/jp/ - Otaku Culture

>>10738508
>also it's funny how actual scientists refuse to change their views when new things are discovered, like that semi recently discovered particle that's faster than light.
>they claimed that since it's impossible based on einstein's theory, it can't happen. they cling to his theory (keyword, theory. in science there's never any hard facts, only consistently repeating theories, which can be always proven wrong) like christians cling to the bible.
>they're no different than religious people.

This is why I hate "skeptics". They attack some easy targets like ghosts and mediums, but it's totally hypocritical. You have faggots like James Randi saying it's all "flim-flam" just because it doesn't meet his accepted views. If you spoke to similarly-minded people a century or two ago and told them about photons or the Higgs Boson, they'd think you're a crazy person just like "skeptics" do.

It actually impedes scientific progress. Parapsychology in particular has had some pretty unusual results. For example, it's possible that the human mind can exert a statistical influence on random number generators. Maybe it's completely made-up or the result of some bias, but they should (at the very least) have a right to prove themselves neutrally, instead of to a committee of "skeptics" masquerading as empirical scientists.