[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/jp/ - Otaku Culture

Search:


View post   

>> No.43726964 [View]
File: 50 KB, 720x720, Sae Fujiki in DDOB-105 looks suspiciously young (2) cropped.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
43726964

By increasingly learning to conceptualise at least classic hags and sometimes even true hags as erotic in their current form instead of only "she must have been sexy when she was young", a side effect is the loss of confidence in my ability to tell how old a woman is. This isn't only about JAV actresses, really it's more common in reality but the manifestation is different. In reality sometimes I can't tell if she's 16 or 60 unless I see her at very close range, in JAV it's more commonly only about the specific category of hag or if she is a hag at all. Is Yumi Anno a true hag or a classic hag? Because the categorisation changes with time as the JAV actress or any woman ripens, this makes it a difficult assessment for conceptualisation when focusing on the span of a career instead of only on the current form. So, for me maybe in the way of personal conceptualisation based on the titles I fkn enjoy, Maki Hojo still could be only a semi-hag despite clearly already being a classic hag even in at least some of them too.

I didn't consciously conceptualise Ririko Kinoshita or Momoko Isshiki as "mature" at all and thought they're youthful, still do despite the understanding and acceptance of the elaborate hag classification as semi-hag and classic hag. On the other hand I still see Sae Fujiki as being a classic hag or even true hag from some angles despite probably only being a semi-hag. I've forgotten the assessment of one of the true hagchads and couldn't find the post in the archives (looks like more /jav/ posts may have been deleted). From other angles such as pic related, she almost looks like a child. If this was the only image I ever saw of her and somebody said "she's 15", maybe I could believe it. I'd think she looks mature for her age, however, I wouldn't question it much because for me this is almost a child. A very erotic child but, even so she almost looks like a child in this screenshot. This becomes even more complicated because normally I don't conceptualise 15 as being a child, for me a child is 12 or below and past 13 becomes a teenager as a distinct category until 19. At 20 adulthood begins, yet conceptually teenagers are closer to adults than children. So looking at Sae Fujiki looking like this, confuses my brain. However, normally she looks very old to me and even "too old" from some angles.

Now I'm going to fap to JUX-950, at least Ayumi Shinoda is some type of hag even if I'm unsure about the exact classification. In the common mood when I fap to her, I conceptualise her as being significantly mature despite seeing that she's still young at least in the JAV that I have downloaded.

>> No.42754529 [View]
File: 50 KB, 720x720, Sae Fujiki in DDOB-105 looks suspiciously young (2) cropped.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
42754529

Uncertain Hagdom Edition

FAQ:
https://jav.now.sh/

Delisted thread:
>>42739980

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]