/jp/ - Otaku Culture

>>15622623
Pfffftt. Demons. That's just superstitions.

>That doesn't prove that they're aliens though.
It doesn't disprove it either.

>>15576409
>there is nothing wrong with trying to find an alternative explanation
While on the same topic.

>>15144962
That's probably because there's no mystery involved.
>it's just the unreliable narrator or everyone was bribed
The Rosatrice explanation is that Shannon died in the first twilight, George knocked at his parents door then killed them with Rosa hiding under the bed. When Kanon and Genji saw the room was locked, they went to get something to cut the lock, Rosa undid the lock from the inside, quickly painted the seal on the door then went back in and hid under the bed.

Both explanations of how the murders could have been committed are valid, in my view, of how the murder could have been done. Though it could be argued that the Rosatrice theory just tries not to rely on the unreliable narrator and bribery as answers. Whether or not being noble in its answers makes it accurate, and better than the official explanation, is up to the reader to decide. Me, I just don't care.

>>14987976
I miswrote that. The red only states people being dead. Not when they died.

For example, the events show that Hideoyoshi, Eva and Kyrie were found dead but they aren't confirmed dead on the spot. Beatrice states in red that all three people are dead. You make the assumption that all three are dead at the moment that they were found, since you trust the red, but it doesn't guarantee that all three had died at that time, only that they were shot.
There's nothing stating that someone, say Kyrie, could have survived her gunwounds and then stumbled upon Nanjo, killed them walked away then died of blood loss. The red was done at the end of the game, so, by that point, Kyrie is considered dead in red. Battler never examines the bodies and they cannot be considered dead, only Nanjo checked their bodies and he could have lied or been wrong.
Rosatrice proposes a similar proposition concerning George, that he was waiting for Shannon to be revived, got furious at Nanjo who defended himself but didn't kill him. So George woke up later, found Nanjo, killed him and then died. Thus, the red confirmed that George died but not when he died.

This is basically how you get around the ep 3 red web. The only possible candidates of who killed Nanjo are Yasu, Kyrie and George.
Concerning Yasu, had Yasu 'known' about the Epitaph being solved a bit sooner, Nanjo would have been alive. Concerning George and Kyrie, had either died of their wounds earlier, Nanjo would have been alive.

This does not confirm that Yasu had not known about the epitaph being solved.

>>14987994
>Ok, so you can just make things up.
Just like you can make things up like Yasu not noticing Eva and Rosa leaving the guest house.
Not much is known about what happened in ep 3, so it really is up to your interpretation.
It's basically a double devils proof on both sides.

>>11697160
My theory > your theory
My taste is shit but who cares about that, right?.

>>11697167
I'm explaining my point and people say the same stupid shit of ''lel Yasu is stupid and didn't know'' or that Eva was paranoid even though there's no evidence to point towards that other than to explain how murder could have continued without Yasu's knowledge.

I love how you fail to disprove it other than laugh and use greentext.
Either way, interpretations can be heard and the validity of a claim can be questioned if things don't hold up.

I proved a contradiction between Yasu not holding her promise and her not actually knowing about it even though she should have followed through with it.

And I honestly don't give a shit about Rosatrice or Yasu or whomever actually committed the crime.
What matters is the discussion. That's all I'm curious about.
Laughing at someone for having different ideas is pretty fucking low.