/jp/ - Otaku Culture

that face pisses me off

Okay.

I wouldn't love her if she wasn't a virgin. I can tell without even asking though, so this whole story is ruined from the start.

>>10327706
No it doesn't.

>>10327706
It reminds me of THAT image.

>>10327712
Keep up the good work.

>>10327713
Why does it bother you that a woman is sexually experienced? Who are you to tell her that she's a slut based on subjective cultural norms?

I really want to watch Nekomonogatari, but I don't have a PC that can actually play MKV's anymore.

Alas, such is the life of a broke NEET.

>>10327714
Stop posting that image.

I'm not capable of love....

>>10327717
>>>/cgl/

I could not be with a girl if she had done anything sexual with another person at any point in her life.

>>10327726
>being this insecure

What's the matter, afraid you wouldn't be able to please her as well as the Football captain?

>>10327727
Fuck off, neurotypical. Enjoy your whores.

I was going to watch this, but I have to be in the perfect mood and it has to be the perfect temperature in my room for me to watch something or else I will be frustrated and it will ruin my viewing experience.

So I have to wait.

I would still love her as long as she didn't lost her virginity to a man. A dog, another girl, a dildo, anything is fine except a male.

>>10327732
>whore

You mean sexually experience woman who knows how to please a man?

>>10327720

>>10327726
Also being raped would count against her if it was her fault, like if she went to a bar and got drunk or dressed like a slut. If it wasn't her fault I could probably get over it.

>>10327735
Those are whores, yes.

Holy shit this thread got a lot of posts really quickly, whats going on here.

>>10327717
It is absolutely disgusting to imagine that a girl who is trying to gain my affection has had intercourse before.

I would not tell her shes a slut, I would cut off all contact with her and for her sake I hope she gets the message.

>>10327739
Why is being a sexually experienced woman who can please you sexually a bad thing? The only reason would be if you're insecure and afraid you wouldn't measure up. Poor baby.

>>10327749
See >>10327732

>>10327746
The trick is making a thread then telling all your friends you made a thread.

>>10327753
But that wouldn't get me any posts.

>>10327751
That's not a response, it's a dodge because you know I'm right, little guy.

>>10327756
Please stop shitposting, okay? Thanks.

>>10327753
Apparently, this thread would never have gotten this many replies this quickly otherwise. Probably would have been mostly ignored maybe two or three posts in the same amount of time.

>>10327702
Unsurprised?
I mean, we're pretty old.

>>10327760
I'll take that as an admission of defeat, sport. I hope you get some self-confidence and stop being such a sad little boy.

franly i would be enough to me to know how being in love is like

hell ill be nice to discover i can feel that emotion

I would ask her to take the lead and request that she patiently tutor me in the ways of debauchery.
I'll promise to make it worth her time!

>>10327767
I'm sorry that you think damaged goods, used up whores are good enough for you. Some people don't have such low standards.

>>10327776
>I'm sorry that you think damaged goods, used up whores are good enough for you.

Those are some mighty cute /a/ buzzwords kiddo. I must have missed the part where you explain why a woman with the ability to please you more thoroughly sexually is a bad thing.

You'll probably respond with another childish insult or avoid answering, because deep down you're just a scared, small man who knows he would never measure up.

I'd tell her to take her STD-ridden ass back to /cgl/.

>>10327776
>>>/r9k/

Why do we need to judge everyone else's choice in women on this board

This is not taking it easy

>>10327812
cool meme, i only just heard it on /jp/s official song too!

This lady went a whole year without sex.

Could you, /jp/?

wow, people are actually taking this thread seriously. I just wanted to post -monogatari girls.

>>10327793
I'm sorry but if you don't think a woman who has sexually interacted with a person other than her (1) husband is a whore, you are wrong. I don't understand why you normals are so invested in making people accept whores. Just get over and realize not everyone is as morally disgusting as yourself.

>>10327793
>I must have missed the part where you explain why a woman with the ability to please you more thoroughly sexually is a bad thing.
The quality of sex should not be a factor when considering if you LOVE someone or not.

I can understand having sex with someone you are in love with and deeply committed to. I can even understand doing it before marriage (in the past, couples got married super quick whereas now they remain in relationships for years).

What I don't understand is how you can go from being in such a relationship to being with me. If the circumstances were any different (i.e. you are a slut) then I wouldn't be interested in you to begin with.

I guess if her boyfriend died or something, then it's okay.

I don't like girls

fuck her w/o condom and then tell her that you have AIDS

>>10327825
back to /a/, please.

Having flags in /jp/ would clear up a lot of outrageous statements in this thread

>>10327827
Sex is a part of love, just like kissing. Grow up.

>>10327825
that is a lie

>>10327749
>>10327756
>>10327767
>>10327793
Sounds to me like you're just mad that your wife or girlfriend or whatever it may be is a slut. That some other man deflowered her and she's had other cocks shoved in her over and over. I'd be mad, too, you know, but it's your fault for ending up in such a situation. Don't try to delude others into making the same mistake.

you discovered ur fater was a women?!??!?!?

>>10327838
elaborate please

>>10327823
>I'm sorry but you are wrong.

Wow, that was a very compelling argument!

> I don't understand why you normals

Very good, try even harder to establish the us vs them dynamic.

>Just get over and realize not everyone is as morally disgusting as yourself.

You've failed to explain why sexual intercourse is disgusting. The obvious answer is that you're scared that if she has had other boyfriends, that she'd compare you to them.

Aside from the people condemning this thread, is there anyone from /jp/ even in here?

>>10327827
>The quality of sex should not be a factor when considering if you LOVE someone or not.

You could say the same thing about the number of sexual partners. Who's being judgmental now?

>>10327847
>You've failed to explain why sexual intercourse is disgusting. The obvious answer is that you're scared that if she has had other boyfriends, that she'd compare you to them.

Can someone counter this? I really can't think of any other reason.

>>10327717
>Why does it bother you that a woman is sexually experienced?
Why wouldn't it bother you? If anything it's outright stupid not to be.

So she has had relations with other men. Why aren't she in stable relations with said men now? Sex is never just sex, that's not how biochemistry works. Sex bonds relation, imprints that lasts, fester, and grows.

To have had previous sexual relations with others, and yet not be in a stable relationship, sets off all kinds of warning bells. To not be bothered by the revelation would be hint at one being inept for failing to follow the logic surrounding the very idea.

That said, if I was truly in love, I wouldn't give up so soon. But it would indeed be bothersome and far from something desirable.

>>10327855
>Sex bonds relation, imprints that lasts, fester, and grows.

Someone has been reading too many romance novels.

>>10327702
I'd tell her it's alright because I am still pure for her.

>>10327857
I'm from /wsg/.

>>10327855
>To have had previous sexual relations with others, and yet not be in a stable relationship, sets off all kinds of warning bells.

To be over the age of 18 (I know, this is /jp/ etc.) and to NOT have had previous sexual relations sets off all kinds of warning bells. Is there something wrong with her?

>>10327839
So basically you're afraid that the fact that she was in an unsuccessful relationship might mean yours might turn sour too.

Insecurity it is.

Leaving aside the fact that it's a ridiculously childish mentality, what if she fell in love with someone who lied to her and pretended to be a good guy, but instead cheated with other women and dumped her in the end?

Do you think she should love him still?

>>10327846
We would see which ones are muslims and which ones are liberals

>>10327859
No man, he used the word "biochemistry". That makes it science.