/jp/ - Otaku Culture

>>15494448
>Yes there is, just look at the proportions of lewd and not lewd pics for most gumos and the proportions for some of Parsley's, Fumikane's and Yoshinori's masterpieces
I hope nobody will >comprehension me this time, it seems quite clear, you really think it's wrong for designs to be sexy. Well, you already got the answer for that.

>proportions
See, proportions. Other girls get more pics because the designs are more appealing (I'm ignoring many other factors to make things simpler even though they often play bigger part than art itself). They get more of both lewd and not-lewd. Lewd design doesn't detract from drawing non-lewd art. It simply gives bigger incentive to draw more art.

>This is the most retardedly easy fanbase to please, which only needs some lewd to like a character.
>which only needs
I see, more tumblr-drivel. You're awfully wrong with your prejudiced misconceptions. I have real problems trying to treat you seriously.

>the gumos have much more pics and doujins on the cute and, more importantly, on the character development and interaction side
Character has nothing to do with Fujikawa.

>cute
It isn't better than lewd. It's simply something else. Other girls also have doujins on cute side. A lot of lewd doujins have a lot of cute elements. Those things aren't exclusive. With Fujikawa you get one thing. With other artists you get both.
(well, Fujikawa has her fair share of porn as well, I'm just playing your game here)

>character development in doujin
Jesus fuck.

>interaction
Lewd doujins also have interaction.

Also, as I explained some posts above, it's wrong to credit Fujikawa for existence of gumo fanbase. It exists because of multiple factors.