/jp/ - Otaku Culture

>>37428164
>huruuuurrrrr there's noooo prooof!
This is why I hate Umineko arguments and people that argue about Umineko. It's about getting owned rather than finding the truth. Ikuko remained young many years after meeting Battler, implying that Ikuko has remained young for as long as she and Battler knew each other.

>Ikuko could have been much younger at her time of meeting Battler for all we know.
How fucking stupid are you? The implication from this is that if Ikuko looks young, then Ikuko must have been even younger when Battler met her. So let us assume that, when Ikuko looks 25-30 by the end of Umineko, then she would have to be *MUCH YOUNGER* at the time of Battler, implying that they met when.... she was 1? What the fuck are you on about, you fucking idiot?

The argument of 'for all we know' is an admission of evasion and lack of thinking. The evidence points to Ikuko remaining youthful throughout the entirety of her time with Battler, which is from Ange being 6 to being an adult/old.


Try thinking, you fucking idiot. Just admit that you stopped thinking and want others to also do the same. You basically went "We don't know, you don't know, so just accept a non-answer that is equivalent to not thinking!!!"