/jp/ - Otaku Culture

>>44990073
>JULIA and Remu make 10 consecutive VR titles each
Interesting choices. I'm not a VRchad and really don't imagine I ever would become one for many reasons, and neither actress you would choose are my cups of tea, but for VRchads who like them must be frustrating.
>"intentional JAVfu name misreadings" or something
It isn't intentional, but the intense mental battle to remember that she's Rin Natsuki instead of Natsuki Rin because I most strongly associate Rin as a family name influenced because of the Chinese family names Lin/Lim and Ling, and Natsuki also can be either given name or family name. It becomes a second layer of confusion because in English family name is last, so I forget the correct order and have to make a guess that has equal likelihood to be right or wrong kek.

As a game. If it's allowed to mix the criteria in a way to enable a hypothetical strange mischaracterisation that becomes machine translated: What Trash. Of course it's pic related, Nagomi.
>>44990584
Nice taste for "oldschool strong faces". It's sort of fascinating how those types of faces were a big popular beauty and eroticism of the 2000s but not so much before or after.
>"mizuno CHAOYANG"
Kek, as a semi-aspiring Chaoyangchad in training who like Sumire Mizukawa and already learned to conceptualise her similarity to Asahi, it never stops being funny to see that Chinese reading of the name. For some reason fapping to her is a rare mood so I have not downloaded many of her JAV, because my hard drives would suffer too much if I downloaded every JAV I probably don't want to fap to often.
>>44992206
My approach is sporadic. Even my favourites, I don't download everything. Sometimes I didn't know about some of my top 10 favourite JAV actresses appearing in lesbian kino together until ten years later KEK. This approach is less stressful, though I still do my best to hoard what I know I'll fap to more than once. So, I can't say any clear number of actresses.
>>44996427
I have a soft spot for self-harm scars and Maika Hiizumi is one of the cutest JAV actresses, so to see her caressing her scars in such a way is very erotic. Maybe MISM-286 is what I'll fap to now.
>facial imperfections add so much character
Yes, though I think a balance exists. For me, the placement of moles and such can be very distracting and even destroy any attraction. I've never seen JAV actresses with moles that made her unfappable but I have seen many girls like that in reality. It isn't just moles. Something like asymmetrical eyelids can be charming, or it can be grotesque. These things are case by case. I see imperfections as measurable by a charm point test: would her personal beauty become reduced without the imperfection? If yes, then it is a charm point. If not, then it isn't a charm point but a neutral feature. But, if her personal beauty would be increased by the reduction of that imperfection, then it's a true blemish. That's what I think about them.

Some girls look most beautiful in a completely natural state even without make-up, others look better with some minimal procedures or heavy make-up, others look ugly on multiple spectra. Because in reality everybody is different, the generalisation becomes dependent on her "type" and if she's a liked type or a disliked type, or neutral. That's why I think Sumire Mizukawa is most attractive with tanned skin, even better after Dr. Kim and wearing light contact lenses that emphasise her vinegar phenotype, because it increases her type. But, somebody who looks nothing like that type would not look better.
>>44996538
The "textureless" filtering is what I dislike most about social media selfies and such. I'm not against the existence of filters and even use some myself KEK, but that trend definitely is a concerning effect for girls. I always hate "think of the children" because the implications want censorship, in this case even worse because it pretends even adult women are incapable of being responsible for their own behaviours but, the truth is that seeing everybody use filters to that degree all the time as the norm creates a very strong conformity against personal beauty and even skin texture. These always existed to different degrees in different times and places but it has become amplified and universal.

But, the only women I know who strongly resist that phenomenon are westernised anti-sexual "feminists" who say it's all men's fault for demanding "perfection". Telling them about the eroticism of imperfections, then they say it's still men's fault and actually women use filters to hide from men's sexualisation. It isn't anything consistent, they just want to blame men. So, I have a negative impression about the opposition to the overuse of filters and such too. I suppose by now it's impossible to go back to the days before extreme filters becoming the norm.

>download link will be available for my IP for the next 0.1 hours
>estimated download time: 6 hours
Nagomi...