[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/jp/ - Otaku Culture

Search:


View post   

>> No.22976934 [View]
File: 21 KB, 617x507, 1526936768310.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
22976934

>>22976675
Nothing dramatic with regards to Kane (so far). Sorry to mislead you.

>> No.21068263 [View]
File: 21 KB, 617x507, 1526936768310.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
21068263

Did Shirou really do the right thing in turning down a grail he couldn't have known was defective?

I understand that the emotional thrust of the Fate route is Shirou and Saber coming to terms with their regrets and trauma, but Shirou doesn't seem to spend any time weighing up the potential value of wishing all those lives back. Obviously it's inconsequential due to the nature of the grail (and the value of the story hinges on Shirou's resolution to accept the past) -- but supposing the story were more straightforward and the grail's power could be trusted (with the servants as evidence), is it still moral of Shirou to decline that opportunity?

I was going to bring up Arturia's case too, but I've just realized the story doesn't make sense in the first place if the grail was real and the previous war had played out the same way, so this line of thought is complicated and ultimately aimless

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]