/jp/ - Otaku Culture

>>3717016
I forgot to add;
Even if the jury *did* get to see them, why would they say that they're adults?

Obviously, borderline cases like late-highschool anime will be a bit of a hit and miss, but actual loli will be shot down every time.

The attached image, for example (Not loli per say, but the first pic that I found that'd be a good example). There is no way that a normal person would see that and claim that she's over 18. Since British law has no "intent" defence, it doesn't matter if the jury sees that and goes "Wtf? That's not dangerous, that's just a funny picture". They're only being asked to decide whether the defendant has it, NOT whether he deserves to be punished for having it.

The law will also never be repealed. We have no constition to point at and say "This says no". We have no-one to vote for who'd stand on a platform of legalising child porn (no-one who'd win more than a dozen votes, anyway).

Time to move to France, I guess.