/jp/ - Otaku Culture

>>44459602
>but goddamn, are all their file sizes this fkn DEKKAI??
It's mainly because it's 3 hours long...and no, some 3 hour titles end up half the size, quality varies. Now you understand why I frequently say shit like "I only have part 3 of 3 though" (^_-)
>My question to the VRsirs for this session is this: how "worth" it are the older format pre-2017 (?) videos that look monoscopic (?) in the thumbnails (I don't think this is the right term, please correct me)? Aki Sasaki has a bunch that interest me. Is it such a severe drop in quality that makes it obsolete or still worth having for the charm of it, I wonder...
Like this? "Very not worth it". It's the VHS of VR porn. Not because it's top/bottom, but more than anything because it's 30 FPS (you'll get sick) and also because the resolution is too low.
I looked CAREM-004 up, and other than being CasanovA (no single VR studio outdoes them with more misses than hits) it looks like a normal L/R 180 VR video. If that one sucks, it's just because of the studio.
Plus I think the CAREM- code is for remasters of shit that was already even worse quality to their usual poor quality.