/jp/ - Otaku Culture

>>40513148
For the love of god.
Give this bitch a sandwich!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5N-u-WtdspI [Embed]

>she says she talked with a lawyer about the new law and decided to make a vid summarizing her thoughts
>the basis of this law originates from previous jav coercion cases and scenarios where actresses didn't want their work to be released, and the new law protects ALL workers regardless of age and gender
>Ai generally agrees with the new law
>around 1~2 years after she retired there was an astonishing rise in these cases and this resulted in many restrictions and things they couldn't do anymore in filming
>they lowered the age from 20 to 18 and trialed it for 2 years to see how it would go
>regarding this new law, Ai doesn't see many disadvantages to it
>she mentions that she has actually asked for her catalog to be removed and only 5 titles remain which can still be legally purchased (she used to have over 1000)
>why did she do it? she believes it was vital for her to move to the next stage in her life, and she only wants to remain in the hearts of people who had bought her work beforehand
>she had asked for her works to be removed 1 year after her retirement but laments that all her stuff is still online on illegal sites
>despite this she still had people telling her things like "you know, i watched some of your stuff lately" and she felt like it was like a "digital tattoo" where her old self will remain on the internet for the rest of her life
>anyway, back to the new law: she feels that people might appear in jav and then when they return to real work there may be times they'll have to quit because they were once pornstars
>she feels that actresses when they are working are given the preferential treatment and get the spotlight shone on them and it allows them financial security, but once it ends it all goes away
>so this new law reassures the current actresses and protects them
>final words: people who first see the headlines like "AV restrictions" or whatever might feel surprised and perhaps outraged but she wants people to do a bit of research because the law is favorable to the actresses in her opinion

>>40332284
TL of one comment chain:
>YS: wow....i got absolutely nothing from this. i wanted to know about why current actresses were against it. i mean, you're retired but you still have a voice you know
konata: could you please provide some examples of current actresses who oppose this?
>YS: there's an magazine interview done by amatsuka moe. there's other actresses so why don't you try searching around? it's not just the actresses but also production crew and writers as well. it's not as simple as just being a retired actress and saying that you approve with the new law. freelancers get fucked over by this the most, and they're mainly the ones who don't want this
>Monkey Shawn: illegality aside, studios being made to unconditionally delete entire catalogs after a year (it used to be two) is questionable

>quake wipes out my two ext hdds from the shelf
>try them out
>both power fine, no vid skipping or messed up sound
thank you saint seagate. i've never had your hard drives die on me praise be to allah

>mfw the horse turned 40 when i thought she was older than that years ago