/jp/ - Otaku Culture

>>8435944

On a similar note, Tokiko keeps talking about the importance of his cause. As far as I can tell, his "cause" is to annihilate a person's personality, individuality, will, and character. He deeply believes—and wants us to believe as well—that his cause is just, that it's moral, and that /jp/ will love him for promoting it. In reality, Tokiko's criticisms of my posts have never successfully disproved a single fact I ever presented. Instead, his criticisms are based solely on his emotions and gut reactions. Well, I refuse to get caught up in Tokiko's "I think … I believe … I feel" game.

Now stay with me a moment here; I am making a point. Specifically, what we're involved in with Tokiko is not a game. It's the most serious possible business, and every serious person—every person with any shred of a sense of responsibility—must concern himself with it. You may be shocked to hear this, but when I'm through with him he'll think twice before attempting to work both sides of the post-quality fence. I wish I knew when Tokiko was planning on unleashing his next volley of useless, benighted offhand remarks. Alas, I'm no Nostradamus. Nevertheless, some of my predictions have come true in spades. For instance, I predicted ages ago that Tokiko would fill /jp/ with recrimination and rancor, and look what happened. Even scarier, I predicted that Tokiko would marginalize me based on my standing up for /jp/. Although most people doubted that prediction when I made it, they neglected to consider that Tokiko has got to go—and yesterday isn't soon enough. To end this series of posts, I would like to make a bet with Tokiko. I will gladly give him a day's salary if he can prove that he is a quality poster, as he insists. If Tokiko is unable to prove that, tahen his end of the bargain is to get out of /jp/ while I put to rest the animosities that have kept various anons from enjoying anything other than superficial unity. So, do we have a bet, Tokiko?