/jp/ - Otaku Culture

>>10511576
epic greentext story epic wiiiin epic wiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiin

KO NEKO TACHI!!!

>>10511576
Credit card info, bank statements, medical details, things that anyone would have and are none of the fucking business of anyone else.

If you have a job, you can also say "company documents" and so on.

Are you still butthurt from the thread yesterday? All truNEETs use truCRYPT.

>>10511576

The only people who complain about "nothing to hide, nothing to fear" are people who have something to hide.

I'd gladly let my dad use my computer because I'm not a paedo.

nipah

>>10511576
Tell him that loving children isn't a crime.

>>10511576
"Because I don't want anyone seeing my porn. Duh."

>>10511600
>The only people who complain about "nothing to hide, nothing to fear" are people who have something to hide.

That is some stellar logic, sonny.

>He asks me why i use encryption if i have nothing to hide?

>>10511611
Then give me one good reason why an innocent, law-abiding citizen would have anything to fear. A real reason, not an emotional or "it's the principle of the thing" reason, i.e. not "It's creepy!" or "It violates my privacy!"

Also keep in mind whenever this issue comes up, it's "invasive" for a useful reason, so can your arguments about cameras recording people naked or whatever.

"Dad, you'll understand when your older"

>>10511622
>so can your arguments about cameras recording people naked or whatever.
what do you have to hide?

>>10511628
Nothing but my misshapen penis.

However, if it was for a real reason, e.g. terrorists were carrying penis bombs and the police wanted to inspect people to help save innocent lives, then that would be for a real reason and I would be fine with it.

>>10511628
Nothing. HEH HEH HEH

>>>/g/

Saved personal info / in case it's stolen.

>>10511637
So the government should be able to search and detain anyone they call a terrorist?

>>10511622
> it's "invasive" for a useful reason

Who defines "useful"? The government?

>>10511637
i'm a federal penis investigator
post a picture of your penis so i can see if there are any nuclear weapons in there

>>10511606

/thread/

also, if he insist, ask him what he would do if he were to show his porn to her mother or father.

>>10511641
Here I'm working under the assumption they were being honest and trustworthy. In practice that's not always the case, obviously.

In OP's case his dad just wants to use his computer. If OP isn't a paedo, a pirate, or a terrorist, he would just hand his laptop over and not use encryption. Since he is at least one of those things, he won't. He has something to hide, he has something to fear. If he didn't have something to hide, he would have nothing to fear.

The argument people should be going for is, "Yes, if you have nothing to hide, then you have nothing to fear. However, I have something to hide." At least admit to being a criminal or a weirdo.

>>10511655
>Here I'm working under the assumption they were being honest and trustworthy.

Plenty of non pedos enjoy cheesey pizza though.

>>10511646
Show me your biometric ID card to confirm your identity. Oh wait, privacy nuts hate those too, even though they're super useful. I guess the big bad government is going to track you down even though you have "nothing to hide"!

>>10511647
I'm not a philosopher or a lawyer, so I don't know. But there is some common ground, e.g. 99.9% of people don't want murders to happen. It's like asking who gets to decide what's "legal" or "illegal". There is always going to be some disagreement, but overall laws are A Good Thing.

>>10511653
Maybe his dad doesn't collect porn?

>>10511667
You're the government's bitch, please kill yourself back to raddit. Nobody has the right to view what's on my computer except for me.

>>10511667
whatever, you pedo
you probably have your dick in an underaged girl anyway
sent the cops to your house

>>10511667
It's be useful if we all hand tracking chips implanted at birth, I'm guessing you support that as well?

Get out freedom-hater.

>>10511667

/pol/ would love you.

>>10511669
Damn straight bro.

>>10511669
Riddit fancy themselves to be super liberal. They oppose every sort of scheme like this, because "Fuck the government! 'govments should serve their ppl not the other way around' - Anonymous from Watchmen".

Law enforcement does have that right if they have a warrant, which is fair enough. If you read in some history book that the police raided a gangster's house and read his (paper) files, you wouldn't bat an eyelid or pay any mind to his privacy, because that's just the intuitive thing that would happen. For some reason people get all tetchy when it comes to electronic data.

>>10511667

> Implying there hasnt been a false conviction that sent an innocent person to jail

A system based around a bunch of peoples feelings is the best way to judge someones innocence.

>>10511688
I like how we complain about tyranny in a world where people used to getanarm hacked off for bumping into a samurai and a knight could rape whoever he wanted as could any relation of his.

If anybody took a fucking moment to think about it, society is basically as free as it's ever going to get and freedom at the expense of everything else is just ignorance.

Hey shitheads go back to /pol/

>>10511697
> society is basically as free as it's ever going to get

But that's objectively wrong. The government micro-manages every aspect of our lives nowadays. Sure, a monarch had supreme power, but you were pretty much left on your own as long as you didn't cause a ruckus.

>>10511667
>but overall laws are A Good Thing
Ah, you have seen the light son of man. Law is always right.

>>10511706
>>10511667
I bet you guys also think the janitor was a positive addition to /jp/?

>>10511701
Medieval peasants literally were not allowed to leave the land they worked on. If their lord demanded it, they would have to fight and die for him. Killing peasants was barely a crime (although it was economically stupid).

Today you can go anywhere you like.

>>10511709
only CP posters complain about janitors

>>10511701
that same moarchy reserved the right to slaughter you whenever just because fuck you. anyone remember william wallace?

>>10511706
laws are predetermined standards for what bevaiour will be accepted by a society so if you want to bitch about it why not live with wolves or flee to North Africa or something?

>>10511709
Stop fooling yourself, Son of Man. You know you wish to join the true side.

>>10511600
That's stupid logic. I have plenty of embarrassing fetishes that are perfectly legal, and that's no one's business but my own.

>>10511717
>I have plenty of embarrassing fetishes that are perfectly legal
they damn well should be illegal

>>10511716
>if you want to bitch about it
I was not "bitching", son of man. I was agreeing with you, it is His will that the world be lawful. May the blessings of YHVH be with you.

No fetish should ever be illegal.
When will humans ever free themselves?

>>10511725
god damn it this isn't dungeons and dragons right now /tg/ stop goofing off and argue like a normal person.

or would you like a translation?
I just rolled a 20 on my shut the fuck up and quit calling me things that I don't even understand well enough to be offended by attack. I rolled a dozen more 20's after that and then a 19.

ask him why he needs a car if theres public transportation

>>10511735
My fine servant metatron is not from this "Dungeons and dragons" you speak of, son of man. And I am proud of you for being lawful, remember law is always the right path son of man.

>>10511745
I just invented a law where you have to suck my dick until I say you can stop.

Better get started son of 2 men (Because they're gay (lol))