/jp/ - Otaku Culture

>>18306613
There is indeed a few 'by default', but I think most monster girls could have individuals who happen to have a personality that fits the definition of tomboy. There's SUPPOSED to be more than enough room for variety among a given type of monster, both physically and in terms of personality, while retaining basic traits.

The main problem is that the character design that KC uses for each monster girl's profile image is almost always treated as the only individual that ever exists, and in the same way the profile's description is treated as being 100% true for every individual rather than just being a general summary of that type of monster girl's mindset.

The fact that KC refuses to allow his setting to have elements unrelated to sex adds to it. We could get art of tomboyish monster girls playing demon world football (which would probably be lewd, but still a hobby outside of sex) while more feminine monsters of the same species turn up their noses to the sport. Disagreements and divergent tastes add flavor to a setting, but no. It's just rape and autistic rape monsters that are usually only ever interested in one thing, if they're interested in anything unrelated to rape at all. I'm not saying I dislike the lewdness, I'm just saying I dislike how KC encourages zero diversity while at the same time dropping small doses of what we should be getting from fanart. Really frustrating.

>>13970560

I don't really care for most of his designs.