/jp/ - Otaku Culture

>>38683468
I take the topic of breasts very seriously. That applies not just to the lush corpulent hills decorating most of the female cast's torsos but also to the more modest and shapely bulges of the less generously endowed girls.

>>38272011
Same. The lewd talk was fun.

>>34422296
Same.
Naizuri is pretty cool too by the way.

>>34374740
>>34374772
Please elaborate more on this my fellow scholars.

>>25773942
Fascinating analysis. Here, you've earned this.

>>23049087
Since we seem to be on the topic of boobs-
I came up with two categories to judge breast consistency.
The first is resilience, while the second is feedback.
Resilience, or malleability, refers to how much/how easily the breasts can be deformed. In other words, it's how soft or firm they are.
Meanwhile feedback, or elasticity, refers to how strongly they resist/spring back once deformed. In other words, it's how springy or cushy they are.
Different combinations of these categories yield different results. For example...
Soft + Cushy: Feather pillow
Soft + Springy: Gelatin
Firm + Cushy: Firm pillow
Firm+ Springy: Balloons
Moderate + Cushy: Tempurpedic pillow
Moderate + Springy: Water balloons
Where do you think various seacats would fall in this spectrum? I'm interested to hear others' opinions on the matter.