/jp/ - Otaku Culture

I'm referring particularly to the idea that the meta world is in Battler's head, etc. I want to take down the notion some still have it's somehow consistent with the rest of the series.

1) Beatrice's creation

This is probably the most important point, which most people forget.

During Episode 5, Meta-Beatrice withers away and dies. She still acts through piece-Beatrice to some extent, but she bites it when Meta Beatrice does.

???, or /jp/'s interpretation of it, contests that Beatrice, or at least Meta Beato is Battler's creation, or the manifestation of his amnesia.

But Beatrice cannot be Battler's creation in Episode 1, because when Beatrice "dies" he is unable to recreate her. It took the events of Episode 6 to restore her and even then she was not precisely the same.

Then how did he create her in Episode 1? If he did so, she would have been like Chick Beatrice, unless another Episode 6 like series of events(the "thousand years") is shown to happen. But meta-Battler clearly remembers the train of events from Ep 1 up until the end.

He doesn't say in Episode 6 "ah yeah, I remember doing that". It's only with help from the other meta pieces he's able to do that. If we interpret the meta characters to be agents of his restoring memory, then it's something it's only just learned.

The story progresses when Beatrice is restored, like some conclusion has been reached. If Beatrice represents Amnesia, how does this make sense?

I'm fairly certain it is stated in Red that Battler cannot create Beatrice outright, yet this is what would have to happen at the start of the game. If you still believe in red, it contradicts the ending. Either way it doesn't make logical sense.

Can someone please tell me about this supposed lesbian threesome?

LambdaxBern fucking where