/jp/ - Otaku Culture

>>43698139
Since it's KiraT's post it will follow "her" typical modus operandi.
1Make up an argument I never made and hope I will defend it as if it was my own.
2Repeat the same debunked made up argument despite being proven wrong before.
3Pretend posts that have a "[Deleted]" mark next to them to not exist, which actually is exactly the same sub 60IQ behavior as above.
Here is a very quick example.
Just the other day KiraT made exactly the same made up argument only to then proceed to pretend it wa mind, and of corse got educated on it.
Today:
Educated you about Kageyama being one of the least popular members
Compare it toL
>>43670676
Already debunked, but since "her" Sub60IQ brain cannot comprehend time continuity and that posts made in the past still exist he believes that if he will post the same made up and debunked argument it will erase the past.
So, again- I never said Kageyama would never become popular. I said one thing only, many, many times. The problem is that I have said it in the past, so Sub60IQ brain assumes, it doesn't exist anymore and he can redefine my argument.
Here is what I have said:
>Kageyama is one of the least popular members in her group according to a chart, that KiraT has posted
(believing it was proving the opposite, but couldn't read it because of "her" Sub60IQ brain)
Next.
>Okay then, Karin-chan will never get center in a main single
Funny thing about this one is that it is an EXACT copy of the situation above. He will never provide any evidence of me saying so. Why? Because "her" Sub60IQ brain cannot comprehend past events. They do not exist anymore and can be retold according to "her" own imagination.
I only pointed out, that sTeCola said, that Karin would be the center for 5th single, which he did not. Not only that, but the center was the complete opposite of that. It was Renaa. 180 degrees. The negative of. The polar opposite. It wasn't a small mistake, it was completely wrong.
>Okay nogizaka's new rivals won't beat nogizaka and look better than Sakurazaka
I hope you are noticing the pattern (because surely KiraT isn't). Yes, I never said this neither. But, my post happened in the past... and the story is exactly the same. Past, present, future. Those are abstract ideas for Sub60IQ brain. By the way, by "the past" I don't mean a year ago. I don't mean a month ago. I don't mean a week ago. I don't mean 24 hours ago. I don't mean 12 hours ago. I mean... Less than 3 hours ago (sic!) >>43697449 This is how Sub60IQ brain operates. It is impossible to have a factual and logic based discussion with a retarded (medical term) person like "her".
>Nobody mentioned looks
Same, as above. People did mention looks. But they did it in the past. Not possible to comprehend for Sub60IQ person.
>nobody cares if they are already evaluated as better than Sakurazaka (which no one mentioned)
Now this one follows the same pattern, but it is even more fastinating to observe, because it takes Sub60IQ person to not comprehend the very recent past, like posts he read less than 3 hours ago, but it takes Sub50IQ to not comprehend how time affects "her" own posts! If a child covers its eyes and says "I am invisible", even if it is wrong about the reality around it it understands, that it own existence is real. Now, Sub50IQ cannot do even that. "Her" own posts do not exist anymore in her head.
So, when she says "nobody cares" she forgot that she cared enough to answer.
So, facts and logic presented here
>>43697674
Were ignored or misrepresented, because of pic related.