[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/jp/ - Otaku Culture


View post   

>> No.17680897 [View]

Use this as OP pic.

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DKjYa9NVoAAGniY.jpg:orig

>> No.17680899 [View]

>>17680894
have you asked in irc? sent Hiroyuki a dm on twitter?

>> No.17680900 [View]

>>17680894
Where's the proof of that? We've had Team 8 threads in the past and there's currently a Sakamichi general. It doesn't break the rules if people are interested in one.

>> No.17680903 [View]

>>17680900
>We've had Team 8 threads
I got a soft ban for that one.

>> No.17680907 [View]

As someone who mainly follows two sister groups, it would be great to have separate threads and it would save me having to scroll through so much crap that I don't care about.

>> No.17680909 [View]

>>17680907
As someone who follows all sister groups it would be terrible to have six threads that all move terribly slow open at all times.

>> No.17680912 [View]

Where do we post if there's an event then?

>> No.17680913 [View]

>>17680903
Neither thread on /jp/ were deleted and they both lasted a long time (Aug 22 - Sep 6 & Sep 19 - Oct 12). I think there was also a Team 8 general on another board for a while.

>> No.17680914 [View]

>>17680909
nmb, hkt and stu ones would be almost empty and would load fast

>> No.17680915 [View]

>>17680909
>>17680912
No one has suggested that this thread should be replaced.

>> No.17680916 [View]

>>17680900
To be fair the Sakamichi threads had been deleted for a while. It took time for the mods to give up and let it actually exist.

>> No.17680917 [View]

>>17680913
mine got deleted within 20 minutes for being 'offtopic'

>> No.17680919 [View]

>>17680916
The sakamichi threads were also reported almost every time for years

>> No.17680920 [View]

>>17680916
I think (some of) the ones that got deleted were made with malicious intent.

>> No.17680921 [View]

What a stupid idea, this thread is already slow and there's hardly any bickering like there was with 46/48, except for the occasional Team 8 outburst and even that is rare these days. There's no reason to split.

>> No.17680922 [View]

>>17680865
because 2hou and /alt always report the shit out of them

>> No.17680923 [View]

There's way more intermingling between akb and sister groups than between 48 and 46.
I'd rather keep the general as it is.

>> No.17680924 [View]

>>17680923
This.

>> No.17680925 [View]

>>17680920
t.mindreader mod

>> No.17680926 [View]

>>17680921
Same thing was said before the Sakamichi general. That general was created because a Yuirifag got butthurt.

>> No.17680929 [View]

>>17680923
>>17680924
>
>>17680915

I don't see the harm.

>> No.17680930 [View]

I would love to be able to post about ske and ngt without having to read hktfags nonsense.

>> No.17680933 [View]

>>17680930
obvious flaseflag is obvious

>> No.17680935 [View]

new
>>17680932
>>17680932

>> No.17680937 [View]

>>17680926
Except there was constant wars and arguments every single thread, especially over OPs. There was good reason for a 48/46 split and it's made this thread much better.

>> No.17680939 [View]

>>17680933
my honest feelings are not a false flag, hkts are annoying.

>> No.17680945 [View]

>>17680937
I don't really agree with that. It was baiting and falseflagging.

>> No.17680948 [View]

>>17680945
How does that make a difference?

>> No.17680954 [View]

>>17680948
So more generals should only be split if more baiting about a group happens? That's retarded. Team 8 should have had a separate thread ages ago with that logic.

>> No.17680956 [View]

>>17680948
Because the drama was manufactured by 1-2 trolls who wanted the split.

>> No.17680957 [View]

>>17680948
if doesn't make any difference and currently we have plenty animosity between different sg then a separate thread for each sg makes perfect sense.

>> No.17680967 [View]

>>17680957
>plenty animosity between different sg
Not really, a few people saying 'I like group X over Y' isn't animosity at all

>> No.17680970 [View]

>>17680957
What thread have you been reading?

>> No.17680979 [View]

>>17680967
>>17680970

>ske is shit hkt is best
>nmb are sluts hkt ftw
>etc

every thread

>> No.17680980 [View]

>>17680967
What thread have you been reading?

>> No.17680982 [View]

it's probably an australian.

>> No.17680984 [View]

>>17680982
I won't say that it isn't.

>> No.17680998 [View]

>>17680979
To me, this just looks like you can't handle banter or you're really easy to bait.

>> No.17681007 [View]

>>17680998
I don't understand the problem with only wanting to see content about a group you follow.

>> No.17681008 [View]

>>17680998
Those are his own posts, he's just trying to stir up shit.

>> No.17681013 [View]

>>17680998
just what triggered the now comfy saka threads

>> No.17681015 [View]

>>17681007
he would run out of people to fight and bait.

>> No.17681030 [View]

>>17681015
this is his only motivation to sperg so much against something that had to happen already

>> No.17681051 [View]

>>17681007
The problem isn't that you only want to see content about one group, it's that you can't handle seeing negative content about yours.

>> No.17681058 [View]

>>17681051
I'm a different person than the one you replied to. I just don't wanna see content about groups I don't follow and that's a large portion of this general.

>> No.17681081 [View]

>>17681058
Ah, well the problem is that a new general becomes functionally redundant if you let everyone post the same stuff in a faster thread, so it has to cause a split. Which other people probably don't want.

>> No.17681099 [View]

>>17681081
I disagree. It would make it easier to talk about the sister groups. You seem to be of the mindset that everyone should love every group. If you only like sister groups, then the general is a pain to browse at times.

>> No.17681104 [View]

>>17681099
>If you only like sister groups, then the general is a pain to browse at times.
not him but the majority of posts in this general is about sister groups

>> No.17681142 [View]

>>17681099
I'm of the mindset that most people are either like you or like multiple groups. If you only like one group and it gets it's own thread eventually you'll end up just splitting off.

>> No.17681223 [View]

Eitofags complaining again.