/jp/ - Otaku Culture

>>11424578

>The sexual acts make no sense in a romantic context (hey I know we've only had sex once but let's immediately try oral/anal/sometimes even more obscure things, even though most couples take a while before daring to try anything new, let alone "strange" things (to people who haven't been completely desensitized to sexual things like us) like anal.

This is the most pathetically boring thing I've ever read.

"I've noticed VN developers make sex scenes cater to a wide variety of sexual interests, so that all of their customers can be satisfied, and that people without a clear-cut preference can get to enjoy many different types of sex scene, rather than the boring realistic image where couples have sex the same way every time forever. Why can't VNs be more boring and like real life?"

I don't think VNs are for you, and neither are anime/LNs/etc. If stepping into a world where the happenings are dictated by what's fun rather than what's 'real' is a problem for you, you should definitely stick to real life. Nobody here will miss you.

>>11426626

"Through love"? What is this even supposed to mean? You just stare at each other with doe eyes and the mana flows into your servant?

The 'mana transfer' thing was thought up to make an easy dosage mechanic for the writers to put sex scenes in. When is Saber going to lose mana? Typically during a fight. So it makes sure that for every fight scene there's a justification to put a sex scene afterward. It's to ensure there's good pacing of exposition, action, and sex scenes. The whole 'mana transfer' thing has no other purpose.

Why are you averse to sex scenes anyway? I wish people would stop regurgitating this prudishness about sex. Sex is an almost poetic expressal of the characters' love. Why are you talking about sex and love as if they're separate? You sound like a religious indoctrination victim who never properly reevaluated their views.

Happy morning, /jp/!

No word from the sun, but it's sure to be here soon.