10556591

no, I've seen better discussions that don't just boil down to a handful of people split between "our current views on human sexuality are perfect and without flaw" and "why can't I fuck any child I want at any time?"

>>10556562
You are forgetting the part where 10 year olds can feel the pleasure of being cummed inside without getting pregnant.

Except in America, that is.

>>10556602
I can browse both, nothings keeping me from leaving either.

>>10556614
Possibly.

>>10556607

no this thread is a hot stupid mess.

>>10556626
Still yes.

>>10556623

He's not going to respond to you because he has no response. He'll just bite his fingers and move onto the next post, so give it up.

>>10556567
Why can't I just say the truth? Why can't I take it easy? Why do I have to be careful with my words? It shouldn't be like that.

>>10556619
I don't just mean financial-wise. Lolita is considered one the best written erotica ever.

>>10556629
No I just don't see the point in replying anymore when I derailed this thread into oblivion already.

>>10556621

>"why can't I fuck any child I want at any time?"

Uh, no one's argument 'boils down' to this. Maybe if you're too stupid to follow them and just try to make up your own meaning it looks like this.

>>10556634

You hate pedophiles, but you derailed a pedophile hair thread?

It's a good try. The actual reason is you're unable to defend your horrendously retarded views.

>>10556640
I thought this was a pedophile raft thread.

>>10556623
They didn't touch kids until they were like 14 or so. You guys always try and lower the age to like toddler level. Stop bullshitting so much, kay. By the time they touched them half of you tards would be talking about "TOO OLD, ONLY 9 YEARS OLD!"

Also, they married them and had ongoing relationship from those ages until adulthood. You guys just want to pump and dump juveniles. Totally different context than what you're trying to compare it to. You're jobless without a future, you aren't getting married to a 14 year old looking to groom her to raise a family.

>>10556640

Pedophile hair thread, lal

>>10556617
How is that different? She hates blacks because she is ignorant and thinks they are "this" or "that". It's still just an opinion based on prejudices and ignorance.

Are pedophobes mentally ill?

>>10556640
This is a paedo pride thread no matter how you look at it.

>>10556643
Pedophile floatation device thread.

>>10556649
>pedophobe
That means fear of children, not fear of pedophiles.

>>10556643
>pedophile raft

This should be a reality show.

>>10556643
Yeah.

>>10556643
I'm sick of all you goddamn paedo ship freaks, rafts are just as viable as a sea vessel.

>>10556662
Wow, you're a fucking nerd.

>>10556662
Actually it means fear of feet, padophobe means fear of children.

>>10556643
Yeah we should be defending the raft-sexuals too, I mean they NEVER get any attention and it's even worse because everyone just thinks they're insane. Think of the raft lovers.

>>10556665
Wrong, podophobia is fear of feet.

>>10556666
As a shipfag I think you guys are freaks of nature ans should capsize yourselves immediately.

>>10556635

'uhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh,' no. On top of having the most obnoxious way of typing and arguing, you and the pedos in this thread are retards that have no idea of how the real world works. There is a valid point to be made about how we deal with child sexuality and you are not making it.

>>10556609
Normalfag detected. I think Roddit is more your style, fuck off there and never return.

>>10556670
capsize THIS
*whips out water wings*

>>10556673
Wrong, latin is dead #YOLO bitch,

>>10556677
Yeah dude, you only yolo once.

>>10556649
What she says about other races and her view of them and how they're "distorted" people isn't ignorance or a simple opinion, it's genuinely believing something that makes no sense in the real world. It's like when people think they're being persecuted by CIA agents with mind control devices or whatever.

If she was a scientific racist or a racial realist, then I wouldn't think she's mentally ill. But that's clearly not the case.

Pedophobes don't necessarily have anything wrong with their mind, it's just the way they've been taught. Racists and homophobes in the 18th century didn't have a mental disorder, because that was the social norm of the day, and they'd been taught that way just as people were once taught the Sun orbits the Earth.

Of course, the people who take it too far might have mental problems. For example, some people just want to watch the world burn. If it wasn't pedos, it would be Muslims, women, or dogs.

>>10556675
Ruddit loves pedos dude, where have you been?

>>10556656
What the fuck are you talking about? I was just implying that puberty hits sooner in America because they eat shitty meat with hormones.

>>10556666
http://objectum-sexuality.org/

>>10556670
Ships are a common target of objectum sexuality, for some reason.

>>10556677
You only love onii-chan.

>>10556683
He's talking about the political correctness of the stark majority of users, not the minority that makes tons of pedo subroddits.

>>10556687
It must be because of the small god of the ship.

>>10556683
http://web.archive.org/web/20130118054305/http://forums.somethingawful.com/showthread.php?threadid=3466025

Something Awful owned those fuckers.

>>10556682
What about soccer moms that see pedophiles at every corner? What about brainwashed people?

>>10556682
I'm a pedo and sometimes I just want to watch the world burn.

>>10556696
>owned
yeah dude le ebin win :)
+1 upvote

>>10556696
You can view threads with the wayback machine? I want my 10 bux for archives back lowjew.

>>10556701
Please do not poopost I beg ya.

Do you want to be my loli tomodachi, /jp/? Suicide is optional.

>>10556710
Yes, but only if you promise to pet me.

>>10556710
We can dress up like princesses and have tea parties and sleep over at each other's houses and go to the mall and paint our nails.

>>10556716
Do we have the same penis size?

>>10556716
>>10556722
I'm pretty sure he is talking about this:

http://depositfiles.com/files/v3q9xnrmj

>>10556724
Yes, if you have a 3 inch cock (hard).

>>10556722
I'd rather rent a van.

>>10556731
I'm aware of that, I have that on my HDD. I'm still playing along my way.

>>10556722
I think he means this kind.

>>10556731
>>10556735
>>10556739
O-oh. No thank you then.

>>10556731
That was a good comic.

>>10556737
Oh, I am sorry then.

I actually like your vision of loli tomodachi better than the original rape spree bromance.

>>10556742
It's a masterpiece.

>>10556671

Is this the sound of a furious goon leaving the thread in a huff?

>>10556756
No, I'm still here.

>>10556739
This made me think. Would you have sex with a kid if you were diagnosed with an incurable illness or planning to kill yourself? Would it be rape, which is fun and deliciously humiliating, or loving consensual sex?

In the case that you didn't have any kind of mortal illness, would you still do it after hitting 80? Or would you just leave this Earth forever without experiencing such a wonderful thing?

>>10556789
Just because I'm dying doesn't mean I should commit unforgivable crimes.

>>10556521
I thought thats what we did on /jp/

>>10556800
>unforgivable crimes

Is /jp/ being raided by normals?

>>10556898
I think he's trying to trick you.

>>10556911
I can't be a master ruseman if you keep exposing me.

>>10556929
soz

Good thread guys.

I think it is all about using the brain though. You can either remain an idiot and do what everyone else says, or you can think things through.

I still remember the day I was scrolling past loli saying to myself "Can't look at these, they are bad." and just stopped to think "Why are they bad again?". Only answer I found was "Someone said it was bad", which I decided to not accept as a valid reason.

>>10557027
Wow, were you really that brainwashed back then?

I don't know how that feels, I've been against all this demonization clusterfuck since I was fucking 11.

>>10557084
Wow you were such an edgy teen.

>>10557027
>I still remember the day I was scrolling past loli saying to myself "Can't look at these, they are bad."
for me it was more visceral. i remember being repulsed by loli a few years ago. and it was more of an experimentation thing when i first began to toy with the idea that maybe it could become fap material for me. made all the more alluring because it was "forbidden" or "bad".