[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/jp/ - Otaku Culture

Search:


View post   

>> No.45379921 [View]
File: 168 KB, 740x996, 1422759336270.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
45379921

>>45379737
>I have already. The names of her spellcards explicitly state that they're meant to kill.
Only if you want to interpret them literally. And if you do, there is no reason why you'd only interpret Junko's cards literally, or else you'd be biased. So we'd have to interpret everyone's cards literally and that would lead to quite a few problems and disagreements with established canon.
>Your "explanation" was frankly quite baseless. It's clearly biased, made correlations out of absolutely nothing and disregarded literal naming to do so.
Again, if you want to interpret something literally and something else not literally, you need to have a good reason to do so. If you don't understand my explanation for the metaphorical interpretation of Junko's spell cards, then that's your problem. But if you do, you can't disregard it as baseless without engaging in its core points first.
>It doesn't. Junko's anger had already been appeased, so she didn't want to fight anymore. Simple as.
Exactly And there would have been no reason to kill anyone she fought with her supposed lethal spell cards, even if she did possess them.
>All of your arguments use insane mental gymnastics to try and prove that Junko's spellcards aren't meant to kill when they obviously are, looking at it from a standpoint free of bias.
I don't need mental gymnastics to prove that Junko's spell cards are not lethal because I don't need to prove that. The burden of proof on that matter rests on you. There is no reason to assume that Junko broke spell card rules without any proof. You yourself had to earlier resort to attacking ZUN's writing in order to defend your argument when confonted by what it naturally implies after applying some critical thinking.

What I'm doing here is questioning the arguments that you present in favour of your interpretation and pointing out that there are serious flaws in them. So unless you are planning to actually adressing the problems in them instead of just brushing my criticism off or ignoring it altogether, then there is very little reason to continue this conversation.

>> No.16083063 [View]
File: 168 KB, 740x996, 1422759336270.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16083063

>>16049674
> i swear, everything about her is perfect. from dress design to stage to ungodly levels of charisma.
Remi has many great qualities on her, but her stage before the boss fight is not one of them. She deserves better.

>> No.12982156 [View]
File: 168 KB, 740x996, Remiliamulet.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12982156

Charismatic and Divine.

>> No.12854628 [View]
File: 164 KB, 740x996, 83c84e28cdb1146792427d8fd777b889.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12854628

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]