/jp/ - Otaku Culture

>>14343666
>a woman that does the exact same job than a man, with the same 'extra', is slightly better paid than the man.
Nope. It's actually the opposite of spills over into more than just salary as well. Equally qualified women are often rated as less competent even in situations with identical resumes. Check out: http://blogs.scientificamerican.com/unofficial-prognosis/study-shows-gender-bias-in-science-is-real-heres-why-it-matters/
>once, according to a Yale study, applications with randomized male and female names were presented to scientists for students applying for a lab manager position. Although the applications were 100% identical the "female" applicants were rated significantly lower in competence & hireability
Funnily enough we also saw this same kind of unconscious bias in symphonies and orchestras. Women became much much more likely to be hired once blind auditions were implemented.

https://ideas.repec.org/p/nbr/nberwo/5903.html

>>14343666
>a woman that does the exact same job than a man, with the same 'extra', is slightly better paid than the man.
Nope. It's actually the opposite of spills over into more than just salary as well. Equally qualified women are often rated as less competent even in situations with identical resumes. Check out: http://blogs.scientificamerican.com/unofficial-prognosis/study-shows-gender-bias-in-science-is-real-heres-why-it-matters/
>once, according to a Yale study, applications with randomized male and female names were presented to scientists for students applying for a lab manager position. Although the applications were 100% identical the "female" applicants were rated significantly lower in competence & hireability
Funnily enough we also saw this same kind of unconscious bias in symphonies and orchestras. Women became much much more likely to be hired once blind auditions were implemented.

https://ideas.repec.org/p/nbr/nberwo/5903.html