/jp/ - Otaku Culture

>>11082556

Because, obviously, presenting the facts means we can't discuss them, right? Obviously, presenting facts must be 'evidently false' and consist entirely of 'non-arguments', right? or, why else would one present them if to to have a discussion.

And, surely, the only proper reply to the presentation of facts is to deny them, and call their presenter a troll. This must be how conversations work, correct?