[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/jp/ - Otaku Culture

Search:


View post   

>> No.5752095 [View]
File: 299 KB, 635x474, PERPETUAL.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5752095

>>5751945
Well, while word of god can say different later, I don't think it's useless to try and piece out contradictions in the theory right here and now. Regardless of a 'clear' definition, you can at least group personalities and physical bodies in groups A and B using existing red truth. We haven't been given a clear definition about several things with the red truth, but I think it's highly irrational to deny the basis like that. For example, we've never been given a clear definition of 'murder' or 'suicide', what actions qualify as either, etc. But it's a little asinine to use that lack of definition as a basis for an argument.

Not that I don't understand what you're saying, and I'm probably one of the last people on /jp/ who thinks Ryukishi is still worth trusting. But for the sake of arguments here, I'm saying the word 'people' either means 'People who were alive at the start of the game' or 'People and personalities who were alive at or after the start of the game'.

The question is are personalities part of the same group as physical bodies (ie, do they count in the count when 'people' are mentioned) for the purpose of the red truth, or aren't they?

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]