[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/jp/ - Otaku Culture

Search:


View post   

>> No.35244094 [View]
File: 34 KB, 400x400, 1618089956708.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
35244094

>>35244064

>> No.34192118 [View]
File: 34 KB, 400x400, 1614215340974.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
34192118

>>34192099
holy shit

>> No.33860564 [View]
File: 34 KB, 400x400, 1615520948685.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
33860564

>>33860459
I don't want the thread to devolve into like 50 paragraph arguments over politics and statistics, but re-read what you said and realise you're the one coming at it from a political bias to fit your own agenda.
You're comparing projections and polling. Polling doesn't tell you who is going to win in accordance to a percentage, that's the job of polling aggregators who then project who is likely to win, which is a lot more uncertain than normal pollsters. Let's go with your Hillary Clinton example, national polling wasn't actually incorrect. All of the pollsters had Hillary up in national polls by a few percentage points, give or take a few given the natural margin of error for polling
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nationwide_opinion_polling_for_the_2016_United_States_presidential_election#Individual_polls

Then, in the actual 2016 election Trump got 46.1% of the vote and Hillary got 48.2% - totally in line with national polling before the election. The issue was the way U.S. elections are actually held in the FPTP style with the electoral college and individual states, national polling is meaningless in regards to pure popular vote in telling you who will win. So Hillary being consistently ahead in national polling + nature of the American political system + bad weighting in state polling = people projecting Hillary's victory despite the actual outcome.

>> No.33803539 [View]
File: 34 KB, 400x400, 1588936005782.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
33803539

Fun fact: Takano shot herself in Gou episode 24 because she wanted to find a way to escape Gou and not be involved in it anymore.

>> No.33538748 [View]
File: 34 KB, 400x400, 1599400876143.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
33538748

>>33538632
Complexity isn't good because complexity is inherently good, other things like characters, motives, themes and plot all come first and if the result of that is an interesting and complex story that's a good thing. Gou being shit and complex but all of the characters are butchered is god awful.

>> No.33533940 [View]
File: 34 KB, 400x400, bigbrain34.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
33533940

>>33533884
He was merciful enough only to destroy Satoko.

>> No.32588720 [View]
File: 34 KB, 400x400, EH--ui6WwAYzYCV.jfif.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
32588720

>>32587507
wisdom 1209434238

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]