[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/jp/ - Otaku Culture

Search:

View post   
  [?]In ghost mode, only threads with non-archived posts will be shown
>> No.43368408 [View]
File: 79 KB, 642x366, miko bucks.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
43368408

>>43368380
sounds disgusting but we have an alternative. futa fiat is back

>> No.21179239 [SPOILER]  [View]
File: 80 KB, 642x366, 1555379805072.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
21179239

>>21176795
Alright Sanae, I'll give you this so stop crying.

>> No.13371314 [View]
File: 92 KB, 642x366, miko money.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13371314

>>13364591
Reminds me of argument about religion in Miko thread long time ago, which looked like it were Byakuren and Miko themeselves arguing, IMO.

>> No.12429117 [View]
File: 92 KB, 642x366, miko money.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12429117

>>12428798
But then he should consider how was the patriarchy rule back then. Was it even allowed for a woman to rule an entire nation as a ruler during that era?

If it was then history should had noted it or it should had brought influence to later empires and continued to today's era, which seems to be not the case as we see today.
If it wasn't then it's impossible to just said that Shotoku was actually a woman who once ruled Japan. At best, she could had been disguised as man so she can rule properly.
Also, there's reason why she refers herself as "Prince", as well as her cohorts, probably. Only Seiga who I know calls Miko "Lady".

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]