/jp/ - Otaku Culture

>>16111526
Of course having an opinion that something is wrong doesn't make it objectively invalid.
What makes it objectively invalid is the pristine, irrefutable argument I presented in the post you chose to respond with "Baww, your delusional".

You don't own "possible clients" and you don't own information beyond the physical supports you do own, i.e. HDD, CD, computer, a sheet of paper.

If tomorrow copyright laws were to get thrown into the trash, does it suddenly become right to copy things? No, you would say, it's still wrong.
Well, where's the argument that makes it wrong beyond what the law says?

If I "take sales away from you", it must mean you had the right to those sales. How do you determine how many sales you have the right to? If your [magical thingy which you don't need to justify] determines you have the rights to 10,000 sales, does it mean it's okay to copy your information after you sold 10,000 units?

Bring it on, nigga. You cannot win, you have feewings and I have arguments.