/jp/ - Otaku Culture

>>10437231
Pathetic ad homines and implied implication might make your post edgy, but it won't win you any discussion outside of the comfort zone that is R3ddit.

>>7868008
You know what's amazing? Your reaction to the realization that a Sankaku Complex article is based on nothing concrete and also happens to be factually wrong. How much do you want to bet that those quotes are just a figment of Artefag's imagination and a result of his poor choice of 2ch matomes from which to copy?
I'm more surprised by all the blind faith you put into Sankaku articles, but I guess that' what they are for: providing opinionated people with "facts" through the good ole Texas sharpshooter fallacy.

>bad press
You mean tabloids? Tabloid articles with no sources or copied verbatim from 2ch threads, even?
Well damn, that's some enlightened literature you have there.